scholarly journals Framework for Systemic Change in Undergraduate STEM Teaching and Learning

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily R. Miller ◽  
Tobin L. Smith ◽  
Linda Slakey ◽  
James Fairweather

The Framework for Systemic Change in Undergraduate STEM Teaching and Learning provides a change model for improving the quality and effectiveness of STEM teaching and learning at research universities. The Framework recognizes the wider setting in which educational innovations take place — the department, the college, the university and the external environment — and addresses key institutional elements necessary for sustained improvement to undergraduate STEM education.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kacy Redd ◽  
NOAH FINKELSTEIN

Abstracts and presentations from the NSEC 2017 National Conference. The conference is for representatives from campus STEM Education Centers or Centers for Teaching and Learning that have a STEM agenda, or those who work closely with these centers. The focus is specifically on centers engaged in improving undergraduate STEM education, including teacher preparation and broader impacts in STEM. It is opportunity for center staff to learn from one another.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hoang Thi Chien

The STEM education teaching approach (STEM teaching) has been one of the important orientations ofthe Vietnamese general education program. However, thus farthere has been no competency framework for STEM teachingin our country. A competency framework for STEM teachingwould include two important things. With this framework,learners would have complete control when setting up theirplan, finding information, defining the learning contentmethodologies and providing multi-subject knowledge at thebeginning of a procedure. Furthermore, it can be orientatedto evaluate the expression level of each student. This paperpresents the process of designing a competency frameworkfor a STEM teaching and suggests the ways to use thisframework at the University of Education.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily R. Miller ◽  
James Fairweather ◽  
Linda Slakey ◽  
Tobin L. Smith ◽  
Tara King

In September 2011, the Association of American Universities launched a major initiative to improve undergraduate STEM education. The overall objective was to influence the culture of STEM departments at AAU institutions so that faculty members are encouraged and supported to use teaching practices proven by research to be effective in engaging students in STEM education and in helping students learn. Progress Toward Achieving Systemic Change provides a five-year status report on the AAU Undergraduate STEM Education Initiative.


Daedalus ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. 29-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Sue Coleman ◽  
Tobin L. Smith ◽  
Emily R. Miller

Promoting excellence in undergraduate STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education at major research universities is necessary to ensure that we have the STEM-literate workforce and general population required to propel the nation forward into the twenty-first century and beyond. This essay provides a brief contextual history of the Association of American Universities' (AAU) effort to improve the effectiveness of undergraduate STEM education at member campuses and delineates the specific goals of this initiative. The essay then illuminates the essential role of the academic department and department chair in achieving long-lasting change and improving the quality of undergraduate education. It also discusses critical strategies and approaches for promoting the most effective methods for undergraduate STEM teaching and learning, with numerous examples from AAU member universities. The essay concludes with an acknowledgment of key challenges and opportunities that continue to face undergraduate education at research universities.


Author(s):  
Mahnaz Moallem ◽  
William L. Sterrett ◽  
Christopher Raymond Gordon ◽  
Sohail Masood Sukhera ◽  
Aisha Mahmood ◽  
...  

The chapter reports the results of integrating computing, project or problem-based learning and engineering process to address the needs of preparing the STEM workforce in Punjab, Pakistan through transforming STEM teaching and learning processes. It also aimed to build the capacity of the University of Education, Lahore to improve the quality and relevancy of its STEM teacher education programs and its partnership schools. A collaborative team of STEM and STEM education faculty from two U.S. universities and University of Education (UE), Lahore designed, developed, implemented, and evaluated STEM learning units with a specific focus on water and management of natural resources to under-served 6-8 grade students in Pakistan through the integration of project-based and problem-based learning (PBL) and Squeak Etoys, modeling, and simulation tool.


Leonardo ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-320
Author(s):  
Danah Henriksen ◽  
Punya Mishra

STEM education in the United States is often described as being in a downward spiral, when assessed by competency test scores and lack of student motivation for engaging STEM disciplines. The authors suggest this arises from an overly instrumental view of STEM. While STEAM has arisen as a pushback paradigm, the application of STEAM in schools is challenging, and educators are often unclear about connecting STEM and the arts. The authors suggest envisioning STEAM through natural disciplinary interconnections. They focus on the integration of language arts and figurative thinking to blur the boundaries of STEM and the arts, and offer examples of figurative language—such as metaphor, linguistic etymology and synecdoche—for framing STEM teaching and learning.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily R. Miller ◽  
Tara King

During a 2019 workshop, the American Association of Universities (AAU) convened experts involved in leading, researching, evaluating and funding efforts to transform undergraduate STEM teaching across all sectors of higher education. The goal was to synthesize essential issues and challenges in designing, leading, and researching institutional and multi-institutional transformation projects to improve undergraduate STEM education.


Author(s):  
Katie Laux

The purpose of this study was to explore teacher and administrator perspectives on STEM education and how they demonstrate characteristics of STEM education. The five schools in this study are part of a greater network of elementary, middle, and high schools that collaborate and learn together. Data were collected through interviews with teachers and administrators and observational notes from meetings and other events. Interviews were recorded and transcribed and then coded to look for themes in the data. Findings indicate teachers and administrators view a supportive leadership, teacher buy in, and comfort in teaching STEM as essential to the implementation of STEM initiatives. Without these necessary components, inequities may arise and lead to less opportunities for students. Overcoming obstacles may require a change in mindset to embrace a culture of STEM teaching and learning. Understanding how teachers and administrators view the importance of STEM and benefits of participating in a community of STEM can help understand how to shift the culture of a school to one more inclusive of STEM education.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3B) ◽  
pp. 202-212
Author(s):  
Kuanysh Zh. Syman ◽  
Vladimir P. Andronov ◽  
Zoya I. Girich ◽  
Irina V. Rodionova ◽  
Marina Y. Litwinowa

The purpose of this work is to identify and substantiate the problems of introducing innovations in the university.  For the purpose of the study the following methods are used systematic analysis of philosophical, pedagogical and psychological scientific literature, researching and summarizing of educating experience; the survey. Education badly needs effective innovations of scale that can help high-quality learning outcomes across the system. The primary focus of educational innovations should be on teaching and learning theory and practice, as well as on the teacher readiness to innovative activity. The analysis of the teachers accepts to innovations demonstrate that the implementation of pedagogical innovations accompanies certain problems of future teacher activity during training at the university. Main factors and reasons determining the teachers’ innovation resistance could be considered when preparing them for innovative activity as a crucial factor for modernizing the country’s education system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document