scholarly journals PENERAPAN PERMODALAN BASEL III DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP KINERJA PERBANKAN DI INDONESIA

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Komang Agus Rudi Indra Laksmana

The global financial crisis that occurred in 2007/2008 has encouraged state leaders who are membersof the G-20 to declare international efforts aimed at increasing transparency, accountability and regulation ofthe financial sector through strengthening the quantity and quality of the banking sector capital. This was basedon the occurrence of the global financial crisis in 2008, one of which was caused by the excessive level of leveragein the banking system both for the position recorded on the balance sheet (on-balance sheet) and inadministrative accounts (off-balance sheet). The final results of the recommendations are thenissued by Basel III:A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks andbanking systems on December 2010. In general, theBasel III agreement has threemain components, namely capital, liquidity and leverage ratio. The applicationofBasel III capital has an impact that will vary in various countries depending onthe number of exposures affected.This study conducted an impact analysis on theperformance of Basel III capital towards the performance of banksin Indonesiaduring the period of 2018 based on capital adequacy (CAR), and on the liquidity(NSFR, LCR) on growthin profitability (ROA). The study involved 11 banks withthe largest assets in Indonesia in 2018. The results showedthat CAR had asignificant negative effect on ROA, while the NSFR had a significant positiveeffect on ROA,and LCR had a significant negative effect on ROA. This study waslimited in terms of the number of samples anddata used, therefore furtherresearch is expected to increase the amount of data and samples and researchvariables.Keyword: Basel III; CAR; LCR

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Yufeng Li ◽  
Zhongfei Li

Since the global financial crisis of 2007-2008, the importance of the procyclicality in the banking sector has been highlighted. One of the Basel III objectives is to promote countercyclical buffers and reduce procyclicality. We apply time-varying copula combined with GARCH model to test the existence of asymmetric procyclicality of Chinese banking. The results show that the procyclicality of Chinese banking is asymmetric, where the dependence between loan and economy growth is more correlated during the decline stage than the rise stage of economy. Based on this asymmetry, we suggest that the authority can use high frequent index for signalling the start point of releasing countercyclical buffer and accelerate the releasing pace to avoid the supply of credit being constrained by regulatory capital requirements in downturns.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 22-33
Author(s):  
Lyubov Khudoliy ◽  
Oleg Bronin

This article discusses the latest methodological recommendations of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision developed in response to the effects of the global financial crisis and known as Basel III. The purpose of the study is to explore scientific approaches to justifying bank regulation as a key condition for overcoming the economic crisis and improving financial sustainability. The object of research is Basel III instruments that will be implemented in the bank regulatory policy of Ukraine. The systematic approach and systemic thinking used in the article allow one to substantiate the expediency of Ukrainian banking institutions’ governance based on the risk-oriented approach and to determine the strategy of bank supervision for the next 1-3 years. The study evaluates the results of stress testing of the largest banks in Ukraine. Thus, the results confirm that the banking sector in Ukraine is sufficiently capitalized in the absence of macroeconomic shocks, but in case of a crisis, some of these banks are not protected. Therefore, the article formulates recommendations for improving the regulation of these banks, the phased implementation of Basel III, the application of new principles, standards, tools and methods, corporate governance and risk management in Ukrainian banks.


2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 7-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peiyi Yu ◽  
Jessica Hong Yang ◽  
Nada Kakabadse

This paper proposes hybrid capital securities as a significant part of senior bank executive incentive compensation in light of Basel III, a new global regulatory standard on bank capital adequacy and liquidity agreed by the members of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. The committee developed Basel III in a response to the deficiencies in financial regulation brought about by the global financial crisis. Basel III strengthens bank capital requirements and introduces new regulatory requirements on bank liquidity and bank leverage. The hybrid bank capital securities we propose for bank executives’ compensation are preferred shares and subordinated debt that the June 2004 Basel II regulatory framework recognised as other admissible forms of capital. The past two decades have witnessed dramatic increase in performance-related pay in the banking industry. Stakeholders such as shareholders, debtholders and regulators criticise traditional cash and equity-based compensation for encouraging bank executives’ excessive risk taking and short-termism, which has resulted in the failure of risk management in high profile banks during the global financial crisis. Paying compensation in the form of hybrid bank capital securities may align the interests of executives with those of stakeholders and help banks regain their reputation for prudence after years of aggressive risk-taking. Additionally, banks are desperately seeking to raise capital in order to bolster balance sheets damaged by the ongoing credit crisis. Tapping their own senior employees with large incentive compensation packages may be a viable additional source of capital that is politically acceptable in times of large-scale bailouts of the financial sector and economically wise as it aligns the interests of the executives with the need for a stable financial system.


2019 ◽  
pp. 329-406
Author(s):  
Iris H-Y Chiu ◽  
Joanna Wilson

This chapter studies capital adequacy regulation, which prescribes that banks can only take certain levels of risk that are supported by adequate levels of capital. In this way, capital adequacy rules provide a form of assurance that banks with adequate levels of capital are likely able to withstand losses that may result from their risk-taking. The Basel Committee developed its first set of capital adequacy standards in the Basel I Capital Accord of 1988. It was subsequently overhauled into the Basel II Capital Accord in 2003. After the global financial crisis of 2007–9, the Basel II Accord’s shortcomings were extensively discussed and the Basel Committee introduced a package of reforms in order to plug the gaps in Basel II. The Basel III package is the most extensive suite of micro-prudential regulation reforms seen to date, as they deal with capital adequacy and a range of other micro-prudential standards.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 641-657
Author(s):  
Irena Pyka ◽  
Aleksandra Nocoń ◽  
Mateusz Muszyński

Motivation: After the global financial crisis, banks’ financial safety has been considered as a public good and put under closer control and supervision. The prudential regulations of credit institutions which are the main subject of the study, have been significantly tightened. Although the minimum level of banks’ own funds, set adequately to the risk, had been a fundamental indicator of banks’ financial safety since the end of 1980s, after the global financial crisis the quality of this capital has changed and the scope of its regulation has been increased. By respecting the new prudential standards of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision at the international level, financial safety of the banks has been additionally put under the macro-supervision. The concern about the overregulation of the banking system raises many controversies, what justifies conducting research on this subject. Aim: The main purpose of the article is to identify changes in the bank’s strategies of creating financial safety after the global financial crisis, considering macro- and micro-prudential regulations, aimed at strengthening the level and quality of bank capital, based on the results of the conducted research. Results: The results of the empirical research indicate that there is a strong belief among management staff in commercial banks in Poland that the increase in the level and structure of the own funds in credit institutions rises their financial safety. The results confirm the intensification of the process of implementing Basel regulations in commercial banks in Poland.


Author(s):  
Jimoh Olatunji ◽  
He Weihang

The purpose of this study is to examine the changing trends of the global financial crisis and its effects on the Nigeria economy. It aims to study the rising success of the policy responds by the Central Bank of Nigeria, using banking sector and the economy as a focal point. Descriptive method data analysis is used to analysis the data collected for the research, the finding from the banking officials of the First Bank Plc on the research topic. The research results show that Nigeria economy has achieved a medium or even high level of implementation policy by Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) to constraint complexity and widespread of Global Financial Crisis (GFC) in the economy, and implored adequately, stability comprehensive measures to address the future penetrated of the financial crisis. It was recommended that the immediate response of the CBN to ensure the maintenance of the banking system stability and injecting liquidity into the system and prudential supervision and regulation of the financial sector.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-138
Author(s):  
Zhelao Vytev ◽  
Hazir Gashi

The advent of the global financial crisis and its consequences have led the banking system to work towards more stringent regulatory rules. Additional regulatory requirements affect various aspects of banks' operations. In this regard, one of the most important questions that arises is how the implementation of the new Basel III regulatory framework affects the liquidity of banking institutions.The focus in this paper is the liquidity of the banks in the Republic of Northern Macedonia. The subject of the study is focused on the strength and direction of the impact of the new Basel III regulatory framework on their liquidity. The aim of the study is to reveal the effect of the use of modern regulatory requirements on liquidity of the banking system. A coefficient analysis is applied using a system of appropriately selected indicators: change (increment or decrease) of liquid and highly liquid assets, relative share of liquid and highly liquid assets in the structure of assets, coverage of liabilities with liquid assets, coverage of short-term liabilities with liquid assets, coverage of deposits by non-financial entities with liquid assets, “loans / deposits” ratio.The study includes observations on developments in the banking sector of the Republic of Northern Macedonia for the period 2007-2018. In terms of the impact of the new regulatory framework on banking liquidity, the twelve-year period analysed includes three distinct phases: 1) the time before the onset of the global financial crisis (until 2009); 2) the crisis period (2009 to 2012); 3) the post-crisis period (after 2012), during which the new regulatory measures are gradually moving (Basel III). For the purposes of the study, two working hypotheses are formulated: 1) first hypothesis - the new rules for regulating liquidity and capital adequacy have a negative or stagnant effect on the liquidity of banks in the Republic of Northern Macedonia, manifested in the form of sensitive fluctuations or in the form of sensitive fluctuations or a number of their financial liquidity indicators; 2) second hypothesis - the implementation of the new regulatory measures does not adversely affect banks' liquidity. The analysis of real empirical data shows that the implementation of the new regulatory measures does not have a negative impact on the liquidity of banks in the Republic of Northern Macedonia, but rather, a tendency to stabilize and improve a number of their key liquidity indicators.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Miao Han

AbstractThe global financial crisis (GFC) has been defined as the worst financial crisis after the Great Depression of the 1930s. Reforms underway, as well as debates in discussion, revolve around both regulatory philosophy and approaches towards better supervisory outcomes. One of the most radical institutional reforms took place in the United Kingdom (UK), where the Twin-Peak model replaced the previous fully integrated regulator – the Financial Services Authority (FSA) under the Financial Services Act 2012. This paper argues that China should also introduce twin peaks regulation, but it is rather based on the resources of risk in its financial sector than the direct GFC challenge. In theory, the core arguments focus on the structure of agencies responsible for prudential regulation and the role played by the central bank as well. The Twin-Peak model has been further examined in terms of regulatory objectives and instruments. By method, this paper is a country-specific comparative study; Australia, the Netherlands and the UK are selected to represent different Twin-Peak models. This paper contributes to the relevant literature in two main aspects. First, it has displayed the principal pattern of the Twin-Peak model after detailing the case studies, including the relationship involving in two regulators, central bank and finance minister in particular. Based on this, second, it becomes possible to design a very specific model to reform China’s current sector-based financial monitoring regime. As far as the author knows, until end-2015, this is the first paper which has proposed such a particular model to China. It is argued that the appropriate institutional structure of market regulation should fit well in with a country’s financial market. Accordingly, the Twin-Peak model will be able to balance the regulatory tasks for the over-concentrated risk in China’s large banking sector but the underdeveloped securities market. Even though, regulatory independence will continue to be challenged.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gergana Mihaylova-Borisova ◽  

The economies are once again facing the challenges of another crisis related to the spread of coronavirus in 2020. The banking sector, being one of the main intermediaries in the economies, is also affected by the spread of the new crisis, which is different compared to the previous crises such as the global financial crisis in 2008 and the European debt crisis in 2012-2013. Still, the banking sector in Bulgaria suffers from the pandemic crisis due to decelerated growth rate of loans, provided to households and non-financial enterprises, as well as declining profits related to the narrowing spread between interest rates on loans and deposits. The pandemic crisis, which later turned into an economic one, is having a negative impact on the efficiency of the banking system. To prove the negative impact of the pandemic crisis on the efficiency of banks, the non-parametric method for measuring the efficiency, the so-called Data envelopment analysis (DEA), is used.


2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd Bridgman

The global financial crisis (GFC) which began in 2007 with a liquidity squeeze in the US banking system and which continues to play out today has affected us all, whether through the collapse of the finance company sector, rising unemployment, falling housing prices or the recession which followed the initial market crash. The speed and scope of the crisis surprised most experts – policy makers included. Specialists from a myriad of disciplines, from economics and finance to risk management, corporate governance and property, are trying to make sense of what happened, why it happened and what it means for us now and into the future. Members of the public rely on the news media to keep them informed of the crisis as it unfolds and they rely on experts to translate these complex events into a language which they can understand. The GFC is educating us all, and it is important that we all learn from it to avoid making the same mistakes again. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document