How Skilled Migrants Enter and Stay in the U.S. Labor Market
This paper examines how academic, corporate and state institutions shape inequality in the flow and labor market incorporation of skilled migrants. Using two original datasets, the paper finds that where a migrant earns their degree matters more for explaining patterns of migration and employment than how many degrees they hold, challenging standard theories of human capital and migration.Logistic regression analysis of a novel dataset of LinkedIn employment histories shows that migrants with U.S. degrees are more likely to work in the U.S. at first and current job, while foreign advanced degrees have a strong negative effect on U.S. employment. 105 in-depth interviews show that U.S. universities facilitate the school-to-work transition to the U.S. labor market for international students and U.S. companies display preferences for U.S. degrees. The paper develops new data sources to study dynamic migration flows in transnational, longitudinal perspective and analyzes these data through a multi-level framework that situates migration and employment within institutional contexts driving inequality in labor market outcomes. The findings emphasize the importance of analyzing the effect country of education and level of educational attainment in shaping labor migration flows. I offer a new conceptualization of life-course transitions in the global education and labor markets as migration decisions.