scholarly journals Psychological type and preferred learning styles of institutional advancement officers: an initial study using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in three geographic areas

1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phyllis J. Lepke
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Initial Study ◽  
Psychological Type ◽  
Institutional Advancement ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
Myers Briggs

Relationships between Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Measure of Psychological Type and Neo Measure of Big Five Personality Factors in Polish University Students: A Preliminary Cross-Cultural Comparison

2008 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 588-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerome J. Tobacyk ◽  
Mary M. Livingston ◽  
James E. Robbins
Keyword(s):  
University Students ◽  
Big Five ◽  
English Language ◽  
Psychological Type ◽  
Personality Factors ◽  
Big Five Personality ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
Myers Briggs ◽  
Big Five Personality Factors

English-language versions of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (Form G) measure of psychological type and the NEO-FFI measure of the Big Five personality factors were completed by 57 Polish university students fluent in the English language. The pattern of correlations between MBTI and NEO-FFI scales for the Polish sample was compared to the pattern of correlations for measures of these same constructs reported for Americans. Four of the five significant relationships between MBTI and NEO-FFI scales reported in the American sample were also recorded in the Polish sample: MBTI Extraversion-Introversion with NEO Extraversion, MBTI Sensing-Intuition and MBTI Judging-Perceiving with NEO-Openness, and MBTI Judging-Perceiving with NEO Conscientiousness. Pending replication with a larger, more representative sample, this preliminary study supports the validity of psychological type in Polish society.

The Search for Innovation Styles

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony A. Nix ◽  
Robert B. Stone
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Product Design ◽  
Personality Types ◽  
Team Dynamics ◽  
Innovative Product ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Design Environment ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
Myers Briggs ◽  
The Way

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator test is known to be a quick and easy way to build good team dynamics. However the workplace is not always built around four person teams that you can easily change based on individual personalities. Research has shown that the various MBTI personalities associate with different learning styles. This gives reason to believe that different individual designers may synthesize data and conceptualize ideas differently in a design environment. If this is true, designers may need a customizable environment or they may need to explore different ways to achieve their potential. This paper examines how individuals with different MBTI personality types take in and view information during the conceptualization stages of product design and whether the way information is inputed is vital to an innovative product design.

Learning Style and Personality Type

1992 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Drummond ◽  
Ann H. Stoddard
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Personality Type ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Gregorc Style Delineator ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
Myers Briggs

To investigate the relations between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the Gregorc Style Delineator and to examine the construct validity of the Style Delineator, 41 undergraduate students preparing to be teachers were given both tests. Observed differences in learning styles by personality type partially support the construct validity of the Style Delineator. Judging individuals ( n = 25) tended to perceive themselves as concrete sequential thinkers as opposed to perceptive individuals ( n = 16) who thought of themselves as concrete random thinkers. Feeling types ( n = 29) tended to prefer random modes of thinking.

Assessing the dream-lag effect among participants with different intuition score measured by the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator.

Dreaming ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-277
Author(s):  
Jiaxi Wang ◽  
Xiaoling Feng ◽  
Ting Bin ◽  
Huiying Ma ◽  
Heyong Shen
Keyword(s):  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
Lag Effect ◽  
Myers Briggs

Validity of a Measure of Critical Thinking Skills

1987 ◽  
Vol 60 (3_part_2) ◽  
pp. 1223-1230
Author(s):  
Bruce Thompson ◽  
Janet G. Melancon
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Item Difficulty ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
Embedded Figures Test ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
Embedded Figures ◽  
Myers Briggs

Based on data from 343 subjects, results suggest that Thompson's Test of Critical Thinking Skills has reasonable item difficulty and discrimination coefficients and appears to be valid. Construct validity was investigated by administering the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the Group Embedded Figures Test. Although conclusions must be considered tentative pending additional study, the results warrant continued inquiry regarding the measure's value.

Typology as a Moderating Variable in Success in Science

1970 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 711-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Reynolds ◽  
Amy G. Hope
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Science Achievement ◽  
Myers Briggs Type Indicator ◽  
School Students ◽  
Homogeneous Groups ◽  
Heterogeneous Groups ◽  
Type Indicator ◽  
Myers Briggs

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) was examined for its utility as a predictor of intellective behaviors. For beginning, intermediate and advanced high school students measures of GPA, IQ, science achievement, and science aptitude were obtained. MBTI subscales were dichotomized and criteria were analyzed relative to the resultant eight groups. MBTI subscales provided evidence that typology may well be a moderating factor in intellective performance. The intuition (S-N) scale provided consistent indication of typological differences moderating performance. MBTI appeared to be more appropriate for heterogeneous groups and lost its discriminatory utility with homogeneous groups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document