Test Level 2 Guardrail-to-Bridge Rail Transition Compatible with 31-in. Guardrail

Author(s):  
R. P. Bligh ◽  
D. R. Arrington ◽  
R. Meza

Many state departments of transportation are in the process of updating their guardrail standards to comply with the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) and guidance issued by FHWA on guardrail height. A key feature of the new systems is an increase in rail mounting height from 27 in. to 31 in. A common application of guardrails is shielding motorists from hazards at bridge approaches, including the end of the bridge rail. When a flexible-approach guardrail is attached to a rigid bridge rail, a transition section is needed to transition the stiffness properly from one system to another. A nested thrie beam transition system has been successfully tested to MASH guidelines and is compatible with a 31-in.-approach guardrail. However, it is cost-prohibitive to use this high-speed, Test Level 3 transition on all roadways. A low-cost transition was successfully evaluated under NCHRP Report 350 Test Level 2 (TL-2) impact conditions for use on lower-speed roadways. However, this TL-2 W-beam transition is 27 in. tall and is not compatible with the new 31-in. guardrail systems. This paper describes a new low-cost guardrail-to-bridge rail transition that was successfully developed and tested under MASH TL-2 conditions. The transition is compatible with new 31-in. guardrails and can connect to rigid concrete bridge rails. The transition is considered suitable for implementation on roadways that have traffic conditions appropriate for the use of TL-2 safety hardware. Use of this system would provide significant savings in both material and installation costs compared with high-speed transition systems.

Author(s):  
Roger P. Bligh

In recent years, many state departments of transportation have had to modify their approach guardrail–to–concrete bridge rail transition systems to comply with the testing requirements of NCHRP Report 350. Generally, these transition systems are designed and tested for use on high-speed roadways. Because no national transition designs have been developed and tested for lower-speed conditions, the same transition standard is typically applied to all roadways regardless of speed. The new transition designs represent a significant increase in installation cost and complexity over some previous designs that were acceptable under NCHRP Report 230. Thus, it may be cost-prohibitive to require use of the same design on all roadways. The purpose of this research was to develop a guardrail–to–concrete bridge rail transition that is suitable for use on lower-speed roadways and that is less expensive and complex than current designs for high-speed roadways. A low-cost transition was successfully evaluated under NCHRP Report 350 Test Level 2 (TL-2) impact conditions. It is considered suitable for use on roadways that have traffic conditions appropriate for the use of TL-2 safety hardware. Use of this system provides significant savings in material and installation cost compared with high-speed (i.e., TL-3) transitions.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2521 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-127
Author(s):  
William F. Williams ◽  
Roger Bligh ◽  
Wade Odell ◽  
Amy Smith ◽  
John Holt

The purpose of this project was to design and test a low-cost bridge rail system that would be compatible with the Midwest Guardrail System (31 in. height) and minimized or eliminated deck damage when impacted by errant vehicles. The Texas Type T631 bridge rail developed for this project is a flexible, low-cost bridge rail system for Test Level 2 (TL-2) applications. The Texas Department of Transportation Type T631 bridge rail designed and developed for this project was evaluated under Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) TL-2 in 2013. The bridge rail incorporated S3X5.7 steel sections designed to yield at the post baseplate. The post baseplate was designed to distribute the baseplate bearing and shear forces without causing damage to the 8-in.-thick reinforced concrete deck. The welds on the posts were designed such that the post yielded without tearing away from the top of the baseplate. The rail element consisted of a 12-gauge W-beam rail element. The rail element was attached to the post with a bolt of diameter 5/16 in. This bolt was designed to break away without adversely affecting vehicle performance. The posts were spaced 6 ft 3 in. on centers for TL-2. The post spacing was reduced to 3 ft 1½ in. on centers and evaluated for MASH Test Level 3 (TL-3) specifications in 2014. At the smaller post spacing, the T631 met all the performance requirements of MASH TL-3. Details of the design and testing of the T631 for MASH TL-2 and MASH TL-3 specifications are provided in this paper.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2309 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger P. Bligh ◽  
Dusty R. Arrington ◽  
Nauman M. Sheikh ◽  
Rory Meza ◽  
Chiara Silvestri

Median barriers are commonly used to separate opposing lanes of traffic on divided highways and to separate managed lanes from general purpose lanes. Concrete median barriers (CMBs) are often preferred on urban freeways with narrow medians because of their minimal deflection and low maintenance. However, long, continuous runs of CMBs limit access of emergency and maintenance vehicles to the other side of a roadway or a managed lane. Implementation of crashworthy median barrier gates at these locations can maintain the desired level of median protection for motorists while offering improved cross-median access for emergency and maintenance vehicles. A new median barrier gate was developed and crash tested. The gate spans a 30-ft opening in a CMB and consists of two vertically stacked 12- x 12- x ¼-in. steel tubes connected to steel end brackets with 2¼-in. diameter steel pins. The gate is economical to fabricate and install. It can be manually operated by a single person and is designed to accommodate reversible traffic flow on both sides of the median and be operable in both directions on each end. The median barrier gate satisfies the criteria for impact performance of Test Level 3 of the Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware and is considered suitable for implementation on divided highways at locations where cross-median access is desired.


Author(s):  
King K. Mak ◽  
Hayes E. Ross ◽  
Roger P. Bligh ◽  
Wanda L. Menges

Two slotted-rail terminal (SRT) designs, one for use on roadways with speed limits of 72.4 km/hr (45 mi/hr) or less and the other for high-speed facilities, were previously developed and successfully crash-tested in accordance with guidelines set forth in NCHRP Report 230. Those SRT designs have been approved by FHWA for use on federal-aid projects. However, FHWA has since adopted NCHRP Report 350 as the official guidelines for safety performance evaluation of roadside features and required that all roadside features to be used on the National Highway System be crash-tested in accordance with the NCHRP Report 350 guidelines by 1998. It is therefore necessary to modify and retest the SRT designs in accordance with NCHRP Report 350 guidelines. The modified SRT design has successfully met the guidelines set forth in NCHRP Report 350 for Test Level 3 conditions, that is, 100-km/hr (62.2 mi/hr) and the results of the crash testing. The modified SRT design has been approved by FHWA for use on the national highway system.


Author(s):  
William Williams

The State Loop 481 steel truss bridge over the Llano River in Junction, Texas, is classified as a historic structure. The bridge is approximately 1,423 ft long and has a railing that attaches directly to the steel truss members and does not meet the current AASHTO Test Level 2 (TL-2) strength requirements. Many supporting truss members were not adequate to resist TL-2 crash force. The purpose of this research was to design a crashworthy retrofit bridge rail that met the current AASHTO TL-2 strength requirements without overstressing the supporting truss members. The new design maintains the historic appearance of the structure. This paper presents details of the new bridge rail design and an analytical procedure for determining the magnitude of force transmitted to the supporting truss members. Crushable-pipe blockouts located between the new retrofit rail design and the truss members were developed as part of this research and were used to minimize the crash force transmitted to the steel truss members. The new bridge rail design was successfully crash tested in accordance with the TL-2 requirements of NCHRP Report 350. A bridge rail expansion splice was developed for the new bridge rail design and was successfully crash tested in accordance with the Test Level 3 requirements of NCHRP Report 350. This paper presents the results of this research, details of the expansion splice, the new bridge rail design, the design procedure, and the results of the crash testing.


Author(s):  
Karla A. Lechtenberg ◽  
Scott K. Rosenbaugh ◽  
Robert W. Bielenberg ◽  
Mario Mongiardini ◽  
Ronald K. Faller ◽  
...  

The varied lateral stiffness between bridge rails and approach guardrail systems may cause vehicle pocketing or wheel snagging to occur near rigid bridge rail ends. To mitigate this potential hazard, an approach guardrail transition (AGT) is used to provide a gradual increase in the lateral stiffness of the barrier between the W-beam guardrail system and the bridge railing. However, these transitions can also cause a propensity for vehicle pocketing or wheel snagging if the change in lateral stiffness occurs too rapidly. Recently, a stiffness transition based on NCHRP Report 350 was developed for use with the Midwest Guardrail System (MGS) and a stiff Thrie beam AGT, and successful testing was performed close to the upstream end of the AGT. The transition was designed with three sizes of steel posts, one of which was nonstandard for state departments of transportation. Thus, a simplified version of the original MGS stiffness transition that used two common sizes of steel posts was developed and was subjected to full-scale crash testing according to Test Level 3 as set forth in the Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware. Subsequently, dynamic post properties obtained from bogie testing and numerical simulations were used to develop an equivalent wood post version of the simplified MGS stiffness transition. Recommendations are made regarding the attachment of the stiffness transitions to FHWA-accepted Thrie beam bridge rail AGTs.


Author(s):  
Mario Mongiardini ◽  
Ronald K. Faller ◽  
John D. Reid ◽  
Dean L. Sicking

Most state departments of transportation use simple adaptations of crashworthy guardrail end terminals, which typically include breakaway posts and an anchor cable, for downstream anchorage systems. The guardrail safety performance for vehicular impacts occurring in close proximity to these simplified, downstream anchorage systems is not well known. Further, the length of need (LON) for the downstream end of these systems has yet to be adequately determined. This research project assessed the safety performance of the Midwest Guardrail System (MGS) for impacts occurring in close proximity to a nonproprietary, trailing-end guardrail terminal under the Test Level 3 conditions of the Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware. The two research objectives were to (a) determine the end of the LON for impacts with light pickup trucks and (b) investigate potential risks for a small passenger car to become unstable when striking the downstream end of the MGS anchored by the nonproprietary, trailing-end terminal. Numerical simulations were carried out to identify the most critical impact location for the 1100C small car and the end of the LON for the 2270P pickup truck. In full-scale crash tests, considerable snag of the 1100C vehicle occurred; however, occupant risk values and vehicle stability were within acceptable limits. The crash test with the 2270P pickup indicated that the end of the LON was located at the sixth post from the downstream-end post. Guidelines were proposed for installing the MGS to shield hazards in close proximity to the tested nonproprietary, trailing-end terminal.


TAPPI Journal ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 17-25
Author(s):  
JUNMING SHU ◽  
ARTHAS YANG ◽  
PEKKA SALMINEN ◽  
HENRI VAITTINEN

The Ji’an PM No. 3 is the first linerboard machine in China to use multilayer curtain coating technology. Since successful startup at the end of 2011, further development has been carried out to optimize running conditions, coating formulations, and the base paper to provide a product with satisfactory quality and lower cost to manufacture. The key challenges include designing the base board structure for the desired mechanical strength, designing the surface properties for subsequent coating operations, optimizing the high-speed running of the curtain coater to enhance production efficiency, minimizing the amount of titanium dioxide in the coating color, and balancing the coated board properties to make them suitable for both offset and flexographic printing. The pilot and mill scale results show that curtain coating has a major positive impact on brightness, while smoothness is improved mainly by the blade coating and calendering conditions. Optimization of base board properties and the blade + curtain + blade concept has resulted in the successful use of 100% recycled fiber to produce base board. The optical, mechanical, and printability properties of the final coated board meet market requirements for both offset and flexographic printing. Machine runnability is excellent at the current speed of 1000 m/min, and titanium dioxide has been eliminated in the coating formulations without affecting the coating coverage. A significant improvement in the total cost of coated white liner production has been achieved, compared to the conventional concept of using virgin fiber in the top ply. Future development will focus on combining low cost with further quality improvements to make linerboard suitable for a wider range of end-use applications, including frozen-food packaging and folding boxboard.


1998 ◽  
Vol 10 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 57-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. S. B. Keats-Rohan

The COEL database and database software, a combined reference and research tool created by historians for historians, is presented here through Screenshots illustrating the underlying theoretical model and the specific situation to which that has been applied. The key emphases are upon data integrity, and the historian's role in interpreting and manipulating what is often contentious data. From a corpus of sources (Level 1) certain core data are extracted for separate treatment at an interpretive level (Level 3), based upon a master list of the core data (Level 2). The core data are interdependent: each record in Level 2 is of interest in itself; and it either could or should be associated with an(other) record(s) as a specific entity. Sometimes the sources are ambiguous and the association is contentious, necessitating a probabilty-coding approach. The entities created by the association process can then be treated at a commentary level, introducing material external to the database, whether primary or secondary sources. A full discussion of the difficulties is provided within a synthesis of available information on the core data. Direct access to the source texts is only ever a mouse click away. Fully query able, COEL is formidable look-up and research tool for users of all levels, who remain free to exercise an alternative judgement on the associations of the core data. In principle, there is no limit on the type of text or core data that could be handled in such a system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document