Breathing Variability and NAVA in Neonates

Author(s):  
2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 388-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Flabeau ◽  
Wassilios G. Meissner ◽  
Annaig Ozier ◽  
Patrick Berger ◽  
François Tison ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 292 (5) ◽  
pp. R1985-R1993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Noëlle Fiamma ◽  
Christian Straus ◽  
Sylvain Thibault ◽  
Marc Wysocki ◽  
Pierre Baconnier ◽  
...  

In humans, lung ventilation exhibits breath-to-breath variability and dynamics that are nonlinear, complex, sensitive to initial conditions, unpredictable in the long-term, and chaotic. Hypercapnia, as produced by the inhalation of a CO2-enriched gas mixture, stimulates ventilation. Hypocapnia, as produced by mechanical hyperventilation, depresses ventilation in animals and in humans during sleep, but it does not induce apnea in awake humans. This emphasizes the suprapontine influences on ventilatory control. How cortical and subcortical commands interfere thus depend on the prevailing CO2 levels. However, CO2 also influences the variability and complexity of ventilation. This study was designed to describe how this occurs and to test the hypothesis that CO2 chemoreceptors are important determinants of ventilatory dynamics. Spontaneous ventilatory flow was recorded in eight healthy subjects. Breath-by-breath variability was studied through the coefficient of variation of several ventilatory variables. Chaos was assessed with the noise titration method (noise limit) and characterized with numerical indexes [largest Lyapunov exponent (LLE), sensitivity to initial conditions; Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy (KSE), unpredictability; and correlation dimension (CD), irregularity]. In all subjects, under all conditions, a positive noise limit confirmed chaos. Hypercapnia reduced breathing variability, increased LLE ( P = 0.0338 vs. normocapnia; P = 0.0018 vs. hypocapnia), increased KSE, and slightly reduced CD. Hypocapnia increased variability, decreased LLE and KSE, and reduced CD. These results suggest that chemoreceptors exert a strong influence on ventilatory variability and complexity. However, complexity persists in the quasi-absence of automatic drive. Ventilatory variability and complexity could be determined by the interaction between the respiratory central pattern generator and suprapontine structures.


Critical Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar F. C. van den Bosch ◽  
Ricardo Alvarez-Jimenez ◽  
Harm-Jan de Grooth ◽  
Armand R. J. Girbes ◽  
Stephan A. Loer

AbstractThe respiratory system reacts instantaneously to intrinsic and extrinsic inputs. This adaptability results in significant fluctuations in breathing parameters, such as respiratory rate, tidal volume, and inspiratory flow profiles. Breathing variability is influenced by several conditions, including sleep, various pulmonary diseases, hypoxia, and anxiety disorders. Recent studies have suggested that weaning failure during mechanical ventilation may be predicted by low respiratory variability. This review describes methods for quantifying breathing variability, summarises the conditions and comorbidities that affect breathing variability, and discusses the potential implications of breathing variability for anaesthesia and intensive care.


Author(s):  
O. F. C. van den Bosch ◽  
R. Alvarez-Jimenez ◽  
S. G. Schet ◽  
K. Delfsma ◽  
S. A. Loer

Abstract Purpose Regulation of spontaneous breathing is highly complex and may be influenced by drugs administered during the perioperative period. Because of their different pharmacological properties we hypothesized that midazolam and s-ketamine exert different effects on the variability of minute ventilation (MV), tidal volume (TV) and respiratory rate (RR). Methods Patients undergoing procedural sedation (PSA) with propofol and remifentanil received a single dose of midazolam (1–3 mg, n = 10) or s-ketamine (10–25 mg, n = 10). We used non-invasive impedance-based respiratory volume monitoring to record RR as well as changes in TV and MV. Variability of these three parameters was calculated as coefficients of variation. Results TV and MV decreased during PSA to a comparable extent in both groups, whereas there was no significant change in RR. In line with our hypothesis we observed marked differences in breathing variability. The variability of MV (– 47.5% ± 24.8%, p = 0.011), TV (– 42.1% ± 30.2%, p = 0.003), and RR (– 28.5% ± 29.3%, p = 0.011) was significantly reduced in patients receiving midazolam. In contrast, variability remained unchanged in patients receiving s-ketamine (MV + 16% ± 45.2%, p = 0.182; TV +12% ± 47.7%, p = 0.390; RR +39% ± 65.2%, p = 0.129). After termination of PSA breathing variables returned to baseline values. Conclusions While midazolam reduces respiratory variability in spontaneously breathing patients undergoing procedural sedation, s-ketamine preserves variability suggesting different effects on the regulation of spontaneous breathing.


2006 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 2076-2083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Wysocki ◽  
Christophe Cracco ◽  
Antonio Teixeira ◽  
Alain Mercat ◽  
Jean-Luc Diehl ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document