Improving Person-Centered Care for Family Planning in India

Author(s):  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia Diamond-Smith ◽  
Beth Phillips ◽  
Patience Afulani ◽  
Aradhana Srivast ◽  
Ginger Golub ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Quality of care of family planning provision has many dimensions, and measuring and understanding these different components is challenging. Furthermore, understanding which components are most important for women’s experiences and method continuation is essential for improving the quality of care provision. Methods: We use longitudinal data from India to explore the impact of different measures of quality (provider preference, provider involvement, and a newly developed scale of person-centered care experiences) on method continuation. We also look at associations between the quality measures and discuss why different measures may be more salient in different contexts. Results: We find that a woman’s person-centered care experience is not associated with continuation in India. Providers having a strong preference is associated with continuation. Conclusions: Certain measures of person-centered quality appear to impact family planning continuation, but the validated person-centered care measure is not. Socio-cultural factors such as power dynamics and gender norms likely impact expectations, and need to be considered in interpreting and choosing quality measures.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia Diamond-Smith ◽  
Beth Phillips ◽  
Patience Afulani ◽  
Aradhana Srivast ◽  
Ginger Golub ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Quality of care of family planning provision has many dimensions, including those related to a woman’s experience, or person-centered care, and measuring and understanding these different components is challenging. Understanding which components are most important for women’s experiences and method continuation is essential for improving the quality of care provision. The objective of this paper is to explore weather a recently developed scale to measure person-centered family planning experiences is associated with method continuation in India. The secondary objective is to compare this scale to other commonly used measures of quality, and if other measures are more associated with continuation. Methods: We use longitudinal data collected from women in Uttar Pradesh, India (N=225 at baseline, N=179 6 weeks later) to explore the association between different measures of quality (provider preference, provider involvement, and a newly developed scale of person-centered care experiences) and method continuation. Results: We find that a woman’s person-centered care experience is not associated with continuation in this population in India. Providers having a strong method preference is associated with continuation. Conclusion: Certain measures of person-centered quality appear to impact family planning continuation, but the validated person-centered care measure is not. Socio-cultural factors such as power dynamics and gender norms likely impact expectations, and need to be considered in interpreting and choosing quality measures.


Author(s):  
Yvette M. McCoy

Purpose Person-centered care shifts the focus of treatment away from the traditional medical model and moves toward personal choice and autonomy for people receiving health services. Older adults remain a priority for person-centered care because they are more likely to have complex care needs than younger individuals. Even more specifically, the assessment and treatment of swallowing disorders are often thought of in terms of setting-specific (i.e., acute care, skilled nursing, home health, etc.), but the management of dysphagia in older adults should be considered as a continuum of care from the intensive care unit to the outpatient multidisciplinary clinic. In order to establish a framework for the management of swallowing in older adults, clinicians must work collaboratively with a multidisciplinary team using current evidence to guide clinical practice. Private practitioners must think critically not only about the interplay between the components of the evidence-based practice treatment triad but also about the broader impact of dysphagia on caregivers and families. The physical health and quality of life of both the caregiver and the person receiving care are interdependent. Conclusion Effective treatment includes consideration of not only the patient but also others, as caregivers play an important role in the recovery process of the patient with swallowing disorders.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 567-570
Author(s):  
Radost Assenova ◽  
Levena Kireva ◽  
Gergana Foreva

Introduction: The European definition of WONCA of general practice introduces the determinant elements of person-centered care regarding four important, interrelated characteristics: continuity of care, patient "empowerment", patient-centred approach, and doctor-patient relationship. The application of person-centred care in general practice refers to the GP's ability to master the patient-centered approach when working with patients and their problems in the respective context; use the general practice consultation to develop an effective doctor–patient relationship, with respect to patient’s autonomy; communicate, set priorities and establish a partnership when solving health problems; provide long-lasting care tailored to the needs of the patient and coordinate overall patient care. This means that GPs are expected to develop their knowledge and skills to use this key competence. Aim: The aim of this study is to make a preliminary assessment of the knowledge and attitudes of general practitioners regarding person-centered care. Material and methods: The opinion of 54 GPs was investigated through an original questionnaire, including closed questions, with more than one answer. The study involved each GP who has agreed to take part in organised training in person-centered care. The results were processed through the SPSS 17.0 version using descriptive statistics. Results: The distribution of respondents according to their sex is predominantly female - 34 (62.9%). It was found that GPs investigated by us highly appreciate the patient's ability to take responsibility, noting that it is important for them to communicate and establish a partnership with the patient - 37 (68.5%). One third of the respondents 34 (62.9%) stated the need to use the GP consultation to establish an effective doctor-patient relationship. The adoption of the patient-centered approach at work is important to 24 (44.4%) GPs. Provision of long-term care has been considered by 19 (35,2%). From the possible benefits of implementing person-centered care, GPs have indicated achieving more effective health outcomes in the first place - 46 (85.2%). Conclusion: Family doctors are aware of the elements of person-centered care, but in order to validate and fully implement this competence model, targeted GP training is required.


2021 ◽  
pp. 105477382110330
Author(s):  
Joy Davis ◽  
Sue Sinni ◽  
Stephen Maloney ◽  
Lorraine Walker

Patients are central to healthcare clinicians and organizations but often subsidiary to clinical expertise, knowledge, workplace processes, and culture. Shifting societal values, technology, and regulations have remoulded the patient-clinician relationship, augmenting the patient’s voice within the healthcare construct. Scaffolding this restructure is the global imperative to deliver person-centered care (PCC). The aim of the scoping review was to explore and map the intersection between patient feedback and strategies to improve the provision of PCC within acute hospitals in Australia. Database searches yielded 493 articles, with 16 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Integration of patient feedback varied from strategy design, through to multi-staged input throughout the initiative and beyond. Initiatives actioning patient feedback fell broadly into four categories: clinical practice, educational strategies, governance, and measurement. How clinicians can invite feedback and support patients to engage equally remains unclear, requiring further exploration of strategies to propel clinician-patient partnerships, scaffolded by hospital governance structures.


Author(s):  
Roman A. Lewandowski ◽  
Jędrzej B. Lewandowski ◽  
Inger Ekman ◽  
Karl Swedberg ◽  
Jan Törnell ◽  
...  

Background: Person-Centered Care (PCC) is a promising approach towards improved quality of care and cost containment within health systems. It has been evaluated in Sweden and England. This feasibility study examines initial PCC implementation in a rehabilitation hospital for children in Poland. Methods: The WE-CARE Roadmap of enablers was used to guide implementation of PCC for patients with moderate scoliosis. A multi-disciplinary team of professionals were trained in the PCC approach and the hospital Information Technology (IT) system was modified to enhance PCC data capture. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the nine health care professionals involved in the pilot study and three patients/parents receiving care. Transcribed data were analyzed via content analysis. Results: 51 patients and their families were treated via a PCC approach. High proportions of new PCC data fields were completed by the professionals. The professionals were able to implement the three core PCC routines and perceived benefits using the PCC approach. Patients and their families also perceived improved quality care. The WE-CARE framework enablers facilitated PCC implementation in this setting. Conclusions: This feasibility pilot study indicates that the Gothenburg PCC approach can be successfully transferred to a rehabilitation hospital in Poland with favorable perceptions of implementation by both professionals and patients/their families.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document