Management and Outcomes Following Emergency Surgery for Traumatic Brain Injury

Author(s):  
e-CliniC ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 504
Author(s):  
Akbar S. Putera ◽  
Eko Prasetyo ◽  
Maximillian Ch. Oley ◽  
Fima L. F. G. Langi

Abstract: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) could result in disorders of central nervous system (CNS). Serum laminin level and the FOUR score have both been suggested as predictors for the outcomes after TBI. This study was aimed to evaluate the relationship between serum laminin level and the FOUR score in TBI patients. This was an observational and analytical study with a cross-sectional design. Subjects were 32 patients with TBI and FOUR scores of 0-16 admitted at the Emergency Surgery Installation of Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou Hospital. Venous blood sample for laminin was taken less than 24 hours after trauma. Assessment of the level of consciousness was determined by using the FOUR score at Emergency Surgery Installation admission <24 hours and observation after >24 hours. Proportional regression model was used to assess changes in FOUR score associated with laminin level. The results obtained 32 patients with TBI, mean laminin level was 818.4 pg/mL with range IQR 597.4-1235.4 pg/mL. In final regression model, each increase of one unit of pre-24 hours FOUR score decreased serum laminin level by 54.4 pg/mL (95% CI -76.3; 32.1 pg/mL, p<0.001). Same as the relationship occurred for the FOUR score after 24 hours, but the decrease was slightly smaller, at 37.2 pg/mL (95% CI -50.2; -24.3 pg/mL, p<0.001). FOUR scores with a high risk of mortality were more likely to be found in relatively high serum laminin levels. In conclusion, there is a relationship between serum laminin level and the FOUR score. Increase in serum laminin level is a potential alternative to lower FOUR score and to predictof poorer outcome in patient with TBI.Keywords: laminin; FOUR score; traumatic brain injury (TBI) Abstrak: Pada cedera otak akibat trauma (COT) sering terjadi gangguan saraf pusat. Laminin serum dan skor FOUR disarankan sebagai prediktor luaran setelah COT. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi hubungan antara kadar laminin serum dan skor FOUR pada pasien COT. Jenis penelitian ialah analitik observasional dengan desain potong lintang. Penelitian dilaksanakan pada 32 pasien dengan COT dan skor FOUR 0-16 yang masuk ke Instalasi Rawat Darurat Bedah (IRDB) RSUP Prof. Dr.R. D. Kandou, Manado. Sampel darah vena untuk pemeriksaan serum laminin diambil kurang dari 24 jam setelah trauma. Penilaian tingkat kesadaran ditetapkan dengan skor FOUR saat masuk IRDB <24 jam dan observasi setelah >24 jam. Model regresi proporsional digunakan untuk menilai hubungan kadar laminin serum dengan skor FOUR. Hasil penelitian mendapatkan 32 pasien dengan COT. Rerata kadar laminin serum 818,4 pg/mL dengan range IQR 597,4-1.235,4 pg/mL. Pada model regresi akhir, setiap peningkatan satu unit skor FOUR pra 24 jam rata-rata menurunkan kadar laminin serum sebesar 54,4 pg/mL (95% CI -76,3; 32,1 pg/mL, p<0,001). Hubungan sejenis terjadi untuk skor FOUR pasca 24 jam, tetapi nilai penurunannya sedikit lebih kecil, yakni 37,2 pg/mL (95% CI -50,2; -24,3 pg/mL, p<0,001). Skor FOUR dengan risiko mortalitas tinggi lebih cenderung ditemukan pada kadar laminin serum relatif tinggi. Simpulan penelitian ini ialah terdapat hubungan antara kadar laminin serum dengan skor FOUR. Peningkatan kadar laminin serum merupakan alternatif potensial skor FOUR yang lebih rendah untuk memrediksi luaran yang lebih buruk pada pasien COT.Kata kunci: laminin; skor FOUR; cedera otak akibat trauma (COT)


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen M. Kelley ◽  
Larry L. Jacoby

Abstract Cognitive control constrains retrieval processing and so restricts what comes to mind as input to the attribution system. We review evidence that older adults, patients with Alzheimer's disease, and people with traumatic brain injury exert less cognitive control during retrieval, and so are susceptible to memory misattributions in the form of dramatic levels of false remembering.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-96
Author(s):  
Mary R. T. Kennedy

Purpose The purpose of this clinical focus article is to provide speech-language pathologists with a brief update of the evidence that provides possible explanations for our experiences while coaching college students with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Method The narrative text provides readers with lessons we learned as speech-language pathologists functioning as cognitive coaches to college students with TBI. This is not meant to be an exhaustive list, but rather to consider the recent scientific evidence that will help our understanding of how best to coach these college students. Conclusion Four lessons are described. Lesson 1 focuses on the value of self-reported responses to surveys, questionnaires, and interviews. Lesson 2 addresses the use of immediate/proximal goals as leverage for students to update their sense of self and how their abilities and disabilities may alter their more distal goals. Lesson 3 reminds us that teamwork is necessary to address the complex issues facing these students, which include their developmental stage, the sudden onset of trauma to the brain, and having to navigate going to college with a TBI. Lesson 4 focuses on the need for college students with TBI to learn how to self-advocate with instructors, family, and peers.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 1363-1370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Brown ◽  
Katy O'Brien ◽  
Kelly Knollman-Porter ◽  
Tracey Wallace

Purpose The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently released guidelines for rehabilitation professionals regarding the care of children with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Given that mTBI impacts millions of children each year and can be particularly detrimental to children in middle and high school age groups, access to universal recommendations for management of postinjury symptoms is ideal. Method This viewpoint article examines the CDC guidelines and applies these recommendations directly to speech-language pathology practices. In particular, education, assessment, treatment, team management, and ongoing monitoring are discussed. In addition, suggested timelines regarding implementation of services by speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are provided. Specific focus is placed on adolescents (i.e., middle and high school–age children). Results SLPs are critical members of the rehabilitation team working with children with mTBI and should be involved in education, symptom monitoring, and assessment early in the recovery process. SLPs can also provide unique insight into the cognitive and linguistic challenges of these students and can serve to bridge the gap among rehabilitation and school-based professionals, the adolescent with brain injury, and their parents. Conclusion The guidelines provided by the CDC, along with evidence from the field of speech pathology, can guide SLPs to advocate for involvement in the care of adolescents with mTBI. More research is needed to enhance the evidence base for direct assessment and treatment with this population; however, SLPs can use their extensive knowledge and experience working with individuals with traumatic brain injury as a starting point for post-mTBI care.


ASHA Leader ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (13) ◽  
pp. 38-38
Author(s):  
G. Gayle Kelley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document