scholarly journals Determination of Colistin and Tigecycline Resistance Profile of Acinetobacter Baumannii Strains from Different Clinical Samples in a Territory Hospital in Turkey

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merih Şimşek ◽  
Cengiz Demir
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Acinetobacter Baumannii ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Empirical Treatment ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Broth Microdilution Method ◽  
Vitek 2

Objective: Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) can develop resistance to various antimicrobial agents via different mechanisms. Hence, the aim of this study was to investigate, by using different methods, the resistance profiles of A. baumannii strains isolated from different clinical specimens; from colistin and tigecycline antibiotics, and also the distribution of this resistance according to the clinical samples. Material and Methods: For this study, 1,265 clinical samples (a samples from each patient) were obtained from various clinics, between; January 2015/December 2018. Identification was conducted by VITEK® 2 compact (bioMerieux, USA) and conventional biochemical tests. Antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed by VITEK 2, and the results of colistin and tigecycline were confirmed by E test and the broth microdilution method. Results: A. baumannii strains (1,265) were most frequently isolated from tracheal aspirate, sputum and blood samples. At the same time, strains were obtained from intensive care units (70.4%) as well as other clinics (29.6%). The rates of colistin and tigecycline-resistant strains were determined using VITEK 2, E test and the broth microdilution methods as: 3.0%, 5.7%, 9.0% and 21.7%, 24.5%, 33.0%, respectively. Conclusion: The determination of appropriate antibioticis are important for empirical treatment. Colistin and tigecycline have become prominent as an important, alternative agent in the treatment of A. baumannii-related infections. The results of this study show that colistin and tigecycline resistance rates in intensive care units have been increasing gradually over the years. Monitoring of resistance patterns of nonfermentative bacteria, isolated from intensive care units, is important for the immediate initiation of appropriate empirical treatment. In-vitro studies with A. baumannii strains should also be supported by clinical trials.

scholarly journals Determination of CEM-101 Activity Tested against Clinical Isolates of Neisseria meningitidis from a Worldwide Collection

2010 ◽  
Vol 54 (9) ◽  
pp. 4009-4011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas J. Biedenbach ◽  
Mariana Castanheira ◽  
Ronald N. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Neisseria Meningitidis ◽  
Meningococcal Disease ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Microdilution Method ◽  
Broth Microdilution Method

ABSTRACT The activity of CEM-101, a fluoroketolide, was compared to those of 11 other antimicrobial agents using the reference broth microdilution method tested against 103 Neisseria meningitidis strains, including ciprofloxacin-nonsusceptible isolates with confirmed gyr A (T91I) mutations. Among the tested isolates, 79.6% were serogroup B or C and all isolates were susceptible to ceftriaxone, azithromycin, minocycline, and rifampin. However, penicillin-nonsusceptible strains were observed (15.5%) and susceptibility to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was only 50.5%. CEM-101 was the most active macrolide-like compound (MIC90, ≤0.015 μg/ml) compared with MIC90s of telithromycin (MIC90, 0.03 μg/ml), azithromycin and clarithromycin (MIC90, 0.12 μg/ml), and erythromycin (MIC90, 0.25 μg/ml). CEM-101 could provide a potent alternative for the prophylaxis of meningococcal disease.

scholarly journals A 5- Year Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections in a University Hospital: A Retrospective Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilknur Erdem ◽  
Ilker Yildirim ◽  
Birol Safak ◽  
Ritvan Karaali ◽  
Berna Erdal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Acinetobacter Baumannii ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Nosocomial Infections ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Esherichia Coli ◽  
Study Results

Abstract OBJECTIVE: ‘Nosocomial infections’ or ‘healthcare associated infections’ are a significant public health problem around the world. This study aimed to assess the rate of culture confirmed nosocomial infections (NIs), frequency of nosocomial pathogens and the antimicrobial resistance patterns of bacterial isolates in a University Hospital. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of NIs in a tertiary hospital, between the years 2015 and 2019 in Tekirdag, Turkey. RESULTS : During the five years, the overall incidence rates (NI/100) and incidence densities (NI/1000 days of stay) of NIs were 2.04% (range 1.76-2.41/100) and 3.50/1000 patients-days (range 2.85-4.64/1000), respectively. 57.4 % of the infections were originated from the Intensive Care Units. The most common NIs according to the primary sites were bloodstream infections (55.3 %) and, pneumonia (20.4%). 67.5% of the isolated microorganisms as nosocomial agents were Gram negative bacteria, 24.9% of Gram positive bacteria and 7.6 % of candida. The most frequently isolated causative agents were Esherichia coli (16.7%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (15.7%). The rate of extended spectrum beta-lactamase production among E. coli isolates was 51.1%. Carbapenem resistance was 29.8% among isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa; 95.1% among isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii, 18.2% among isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Colistin resistance was 2.4% among isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. Vancomycin resistance was 5.3% among isolates of Enterococci.CONCLUSION: Our study results demonstrates the microorganisms of isolated from Intensive Care Units demonstrates high level resistance to many antimicrobial agents. The rising in incidence of multidrug-resistant microorganisms indicate that more interventions are urgently needed to reduce NIs in our ICUs.

scholarly journals Isolation and Evaluation of Clinically Important Acinetobacter Baumannii From Intensive Care Unit Samples

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 83-90
Author(s):  
Mohamed Mowfik Sehree ◽  
Hanaa N. Abdullah ◽  
Amani M. Jasim
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Acinetobacter Baumannii ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Culture Media ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Surgical Wounds ◽  
Blood And Urine Samples ◽  
Vitek 2 ◽  
Moderate Resistance

Acinetobacter baumannii is considered a critical healthcare problem for patients in intensive care units due to its high ability to be multidrug-resistant to most commercially available antibiotics. The current study is at aimed at isolating and identifying the clinical isolates of A. baumannii from different samples and investigating the antibiotic resistance of isolates. Isolation and diagnosis of bacteria were achieved by conventional techniques, including routine and selective culture media (Chrome agar), biochemical test, EPI 20E, and VITEK-2. These methods were basically considered as a gold standard for identification of A. baumannii infections from different clinical sources, and culture positive isolates were tested for antibiotic susceptibility using a modified Kirby–Bauer method. A total of 375 clinical specimens were collected from different infections in some hospitals in Mosul and Erbil cities/Iraq from Sep 2020 to Jan 2021. Overall, 41 isolates were identified as A. baumannii using conventional and biochemical methods, and then confirmed by VITEK-2 system. Our results established that only 41(14.4%) isolates were diagnosed as A. baumannii, and most of these isolates were from burns (36.5%), surgical wounds (34.1%), and sputum (14.6%). However, it was identified in CSF, blood, and urine samples with lower percentages (7.3%, 4.8%, and 2.4%, respectively). The clinical isolates of A. baumannii showed high to moderate resistance to Piperacillin (97.5%), Piperacillin/ Tazobactam., Ceftazidime (87.8%), Meropenem (85.3%), Tri/slphamethoxazole (82.9%), Levofloxacin (80.4%), Imipenem, Ciprofloxacin (78%), Gentamycin (75.6%), Amikacin (73.1%), Netilmicin (68.2%), Tobramycin (60.9%) and Tetracycline (31.7%). However, two antimicrobial agents which were Colistin and Tigecycline produced 0 and 2.4 % resistance to A. baumannii respectively, which were considered the most used choices to treat A. baumannii infections. The current findings suggest that automated Vitek 2 system is the most common method to accurately detect the isolates and evaluate multi-drug resistant A. baumannii among patients.

PREVALENCE OF CARBAPENEM-RESISTANT ACINETOBACTER BAUMANNII (CRAB) IN MEDICAL AND SURGICAL INTENSIVE CARE UNITS (ICUS) OF JPMC, KARACHI

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rabia Arshad
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
Acinetobacter Baumannii ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Carbapenem Resistance ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Increased Risk

Background: Antimicrobial resistance is one of the research priorities of health organizations due to increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Outbreaks of nosocomial infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii (CRAB) strains are at rise worldwide. Antimicrobial resistance to carbapenems reduces clinical therapeutic choices and frequently led to treatment failure. The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence of carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii isolated from patients in intensive care units (ICUs). Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out in the Department of Microbiology, Basic Medical Sciences Institute (BMSI), Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre (JPMC), Karachi, from December 2016 to November 2017. Total 63 non-repetitive A. baumannii were collected from the patients’ specimens, admitted to medical and surgical ICUs and wards of JPMC, Karachi. The bacterial isolates were processed according to standard microbiological procedures to observe for carbapenem resistance. SPSS 21 was used for data analysis. Results: Out of the 63 patients, 40 (63.5%) were male. The age of the patient ranged from 15-85 year, with average of 43 year. 34.9% patients had been hospitalized for 3 days. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was present in highest number with average of 58.7% for morbidity. Number of patients on mechanical ventilation was highest (65.1%). All isolates were susceptible to colistin. The resistance to ampicillin-sulbactam, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, amikacin, piperacillin- tazobactam and meropenem was 82.5%, 81%, 100%, 87.3%, 82.5% and 82% respectively. Out of 82% CRAB, 77% were obtained from ICUs. Conclusion: This study has revealed the high rate of carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii isolates in ICUs thus leaving behind limited therapeutic options.

scholarly journals Colonization of central venous catheter in the intensive care units at the Institute of Cardiovascular Disease "Dedinje": One year study

2005 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 33-37
Author(s):  
Ivana Cirkovic ◽  
Vera Mijac ◽  
Milena Svabic-Vlahovic ◽  
S. Dukic ◽  
I. Ilic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Microbial Colonization ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Candida Spp ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Microbiological Methods ◽  
Increased Risk

Objectives: The application of Central Venous Catheters (CVC) is associated with increased risk of microbial colonization and infection. The aim of present study was to assess the frequency of pathogens colonizing CVC and to determine their susceptibility pattern to various antimicrobial agents. Materials and methods: A total of 253 samples of CVC from intensive care units (ICU) patients were received for culture during 2003. All microorganisms were identified by standard microbiological methods and the susceptibility to antimicrobial agents was determined according to NCCLS recommendations. Results: A total of 184 (72.7%) cultures were positive and 223 pathogens were isolated. Coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS) were the dominant isolates (24.7%), followed by Enterobacter spp. (12.1%), Pseudomonas spp. (11.7%), Enterococcus spp. (9.9%), Klebsiella spp. (8.6%), Candida spp. (7.6%), Acinetobacter spp. (7.6%), other Gram negative nonfermentative bacilli (5.8%), Serratia spp. (4.5%), Staphylococcus aureus (2.6%), Proteus mirabilis (2.2%), E. coli (1.8%) and Citrobacter spp. (0.9%). Meropenem (84.5%) and vancomycin (100%) remain the most effective antimicrobial agents against Gram negative and Gram positive bacteria, respectively. Conclusion: Gram negative bacilli and CNS are the commonest microorganisms colonizing CVC from ICU patients. The increasing resistance of the bacteria to antimicrobial agents is the major problem in spite of restricted policy of using antimicrobial agents in ICU.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document