scholarly journals EFEKTIFITAS PENGAWASAN HAKIM OLEH KOMISI YUDISIAL

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-17
Author(s):  
Oddie Moch Ikhsan ◽  
Habib Muhsin Syafingi ◽  
Dyah Adriantini Sintha Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
District Court ◽  
Police Chief ◽  
Trial Judge ◽  
Effective Implementation ◽  
Court Judge ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
National Police

Starting from the establishment of a suspect Candidate Former National Police Chief Pol Commissioner General Budi Gunawan then apply prapradilan to the South Jakarta District Court. Because the 77 Criminal Code stated determination of the suspect is not an object pretrial. In those articles which can be handled by pretrial regulated limitative, only for legitimate or not the arrest, detention, discontinuation or termination of the investigation and prosecution of compensation or rehabilitation for a criminal case was stopped at the level of investigation or prosecution. After a single judge South Jakarta District Court partially granted the petition Sarpin Rizaldi prapreadilan BG. In his judgment, Sarpin interprets the determination of the suspect as one of the pre-trial. Judge Sarpin Ats such action under the spotlight of the Judicial Commission for the above decision. The Judicial Commission then recommended to the Supreme Court Judge Sarpin to sanctions, but the Supreme Court rejected the recommendation because they have entered the realm of the judge's decision. The formulation of the problem in this study is How Model Judicial Oversight Committee, Oversight Problems To Know judge by the Judicial Commission, the Judicial Commission How the Implementation Monitoring and Oversight How effective implementation of the functions of the Judicial Commission in supervising judges and its influence on the judicial power. The method used in this research is using normative juridical approach, the specification of the research is descriptive analytical.Based on the findings of the Judicial Commission has the concept of preventive surveillance by the repressive, namely to prevent and then are giving emphasis and contain sanctions. The Judicial Commission has the authority to give the sanction of ethics recommendations to the Supreme Court but the repressive ie without the MA recommendations, the recommendations of the Judicial Commission to be worth sia. Cooperation and there is no obvious surgical realm between the Supreme Court and the Judicial Commission.

PENALTIES PROVIDED FOR SERIOUS CRIMES IN THE CRIMINAL CODE OF UKRAINE

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oleksandra Skok ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Special Part ◽  
The Right ◽  
National Police

The statistics of the Prosecutor General's Office on registered criminal offenses in the form of serious crimes for 2020 and 2021 were reviewed. Based on this, the number of serious crimes registered by the National Police of Ukraine during the reporting periods was determined. The provisions of the current Criminal Code of Ukraine, the Criminal-Executive Code of Ukraine, the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court No 7 of October 24, 2003 are analyzed, as well as some scientific positions of domestic scientists Knyzhenko O. O are taken into account. and Berezhnyuk V. M In addition, a review of the case law of the Supreme Court of Cassation on sentencing was studied. A thorough criminal-legal analysis of the sanctions of the articles of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine in the part of punishments established for the category of serious crimes was carried out. Based on the analysis, it was determined which main and additional punishments are regulated in the sanctions of the articles of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine for the investigated category of crimes. The quantitative and qualitative indicator of sanctions for serious crimes has been determined, which include: imprisonment for a definite term; punishments alternative to imprisonment; additional penalties. Legislative and doctrinal provisions on punishments in the form of imprisonment for a definite term, restriction of liberty, fine, correctional labor, arrest are considered. The judicial practice of Ukraine in the part of certain issues related to the execution of a penalty in the form of a fine and the replacement of a penalty in the form of a fine with a penalty in the form of correctional labor is analyzed. It is established that the Criminal Code of Ukraine, in the sanctions of the articles, provides for the application to a person who has committed a serious crime, punishment in the form of imprisonment, restriction of liberty, fine, correctional labor, arrest - as the main punishment. The range of additional punishments is defined, which determine: confiscation of property, deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities and a fine.

PENEGAKAN HUKUM OLEH HAKIM AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA DALAM MENANGANI KASASI PERKARA KARTEL PUTUSAN KPPU YANG MENGGUNAKAN ALAT BUKTI TIDAK LANGSUNG (INDIRECT EVIDENCE)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-101
Author(s):  
Fransiska Lestari Simanjuntak
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Indirect Evidence ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Problem ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Is Research ◽  
Court Judge ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Valid Evidence ◽  
The Republic

Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) is an institution authorized to handle unfair business competition violation. In fact, in several KPPU decisions it was revealed that KPPU prioritizes indirect evidence in handling cartel cases in Indonesia. KPPU's decision is not final and binding. Business actors who do not accept the decision of KPPU may file an objection at the District Court. The parties who do not accept the decision of the district court, may file an appeal in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. The type of research is used in this research is normative legal research, that is research done by reviewing the rules of law applicable or applied to a certain legal problem. The result of the research shows that in the Supreme Court appeal, KPPU's decision was upheld and canceled by Supreme Court to KPPU's decision uses indirect evidence in handling cartel case. The basis of consideration of the Supreme Court Justices ruling the KPPU's decision in the case of the tire cartel and the cement cartel is the Chief Justice accepting and acknowledging the indirect evidence as valid evidence, since the evidence is sufficient and logical evidence, and there is no evidence the more powerful that can weaken the indirect evidence. While the consideration of the Supreme Court Judge overturning the KPPU's decision in the case of cartel fuel surcharger is not accepting and acknowledging indirect evidence as valid evidence, because the evidence is insufficient and illogical, and there is stronger evidence that can weaken the tool indirect evidence

scholarly journals O przedmiocie ochrony prawnej przestępstwa paserstwa umyślnego

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 39-72
Author(s):  
Marta Zwierz
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Offence ◽  
Legal Tradition ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Legal Arguments

This paper addresses the problem of classifying the criminal offence of handling stolen goods under the Polish Criminal Code of 1997. Referring to two separate and contradictory views about the crime, the study looks at both of them and attempts to define the subject of legal protection of that criminal offence in the Polish legal system. To this end, the paper also discusses a judgment of 26 June 2014 of the Polish Supreme Court (I KZP 8/14), in which the Supreme Court could not conclusively resolve the issue, creating even more doubts. The author questions the position of the Polish Supreme Court, arguing that it is not supported by either logical or legal arguments which would stem from the long-standing legal tradition. The author further argues that all problems arising from the determination of the good legally protected by the criminal offence as defined in Article 291(1) of the Polish Criminal Code result from the erroneous classification of criminal offences by the Polish lawmaker.

scholarly journals Deposit of Compensation in Land Acquisition for the Construction of the Padang-Pekanbaru Toll Road in Public Interest

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 285
Author(s):  
Debby Khristina ◽  
Kurnia Warman ◽  
Hengki Andora
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
District Court ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Toll Road ◽  
The Supreme Court

Deposit of compensation at the Court which is carried out in land acquisition for the public interest is one of the solutions to accelerate the development process. The disagreement of the parties regarding compensation has made the agency managing the project use a consignment mechanism to solve this compensation problem. Therefore, this research is focused on 3 (three) main problems. First, what is the process of assessing and determining compensation for land acquisition for the construction of the Padang-Pekanbaru toll road on Jalan Padang-Sicincin? Second, what is the process of filing an objection to the determination of the form and / or amount of compensation at the Pariaman District Court? Third, how is the implementation of deposit for compensation in land acquisition for the construction of the Padang-Pekanbaru toll road on the Padang-Sicincin road? This type of research is empirical juridical legal research and to answer the above problems, this study uses primary data and secondary data. Primary data is obtained through field research, while secondary data is obtained from tracing laws and regulations and decisions of Constitutional Court judges. The data analysis was conducted in a descriptive qualitative manner. The results showed that the process of appraising and determining compensation for land acquisition was carried out starting from the process of appointing the appraisal team, the assessment of compensation by the appraisal team, deliberation, and the process of determining the compensation. The appointment of an appraisal team is determined by the Chief Executive of Land Acquisition using the direct procurement method. The appraiser makes an appraisal using the Fair Replacement Value and refers to the SPI 306 Technical Guidelines. The results of the appraisal are used as the basis for deliberations to determine compensation. The fact is that the deliberations are carried out as it should be, but the price set by the Appraiser (Appraisal) is as if only a final price that must be agreed upon by the entitled Party, even though the price recommended by the Appraisal is a price that is the price for negotiating with the community land owner. The process for filing an objection to the determination of the form and / or amount of compensation at the Pariaman District Court is in accordance with the Supreme Court Regulation No.3 of 2016 and is a form of legal protection for land rights owners. The implementation of land’s deposit compensation at the Pariaman District Court is carried out in accordance with the Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2016 and in the Compensation of the Damages awaits a court process that has permanent legal force so that the money can be given to the party entitled to receive it

scholarly journals PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP PERBUATAN MENGHILANGKAN MAYAT YANG DILAKUKAN ANAK (STUDI TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 774K / PID.SUS / 2015)

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 636
Author(s):  
Heppi Florensia ◽  
Mety Rahmawati
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
District Court ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Supreme Court Ruling ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Court Of Appeal

Criminalization of the offender especially in the perpetrators of children under age is as a sanction that tells implied to someone who performs acts meet certain conditions. Often in prosecuting a criminal case the Public Prosecutor is wrong in deciding what articles should be imposed on the perpetrator. As one case of Supreme Court verdict No.774K/PID.SUS/2015 with 16-year-old defendant Dicky Pranata prosecuted by the Prosecutor with Article 340 of the Penal Code juncto Article 56 of the Criminal Code is a criminal act of premeditated murder, in which the elements of Article 340 of the Criminal Code are not fulfilled the defendant's self but the existence of other crimes Article 181 of the Criminal Code of disappearance committed by the defendant. The defendant was sentenced to 10 years in prison at the District Court, while the defendant was released from the sentence of the Court of Appeal and Cassation. The problem in this research is whether the act of the perpetrator fulfills the elements in Article 340 juncto Article 56 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code juncto Article 1 paragraph (3) SPPA Act and Article 181 of the Criminal Code? How to base criminal offenses in the Supreme Court ruling case No.774K/PID.SUS/2015? The researcher examines the problem with normative juridical method. Based on the analysis result that the defendant is not proven to commit element of crime Article 340 KUHP, but the existence of criminal act Article 181 of Criminal Code which has been done by defendant.

scholarly journals Glosa do postanowienia SN z 30 maja 2017 roku, IV KK 164/17

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 ◽  
pp. 135-144
Author(s):  
Adam Wróbel
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Temporal Proximity ◽  
Imminent Danger ◽  
Sufficient Cause ◽  
Time Element ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Given ◽  
Further Development

COMMENTARY ON THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF 30 MAY 2017, IV KK 164/17The author indicates that it is possible — in a certain state of things — to approve the claim of Article 160 § 1 of the Criminal Code that the immediacy of danger should be associated not so much with the temporal proximity of the effect that may occur in relation to the development of the situation, as with the condition when the inevitable consequence of the further development of the situation without the need for any new dynamizing factors constitutes a risk to one’s life or health.Nevertheless, the author cites and shares the view expressed in the doctrine that four views of criteria of directness can be distinguished in the perspective of imminent danger, based on a time element, an element of probability, an element of sufficient cause, an element of inevitability; sometimes some of the given elements are combined or used alternatively in the determination of immediacy A. Spotowski, Funkcja niebezpieczeństwa w prawie karnym, Warszawa 1990, p. 82. Each separate situation requires — in the perspective of examining whether there exists an “immediate danger” — reference to specific, existing circumstances. The author considers it right that in order to attribute the responsibility to the perpetrator for unintentional crime it is not enough to say that he had been careless. It is necessary to demonstrate that he was aware that his behavior can lead to the prohibited act provided such a possibility, or, did not provide for such possibility, although it could have been provided. The author rejects the view that the crime specified in Article 160 § 1 of the Criminal Code can be committed only by action because in the perspective of this deed — which he proves in the commentary — two forms may exist: action or omission.

TINJAUAN YURIDIS MENGENAI TINDAK PIDANA YANG DITUNTUT DENGAN PASAL 351 (3) KUHP STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN MA NO. 1043 K/PID/2016

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-62
Author(s):  
Rahmat Saputra
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Supreme Court

The purpose of this study was to provide an overview of the actions of the defendant already fulfilling the elements of Article 351 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code in the Supreme Court Decision No. 1043 K / PID / 2016 and to illustrate the basic consideration of the judge in imposing a verdict on a criminal offense charged with Article 351 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code in the Supreme Court decision No. 1043 K / PID / 2016. The method used in this study is normative law research. Data collection methods in this study were carried out with literature study, which is a method of collecting data by searching and reviewing library materials (literature, research results, scientific magazines, scientific bulletins, scientific journals). Data collection techniques using qualitative analysis methods. The conclusion in this study is the application of material criminal law by the Panel of Judges of the Supreme Court in the case of Number 1043 K / PID / 2016 which corrected the decision of the Banjarmasin High Court Number 59 / PID / 2016 / PT.BJM, dated 13 July 2016 which strengthened the Kotabaru District Court Decision Number 64 / Pid.B/2016/PN. Ktb, dated April 27, 2016 stating that the defendant Nanang Ramli bin (late) Syamsudin was proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing a criminal act of maltreatment which resulted in the death of the victim Jumadi alias jumai bin yahya ( alm) as stipulated in Article 351 paragraph (3) the Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as the Criminal Code) is correct, it is in accordance with the Public Prosecutor's Subsidies indictment, and has been based on the facts of the trial, the evidence presented The Public Prosecutor is in the form of witness statements, evidence, post mortem, and statements of the defendant. The Panel of Judges of the Kotabaru District Court in its consideration there are still some shortcomings, especially in its subjective considerations, namely on consideration of things that are burdensome and matters that alleviate the defendant. The consideration used by the judge in this case only focuses on the perpetrators of the crime. Whereas Article 5 paragraph (1) of Law Number 48 Year concerning Judicial Power requires judges to explore, follow, and understand the legal values ​​and sense of justice that lives in society. This means that the judge must also consider the loss of the crime victim, and the community

scholarly journals Kajian Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Agung dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pada Perusahaan Leasing Dengan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Agustine Azizah
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Court Judge ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Finance Company

The purpose of this study for reviewed the dispute resolution between the finance company and the consumer decided by BPSK in the case of Supreme Court Decision Number 210 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2015 and examine the consideration of the Supreme Court Judge stating that BPSK is not authorized to decide case in between consumer financing companies.This research is normative descriptive who use secondary data and collecting data use literature study. Data analysis use interactive model.The result of the research indicates that the Supreme Court Decision Number 210 K/Pdt.Sus- BPSK/2015 in the case of special dispute on consumer dispute between First Indo American Leasing Branch Bandung ("First Indo Finance") with BPSK Bandung and Neva Rahmansyah, SE stated that The Supreme Court rejected the appeal from the First Appeal Applicant of PT First Indo American Leasing Bandung ("First Indo Finance") and amended the decision of Bandung District Court Number 461/Pdt.G/2014/PN Bdg. dated December 24, 2014 so that it is clear that the Supreme Court accepted the exception of the petitioners and stated that BPSK is not authorized to examine and adjudicate the case and to punish the Cassation Applicant Applicant to pay the court fee in the appeal level stipulated at Rp 500,000 (five hundred thousand rupiahs). Consideration of the Supreme Court Judge stating that BPSK is not authorized to  decide the case in the case between the finance company and the consumer because the legal relationship between the Plaintiff and the Defendant constitutes a joint financing agreement with the fiduciary transfer of property, which implements civil law relationships and does not include consumer disputes as provided in the Act Number 8 Year 1999 on Consumer Protection so that the dispute arising from the implementation of the consumer financing agreement is a dispute agreement which is the authority of the District Court.  

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP MEREK TERKENAL ASING DI INDONESIA (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN MAHKAMA AGUNG NOMOR: 165/Pdt.Sus-Hki/2016 DAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMA AGUNG NOMOR: 557K/Pdt.sus-HKI/2015)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1026
Author(s):  
Ronald Kurniawan ◽  
Simona Bustani
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Main Issue ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Case Number

The first dispute with Case Number MA Decree 557 K / Pdt.Sus-HKI / 2015 that occurred between the designer clothing (designer) from France, Pierre Cardin owner of the Brand Business Pierre Cardin as the claimant, whose brand is a popular brand and has been used since the beginning In March 1974, in this matter the prosecutor against the defendant Alexander Satryo Wibowo, was a local businessman who owned the Trademark Pierre Cardin, who had registered his trademark since July 29, 1977 in Indonesia, where there were similarities in essence or overall in the use of the trademark between the claimant and defendant. Therefore Pierre Cardin, hereby as the prosecutor, demanded the cancellation of the registered mark Card Pierre Cardin used by the defendant, against this demand the Commercial Court at the Central Jakarta District Court has determined the determination of Ms. 15 / Pdt.Sus-Trademark / 2015 / PN.Niaga.Jkt .Pst., Dated June 9, 2015 which in the main issue rejected the claim of the prosecutor for the whole. Furthermore, the Plaintiff requested the appeal of the appeal to the Supreme Court. Legal remedies requested by the claimant in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 6 point (3) letter b of Law Number 15 of 2001 concerning Trademarks. In carrying out the appeal appeal law, the Supreme Court has decided on decision number 557 K / Pdt.Sus-HKI / 2015 which in its stipulation stipulates rejecting an appeal request from the appealer Pierre Cardin.

scholarly journals KAJIAN HUKUM KEWENANGAN PENYELIDIKAN ANTARA KEPOLISIAN, KPK DALAM PEMBERANTASAN PIDANA KORUPSI DARI KELEMBAGAAN NEGARA

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumiaty Adelina Hutabarat
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right ◽  
National Police ◽  
The Relationship

<p>There are two law enforcement agencies combating corruption, namely the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and the Police, having the same authority, but in implementing authority there are differences, for example in the application of laws that govern the two institutions.The problem that becomes the study of this research is how the problem of the existence of the KPK as an institution to eradicate corruption has the authority regulated in RI Law No. 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission, whose authority lies with the Police regulated in RI Law No. 2 of 2002 concerning the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia which refers to the Criminal Code The results of the study showed that the resolution of the dispute between the Police and the Corruption Eradication Commission in the investigation of corruption was carried out by coordinating the Corruption Eradication Commission and the Police in Corruption Criminal Investigations. Law number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission regulates the relationship between the performance of the KPK and the Police regarding investigations, investigations and prosecutions.Settlement of authority disputes between the Police and the KPK should be the authority of the Supreme Court, due to judicial review under the Supreme Court Law. The right to test the law is the application of a balanced and balanced government. The Corruption Eradication Commission was formed by the Law 30/2002 whereas the Indonesian Police was formed by the 1945 Constitution, article 30 paragraph 4.</p><p><strong>Keywords : <em>Authority, investigation, KPK</em></strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document