scholarly journals Relationship between Knee Osteoarthritis and Spinopelvic Sagittal Alignment in Volunteers over 50 Years of Age

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 495-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Yasuda ◽  
Daisuke Togawa ◽  
Tomohiko Hasegawa ◽  
Yu Yamato ◽  
Sho Kobayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Research Society ◽  
The Other ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Significant Group ◽  
Scoliosis Research Society ◽  
The Relationship

Study Design: Large cohort study of volunteers.Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the severity of knee osteoarthritis, assessed using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading scale, and spinopelvic sagittal alignment in older adult volunteers.Overview of Literature: The relationship between spinopelvic alignment in the sagittal plane and knee osteoarthritis in the coronal plane is unclear.Methods: Volunteers over 50 years of age underwent radiographic analysis. Radiographic parameters including pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis, and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were measured. The the three Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab sagittal modifiers (PT, SVA, PI–LL) were categorized and the KL grade was assessed. Differences in spinopelvic parameters and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores among KL grades were evaluated.Results: A total of 396 volunteers (160 men, 236 women; mean age, 74.4 years) were analyzed. PI–LL and PT in KL4 were significantly higher compared to that in the other KL grades. However, there were no significant group differences in SVA. In women, but not in men, higher frequencies of the worst modifier grade (++) were observed for PI–LL and PT in the KL3 and KL4 groups compared to those for the other KL grades. In women, the ODI score in KL4 was worse compared to that in the other KL grades.Conclusions: Individuals over 50 years of age with severe knee osteoarthritis had poor lumbo-pelvic sagittal alignment. Moreover, the progression severity of knee osteoarthritis had more impact onstronger relationship with lumbo-pelvic malalignment and disability-related low back pain in women than in men.

scholarly journals Sagittal alignment based on inflection point and its differences according to age groups

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 230949902090461
Author(s):  
Moon Soo Park ◽  
Seong-Hwan Moon ◽  
Tae-Hwan Kim ◽  
Jae Keun Oh ◽  
Seung Jin Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Sacral Slope ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Inflection Points ◽  
Lumbar Segment ◽  
Cervical Segment

Purpose: We have always used the standard anatomical landmark vertebrae to measure the sagittal alignment. Instead, scoliosis has been evaluated by the end vertebrae in the coronal plane. There have been clinical studies to investigate sagittal alignment on the end vertebrae of inflection points (IPs). The purpose is to determine sagittal alignment based on IPs and to elucidate the changes while considering age groups. Methods: We identified the most titled vertebrae in the sagittal plane to define the end vertebrae of S1, thoracolumbar and cervicothoracic IPs and to measure the Cobb angles of sacral slope, functional lumbar, thoracic, cervical segment between them, and the McGregor’s line, and the IP distances from the C2 plumb line to the point bisecting the upper end plate of the IPs, in addition to S1. Results: The most common thoracolumbar and cervicothoracic IPs were L2 and T1, respectively. However, the next most common cervicothoracic IP changed from T2 in the youngest to C7 in the oldest age group. The sagittal angles decreased at the sacral slope and functional lumbar segment but not the functional thoracic segment and functional cervical segment. Similarly, the distance increased at the C2 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) distance to S1 and thoracolumbar IP distance but not at the cervicothoracic IP distance. There was no difference in the pelvic incidence among age groups. Conclusion: The sagittal Cobb angles based on the IPs decreased at the sacral slope and functional lumbar segment in the older adults. Consequently, the C2 SVA distance to S1 and thoracolumbar IP distance increased.

scholarly journals Cervical sagittal alignment in patients with dropped head syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 230949902199011
Author(s):  
Weiqing Qian ◽  
Kenji Endo ◽  
Takato Aihara ◽  
Yasunobu Sawaji ◽  
Hidekazu Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spondylosis ◽  
Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Spinal Alignment ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Dropped Head Syndrome ◽  
Sagittal Spinal Alignment ◽  
Cervical Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Lumbar Alignment ◽  
The Relationship

Background: Dropped head syndrome (DHS) can be divided into two types, the positive sagittal vertical axis (SVA) type and the negative SVA type. However, the cervical sagittal alignment of DHS including global sagittal spinal alignment and the typical cervical alignment of the types of DHS is still unclear. The purpose of this study was to clarify the character of cervical sagittal alignment of DHS and analyze the relationship between cervical sagittal alignment and global sagittal spinal alignment. Methods: The subjects were 35 DHS patients (10 men, 25 women, mean 71.1 years old). They were divided into two groups: negative DHS (N-DHS group, SVA < 0 mm) and positive DHS group (P-DHS group, SVA ≥ 0 mm). As control, 28 age-matched cervical spondylosis patients (CS, 21 men, 7 women, mean 67.4 years old) were analyzed. The following parameters were measured on lateral global-spine standing radiographs: cervical SVA (C2-C7SVA), O-C2A (O-C2 angle), C2 slope (C2S), C2-7A (C2-7 angle), T1 slope (T1S) and C7SVA. Results: The results of measurements of each of the averaged sagittal alignment parameters were (CS, P-DHS, N-DHS): C2-7SVA(26.2 mm, 47.3 mm, 44.5 mm), O-C2 angle (35.0°, 37.1°, 39.3°), C2S (16.5°, 31.4°, 33.8°), C2-7A (9.3°, 9.9°, −16.6°), T1S (22.9°, 39.7°, 25.7°), C7SVA (35.3 mm, 51.0 mm, −43.1 mm). C2-C7SVA and C2S were significantly larger in both types of DHS compared to CS. Comparing P-DHS with N-DHS, C2-C7A and T1S were significantly smaller in N-DHS. Conclusions: O-C2A did not differ significantly among CS, P-DHS and N-DHS. In DHS patients, C2-7SVA and C2S were significantly larger than those of CS regardless of the type of DHS. The typical cervical sagittal alignment of DHS was different between P-DHS and N-DHS. In P-DHS, C2-7A and T1S were larger than those in N-DHS and the imbalance of thoraco-lumbar alignment should be noted.

scholarly journals Are the sagittal cervical radiographic modifiers of the Ames-ISSG classification specific to adult cervical deformity?

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 483-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziad Bakouny ◽  
Nour Khalil ◽  
Joeffroy Otayek ◽  
Aren Joe Bizdikian ◽  
Fares Yared ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Research Society ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Global Alignment ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Scoliosis Research Society ◽  
Cervical Deformity ◽  
Asymptomatic Subjects

OBJECTIVEThe Ames–International Spine Study Group (ISSG) classification has recently been proposed as a tool for adult cervical deformity evaluation. This classification includes three radiographic cervical sagittal modifiers that have not been evaluated in asymptomatic adults. The aim of this study was to determine whether the sagittal radiographic modifiers described in the Ames-ISSG cervical classification are encountered in asymptomatic adults without alteration of health-related quality of life (HRQOL).METHODSThe authors conducted a cross-sectional study of subjects with an age ≥ 18 years and no cervical or back-related complaints or history of orthopedic surgery. All subjects underwent full-body biplanar radiographs with the measurement of cervical, segmental, and global alignment and completed the SF-36 HRQOL questionnaire. Subjects were classified according to the sagittal radiographic modifiers (chin-brow vertical angle [CBVA], mismatch between T1 slope and cervical lordosis [TS-CL], and C2–7 sagittal vertical axis [cSVA]) of the Ames–ISSG classification for cervical deformity, which also includes a qualitative descriptor of cervical deformity, the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) myelopathy score, and the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)–Schwab classification for spinal deformity assessment. Characteristics of the subjects classified by the different modifier grades were compared.RESULTSOne hundred forty-one asymptomatic subjects (ages 18–59 years, 71 females) were enrolled in the study. Twenty-seven (19.1%) and 61 (43.3%) subjects were classified as grade 1 in terms of the TS-CL and CBVA modifiers, respectively. Ninety-eight (69.5%) and 4 (2.8%) were grade 2 for these same respective modifiers. One hundred thirty-six (96.5%) subjects had at least one modifier at grade 1 or 2. There was a significant relationship between patient age and grades of TS-CL (p < 0.001, Cramer’s V [CV] = 0.32) and CBVA (p = 0.04, CV = 0.22) modifiers. The HRQOL, global alignment, and segmental alignment parameters were similar among the subjects with different modifier grades (p > 0.05).CONCLUSIONSThe CBVA and TS-CL radiographic modifiers of the Ames-ISSG classification do not seem to be specific to subjects with cervical deformities and can occur in asymptomatic subjects without alteration in HRQOL.

Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab Grade 6 Osteotomy for Severe Congenital Angular Kyphoscoliosis: An Analysis of 17 Cases With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Neurosurgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 87 (5) ◽  
pp. 925-930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Shi ◽  
Benlong Shi ◽  
Dun Liu ◽  
Yang Li ◽  
Sanqiang Xia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Research Society ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Vertebral Column Resection ◽  
Scoliosis Research Society ◽  
Rod Breakage ◽  
The Mean

Abstract BACKGROUND For some patients with severe congenital angular kyphoscoliosis (SCAK), 1-level vertebral column resection is insufficient and the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab Grade 6 osteotomy may be necessary. However, the indications and clinical outcomes of SRS-Schwab Grade 6 osteotomy in patients with SCAK have not been investigated in depth. OBJECTIVE To investigate the middle-term radiographic and clinical outcomes, and to evaluate the safety of this high technique-demanding procedure. METHODS Patients with SCAK undergoing SRS-Schwab Grade 6 osteotomy from 2005 to 2016 followed up at least 2 yr were retrospectively reviewed. The potential indications of SRS-Schwab Grade 6 osteotomy were analyzed. The coronal Cobb angle, segmental kyphosis (SK), deformity angular ratio (DAR), coronal balance, and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were measured in the preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up. The intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. RESULTS A total of 17 patients with SCAK (10 M and 7F) were included, and the mean follow-up was 30.8 ± 16.4 mo. The indications of SRS-Schwab Grade 6 osteotomy were as follows: multiple “pushed-out” hemivertebrae (13, 76.5%) and multilevel anterior block (4, 23.5%). Compared with preoperation, the coronal Cobb angle, SK and SVA at postoperation were significantly improved (P &lt; .05 for all). The mean total DAR was 33.4 ± 9.9 at preoperation. Three patients were found to have postoperative neurological deficit. Rod breakage occurred in 3 patients at 15- to 48-mo follow-up, and revision surgeries were performed. At the last follow-up, firm bony fusion was observed in all patients. CONCLUSION The technique-demanding SRS-Schwab Grade 6 osteotomy, if well indicated, could provide satisfying correction of the SCAK deformity.

Uncertainty in the Relationship Between Sagittal Alignment and Patient-Reported Outcomes

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter D Angevine ◽  
David Bray ◽  
Michael Cloney ◽  
Hani Malone
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Senior Author ◽  
High Density ◽  
Individual Values ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Heterogeneous Effects ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract BACKGROUND Previous studies have reported correlations and precise quantitative relationships between sagittal alignment and health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) scores. These studies have not reported the extent of uncertainty in these relationships. OBJECTIVE To explore the uncertainty in the overall relationships between sagittal alignment and HRQOL and in the predictions of individual patient pain and disability. METHODS A retrospective analysis of all new adult patients with long-cassette radiographs and complete outcomes questionnaires presenting to the senior author from 2012 to 2014 was performed. Univariable maximum a posteriori linear regression analyses using Bayesian methods were performed. High-density probability intervals for mean regression relationships and for individual values were calculated using minimally informative prior distributions. RESULTS A total of 134 patients satisfied inclusion criteria and were included. For Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) vs pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (LL), the 90% high-density probability interval ranged from –0.04 to 0.23, indicating that both the magnitude and direction of the relationship were uncertain. For both ODI vs sagittal vertical axis and ODI vs LL, there was uncertainty in the magnitude of the slope. Wide regions of uncertainty were also seen for predicting individual patient scores. CONCLUSION We report the previously unpublished degree of uncertainty in the mean quantitative relationships between radiographic sagittal alignment and patient-reported outcomes and in individual patient outcomes scores. Based on these results, establishing treatment thresholds or predicting an individual's outcome is unreliable. Further research efforts should be focused on developing multilevel hierarchical models incorporating parameter uncertainty and heterogeneous effects.

Factors influencing patient satisfaction after adult scoliosis and spinal deformity surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 408-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazunori Hayashi ◽  
Louis Boissière ◽  
Fernando Guevara-Villazón ◽  
Daniel Larrieu ◽  
Susana Núñez-Pereira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
The Other ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Scoliosis Research Society ◽  
Self Image ◽  
Radiographic Parameters

OBJECTIVEAchieving high patient satisfaction with management is often one of the goals after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. However, literature on associated factors and their correlations with patient satisfaction is limited. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical and radiographic factors independently correlated with patient satisfaction in terms of management at 2 years after surgery.METHODSA multicenter prospective database of ASD surgery was retrospectively reviewed. The demographics, complications, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) subdomains, and radiographic parameters were examined to determine their correlation coefficients with the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire (SRS-22R) satisfaction scores at 2 years (Sat-2y score). Subsequently, factors determined to be independently associated with low satisfaction (Sat-2y score ≤ 4.0) were used to construct 2 types of multivariate models: one with 2-year data and the other with improvement (score at 2 years − score at baseline) data.RESULTSA total of 422 patients who underwent ASD surgery (mean age 53.1 years) were enrolled. All HRQOL subdomains and several coronal and sagittal radiographic parameters had significantly improved 2 years after surgery. The Sat-2y score was strongly correlated with the SRS-22R self-image (SI)/appearance subdomain (r = 0.64), followed by moderate correlation with subdomains related to standing (r = 0.53), body pain (r = 0.49–0.55), and function (r = 0.41–0.55) at 2 years. Conversely, the correlation between radiographic or demographic parameters with Sat-2y score was weak (r < 0.4). Multivariate analysis to eliminate confounding factors revealed that a worse Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score for standing (≥ 2 points; OR 4.48) and pain intensity (≥ 2 points; OR 2.07), SRS-22R SI/appearance subdomain (< 3 points; OR 2.70) at 2 years, and a greater sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (> 5 cm; OR 2.68) at 2 years were independent related factors for low satisfaction. According to the other model, a lower improvement in ODI for standing (< 30%; OR 2.68), SRS-22R pain (< 50%; OR 3.25) and SI/appearance (< 50%; OR 2.18) subdomains, and an inadequate restoration of the SVA from baseline (< 2 cm; OR 3.16) were associated with low satisfaction.CONCLUSIONSSelf-image, pain, standing difficulty, and sagittal alignment restoration may be useful goals in improving patient satisfaction with management at 2 years after ASD surgery. Surgeons and other medical providers have to take care of these factors to prevent low satisfaction.

scholarly journals The Influence of Natural Head Position on the Cervical Sagittal Alignment

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Kuan Wang ◽  
Zhen Deng ◽  
Zhengyan Li ◽  
Huihao Wang ◽  
Hongsheng Zhan
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Head Position ◽  
Biomechanical Analysis ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Cervical Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Backward Shift ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Curvature Type

Introduction. This study investigated the relationship between the parameters related to the natural head position and cervical segmental angles and alignment of patients with neck pain. Material and Methods. The lateral radiographs of the cervical spine were collected from 103 patients and were used to retrospectively analyze the correlation between the natural head position, cervical local sagittal angles, and alignment. Sagittal measurements were as follows: cervical curvature classification, slope of McGregor’s line (McGS), local sagittal angles (C0–C2 angle, C2–C5 angle, C5–C7 angle, and C2–C7 angle), T1 slope, center of gravity of the head to sagittal vertical axis (CG–C7 SVA), and local sagittal alignment (C0–C2 SVA and C2–C7 SVA). Results. McGS was significantly correlated to C0–C2 angle (r=0.57), C0–C2 SVA (r=−0.53), C2–C7 SVA (r=−0.28), and CG–C7 SVA (r=−0.47). CG–C7 SVA was also significantly correlated to curvature type (r=0.27), C5–C7 angle (r=−0.37), and C2–C7 angle (r=−0.39). Conclusions. A backward shift with an extended head position may accompany a relatively normal curvature of the cervical spine. The effect of posture control in relieving abnormal mechanical state of the cervical spine needs to be further confirmed by biomechanical analysis.

Surgical treatment of pathological loss of lumbar lordosis (flatback) in patients with normal sagittal vertical axis achieves similar clinical improvement as surgical treatment of elevated sagittal vertical axis

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin S. Smith ◽  
Manish Singh ◽  
Eric Klineberg ◽  
Christopher I. Shaffrey ◽  
Virginie Lafage ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Spinal Deformity ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Research Society ◽  
Physical Component Score ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Short Form 36 ◽  
Scoliosis Research Society

Object Increased sagittal vertical axis (SVA) correlates strongly with pain and disability for adults with spinal deformity. A subset of patients with sagittal spinopelvic malalignment (SSM) have flatback deformity (pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis [PI-LL] mismatch > 10°) but remain sagittally compensated with normal SVA. Few data exist for SSM patients with flatback deformity and normal SVA. The authors' objective was to compare baseline disability and treatment outcomes for patients with compensated (SVA < 5 cm and PI-LL mismatch > 10°) and decompensated (SVA > 5 cm) SSM. Methods The study was a multicenter, prospective analysis of adults with spinal deformity who consecutively underwent surgical treatment for SSM. Inclusion criteria included age older than 18 years, presence of adult spinal deformity with SSM, plan for surgical treatment, and minimum 1-year follow-up data. Patients with SSM were divided into 2 groups: those with compensated SSM (SVA < 5 cm and PI-LL mismatch > 10°) and those with decompensated SSM (SVA ≥ 5 cm). Baseline and 1-year follow-up radiographic and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes included Oswestry Disability Index, Short Form–36 scores, and Scoliosis Research Society–22 scores. Percentages of patients achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) were also assessed. Results A total of 125 patients (27 compensated and 98 decompensated) met inclusion criteria. Compared with patients in the compensated group, patients in the decompensated group were older (62.9 vs 55.1 years; p = 0.004) and had less scoliosis (43° vs 54°; p = 0.002), greater SVA (12.0 cm vs 1.7 cm; p < 0.001), greater PI-LL mismatch (26° vs 20°; p = 0.013), and poorer HRQOL scores (Oswestry Disability Index, Short Form-36 physical component score, Scoliosis Research Society-22 total; p ≤ 0.016). Although these baseline HRQOL differences between the groups reached statistical significance, only the mean difference in Short Form–36 physical component score reached threshold for MCID. Compared with baseline assessment, at 1 year after surgery improvement was noted for patients in both groups for mean SVA (compensated –1.1 cm, decompensated +4.8 cm; p ≤ 0.009), mean PI-LL mismatch (compensated 6°, decompensated 5°; p < 0.001), and all HRQOL measures assessed (p ≤ 0.005). No significant differences were found between the compensated and decompensated groups in the magnitude of HRQOL score improvement or in the percentages of patients achieving MCID for each of the outcome measures assessed. Conclusions Decompensated SSM patients with elevated SVA experience significant disability; however, the amount of disability in compensated SSM patients with flatback deformity caused by PI-LL mismatch but normal SVA is underappreciated. Surgical correction of SSM demonstrated similar radiographic and HRQOL score improvements for patients in both groups. Evaluation of SSM should extend beyond measuring SVA. Among patients with concordant pain and disability, PI-LL mismatch must be evaluated for SSM patients and can be considered a primary indication for surgery.

scholarly journals Sagittal profile modifications in hybrid versus all screw technique in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Scaramuzzo ◽  
Antonino Zagra ◽  
Giuseppe Barone ◽  
Stefano Muzzi ◽  
Leone Minoia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Thoracic Kyphosis ◽  
Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Sagittal Profile ◽  
Sacral Slope ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Lenke Classification

AbstractAim of the study was to evaluate sagittal parameters modifications, with particular interest in thoracic kyphosis, in patients affected by adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) comparing hybrid and all-screws technique. From June 2010 to September 2018, 145 patients were enrolled. Evaluation included: Lenke classification, Risser scale, coronal Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS). Patients were divided in two groups (1 all-screws and 2 hybrid); a further division, in both groups, was done considering preoperative TK values. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was conducted. 99 patients were in group 1, 46 in group 2 (mean follow-up 3.7 years). Patients with a normo-kyphotic profile developed a little variation in TK (Δ pre–post = 2.4° versus − 2.0° respectively). Hyper-kyphotic subgroups had a tendency of restoring a good sagittal alignment. Hypo-kyphotic subgroups, patients treated with all-screw implants developed a higher increase in TK mean Cobb angle (Δ pre–post = 10°) than the hybrid subgroup (Δ pre–post = 5.4°) (p = 0.01). All-screws group showed better results in restoring sagittal alignment in all subgroups compared to hybrid groups, especially in hypo-TK subgroup, with the important advantage to give better correction on coronal plane.

scholarly journals The Pelvic Incidence Stratified Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment in Asymptomatic Chinese Population With Different Age Groups

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822198964
Author(s):  
Siyu Zhou ◽  
Zhuoran Sun ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
Da Zou ◽  
Weishi Li
Keyword(s):  
Chinese Population ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Elderly Subjects ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Sagittal Parameters ◽  
Very High

Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Objective: To provide the age- and pelvic incidence-related variations of sagittal alignment in asymptomatic Chinese population. Methods: This study recruited asymptomatic adult subjects. All subjects undertook the standing whole spinal radiograph and the sagittal parameters were measured: sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), pelvic incidence (PI) and pelvic tilt (PT). All subjects were divided into young, middle aged and elderly groups, then each age group was further divided into 5 subgroups (very low, low, average, high and very high) based on PI values. The relations between PI, age and other parameters were evaluated. The differences in sagittal parameters of each PI subgroup were compared. Results: 546 subjects were included with an average age of 38.6 years (18 to 81). The number of subjects over 70 years and with very low PI was relatively small. The average of PI, TPA, PT and LL were 45.9° ± 8.4°, 6.4° ± 6.2°, 11.9° ± 6.6° and 49.2° ± 10.1°, respectively. SVA, TPA, TK and PT increased with age ( P < 0.05), while SVA, TPA, PT, PI-LL also increased with PI ( P < 0.05). LL, PT, TPA, PI-LL and LL-TK were different among the 5 PI subgroups ( P < 0.05). However, the values of LL in elderly subjects with high and very high PI were similar. Conclusion: The age- and PI-related variations in sagittal alignment of Chinese population were provided. The sagittal parameters were significantly influenced by age and PI. The individual pelvic morphology should be carefully considered during the assessment and restoration of sagittal balance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document