scholarly journals Impact of surgical methodology on the complication rate and functional outcome of patients with a single brain metastasis

2015 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 1132-1143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akash J. Patel ◽  
Dima Suki ◽  
Mustafa Aziz Hatiboglu ◽  
Vikas Y. Rao ◽  
Benjamin D. Fox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Brain Metastasis ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Neurological Complications ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Single Brain Metastasis ◽  
Piecemeal Resection

OBJECT Brain metastases are the most common intracranial neoplasms and are on the increase. As radiation side effects are increasingly better understood, more patients are being treated with surgery alone with varying outcomes. The authors previously reported that en bloc resection of a single brain metastasis was associated with decreased incidences of leptomeningeal disease and local recurrence compared with piecemeal resection. However, en bloc resection is often feared to cause an increased incidence of postoperative complications. This study aimed to answer this question. METHODS The authors reviewed data from patients with a previously untreated single brain metastasis, who were treated with resection at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (1993–2012). Data related to the patient, tumor, and methods of resection were obtained. Discharge Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores and 30-day postoperative complications were noted. Complications were considered major when they persisted for longer than 30 days, resulted in hospitalization or prolongation of hospital stay, required aggressive treatment, and/or were life threatening. RESULTS During the study period, 1033 eligible patients were identified. The median age was 58 years, 83% had a KPS score greater than 70, and 81% were symptomatic at surgery. Sixty-two percent of the patients underwent en bloc resection of their tumor, and 38% underwent piecemeal resection. There were significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of preoperative tumor volume, tumor functional grade, and symptoms at presentation, among others. The overall complication rates were 13% for patients undergoing en bloc resection and 19% for patients undergoing piecemeal resection (p = 0.007). The incidences of major complications and neurological complications were also significantly different. There was a trend in the same direction for major neurological complications, although it was not significant. Among patients undergoing piecemeal resection of tumors in eloquent cortex, 24% had complications (13% had major, 18% had neurological, 9% had major neurological, and 13% had select neurological complications; 4% died within 1 month of surgery). Among those undergoing en bloc resection of such tumors, 11% had complications (6% had major, 8% had neurological, 4% had major neurological, and 4% had select neurological; 2% died within 1 month of surgery). The differences in overall, major, neurological, and select neurological complications were statistically significant, but 1-month mortality and major neurological complications were not. In addition, within subcategories of tumor volume, the incidence of various complications was generally higher for patients undergoing piecemeal resection than for those undergoing en bloc resection. CONCLUSIONS The authors' results indicate that postoperative complication rates are not increased by en bloc resection, including for lesions in eloquent brain regions or for large tumors. This gives credence to the idea that en bloc resection of brain metastases, when feasible, is at least as safe as piecemeal resection.

scholarly journals Endoscopic resection outcomes and predictors of failed en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (11) ◽  
pp. E1820-E1826
Author(s):  
William W. King ◽  
Peter V. Draganov ◽  
Andrew Y. Wang ◽  
Dushant Uppal ◽  
Amir Rumman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Colorectal Polyps ◽  
Polyp Size ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Mucosal Resection ◽  
Piecemeal Resection

Abstract Background and study aims En bloc endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is preferred over piecemeal resection for polyps ≤ 20 mm. Data on colorectal EMR training are limited. We aimed to evaluate the en bloc EMR rate of polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees and to identify predictors of failed en bloc EMR. Methods This was a multicenter prospective study evaluating trainee performance in EMR during advanced endoscopy fellowship. A logistic regression model was used to identify the number of procedures and lesion cut-off size associated with an en bloc EMR rate of ≥ 80 %. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of failed en bloc EMR. Results Six trainees from six centers performed 189 colorectal EMRs, of which 104 (55 %) were for polyps ≤ 20 mm. Of these, 57.7 % (60/104) were resected en bloc. Trainees with ≥ 30 EMRs (OR 6.80; 95 % CI: 2.80–16.50; P = 0.00001) and lesions ≤ 17 mm (OR 4.56;95 CI:1.23–16.88; P = 0.02) were more likely to be associated with an en bloc EMR rate of ≥ 80 %. Independent predictors of failed en bloc EMR on multivariate analysis included: larger polyp size (OR:6.83;95 % CI:2.55–18.4; P = 0.0001), right colon location (OR:7.15; 95 % CI:1.31–38.9; P = 0.02), increased procedural difficulty (OR 2.99; 95 % CI:1.13–7.91; P = 0.03), and having performed < 30 EMRs (OR: 4.87; 95 %CI: 1.05–22.61; P = 0.04). Conclusions In this pilot study, we demonstrated that a relatively low proportion of trainees achieved en bloc EMR for polyps ≤ 20 mm and identified procedure volume and lesion size thresholds for successful en bloc EMR and independent predictors for failed en bloc resection. These preliminary results support the need for future efforts to define EMR procedure competence thresholds during training.

Comparative risk of leptomeningeal disease after resection or stereotactic radiosurgery for solid tumor metastasis to the posterior fossa

2008 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dima Suki ◽  
Hiba Abouassi ◽  
Akash J. Patel ◽  
Raymond Sawaya ◽  
Jeffrey S. Weinberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Posterior Fossa ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Leptomeningeal Disease ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Resection Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Piecemeal Resection

Object The authors tested the hypothesis that patients with metastatic posterior fossa lesions (MPFLs) treated with resection have a higher risk of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) than those with MPFLs treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Methods Between 1993 and 2004, 379 patients with MPFLs were treated with resection or SRS at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. The authors' primary study outcome was the incidence of LMD, as diagnosed with cerebrospinal fluid cytological analysis and/or neuroimaging. Results Resection was performed in 260 patients, whereas 119 patients underwent SRS. The median patient age was 56 years, 51% of patients were male, and 93% had a Karnofsky Performance Scale score $ 70. The most common primary cancers were those of the lung, breast, and kidney, as well as melanoma. Leptomeningeal dissemination of cancer occurred in 33 patients: 26 in the resection group and 7 in the SRS group (resection group: rate ratio [RR] 2.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89–4.75, p = 0.09). Piecemeal tumor resection (137 cases) was associated with a significantly higher risk of LMD than en bloc resection (123 cases; RR 3.4, 95% CI 1.43–8.12, p = 0.006) or SRS (RR 3.37, 95% CI 1.41–8.04, p = 0.006), and there was no significant difference in the risk for LMD between en bloc resection and SRS (en bloc resection: RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.34–2.81, p = 0.98). The multivariate RR and significance associated with piecemeal resection, however, were consistent, with a strong effect (RR 2.45, 95% CI 1.19–5.02, p = 0.02) and no indication of biases associated with tumor size, location, or cystic/necrotic appearance. Conclusions There is an increased risk of LMD after piecemeal resection of an MPFL. This increase, although clinically and statistically significant, is not as alarming as previously reported and is absent when en bloc removal is achieved. Further assessment of the role of resection in a controlled prospective setting is warranted.

Leiomyogenic tumor of the spine: surgical treatments and long-term outcomes of 12 consecutive patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-97
Author(s):  
Shaohui He ◽  
Yuduo Xu ◽  
Jialin Li ◽  
Yue Zhang ◽  
Haifeng Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Piecemeal Resection

OBJECTIVELeiomyogenic tumor of the spine is rare with limited published information. Here, the authors report the clinical features and long-term surgical outcomes and investigate the prognostic factors affecting disease-free survival (DFS).METHODSTwelve patients presented to the authors’ institution for surgical treatment from January 2005 to December 2018. The clinical characteristics and outcomes were retrospectively reviewed, and the DFS rate was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to identify the potential prognostic factors, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.RESULTSThe mean patient age was 49.7 ± 12.9 years (range 22–73 years). Four patients underwent marginal en bloc resection, and 8 patients underwent conventional piecemeal resection. Pathological diagnosis revealed leiomyosarcoma in 9 patients and leiomyoma in 3 patients. Three patients had tumor recurrence at a mean follow-up of 10.4 months (range 7.0–15.0 months), while 4 developed metastases at an average of 13.8 months (range 5.5–21.3 months) postoperatively. During the mean follow-up of 33.7 months (range 9.6–78.5 months), the estimated 1- and 5-year DFS rates were 66.7% and 38.2%, respectively. Albumin loss > 20 g/L after surgery, Ki-67 positivity > 10%, and piecemeal resection were correlated with worse DFS.CONCLUSIONSSurgical management of spinal leiomyogenic tumors is challenging due to the high rate of recurrence and metastases. En bloc resection should be performed in eligible patients. Albumin loss > 20 g/L and the Ki-67 index may be independent factors affecting prognosis.

COMPARATIVE RISK OF LEPTOMENINGEAL DISSEMINATION OF CANCER AFTER SURGERY OR STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY FOR A SINGLE SUPRATENTORIAL SOLID TUMOR METASTASIS

Neurosurgery ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 664-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dima Suki ◽  
Mustafa Aziz Hatiboglu ◽  
Akash J. Patel ◽  
Jeffrey S. Weinberg ◽  
Morris D. Groves ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastasis ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Leptomeningeal Disease ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
University Of Texas ◽  
The Difference

Abstract OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that differential risks of developing leptomeningeal disease (LMD) exist in patients having a single supratentorial brain metastasis resected via a piecemeal or en bloc approach or treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS Between 1993 and 2006, 827 patients with a supratentorial brain metastasis underwent resection or SRS at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. The primary outcome was the incidence of LMD. RESULTS Resection was performed piecemeal in 191 patients and en bloc in 351 patients; 285 patients received SRS. LMD occurred in 33 patients, 29 in the resection group and 4 in the SRS group. Risk of LMD was significantly higher with piecemeal tumor resection than with other procedures (SRS: hazard ratio [HR] for piecemeal, 5.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9–17.2; P = 0.002; en bloc, HR for piecemeal, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.3–5.6; P = 0.009). The difference between piecemeal and en bloc was particularly pronounced in patients with a melanoma primary (HR, 8.4; 95% CI, 1.8–39.2; P = 0.007). The risk of LMD was not significantly different between en bloc resection and SRS (HR for en bloc, 2.1; 95% CI, 0.7–6.4; P = 0.21). Similar results were obtained when comparing effects of SRS and both resection approaches after limiting the sample to patients with tumors in a specific volume range. CONCLUSION Piecemeal resection of a supratentorial brain metastasis carries a higher risk of LMD than en bloc resection or SRS. Further assessment of the role of the 2 surgical resection approaches and SRS in a controlled prospective setting with large numbers of patients is warranted.

scholarly journals Spondylectomy in the Treatment of Neoplastic Spinal Lesions – A Retrospective Outcome Analysis of 582 Patients Using a Patient-Level Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Alexander Spiessberger ◽  
Alexander Spiessberger ◽  
Varun Arvind ◽  
Mansoor Nasim ◽  
Basil Grueter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Spinal Tumors ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
En Bloc Spondylectomy ◽  
Patient Level ◽  
Bloc Spondylectomy

Background: En-bloc spondylectomy in the treatment of spinal tumors is a complex procedure with potential complications. This study aims at identifying predictors of postoperative complications, lesion recurrence and overall survival. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted, and patient-level data extracted from the included studies. Multiple linear-regression models were calculated to predict the occurrence of postoperative complications, lesion recurrence and overall survival based on age, tumor etiology, surgical approach, mode of resection (en-bloc versus intralesional), tumor extension based on Weinstein-BorianiBiagini classification system and number of levels treated. Results: Data of 582 individual adult and pediatric patients were extracted from the literature; Patient characteristics are: 45% female, median age of 46 years (range 5-78); most common etiologies were: sarcoma (46%), metastases (31%) and chordoma (11%). The surgical technique was: anterior (2.5%), combined (45%) and posterior approach (52.4%); 68.5% underwent en-bloc spondylectomy; average levels resected were 1.6 (1-6); 65% of patients had neurologic deficits at presentation, average survival was 2.6 years; Direct procedure-related complications were observed in 17.7%, with the most prevalent being CSF leaks, wound infections and neural injury. For postoperative complications, recurrence and 5-year survival significant regression equations were found (F(7,90)=2.57, p=0.018) with an R2 of 0.1; (F(5,147)=2.35, p=0.044) with an R2 of 0.07 and (F(4,101)=7.2, p=0.01) with an R2 of 0.38. Odds ratio for predicted complications was 1.35 for en-bloc resection and 1.25 for more than one level treated. The odds ratio for tumor recurrence was 0.78 for en-bloc resection; odds ratio for 5-year survival were 0.79 for increased patient age, 0.65 for increasing tumor grade, 0.79 for tumor dissemination at diagnosis and 1.68 for en-bloc resection. Conclusion: En-bloc spondylectomy provides improved survival and lower recurrence rates but also higher operative complication rates when compared to intralesional resections. Interestingly the complication rate was not influenced by tumor stage (WBB scale) and tumor etiology.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Resection Margin after Image-Guided Dural Tail Resection in Convexity Meningiomas

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1177
Author(s):  
Darius Kalasauskas ◽  
Yasemin Tanyildizi ◽  
Mirjam Renovanz ◽  
Marc A. Brockmann ◽  
Clemens J. Sommer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Cell ◽  
Resection Margin ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Tumor Infiltration ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Image Guided ◽  
Dural Tail ◽  
Piecemeal Resection

Infiltration of adjacent dura with meningioma cells is a common phenomenon. Wide resection of the dural tail (DT) to achieve a gross total resection is a general recommendation. We aimed to investigate a tumor cell infiltration of the DT after image-guided resection of convexity meningiomas. The study’s inclusion criteria were the diagnosis of convexity meningioma, planned Simpson I° resection, and an identifiable DT. Intraoperative image-guidance was applied to identify the outer edge of the DT and to guide resection. After resection, en-bloc specimen or four samples of outermost pieces of DT in case of piecemeal resection were sent for histological analysis. In addition to resection margin infiltration, the radiological extent of DT, radiomic characteristics (109 in total), histology, and demographic data were assessed. Hierarchical clustering was used to generate patient clusters for radiomic analysis. Twenty-two patients were included in the study, while 20 (91%) were female. The mean age was 54.2 (Standard deviation (SD) 13.9, range 30–85) years. En-bloc resection could be achieved in 4 patients. The remaining patients received piecemeal resection. 2 DT samples were omitted due to tumor infiltration of the superior sagittal sinus. None of the en-bloc resection samples demonstrated dural infiltration on the resection margin. Tumor cells were detected in 4 of 70 (5.7%) dural tail samples and could not be excluded in another 5 of 70 (7.1%). No tumor recurrences were detected at follow-up MRI examinations after a mean follow-up of 27.5 (SD 13.2, range 0 to 50.0) months. There was no significant association between DT infiltration and histological subtype or patient characteristics and between DT extent and tumor infiltration. Clustering according to radiomic characteristics was not associated with tumor infiltration (p = 0.89). The radiological dural tail does not reliably outline the extent of tumor cell infiltration in convexity meningiomas. Hence, the extent of dural tail resection should not exclusively be guided by preoperative radiological appearance.

Factors influencing the risk of local recurrence after resection of a single brain metastasis

2010 ◽  
Vol 113 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akash J. Patel ◽  
Dima Suki ◽  
Mustafa Aziz Hatiboglu ◽  
Hiba Abouassi ◽  
Weiming Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Brain Metastasis ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Scale ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Single Brain Metastasis ◽  
Piecemeal Resection

Object Local recurrence (LR) of a resected brain metastasis occurs in up to 46% of patients. Postoperative whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) reduces that incidence. To isolate factors associated with the risk of LR after resection, the authors only studied patients who did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy. Methods The authors reviewed data from 570 cases involving patients who had undergone resection of a previously untreated single brain metastasis at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1993 and 2006 without receiving postoperative WBRT. All tumors were measured preoperatively on MR images. The resection method (en bloc resection [EBR] or piecemeal resection [PMR]) was noted at the time of surgery. Predictors of LR were assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results The median patient age was 58 years, 55% were male, and 88% had a Karnofsky Performance Scale Score ≥ 80. The most common primary cancers were those of the lung (28%), skin (melanoma, 21%), kidney (19%), and breast (11%). Piecemeal resection was performed in 201 patients (35%) and EBR in 369 (65%). Local recurrence developed in 84 patients (15%). The histological type of the primary cancer did not significantly predict LR; however, 7 of 22 patients with sarcoma developed LR (p = 0.16). The authors identified 2 variables that increased the risk of LR. Undergoing PMR carried a significantly higher LR risk than EBR (crude hazard ratio [HR] 1.7, 95% CI 1.1–2.6, p = 0.03). Tumors exceeding the median volume (9.7 cm3) had a significantly higher LR risk than those that were < 9.7 cm3 (crude HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1–2.6; p = 0.02). In the multivariate analysis, small tumors removed by EBR had a significantly lower LR risk. Conclusions The LR risk of a single brain metastasis is influenced by biological factors (such as tumor volume) and treatments (such as the resection method). Early administration of postoperative WBRT may be particularly warranted when such negative tumor-related prognostic factors are noted or when treatment-related ones such as PMR are unavoidable.

Surgical Resection of Calvarial Metastases Overlying Dural Sinuses

Neurosurgery ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 745-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher B. Michael ◽  
Ziya L. Gokaslan ◽  
Franco DeMonte ◽  
Ian E. McCutcheon ◽  
Raymond Sawaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Dural Sinus ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Venous Sinuses ◽  
Piecemeal Resection

Abstract OBJECTIVE Few reports have addressed the surgical management of cranial metastases that overlie or invade the dural venous sinuses. To examine the role of surgery in the treatment of dural sinus calvarial metastases, we reviewed retrospectively 13 patients who were treated with surgery at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1993 and 1999. We compared them with 14 patients who had calvarial metastases that did not involve a venous sinus. METHODS Clinical charts, radiological studies, pathological findings, and operative reports were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS The median age of patients with dural sinus calvarial metastases was 54 years. Nine patients were men and four were women. Renal cell carcinoma and sarcoma were the most common primary tumors. Similar features were noted in the 14 patients with nonsinus calvarial metastases. Of the 13 dural sinus calvarial metastases, 11 involved the superior sagittal sinus, and 2 involved the transverse sinus. In nine patients, the involved sinus was resected, and in four patients, the sinus was reconstituted after tumor removal. Nine patients in the dural sinus calvarial metastases group received en bloc resection, and four received piecemeal resection. No operative deaths occurred. The overall median actuarial survival was 16.5 months. The survival times of the two groups were comparable. In the group with dural sinus calvarial metastases, transient postoperative neurological deficits occurred in two patients (15%), and a permanent deficit occurred in one patient (8%). No patients in the group with nonsinus calvarial metastases experienced deficits after resection. Compared with piecemeal resection, en bloc resection was associated with significantly less blood loss. CONCLUSION Complete extirpation of calvarial metastases that overlie or invade a dural sinus can be achieved with only slightly more morbidity than complete removal of calvarial metastases that are located away from the sinuses. En bloc resection is as safe as piecemeal resection and is more effective in limiting operative blood loss. The overall recurrence and survival rates of patients with dural sinus calvarial metastases are similar to those of patients with calvarial metastases that do not involve the sinuses. Therefore, involvement of a dural venous sinus should not discourage resection of calvarial metastases. In carefully selected cancer patients, surgery provides effective palliation of symptomatic calvarial metastases that overlie or invade the venous sinuses.

scholarly journals Postoperative Outcomes of Distal Pancreatectomy for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Abutting the Pancreas in the Left Upper Quadrant

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyeong Deok Kim ◽  
Kyo Won Lee ◽  
Ji Eun Lee ◽  
Jeong Ah Hwang ◽  
Sung Jun Jo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Retroperitoneal Sarcoma ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Pancreatic Invasion ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Resection Of The Pancreas

BackgroundEn bloc resection of the tumor with adjacent organs is recommended for localized retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). However, resection of the pancreas is controversial because it may cause serious complications, such as pancreatic fistula or bleeding. Thus, we evaluated the outcomes of distal pancreatectomy (DP) in pancreas-abutting RPS of the left upper quadrant (LUQ).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients who underwent surgery for RPS between September 2001 and April 2020. We selected 150 patients with all or part of their tumor located in the LUQ on preoperative computed tomography. Eighty-six patients who had tumors abutting the pancreas were finally enrolled in our study.ResultsFifty-three patients (53/86; 61.6%) were included in the non-DP group, and 33 patients (33/86; 38.4%) were included in the DP group. Total postoperative complications and complication rates for those Clavien–Dindo grade 3 or higher were similar between the non-DP group and DP group (p = 0.290 and p = 0.550). In the DP group, grade B pancreatic fistulae occurred in 18.2% (6/33) of patients, but grade C pancreatic fistulae were absent, and microscopic pancreatic invasion was noted in 42.4% (14/33) of patients. During multivariate analysis, microscopic pancreatic invasion was deemed a risk factor for local recurrence (p = 0.029). However, there were no significant differences on preoperative computed tomography findings between the pancreatic invasion and non-invasion groups.ConclusionDP is a reasonable procedure for pancreas-abutting RPS located at the LUQ when both complications and complete resection are considered.

scholarly journals Snare combined with endoscopic clips in endoscopic resection of gastric submucosal tumor: a method of tumor traction

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (09) ◽  
pp. E1150-E1162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang Zhang ◽  
Jian-qun Cai ◽  
Zhen Wang ◽  
Bing Xiao ◽  
Yang Bai
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Submucosal Tumor ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Gastric Fundus ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
Gastric Submucosal Tumor ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Total Operation Time

Abstract Background and study aims Mucosal traction as a supportive technique is very useful for endoscopists during endoscopy. For gastric submucosal tumor (SMT), our team explored a method of pulling the SMT with a snare combined with endoclips (PSMT-SE). This study preliminarily explored its feasibility to assist resection of gastric SMT. Patients and methods Operation-related data from patients who underwent gastric SMT removal assisted by PSMT-SE at the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center of Guangzhou Nanfang Hospital, China between January 2017 and October 2018 were retrospectively collected: tumor size and location, origin of tumor, total operation time, en bloc resection rate, intraoperative and postoperative complications. Results Forty-two gastric SMTs in 41 patients were included in this study. Fifteen tumors were located in the gastric fundus, 11 in the gastric body, two in the gastric angle, 10 in the gastric antrum, and four in the greater curvature of the gastric fundus and the body junction. Further, 11 tumors originated from the submucosa and 31 originated from the muscularis propria. Endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic full-thickness resection assisted by PSMT-SE were performed to resect 30 and 12 tumors, respectively. PSMT-SE could effectively expose the surgical field. Median diameter of resected tumors was 2.0 (0.7) cm, the total operation time was 45.5 (27.0) min, and the en bloc resection rate was 100 %. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. Conclusion PSMT-SE is a potentially useful method for assisting resection of gastric SMT with tumor traction. Further prospective studies with large sample sizes are warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document