scholarly journals Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostatic Biopsy and its Complications: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (221) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Joshi

Introduction: Transrectal ultrasound of prostate provides better visual for biopsy. Transrectalultrasound guided prostate biopsy is usually performed in men with an abnormal digital rectalexamination, and elevated prostate specific antigen (>4ng/ml) or prostate specific antigen velocity(rate of prostate specific antigen change) i.e., >0.4-0.75ng/ml/year. The aim of the study is to find outthe complications of transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic biopsies. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was done among 50 patients who transrectalultrasound guided prostatic biopsies in a tertiary care hospital, from July 2017 to July 2019 afterreceiving ethical approval from the Institutional Review Committee of Kathmandu MedicalCollege and teaching hospital. Convenient sampling was done. All patients were informed aboutthe potential benefits and risks of the transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy and patientssigned an informed written consent form. Statistical analysis was done by using Statistical Packagefor Social Sciences version 16. Results: Mean prostate specific antigen was 34.571 and mean weight of prostate was 44.6gm.Moderate to severe pain was experienced by 15 (30%), 2 (4%) had hematuria with fever accountingfor 3 (6%) patients. All were managed conservatively with no mortality related to the procedure andcomplication. Three patients was positive for malignancy on re-biopsy. Conclusions: Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of prostate is a pioneer experience in Nepal. Ithas proved to be an useful tool of diagnosis of suspected carcinoma of Prostate. Use of neurovascularblock may reduce the pain during the procedure.  

Vacunas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y.M. AlGoraini ◽  
N.N. AlDujayn ◽  
M.A. AlRasheed ◽  
Y.E. Bashawri ◽  
S.S. Alsubaie ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nandini Chatterjee ◽  
Supratick Chakraborty ◽  
Mainak Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Sinjon Ghosh ◽  
Bikramjit Barkandaj ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nearmeen M. Rashad ◽  
Marwa G. Amer ◽  
Waleed M. Reda Ashour ◽  
Hassan M. Hassanin

Abstract Background Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system with varied clinical features. Disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) of MS associated with different types of thyroiditis. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to assess the prevalence of thyroid dysfunction in MS and to investigate the association between DMDs and the risk of thyroiditis in MS. A cross-sectional study included 100 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in relapse, and the diagnosed was according to revised McDonald’s criteria 2010. Results Our results revealed that the prevalence of thyroiditis was 40%; autoimmune (34%) and infective (6%) among patients with RRMS in relapse and cerebellar symptoms were significantly higher in patients with thyroiditis compared to patients without thyroiditis. Regarding the association between DMDs and thyroiditis, the prevalence of patients treated with interferon-beta-1b was higher in MS patients with thyroiditis compared to MS patients without thyroiditis. However, the prevalence of patients treated with interferon-beta-1a was lower in MS patients with thyroiditis compared to MS patients without thyroiditis. In addition, we found CMV infection was more common in patients treated by interferon beta-1b and candida infection was common in patients treated by fingolimod. Conclusions Thyroiditis is commonly observed in patients with RRMS in relapse and higher prevalence of patients treated with interferon-beta-1b which is commonly associated with thyroiditis and CMV infection; however, candida thyroid infection was common in MS patients treated by fingolimod.


Author(s):  
Sujeet A. Divhare ◽  
Satyashil Ingale

Background: Potential importance of drug –drug interactions (DDIs) is increasing as polypharmacy becomes more prevalent. Because additional data on the incidence and pattern of potential DDIs among diabetic patients are lacking in India, and supplemental pharmacodynamic or clinical outcome information is needed to address importance of a drug- drug interaction. Aim and objectives: To identify and analyze the pattern of DDIs in patients being prescribed anti-diabetic drugs in a tertiary care hospital. Material and Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study was carried out for a period of three months in 200 Type 2 diabetes mellitus (Type 2 DM) patients who were taking at least one antidiabetic agent during the period of past six months, of any age and either sex admitted in medicine ward of a tertiary care teaching hospital. Only one prescription was included for each patient on his/her 3rd day of hospitalization in the ward. Results: A total of 1217 drugs were prescribed in 200 prescriptions, resulting in an average of 6.1 drugs per prescription. A total of 637 potential DDIs were noted. The majority were seen in middle aged and elderly people. No overall difference was detected in the patients on insulin or metformin therapy taking or not taking additional drugs with the potential to interact. Worse control was found in the group of patients on sulphonylurea therapy taking interacting drugs (P <0.05). This difference was most marked in the group of patients over 60 years of age, who also had the highest intake of potentially interacting drugs (57%; <35 years-37%). Conclusion: Antidiabetic drugs have numerous interactions. A good practice is to use a drug­–drug interaction checker if any questions arise, several are available online. Quality care starts with the clinician obtaining a complete medication list for each patient at the start of each visit. Keywords: diabetes mellitus, drug interactions, hypoglycemic agents, drug therapy, co-morbidity, polypharmacy


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document