scholarly journals Applications for General Collective Intelligence

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy E Williams
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
General Problem ◽  
Collective Intelligence

General Collective Intelligence or GCI has been described as a system that organizes groups into a single collective intelligence with the potential for vastly greater general problem-solving ability than any individual in the group. This paper explores examples of the classes of problems that might be solved with GCI.

scholarly journals Discovering and Implementing Self-Sustaining Networks of Cooperation with General Collective Intelligence

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy E Williams
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
General Problem ◽  
Iterative Process ◽  
Collective Intelligence ◽  
Exponential Increase ◽  
Growing Networks ◽  
First Time

Leveraging General Collective Intelligence or GCI, a platform with the potential to achieve an exponential increase in general problem-solving ability, a methodology is defined for finding potential opportunities for cooperation, as well as for negotiating and launching cooperation. This paper explores the mechanisms by which GCI enables networks of cooperation to be formed in order to increase outcomes of cooperation and in order to make that cooperation self-sustaining. And this paper explores why implementing a GCI for the first time requires designing an iterative process that self-assembles continually growing networks of cooperation.

scholarly journals AI Safety and General Collective Intelligence

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy E Williams
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
General Problem ◽  
Collective Intelligence ◽  
The Other ◽  
General Intelligence ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Artificial General Intelligence ◽  
The Future ◽  
Ai Safety

Considering both current narrow AI, and any Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) that might be implemented in the future, there are two categories of ways such systems might be made safe for the human beings that interact with them. One category consists of mechanisms that are internal to the system, and the other category consists of mechanisms that are external to the system. In either case, the complexity of the behaviours that such systems might be capable of can rise to the point at which such measures cannot be reliably implemented. However, General Collective Intelligence or GCI can exponentially increase the general problem-solving ability of groups, and therefore their ability to manage complexity. This paper explores the specific cases in which AI or AGI safety cannot be reliably assured without GCI.

scholarly journals The Necessity of General Collective Intelligence Driven Processes in Achieving Pervasive Manufacturing

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy E Williams
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Competitive Advantage ◽  
General Problem ◽  
Collective Intelligence ◽  
Group Problem ◽  
Group Problem Solving

General Collective Intelligence has been defined as a system that orchestrates groups to cooperate as a single collective intelligence that greatly increases the group’s general problem-solving ability. This increase in group problem-solving ability applies to any group problem. It applies to manufacturing, where GCI has the potential to facilitate decentralized processes not possible otherwise. It applies to design, where GCI has the potential to reliably enable groups to create designs far too complex otherwise. And it applies to cooperation in general, where GCI has the potential to enable cooperation to be reliably scaled, so where the value of that cooperation is positive and can therefore subsidize the cooperation itself, that value might be increased to the point that it can reliably create powerful competitive advantage for groups of local businesses that cooperate to supply local demand through pervasive manufacturing. This paper explores why for these and other reasons, GCI is a necessary component to achieving pervasive use of pervasive manufacturing.

scholarly journals Cognitive Computing and its Relationship to Computing Methods and Advanced Computing from a Functional Modeling Perspective

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy E Williams
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
General Problem ◽  
Collective Intelligence ◽  
Computing Methods ◽  
Modeling Technique ◽  
Human Cognition ◽  
Cognitive Computing ◽  
Functional Modeling ◽  
Semantic Modeling ◽  
Advanced Computing

Recent advances in modeling human cognition have resulted in what is suggested to be the first model of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) with the potential capacity for human-like general problem-solving ability, as well as a model for a General Collective Intelligence or GCI, which has been described as software that organizes a group into a single collective intelligence with the potential for vastly greater general problem-solving ability than any individual in the group. Both this model for GCI and this model for AGI require functional modeling of concepts that is complete in terms of meaning being self-contained in the model and not requiring interpretation based on information outside the model. This definition of a model for cognition has also been suggested to implicitly provide a semantic interpretation of functional models created within the functional modeling technique defined to meet the data format requirements of this AGI and GCI, so that the combination of the model of cognition to define an interpretation of meaning, and the functional modeling technique, together result in fully self-contained definitions of meaning that are suggested to be the first complete implementation of semantic modeling. With this semantic modeling, and with these models for AGI and GCI, cognitive computing is far better defined. This paper explores the various computing methods and advanced computing paradigms from the perspective of this cognitive computing.

scholarly journals Bridging the Left - Right Political Divide with Artificial Intelligence and Collective Intelligence

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy E Williams
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
General Problem ◽  
Cognitive Bias ◽  
Intelligent Agents ◽  
Collective Intelligence ◽  
Optimal Solution ◽  
Functional Modeling ◽  
Political Debate ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Political Divide

A model of cognition suggests that the left vs right political debate is unsolvable. However the same model also suggests that a form of collective cognition (General Collective Intelligence or GCI) can allow education, health care, or other government services to be customized to the individual, so that individuals can choose services anywhere along the spectrum from socialized services if they desire, or private services if they desire, thereby removing any political stalemate where it might prevent any progress. Whatever services groups of individuals choose, GCI can significantly increase the quality of outcomes achievable through either socialized or private services today, in part through using information regarding the fitness of any services deployed, to improve the fitness of all services that might be deployed. The emerging field of General Collective Intelligence (GCI) explores how platforms might increase the general problem-solving ability (intelligence) of groups so that it is significantly higher than that of any individual. Where Collective Intelligence (CI) must find the optimal solution to a problem or group of problems, having general problem-solving ability, a GCI must also have the capacity to find the optimal problem to solve. In the case of political discussions, GCI must have the ability to re-frame political discourse from being focused on questions that have not proved resolvable, such as whether or not left leaning or right leaning political opinions are in general more “right” or “wrong”. Instead GCI must have the ability to refocus discussions, including on how to objectively determine whether a left or right bias optimizes outcomes in a specific context, and why. This paper explores the conjecture that determining whether a left leaning or right leaning cognitive bias is "optimal" (i.e. "true) based on any CI or other aggregate of individual reasoning that is not GCI, cannot reliably converge on "truth" because each individual cognitive bias leads to evaluating truth according to different reasoning types (type 1 or type 2) that might give conflicting answers to the same problem. However, through using functional modeling to create the capacity to represent all possible reasoning processes, and through using functional modeling to represent the domains in conceptual space in which each reasoning process is optimal, it is possible to systematically categorize an unlimited number of collective reasoning processes and the contexts in which execution of those reasoning processes with a right leaning or left leaning bias is optimal for the group. By designing GCI algorithms to incorporate each bias in its optimal context, a GCI can allow individuals to participate in collective reasoning despite their biases, while collective reasoning might still converge on "truth" in terms of functioning to optimize collective outcomes. And by deploying intelligent agents incorporating some subset of AGI to interact on the individual's behalf at significantly higher speed and scale, collective reasoning might gain the capacity to consider all reasoning and all "facts" available to any individual in the group, in order to converge on that truth while significantly increasing outcomes.

scholarly journals Does Creating an Artificial General Intelligence Require General Collective Intelligence in Order to be Reliably Achievable?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy E Williams
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
General Problem ◽  
Cognitive Functions ◽  
Collective Intelligence ◽  
Functional Model ◽  
General Intelligence ◽  
Artificial General Intelligence ◽  
Exponential Increase ◽  
Group A ◽  
Complete Set

General Collective Intelligence or GCI has been predicted to create the potential for an exponential increase in the problem-solving capacity of the group, as compared to the problem-solving capacity of any individual in the group. A functional model of cognition proposed to represent the complete set of human cognitive functions, and therefore to have the capacity for human-like general problem-solving ability has recently been developed. This functional model suggests a methodical path by which implementing a working Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) or a working General Collective Intelligence might reliably be achievable. This paper explores the claim that there are no other reliable paths to AGI currently known, and explores why this one known path might require an exponential increase in the general problem-solving ability of any group of individuals to be reliably implementable. And why therefore, AGI might require GCI to be reliably achievable.

scholarly journals General Collective Intelligence and the Constraints to Group Decision-Making

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy E Williams
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
General Problem ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Collective Intelligence ◽  
Academic Disciplines ◽  
Group Problem ◽  
Group Problem Solving ◽  
Decision Systems

This paper addresses the question of how current group decision-making systems, including collective intelligence algorithms, might be constrained in ways that prevent them from achieving general problem solving ability. And as a result of those constraints, how some collective issues that pose existential risks such as poverty, the environmental degradation that has linked to climate change, or other sustainable development goals, might not be reliably solvable with current decision-making systems. This paper then addresses the question that assuming specific categories of such existential problems are not currently solvable with any existing group decision-systems, how can decision-systems increase the general problem solving ability of groups so that such issues can reliably be solved? In particular, how might a General Collective Intelligence, defined here to be a system of group decision-making with general problem solving ability, facilitate this increase in group problem-solving ability? The paper then presents some boundary conditions that a framework for modeling general problem solving in groups suggests must be satisfied by any model of General Collective Intelligence. When generalized to apply to all group decision-making, any such constraints on group intelligence, and any such system of General Collective Intelligence capable of removing those constraints, are then applicable to any process that utilizes group problem solving, from design, to manufacturing or any other life-cycle processes of any product or service, or whether research in any field from the arts to the basic sciences. For this reason these questions are important to a wide variety of academic disciplines. And because many of the issues impacted represent existential risks to human civilization, these questions may also be important by to all by definition.

scholarly journals Human Intelligence and General Collective Intelligence as Phase Changes in Animal Intelligence

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy E Williams
Keyword(s):  
Phase Transition ◽  
Phase Transitions ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
General Problem ◽  
Collective Intelligence ◽  
Phase Changes ◽  
Human Intelligence ◽  
Animal Intelligence ◽  
Collective Cognition ◽  
Order Pattern

The hypothesis that human intelligence represents a phase transition in animal intelligence is explored, as is the hypothesis that General Collective Intelligence (GCI), which has been defined as a system that organizes groups into a single collective cognition with the potential for vastly greater general problem-solving ability than that of any individual in the group, represents a phase transition in human intelligence. At these phase transitions, cognition can be demonstrated to gain the capacity for exponentially greater general problem-solving ability. If valid, then when generalized as an Nth order pattern, these N phase transitions represent successively more powerful super-intelligences, where each of these super-intelligences can potentially be implemented as an Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), or as a General Collective Intelligence (GCI).

scholarly journals Assessing the Potential Impact of General Collective Intelligence

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy E Williams
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
General Problem ◽  
Collective Intelligence ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Human History ◽  
First Order ◽  
Exponential Increase ◽  
Potential Impact ◽  
Near Term

The concept of General Collective Intelligence or GCI is summarized, and the potential for GCI to exponentially increase the general problem-solving ability of the group so that it is far larger than that of any individual in the group, and therefore the potential for GCI to exponentially increase the ability of groups to impact collective outcomes are explored. GCI is represented as a repeating pattern, beginning with a first order GCI, then progressing to an Nth order one, where N might be limited by the resources available, and where each order is suggested to create the potential for an exponential increase in general problem-solving ability. Finally, the claim that such an exponential increase in potential for impact on any general problem makes GCI the most important innovation in human history, and the most important innovation in the near term future, until the transition to second order GCI, is explored.

scholarly journals Using Systems Thinking to Exponentially Increase Impact

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy E Williams
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Systems Thinking ◽  
General Problem ◽  
Collective Intelligence ◽  
General Intelligence ◽  
Functional Modeling ◽  
Artificial General Intelligence ◽  
Exponential Increase

This paper explores how Human-Centric Functional Modeling might provide a method of systems thinking that in combination with models of Artificial General Intelligence and General Collective Intelligence developed using the approach, creates the opportunity to exponentially increase impact on targeted outcomes of collective activities, including research in a wide variety of disciplines as well as activities involved in addressing the various existential challenges facing mankind. Whether exponentially increasing the speed and scale of progress in research disciplines such as physics or medicine, or whether exponentially increasing capacity to solve existential challenges such as poverty or climate change, this paper explores why gaining the capacity to reliably solve such challenges might require this exponential increase in general problem-solving ability, why this exponential increase in ability might be reliably achievable through this approach, and why solving our most existential challenges might be reliably unachievable otherwise.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document