scholarly journals Peculiarities of qualification of criminal offenses against movement safety and transport operation: a review of judicial practice.

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-234
Author(s):  
Vasyl Berezniak
Keyword(s):  
Traffic Safety ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Decisive Evidence ◽  
Act Assessment

The article reviews some court decisions, which highlight the key features of the assessment of criminal offenses against traffic safety and transport operation. Typical situations of committing criminal offenses of this type with the analysis of difficulties of qualification and further bringing a person to criminal responsibility are studied. In addition, attention is paid to the differentiation of legal liability, where the means of committing an offense or the subject is a vehicle, as well as highlighted key aspects related to the definition, type and nature of the act. Assessment of criminal offenses against traffic safety and transport operation under art. 286 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine should be based not only on the rules of substantive law, ie the law of Ukraine on criminal liability. Within the framework of criminal proceedings, the employee-practitioner is guided by the rules of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, which provides for the possibility of changing the assessment of a criminal offense, taking into account the available facts and circumstances. Regarding the existence of certain regulations governing the specifics of assessment and further pre-trial investigation into the commission of a criminal offense against traffic safety and transport operation, today the national justice system has formed judicial practice on this issue. However, it requires some generalization and identification of key points in the qualification of the investigated criminal offenses or further criminal proceedings. The decisive evidence in criminal proceedings concerning criminal offenses against traffic safety and transport operation is the experts’ conclusions from various types of examinations, which are appointed in these proceedings. In particular, auto-technical, auto-commodity, transport-trasological expert studies, which establish important circumstances for establishing the suspect’se guilt or innocence.

scholarly journals Serious Consequences Caused by the Crime as an Aggravating Circumstance

2020 ◽  
pp. 305-312
Author(s):  
Viktor ZAKHARCHUK
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Significant Strength ◽  
Additional Qualification ◽  
Objective Side

The judicial practice of sentencing is analyzed in the case when a criminal offense has serious consequences that are outside the objective side of a certain socially dangerous act. Given the evaluative nature of this circumstance and the lack of legislative explanation of its content, there are typical mistakes that courts make in classifying the serious consequences of the crime as an aggravating circumstance. The order of sentencing in the case when the death of the victim was caused by a criminal offense, property damage in large or especially large amounts, etc. was investigated. The procedure for distinguishing serious consequences as an aggravating circumstance and as a mandatory feature of the objective side of the relevant criminal offense is analyzed. It is established that in some cases the task of a serious criminal offense requires additional qualification under other articles of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. The article proposes the criteria with serious consequences of the crime should be considered as an aggravating circumstance. It is established that the grave consequences caused by the crime as an aggravating circumstance do not form a new basis for criminal liability, as the court imposes punishment within the sanction of the article. Also, when the court decides the issue of criminal responsibility of the perpetrator, the signs of the composition of the criminal offense will be crucial, and not the presence of aggravating circumstances. After all, the court must impose a penalty within the limits provided by the sanction of the article containing the elements of a particular offense. It is argued that the main feature that distinguishes serious consequences from other criminal offenses and from other aggravating circumstances is the significance of these circumstances, i.e. the significant strength of influence compared to other circumstances that characterize the severity of the crime and the perpetrator. Recognition of certain consequences as grave and classifying them as aggravating circumstances belongs to the court, which must thoroughly examine the evidence of the occurrence of such consequences and make a final decision.

scholarly journals INTERACTION OF INVESTIGATOR WITH EXPERT SUBDIVISIONS DURING THE INVESTIGATIVE EXPERIMENT IN THE INVESTIGATION OF VIOLATIONS OF TRAFFIC SAFTY RULES OR TRANSPORT OPERATION

2020 ◽  
pp. 424-433
Author(s):  
А. О. Чичиркін
Keyword(s):  
Traffic Safety ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Organizational Skills ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Vehicle Operation ◽  
Procedural Time ◽  
Safety Rules

During the investigation of criminal offenses related to violation of traffic safety rules and operation of vehicles, conducting an investigative experiment is one of the mandatory investigative (search) actions, which requires the investigator to concentrate mental and organizational skills and a significant amount of procedural time within the pre-trial investigation, which can be properly ensured through interaction with expert units. In this category of criminal proceedings, the investigative experiment is a source of information on the parameters and characteristics of the accident, which can not be obtained in other ways, and without which many important expert tasks can not be solved during forensic examinations. The purpose of the article is to study the peculiarities of the investigator's interaction with expert units during the investigative experiment in investigating violations of traffic safety rules or vehicle operation, by establishing areas of interaction between the investigator and experts during the investigative experiment in this category of cases; disclosure of types of investigative experiment and typical situations of interaction of the investigator with experts during its carrying out during investigation of the criminal offense provided by Art. 286 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine; determining the role of the expert as a specialist involved in the investigative experiment in the investigation of violations of traffic safety rules or transport operation; identification of shortcomings that arise from improperly organized interaction of the investigator with the expert during the investigative experiment, a proposal for measures to prevent them. The article highlights and reveals the content of the peculiarities of the investigator's interaction with expert units during the investigative experiment in the investigation of violations of traffic safety rules or vehicle operation. It was found that one of the main shortcomings in the design of the protocol is that the investigator during the investigative experiment constantly evaluates the conditions, progress and results of experiments. When drawing up the report, keep in mind that the evaluation of the results by the investigator and other participants in the investigative experiment is beyond the scope of the protocol. As a rule, the evaluation of the results is stated at the end of the protocol.

ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PENGGELAPAN YANG TIMBUL DARI HUBUNGAN SEWA MENYEWA MOBIL DIKAITKAN DENGAN PASAL 372 KUHP

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-216
Author(s):  
Hurip Agustina ◽  
Dadang Suprijatna ◽  
Aal Lukmanul Hakim
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Bottom Layer ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Car Rental

Crime embezzlement car rentals are lately often devastating car rental owner. This is an issue where the meaning of a rule of law if the crime committed community can not be followed by the rule of law, such as crimes by way of evasion is one of the types of crimes against human wealth which is stated in Article 372 of the Criminal Code, which is a crime that does not exist inexhaustible, both from the bottom layer to the top layer of society can also be committing a criminal act embezzlement is a crime that originated from the existence of a trust in others, and that trust is lost because of the lack of an honesty. It is stated that the crime of embezzlement have a problem that is closely linked to attitudes, moral, mental, honesty and trust humans as individuals. The purpose of this study are as follows: 1) To determine and analyze the occurrence of the crime of embezzlement car rental. 2) To know and analyze the application of Article 372 of the Criminal Code the crime of embezzlement in the rental car. 3) To know and analyze the efforts of the police in preventing crime of embezzlement car lease. This study uses normative juridical approach that is used to make the description clear, systematic, transparent and precise about the facts / specific nature of the area and population which is then analyzed to obtain the desired facts. Criminal offense embezzlement rental car can be imprisoned if they meet the overall elements of the offenses charged by the public prosecutor and the offender accountable for his actions. If the offender does not meet one of the elements of which the accused, then it can not be convicted. The elements of criminal responsibility are: 1) committing illegal or criminal acts; 2) for the criminal should be able to be responsible; 3) to have a fault; 4) absence of an excuse. The conclusion from this study is the adoption of Article 372 of the Criminal Code in criminal offenses of embezzlement car rental where the incidence of criminal acts committed tenants for the rented goods belonging to the owner of the rental rights because of misuse or abuse of trust in which the crime of embezzlement are set in the provisions of Article 372 of the Criminal Code.

scholarly journals Circumstances to Be Clarified under the Investigation of Interference into Law Enforcement Officer’s Activity

2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-103
Author(s):  
V. O. Gusieva
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Enforcement Officer ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Procedural Costs ◽  
Detailed List ◽  
Law Enforcement Officer

The author has substantiated the need to establish the circumstances to be clarified and has determined their significance during the investigation. It has been emphasized that the circumstances to be clarified include the circumstances to be proved in criminal proceedings, criminal and forensic characteristics of a criminal offense. In order to determine the circumstances to be clarified during the investigation of interference in the activities of a law enforcement officer, the author has studied the circumstances to be clarified within the group of criminal offenses related to obstruction of the activities of a law enforcement officer, as well as during the investigation of interference in the activities of a forensic expert. Taking into account the specified scientific provisions, the author has defined a detailed list of circumstances to be clarified during the investigation of interference in the activities of a law enforcement officer. It has been established that the circumstances to be clarified during the interference in the activities of a law enforcement officer include: 1) circumstances related to the criminal offense, namely: time, place, situation and traces of a criminal offense, methods of its commission (preparation, direct commission and concealment), tools and means used during the interference, the scope of procedural costs; circumstances that are the basis for ceasing criminal proceedings; the reasons and conditions that contributed to the commission of a criminal offense; 2) circumstances related to the identity of the victim, including: socio-demographic characteristics of the victim, place of work, position held; official and functional responsibilities, the victim’s belonging to a law enforcement agency during the commission of a criminal offense against him; the type and scope of damage caused to the victim; 3) circumstances related to the identity of the offender, namely: socio-demographic data of the offender, physiological and psychological condition, gender, citizenship, financial status, place of work, the record of criminal conviction and the facts of bringing to administrative liability; the presence of dependent disabled people; the presence of guilt in the form of direct intent, the purpose of the action; circumstances that aggravate or mitigate the punishment of the offender are grounds for releasing from criminal liability or punishment that exclude criminal liability; presence of accomplices.

scholarly journals ON THE ISSUE OF IMPROVING THE CRIMINAL LAW NORMS ON LIABILITY FOR VIOLATION OF THE RULES OF DRIVING OR OPERATION OF CARS

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-106
Author(s):  
V.V. Kusakin ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Traffic Safety ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Military Vehicles ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Observation Methods ◽  
Expert Assessments ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Legislation

The article is devoted to the analysis of Article 350 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, which provides for criminal liability for violation of the rules of driving or operating cars, the evolution of this article and the problems of sentencing under it are considered. One of the suggestions for improving this article is to change its sanction, which will eliminate the identified significant legal gap. The author conducted a comprehensive analysis of various aspects related to the criminal violation of traffic safety rules and the operation of military vehicles, and proposed the author's solution to the problematic aspects. The study used specific dialectical methods: comparative, hermeneutical, discursive, formal-legal, as well as some sociological methods: observation, methods of expert assessments and analysis. The provisions contained in the materials of the article can be used to improve the current criminal legislation and to develop explanations of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in reviews of judicial practice.

scholarly journals MEASURES OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESPONSE TO PROHIBITIONS IN THE FIELD OF TRAFFIC SAFETY AND VEHICLE OPERATION: SOME ASPECTS OF REGULATORY CERTAINTY AND PRACTICE OF USE

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 59-68
Author(s):  
A. Iashchenko
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Traffic Safety ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Primary Role ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Vehicle Operation ◽  
Special Part ◽  
General Part ◽  
Criminal Justice Response

The article is devoted to the research of measures of criminal justice response to prohibitions in the field of traffic safety and vehicle operation. It is noted that the primary role in state response to violation of criminal justice prohibitions in the field of traffic safety and vehicle operation is given to punishment, but no less important role is paid to other alternative to prohibition measures of criminal justice nature based on the concussion (special confiscation) or the encouragement (exemption from criminal responsibility or serving a sentence). It is concluded that the normative regulations of threats of application of certain punitive measures of criminal justice nature in sanctions of the articles of this section of the Special part in which the legislator defines the threat of application of various types of punishment for committing the crimes stipulated in crimes’ dispositions, needs specification from the point of view of the system interconnection, along with the provisions of the General Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, whereas the practice of application of special confiscation its further distribution and development, considering the proposed recommendations of its delimitation with the so called criminal procedural confiscation as means of criminal procedural concussion. In particular, it is noted that such clarification may be implemented either by enforcing additional penalties specified in the sanctions of Part 1, 2, 3 of Article 286, part 1 of Article 287 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, to the common list of types of punishments, with their separate meaningful definition in the corresponding articles of the section X of the General part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, or by covering normative definition in sanctions of the specified articles of section XI of the Special part of threats of application of such additional types of punishments according to the existing parts of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. In this regard the sanctions of Article 286 and 287 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine propose to make appropriate changes. As for the practice of applying special confiscation for committing crimes in the field of traffic safety and vehicle operation, it is recommended that the question of its implementation should be based on the fact that the subject of special confiscation may be defined in paragraph 1 of Part 1 of Art. 96-2 of the Criminal Code - items 6, 6-1 part 9 of Art. 100 of the Criminal Procedure Code, paragraph 2, part 1 of Art. 96-2 of the Criminal Code - item 2 part 9 of Art. 100 of the CPC, paragraph 3, part 1 of Art. 96-2 of the Criminal Code - item 5 part 9 of Art. 100 of the CPC, paragraph 4, part 1 of Art. 96-2 of the Criminal Code - item 1 part 9 of Art. 100 of the CPC items of the material world that possess a certain property value, and are usually considered as physical evidence in criminal proceedings initiated on the fact of committing certain crimes in the field of traffic safety and vehicle operation.

scholarly journals CORPORATE CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN INDONESIA ON THE PERSPECTIVE OF COMPARISON

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-154
Author(s):  
Muchammad Chasani
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Criminal Legislation ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability ◽  
Responsibility System

The regulation of corporate criminal liability in Indonesia's criminal justice system is basically a new and still debatable issue. It is said that because in the Criminal Code is not recognized and regulated explicitly about the corporation as a subject of criminal law. This is a natural thing since the WvS Criminal Code still adheres to the principle of "societas delinquere non potest" or "non-potest university delinquere", that is, a legal entity can not commit a crime. Thus, if in a society there is a criminal offense, then the criminal act is deemed to be done by the board of the corporation concerned. Regarding the corporate criminal responsibility system in Indonesia, in the corruption law Article 20 paragraph (1), if the corporation committed a criminal act of corruption, then those responsible for the criminal act shall be the corporation only, the management only, or the corporation and its management. Thus, it can be said that the regulation of corporate criminal liability in the legal system in Indonesia is expressly only regulated in special criminal legislation, because the Criminal Code of WvS still adheres to the principle of "societas delinquere nonpotest" so it is not possible to enforce corporate criminal liability in it.

scholarly journals Criminal-legal meaning of driving under the influence in the acts stipulated by Article 286 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine

2020 ◽  
pp. 66-72
Author(s):  
V. Myslyvyi
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Code ◽  
Driving Under The Influence ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Operation Rules ◽  
Driving While Impaired ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Vehicle Operation ◽  
Objective Side ◽  
Determining Factor

The article deals with issues of combatting criminal offenses related to violations of road safety and vehicle operation rules stipulated by Article 286 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. The focus is on acts committed by persons who were in a state of alcohol, drugs or other intoxication. Based on research and analysis of current national judicial practice the author has revealed the presence of contradictions in court judgments of different instances where provided opposite criminal legal assessment consisting of a criminal offense under Article 286 of the CC of Ukraine, the following factors as driving while impaired by alcohol, drugs and other intoxication. The essence of such an assessment, as shown by a certain part of the verdicts, is that some courts do not consider the state of intoxication of a person driving a vehicle as a sign of the objective side of this criminal offense, and therefore do not see it as one of the reasons acts as a determining factor of these criminal offenses. The research paper contains a critical analysis of this approach in judicial practice and provides arguments for its unreasonableness, as driving under the influence as a cause of accidents in transport is considered to be universally recognized. However to avoid contradictions in judicial practice and to reach efficiency impact of criminal legaltools in combating the above mentioned criminal offense the author has proposed that Article 286 of the CC of Ukraine should stipulate an aggravating circumstances such as the commitment of a criminal offense by a person being in a state of intoxication

scholarly journals VICTIMOLOGICAL RISKS FOR ROAD USERS AS AN ELEMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (11) ◽  
pp. 2922-2927
Author(s):  
Vladyslava S. Batyrgareieva ◽  
Alina V. Kalinina ◽  
Kateryna O. Poltava
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Traffic Safety ◽  
Road Safety ◽  
Drunk Driving ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Health Approach ◽  
Road Accidents ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Road Users ◽  
Criminal Offenses

The aim: This article aims to analyze the statistics of road accidents victims in Ukraine in general and the level of criminal offenses’ against traffic safety and transport operation victims, in particular, to consider the main victimological risks for road users and provide them with a public health approach. Materials and methods: The theoretical basis of the article is specialized literature on law, economics, and sociology. The empirical basis of the research was the materials of generalization of more than 1,000 criminal proceedings under Art. 286 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, the results of a survey of Ukrainian citizens on the state of road safety in Ukraine. Results: According to the results of an empirical study, in terms of role, pedestrians clearly predominate among the victims (59.6%), while every fourth victim is a passenger of a vehicle. Driver victims are only 14.6% of the total number. Victimological risk on the roads is the probability of becoming a victim and suffering damage to one’s life and health from criminal offenses against traffic safety and operation of transport. For each of the categories of victims there are both general and specific victimological risks. The causes of accidents can be grouped by the source of danger in the triangle “person – mechanism – road”. Conclusions: The most dangerous and widespread victimological risks for road users in Ukraine are speeding and maneuvering, drunk driving, parking violations, poor road infrastructure, physiological and psychological characteristics of road users, low professional skills of drivers, etc.

scholarly journals Peculiarities of interaction of investigators with operative subdivisions of the National Police of Ukraine.

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 289-293
Author(s):  
Inna Sichkovska
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The State ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Main Task ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
National Police ◽  
Do So

. The scientific article is devoted to the issues of peculiarities of interaction of investigators with operative subdivisions of the National Police of Ukraine. It is determined that it should be understood as the interaction of employees of inquiry units with operational units of the National Police of Ukraine. The classification, forms and principles of such interaction are specified. The interaction between the coroner and the operative unit during the pre-trial investigation in the form of an inquiry has limits set by the legislator: it can be carried out at any stage of the pre-trial investigation in the form of an inquiry, but must end with the closure of criminal proceedings. application of coercive measures of medical or educational nature, petition for release of a person from criminal liability. When investigating criminal offenses, investigators interact with employees of operational units of the National Police, security agencies, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, the State Bureau of Investigation, bodies supervising compliance with tax and customs legislation, the State Penitentiary Service of Ukraine, the State Border Guard services of Ukraine on the basis of the Constitution of Ukraine, the Criminal Code of Ukraine, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Laws of Ukraine «On the National Police», «On operational and investigative activities», etc. The investigator, exercising his powers in accordance with the requirements of the CPC of Ukraine, is independent in his procedural activities, interference in which persons who do not have the legal authority to do so is prohibited. The main task of interaction of inquiry units of the National Police of Ukraine with other structural subdivisions of the National Police is prevention of criminal offenses, their detection and investigation, bringing to justice the perpetrators, compensation for damage caused by criminal offenses, restoration of violated rights and interests of individuals.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document