Recruitment and ATM-mediated phosphorylation of repair and signaling proteins at DNA double strand breaks

NMDA Receptor Signaling Mediates cFos Expression via Top2β-Induced DSBs in Glioblastoma Cells

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers11030306 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 11 (3) ◽

pp. 306 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Henrik Lutz ◽

Thy Nguyen ◽

Juliane Joswig ◽

Kerstin Rau ◽

Bodo Laube

Keyword(s):

Nmda Receptor ◽

Clonogenic Survival ◽

Early Response ◽

Double Strand Breaks ◽

Signaling Proteins ◽

Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽

Strand Breaks ◽

Promising Target ◽

Nmdar Activation ◽

Responsive Element

The activation of Ca2+-permeable N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor channels (NMDARs) is crucial for the development and survival of neurons, but many cancers use NMDAR-mediated signaling as well, enhancing the growth and invasiveness of tumors. Thus, NMDAR-dependent pathways emerge as a promising target in cancer therapy. Here, we use the LN229 and U-87MG glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cells and immunofluorescence staining of 53BP1 to analyze NMDAR-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), which represent an important step in the NMDAR signaling pathway in neurons by facilitating the expression of early response genes. Our results show that NMDAR activation leads to the induction of DSBs in a subpopulation of glioma cells. In a further analogy to neurons, our results demonstrate that the induction of DSBs in LN229 cells is dependent on the activity of topoisomerase IIβ (Top2β). Western blot analysis revealed that the inhibition of NMDARs, cAMP-responsive element binding transcription factor (CREB) and Top2β decreased the expression of the proto-oncogene cFos. Knockdown of Top2β with siRNAs resulted in a downregulation of cFos and increased the radiosensitivity of LN229 cells in clonogenic survival. We also observed impaired cFos expression upon NMDAR and Top2β inhibition in a primary GBM cell line, suggesting that NMDAR signaling may be widely used by GBMs, demonstrating the potential of targeting NMDAR signaling proteins for GBM therapy.

Download Full-text

SET8 localization to chromatin flanking DNA damage is dependent on RNF168 ubiquitin ligase

10.1101/766147 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Stanimir Dulev ◽

Sichun Lin ◽

Qingquan Liu ◽

Vildan B. Cetintas ◽

Nizar N. Batada

Keyword(s):

Dna Damage ◽

Ubiquitin Ligase ◽

Proteasome Inhibition ◽

Double Strand Breaks ◽

Signaling Proteins ◽

Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽

Post Translational Modifications ◽

Chromatin Remodelers ◽

Strand Breaks

AbstractThe DNA damage response (DDR) associated post-translational modifications recruit chromatin remodelers, signaling proteins such as 53BP1 and repair factors to chromatin flanking DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) to promote its repair. Although localization of both RNF168 ubiquitin ligase and SET8 methyltransferase at DSBs is essential for 53BP1’s recruitment to DSBs, it is unclear if they do so via the same pathways. Here we report that RNF168 mediates SET8’s recruitment to DSBs. Depletion of cellular pool of ubiquitin through proteasome inhibition abolished RNF168 and SET8’s localization to DNA damage. Knockdown of RNF8 or RNF168 abolished SET8’s recruitment to DNA damage. Moreover, RNF168 and SET8 form stable complexes in vivo. Based on these results we propose a model in which SET8, which despite being a pan-chromatin binding protein, can accumulate several folds at chromatin flanking DSBs through tethering to other proteins that specifically localize to chromatin regions with specific modifications.

Download Full-text

Repair pathway choice for double-strand breaks

Essays in Biochemistry ◽

10.1042/ebc20200007 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 64 (5) ◽

pp. 765-777 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Yixi Xu ◽

Dongyi Xu

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Double Strand Breaks ◽

Homologous Region ◽

Gene Repair ◽

Repair Pathway ◽

Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽

Environmental Radiation ◽

Strand Breaks ◽

Dna End Resection ◽

End Resection

Abstract Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is at a constant risk of damage from endogenous substances, environmental radiation, and chemical stressors. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) pose a significant threat to genomic integrity and cell survival. There are two major pathways for DSB repair: nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). The extent of DNA end resection, which determines the length of the 3′ single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) overhang, is the primary factor that determines whether repair is carried out via NHEJ or HR. NHEJ, which does not require a 3′ ssDNA tail, occurs throughout the cell cycle. 53BP1 and the cofactors PTIP or RIF1-shieldin protect the broken DNA end, inhibit long-range end resection and thus promote NHEJ. In contrast, HR mainly occurs during the S/G2 phase and requires DNA end processing to create a 3′ tail that can invade a homologous region, ensuring faithful gene repair. BRCA1 and the cofactors CtIP, EXO1, BLM/DNA2, and the MRE11–RAD50–NBS1 (MRN) complex promote DNA end resection and thus HR. DNA resection is influenced by the cell cycle, the chromatin environment, and the complexity of the DNA end break. Herein, we summarize the key factors involved in repair pathway selection for DSBs and discuss recent related publications.

Download Full-text