Identification of carriers of resistance to common bunt (Tilletia caries) of winter wheat

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Common Bunt ◽  
Tilletia Caries

Variability of resistance to common bunt of wheat

1999 ◽  
Vol 35 (No. 1) ◽  
pp. 26-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Pospisil ◽  
J. Benada ◽  
I. Polisenská
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Wheat Variety ◽  
High Variability ◽  
Common Bunt ◽  
Wheat Varieties ◽  
Tilletia Caries ◽  
Winter Wheat Variety ◽  
Seed Dressing ◽  
Spring Wheat Variety

During 1997–1998, the reaction of the collections of winter and spring wheat varieties to Tilletia caries was determined. In both years the most diseased winter varieties were Simona and Sparta, the least diseased were Samara and Ilona. High variability in the level of infection was observed in some varieties (VIada, Estica, Regina, Vega). No winter wheat variety was completely resistant. The most diseased spring wheat variety was Alexandria in both years, while Grandur showed no infection. High variability in the level of infection was observed in the special trials with cv. Ina and Contra. In trials of the efficacy of seed dressing against T. caries and T. laevis there was variability only in the controls, but not in dressed variants.

scholarly journals Common Bunt Resistance of Winter Wheat Genotypes Under Artificial Infection

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4.38) ◽  
pp. 737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuttymurat Tagayev ◽  
Aleksey Morgounov ◽  
Minura Yessimbekova ◽  
Aigul Abugalieya
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Disease Incidence ◽  
Artificial Infection ◽  
Common Bunt ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Breeding Programs ◽  
Tilletia Caries ◽  
Wheat Genotypes ◽  
Moderate Resistance ◽  
High Level

Common bunt (Tilletia caries) is a seed-transmitted fungal disease in wheat. The resistant cultivars and germplasm lines of wheat will be useful for control this type of disease in organic farming. A set of 75 wheat cultivars and lines from International Winter Wheat Improvement Program (IWWIP) of Turkey were used to determine resistance to common bunt. The experiment was carried out at the Kazakh Research Institute of Agriculture and experimental material was grown in an artificially inoculated nursery during the 2016-2017 season. The productivity of wheat genotypes under artificial infection ranged from 1.13 t/ha to 7.29 t/ha. The susceptible check to common bunt, GEREK 79 had a high level of susceptibility to common bunt with 59.7% infected heads. The high mean disease incidence in the nursery was 74.4%. Sixteen genotypes were resistant to disease under artificial inoculation. Out of 75 wheat cutivars, 42 wheat genotypes (56% of all genotypes) were classified as moderate resistance to disease. Identified resistance genotypes will be useful for breeding programs for forming resistance cultivars to common bunt in Kazakhstan.   

scholarly journals Genetic architecture of common bunt resistance in winter wheat using genome-wide association study

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amira M. I. Mourad ◽  
Ahmed Sallam ◽  
Vikas Belamkar ◽  
Ezzat Mahdy ◽  
Bahy Bakheit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Association Study ◽  
Genetic Architecture ◽  
Genome Wide Association Study ◽  
Genome Wide Association ◽  
Common Bunt ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Bunt Resistance

scholarly journals Immunological characteristics of winter wheat varieties to the main pathogens in the right-bank Forest Steppe

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 74-81
Author(s):  
L. Golosna ◽  
O. G. Afanasieva ◽  
O.V. Shevchuk ◽  
L.O. Kucherova ◽  
I.S. Shvets ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Powdery Mildew ◽  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Root Rot ◽  
Tan Spot ◽  
High Plasticity ◽  
Common Bunt ◽  
Sources Of Resistance ◽  
Wheat Varieties ◽  
Group Resistance ◽  
Winter Wheat Varieties

Aim. To determine the resistance of winter wheat varieties to the main pathogens, to establish their stability and plasticity, to identify perspective sources of resistance. Methods. Laboratory – production of inoculum of pathogens; field – artificial inoculation,, assessment of variety stability; statistical calculation of disease severity, indicators of stability and plasticity. Results. In 2015–2017, the resistance of 43 varieties of winter wheat to the main pathogens of leaf diseases, common bunt and root rots was assessed. Resistance to powdery mildew was found in 32 varieties, tan spot – in 2, root rot – in 3, hard smut – in 2 varieties. Six varieties of winter wheat were characterized by group resistance. Varieties that combine high plasticity and stability of the sign of disease resistance have been identified. Conclusions. Valuable sources of resistance are winter wheat varieties with group resistance to common bunt and powdery mildew – Tradytsiia Odeska and Kurs; powdery mildew and tan spot – Nasnaga and Zolotonozhka; powdery mildew and root rot – Nezabudka and Shchedrist kyivska.Keywords: resistance, winter wheat, diseases, plasticity, stability.

Tilletia foetida. [Descriptions of Fungi and Bacteria].

1981 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. M. Mordue
Keyword(s):  
Geographical Distribution ◽  
Volatile Compound ◽  
Moist Soil ◽  
Common Bunt ◽  
Tilletia Caries ◽  
Dikaryotic Mycelium ◽  
Tilletia Foetida

Abstract A description is provided for Tilletia foetida. Information is included on the disease caused by the organism, its transmission, geographical distribution, and hosts. HOSTS: On Triticum, Secale, Triticale, Hordeum, Agropyron, Elymus, Sitanion, Lolium. DISEASE: Causes common bunt (stinking or covered smut) of wheat. Tilletia caries (CMI Descriptions 719) causes a virtually identical disease known by the same name. The seed contents inside the pericarp are converted to a mass of teliospores and the seed converted into a 'bunt ball' which ruptures on harvesting, releasing the black spores and the volatile compound trimethylamine which has a foul, fishy odour. Diseased plants are somewhat stunted and the heads of infected plants remain greener than those containing healthy grain and are more slender; the glumes of diseased spikelets are also spread apart. GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION: Widely distributed in most countries where wheat is grown but less widespread than T. caries and not apparently in UK (CMI Map 295, ed. 2, 1968). TRANSMISSION: Spores are released when the grain is harvested and are dispersed by air to contaminate healthy grain and soil. Spores germinate in moist soil to produce a basidium and acicular basidiospores (primary sporidia). These fuse to produce a dikaryotic mycelium which may directly infect host seedling coleoptiles or produce further secondary sporidia.

OVERWINTERING OF CERTAIN CEREAL PATHOGENS IN ALBERTA

1937 ◽  
Vol 15c (12) ◽  
pp. 547-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. R. Foster ◽  
A. W. Henry
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Fusarium Culmorum ◽  
Soil Surface ◽  
Freezing And Thawing ◽  
Tilletia Caries ◽  
Helminthosporium Sativum ◽  
Favorable Conditions ◽  
Germ Tubes ◽  
Continuous Freezing ◽  
Hardened Condition

Helminthosporium sativum, Fusarium culmorum, Ophiobolus graminis, Leptosphaeria herpotrichoides, Wojnowicia graminis, Erysiphe graminis, Tilletia caries, and Tilletia foetens readily overwinter under natural conditions at Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. The first five of these overwinter at Edmonton in both spore and vegetative stages and are highly resistant to cold. Even in a non-hardened condition several of them survived severe frost. Young germ tubes of H. sativum for instance continued growth after being frozen solid overnight. Fresh agar cultures of H. sativum, F. culmorum and O. graminis grew vigorously after exposure to sub-zero temperatures. Agar cultures of H. sativum and F. culmorum were viable after a 17-day exposure to temperatures ranging from about 0° F. to —50° F.Conidia of H. sativum proved less resistant to freezing and thawing than to continuous freezing. They survived longer than conidia of F. culmorum and F. graminearum. Mycelia of all foot-rot fungi grown on sterilized barley seeds were viable in one case after three months of continuous freezing, and in another after 40 alternate freezings and thawings. H. sativum and F. culmorum growing in soil survived 61 alternate freezings and thawings.H. sativum, F. culmorum and L. herpotrichoides, retained their viability more readily on the soil surface than when buried at depths of from 2 to 12 in. Well aerated soil seemed to favor the survival of H. sativum, although other factors besides aeration probably are involved. Strains of H. sativum from high latitudes were not better adapted to low temperatures than strains from lower latitudes.The bunt fungi, T. caries and T. foetens, are shown to be capable of overwintering at Edmonton in the form of mycelia in winter wheat. Infection of winter wheat from soil-borne spores may occur in western Canada, but in these experiments soil-borne spores did not survive to infect wheat in the spring.Erysiphe graminis overwinters in the perithecial stage at Edmonton. In the studies made, ascospores were differentiated in the spring, when favorable conditions prevailed and before the first infections of winter wheat were observed.

scholarly journals Response of Lithuanian Winter Wheat Advanced Lines to Common Bunt (Tilletia tritici (BJERK.) WINT)

2009 ◽  
Vol 63 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 51-56
Author(s):  
Vytautas Ruzgas ◽  
Žilvinas Liatukas
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Disease Incidence ◽  
Common Bunt ◽  
Infection Level ◽  
Breeding Lines ◽  
Tilletia Tritici ◽  
Resistance Sources ◽  
Resistant Lines ◽  
High Infection ◽  
Very High

Response of Lithuanian Winter Wheat Advanced Lines to Common Bunt (Tilletia tritici (BJERK.) WINT) The study was carried out at the Lithuanian Institute of Agriculture in an artificially inoculated nursery during 2006-2007. Resistance to common bunt in 2006 was tested for 71, in 2007 for 118 breeding lines of Lithuanian winter wheat from the competitive trial nursery. Additionally, 148 promising lines were selected and tested from the check nursery, which possessed some resistance in their pedigree ancestors. The average disease incidence in 2006 and 2007 was 80.9 and 63.5%, respectively. The very high infection level highlighted the genotypes with the most effective resistance under conditions highly favourable for common bunt. There were no lines without infected ears. Among the 29 breeding lines tested in the two years, two lines Bill/Aspirant and Dream/Lut.9329 were infected the least, 17.2% and 1.9% in 2006 and 18.5% and 7.8% in 2007, respectively. Most of the breeding lines were highly susceptible. Lines with disease incidence over 50% accounted for over 90% in 2006 and 80% in 2007 of the total lines tested. The most resistant lines had in their pedigrees the following resistance sources: genotypes Bill, Lut.9329, Strumok, Lut.9313, Lut.9358, Tommi as well as Dream, Haldor, 91002G2.1, 96/101, Bezenchiukskaya380.

Comparative Genealogical Analysis of the Resistance of Winter Wheat to Common Bunt

2004 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 410-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. P. Martynov ◽  
T. V. Dobrotvorskaya ◽  
O. D. Sorokin
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Common Bunt ◽  
Genealogical Analysis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document