Scientific creativity of G.V.F. Hegel and prospects development of modern Philosophy of Law: to the 250th anniversary of the birth of G.V.F. Hegel and the 200th anniversary of his "Philosophy of Law"

2020 ◽  
pp. 165
Author(s):  
Nataliya Krotkova
Keyword(s):  
Modern Philosophy ◽  
Philosophy Of Law ◽  
Scientific Creativity ◽  
250Th Anniversary ◽  
200Th Anniversary

THEORY OF LAW AND PHILOSOPHY OF LAW AS THEORETICAL DISCOURSES: SPECIFICS AND RELATIONSHIP

2020 ◽  
pp. 9-17
Author(s):  
Вадим Леонидович Афанасьевский
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Knowledge ◽  
Scientific Theory ◽  
Theoretical Concept ◽  
Philosophy Of Law ◽  
The West ◽  
Scientific Creativity ◽  
Key Characteristics ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Theory Of Law ◽  
The Relationship

В статье анализируется проблема взаимоотношений философии права и научной теории права. Рассматриваемая проблема стала особенно актуальной в российском образовательном пространстве в связи с введением после длительного перерыва в государственный образовательный стандарт магистратуры по юриспруденции учебной дисциплины «Философия права». Автор статьи в качестве базисного принимает тезис, согласно которому философия права, являясь сферой философской мысли, и теория права как область научного социогуманитарного знания представляют собой разные типы теоретического дискурса. Исходя из этого, в статье выстраивается теоретическая концепция, согласно которой задачей философии права как философского типа мышления является конструирование или экспликация онтологических, эпистемологических, аксиологических, феноменологических оснований для формирования и функционирования научных теоретико-правовых и историко-правовых построений. Для реализации поставленной в статье задачи подробно рассматриваются ключевые характеристики как теории философского типа, так и идеалов, норм и характеристик научного знания. Выявленное различие экстраполируется на взаимоотношение теории права как продукта научного творчества и философии права как конструкции, задающей базовые мировоззренческие смыслы. В качестве примера выработанных философией права и государства оснований научных теорий прогресса, государства, морали и права, автор приводит взгляды мыслителей западноевропейской философской классики: Т. Гоббса, Ж.-Ж. Руссо, И. Канта, Г.В.Ф. Гегеля. Именно их философские концепции предопределили образы теоретико- и историко-правовых учений XVIII, XIX, XX и даже начала XXI в. Таким образом, отношение философии права и теории права выстраивается по «вертикали»: от онтологического основания к возведению теоретико-правовых и историко-правовых научных построений. The article analyzes the problem of the relationship between the philosophy of law and the scientific theory of law. The problem under consideration has become especially urgent in the Russian educational space in connection with the introduction of the Philosophy of Law discipline master's degree in law after a long break. The author of the article takes as the basis the thesis that the philosophy of law, being the sphere of philosophical thought, and the theory of law as a field of scientific socio-humanitarian knowledge are different types of theoretical discourse. Based on this, the article builds a theoretical concept according to which the task of the philosophy of law as a philosophical type of thinking is the construction or explication of ontological, epistemological, axiological, phenomenological grounds for the formation and functioning of concrete scientific theoretical and legal and historical and legal constructions. To implement the task posed in the article, the key characteristics of both a theory of a philosophical type and ideals, norms and characteristics of scientific knowledge are examined in detail. The revealed difference is extrapolated to the relationship between the theory of law as a product of scientific creativity and the philosophy of law as a construction that sets basic philosophical meanings. As an example of the foundations of the scientific theories of progress, state, morality and law developed by the philosophy of law and the state, the author gives the views and thinkers of the West European philosophical classics T. Hobbes, J.-J. Russo, I. Kant, G.V.F. Hegel. It was their philosophical concepts that predetermined the images of theoretical and historical-legal doctrines of the XVIII, XIX, XX and even the beginning of the XXI centuries. Thus, the attitude of the philosophy of law and the theory of law is built along the «vertical»: from the ontological foundation to the construction of theoretical and historical and historical legal scientific constructions.

scholarly journals methodological conflict between theory and philosophy of law

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (S3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergey S. Shestopal ◽  
Elena A. Kazachanskaya ◽  
Svetlana V. Kachurova ◽  
Evgeniy V. Kachurov
Keyword(s):  
Modern Philosophy ◽  
Ontological Status ◽  
Philosophy Of Law ◽  
Legal Science ◽  
Scientific Disciplines ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
Theory Of Law

The subject of this research is the recently intensified competition in modern jurisprudence of two equally respectable scientific disciplines: philosophy of law and theory of law. The goal is to demarcate the meaning of these concepts. Their ontological status (essential significance) in relation to the existence of the law, the reflection of which they are, is also considered. Based on analysis of the existential criticism of the dominant forms of modern ideology, it is proved that the existing theories of law depend on these forms. A stable tendency in modern philosophy to return legal science to the origins of philosophical knowledge of legal reality is stated.

scholarly journals READING GEGEL. REFLECTIONS ON THE 200TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE "PHILOSOPHY OF LAW

2021 ◽  
pp. 67-88
Author(s):  
С.И. Захарцев ◽  
В.П. Сальников
Keyword(s):  
Philosophy Of Law ◽  
Insufficient Attention ◽  
200Th Anniversary ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Relationship

Авторы знакомят с результатами анализа «Философии права» Гегеля. Выделяются фрагменты названной книги, которым не уделялось или уделялось недостаточно внимания со стороны философов и юристов. Например, демонстрируются размышления Гегеля о войне, о России, о других народах, анализируются отношения философа и власти. Материал может быть интересен как специалистам, так и широкому кругу читателей. The authors present the results of the analysis of Hegel's "Philosophy of Law". Fragments of the named book are highlighted, which were not paid or received insufficient attention from philosophers and lawyers. For example, Hegel's reflections on the war, about Russia, about other peoples are demonstrated, the relationship between the philosopher and the authorities is analyzed. The material can be of interest to both specialists and a wide range of readers.

scholarly journals Socio-Cultural Foundations of the National Philosophy of Law: History and Modernity

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 48-57
Author(s):  
I A Katsapova
Keyword(s):  
Social Development ◽  
Modern Philosophy ◽  
Social Life ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Social Institutions ◽  
Social Philosophy ◽  
Special Importance ◽  
Main Task ◽  
Philosophy Of Law ◽  
Cultural Foundations

The article reveals the socio-cultural foundations of the national philosophy of law, which are considered in the historical and modern civilizational aspect. The role of law is analyzed in social and cultural programs of social development. It is emphasized that the special importance in the conditions of modern modernization of state and public relations is the understanding of the possibilities and boundaries of the implementation of the existing universal meanings and principles of the organization. It is emphasized relations and their adaptation to modern processes. Modernization is considered as a factor of social development of society, as a way to improve social institutions and relations. The article also focuses on the problem of global modernization and inclusion of local cultures. The article focuses on the problem of adaptation of traditional societies to the modern model of global modernization. The attention focuses on the fact that modern social projects and concepts should move from the concept of «global community» to the understanding of new factors of social life and form new ideas about the conditions of human life in the planetary world.The article reveals the principle of correlation between the philosophy of law and social philosophy. Domestic philosophy of law, is based on philosophical ethics. It is presented in the article as a «normative area of knowledge», and transformed into a system of norms (law and morality) regulations and obligations of public life. It is also emphasized that the main task of the modern philosophy of law is to determine the conceptual unity of historical and modern understanding of the nature of the socio-political world and ways of its knowledge, based on the dialectic of complementarity. The practical task of the modern philosophy of law is to substantiate and concretize the ideology of social life, which assumes the unity of law, politics and morality. It is also proved that in the context of globalization the modern philosophy of law meets the challenges that actualizes the process of socio-political integration and modernization.

scholarly journals Freedom of conscience and freedom of religion: Religious, theological and legal dimensions

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (19) ◽  
pp. 5-10
Author(s):  
Mykhailo Babiy ◽  
Sergiy Prysukhin
Keyword(s):  
Modern Philosophy ◽  
Religious Studies ◽  
Self Determination ◽  
Freedom Of Religion ◽  
Large Array ◽  
Philosophy Of Law ◽  
Freedom Of Conscience ◽  
Social Transformations ◽  
Temporal Aspect ◽  
Special Studies

Among the problems of religious studies and theological discourses in the historical and temporal aspect, theoretical and practical issues related to freedom of conscience and freedom of religion are constant in their relevance. Actualization of the attention of domestic and foreign scientists and theologians in recent years is largely due to globalization processes, social transformations, the desire to establish a free, full justice of people's lives, as well as a significant exacerbation of the problems of the formation of the ideological and semantic (including religious) base of modern being personality, self-determination and self-realization of which in the sphere of worldview, morals and rights today appear to be necessary and extraordinary. Without exaggeration these problems are some of the most important topics of modern philosophy of law, religious studies and jurisprudence. Essential, conceptual peculiarities of freedom of conscience and freedom of religion, their paradigmatic fundamentals are devoted to a large array of scientific, theological literature, special studies.

scholarly journals Idea of law for XXI century (on some tasks of the modern philosophy of law

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-86
Author(s):  
M V Shugurov
Keyword(s):  
Modern Philosophy ◽  
Legal Philosophy ◽  
Philosophy Of Law ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Decisive Importance ◽  
Methodological Approaches ◽  
The Law

The article is devoted to understanding and updating the methodological approaches to analysis of the idea of law as a phenomenon of the legal reality. The author pays an increased attention to justification of the idea in a kind of the tool for cognition and change of the positive law. A decisive importance is given to examining some perspectives of considering the idea of law as the paradigm and the fundamental image combining the axiological and logical moments of legal reality. In the article there is conducted the thought on that elaborating the Idea of law for XXI century suppose modernizing the agenda of modern legal philosophy as well as implementation of practical steps concerning forming the dialogue between adherents of different models of understanding the law so long as the idea of law is integrated unity of fundamental legal ideas not reduced fully to each of such ideas.

scholarly journals The Nature and Potential Applications of Contextual Definition in Philosophy of Law

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vitaly Ogleznev
Keyword(s):  
Modern Philosophy ◽  
Philosophy Of Language ◽  
Philosophy Of Law ◽  
Legal Language ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Legal Science ◽  
Potential Applications ◽  
Contextual Definition ◽  
Legal Concepts

The paper analyses the nature and potential applications of contextual definitions in modern philosophy of language and jurisprudence. It is shown that the distinction between a contextual definition and a genus–differentia definition proposed by some legal philosophers, where the latter is considered ineffective and unproductive in analyzing legal concepts, is sometimes deceptive. The weaknesses of the argument about this distinction are shown by examining the constitutional legal rules, which can be considered an example of the application of contextual definitions in legal science. On the basis of this claim, it is shown that these two types of definition may well coexist at least in legal language and in some sense complement each other when different areas of their applicability are taken into account.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document