scholarly journals Interprofesioanal Education (IPE) Sebagai Upaya Membangun Kemampuan Perawat Dalam Berkolaborasi Dengan Tenaga Kesehatan Lain

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Puput Risti Kusumaningrum ◽  
Anggorowati Anggorowati
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration

Latar Belakang : Pelayanan kesehatan yang bermutu menjadi tuntutan bagi pemberi pelayanan kesehatan di era global. Pelayanan kesehatan yang bermutu dapat dicapai dengan praktek kolaborasi. Pendidikan terintegrasi yang dicetuskan sebagai media kolaborasi menurut WHO adalah Interprofesional Education (IPE). IPE merupakan proses dimana sekelompok peserta didik atau tenaga kesehatan dengan latar belakang berbeda belajar bersama dalam jangka waktu tertentu pada masa pendidikan, dengan interaksi sebagai tujuan utamanya, untuk kolaborasi dalam menyediakan pelayanan preventif, promotif, rehabilitataif, dan pelayanan kesehatan lainnya (WHO, 2010). Konsep pembelajaran IPE dapat diterapkan dalam 3 kegiatan yaitu pada pembelajaran di Rumah Sakit, akademik, dan komunitas. Pembelajaran IPE di Rumah Sakit yang berjalan baik diharapkan dapat menghasilkan profesional di bidang kesehatan yang mampu berkolaborasi dengan profesi kesehatan lain, sehingga dapat berperan serta dalam pembangunan kesehatan di Indonesia. Tujuan : Literature review ini untuk mengetahui apakah IPE dapat membangun  kemampuan perawat dalam berkolaborasi dengan tim kesehatan lainMetode : Literature review ini dilakukan dengan melakukan penelusuran artikel publikasi pada EBSCO, Googlesearch, PubMed, Sciencedirect.com dengan kata kunci yang dipilih yaitu interprofessional education (IPE), collaboration, interprofessional collaboration (IPC). Penelusuran dilakukan dengan membatasi terbitan dari tahun 2010-2015. Hasil : Dari hasil penelusuran literatur bahwa IPE secara efektif dapat membangun kemampuan perawat dalam berkolaborasi dengan tenaga kesehatan lain. Diharapkan pelaksanaan IPE dapat dilaksanakan secara berkelanjutan dengan persiapan yang lebih maksimal lagi, mengingat institusi kesehatan merupakan penyedia utama calon tenaga kesehatan professional.

scholarly journals A Rapid Literature Review on the Strategies for Collaboration Between Occupational therapists and Speech-Language Therapists in the Field of Augmentative and Alternative Communication

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daryl Patrick Yao
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Augmentative And Alternative Communication ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Occupational Therapists ◽  
The Philippines ◽  
Case Based Learning ◽  
Communication Needs ◽  
The Right ◽  
Meta Analyses

An alternative and augmentative communication (AAC) device replaces or supplements a person’s natural speech. Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs) collaborate with a team of healthcare professionals in the process of identification and use of the right AAC device for a person with complex communication needs (CCN). In the Philippines, occupational therapists (OTs) and SLPs are more likely to collaborate in the treatment of their clients due to their interprofessional education (IPE) experience. However, most Filipino SLPs do not engage in interprofessional collaboration (IPC) when rendering AAC services. Thus, there is a need to identify existing literature that tackles collaborative practices to raise the quality of service and care. Hence, this study aimed to identify and discuss existing literature that documented IPE and IPC strategies between OTs and SLPs in the field of AAC. The structure of this literature review was guided and adapted from the topics outlined in the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). Literature archived in two databases (Pubmed and Scopus) were reviewed. Two articles out of five studies were included in this review. Strategies found were “case based learning approach” for post-graduate students and the “Beyond Access model” in supporting practitioners. In conclusion, there is a dearth of literature on IPC practices among OTs and SLPs in the field of AAC. There is a need to report IPE and IPC efforts in the Philippines to provide applicable strategies to the local healthcare landscape.

scholarly journals Stereotyping as a Major Barrier to Achievement of Interprofessional Education Competencies: A Narrative Literature Review

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Conroy
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
Major Barrier ◽  
Search Terms ◽  
Narrative Literature ◽  
Narrative Literature Review ◽  
Barriers To Achievement ◽  
Negative Stereotyping

Purpose: A major advancement in interprofessional(IP) practice and education has been the introduction of the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) core competencies. The purpose of this study is to explore stereotyping as a barrier to achievement of the IPEC competencies. Methods: There has been research into barriers to interprofessional collaboration and some barrier themes have occurred. But to this point, nothing has been studied on barriers to the use of the IPEC core competencies. This study aims to show barriers to achievement of the IPEC competencies through a narrative literature review. Articles were selected from three databases: CINAHL, Medline and ERIC were utilized in this review using the search terms “Interprofessional collaboration” and “Stereotyping”. Results: In articles used to review barriers to interprofessional collaboration, an underlying theme of negative stereotyping about different professions appears to be in place. Themes include: Differences in history and culture, fears of diluted professional identity, differences in language and jargon, and concerns regarding clinical responsibility. Conclusion: A literature review of studies on implementation of interprofessional activities, with correlations to the IPEC core competencies as a framework suggest that stereotyping may be a major barrier to implementation and achievement of the IPEC competencies.

Moving From Interprofessional Education Toward Interprofessional Practice: Bridging the Translation Gap

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 971-976
Author(s):  
Imran Musaji ◽  
Trisha Self ◽  
Karissa Marble-Flint ◽  
Ashwini Kanade
Keyword(s):  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Evaluation Model ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Interprofessional Practice ◽  
Translational Model ◽  
Key Stakeholders ◽  
Clear Identification

Purpose The purpose of this article was to propose the use of a translational model as a tool for identifying limitations of current interprofessional education (IPE) research. Translational models allow researchers to clearly define next-step research needed to translate IPE to interprofessional practice (IPP). Method Key principles, goals, and limitations of current IPE research are reviewed. A popular IPE evaluation model is examined through the lens of implementation research. The authors propose a new translational model that more clearly illustrates translational gaps that can be used to direct future research. Next steps for translating IPE to IPP are discussed. Conclusion Comprehensive reviews of the literature show that the implementation strategies adopted to date have fostered improved buy-in from key stakeholders, as evidenced by improved attitudes and perceptions toward interprofessional collaboration/practice. However, there is little evidence regarding successful implementation outcomes, such as changed clinician behaviors, changed organizational practices, or improved patient outcomes. The authors propose the use of an IPE to IPP translational model to facilitate clear identification of research gaps and to better identify future research targets.

Interprofessional Collaboration to Promote Culturally Engaged and Strengths-Based Practice

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 1410-1421
Author(s):  
Erica Ellis ◽  
Mary Kubalanza ◽  
Gabriela Simon-Cereijido ◽  
Ashley Munger ◽  
Allison Sidle Fuligni
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Training Program ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Clinical Training ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Communication Disorders ◽  
Outreach Program ◽  
State University ◽  
Diversity And Inclusion ◽  
Health Nursing

Purpose To effectively prepare students to engage in interprofessional practice, a number of Communication Disorders (COMD) programs are designing new courses and creating additional opportunities to develop the interprofessional competencies that will support future student success in health and education-related fields. The ECHO (Educational Community Health Outreach) program is one example of how the Rongxiang Xu College of Health and Human Services at California State University, Los Angeles, has begun to create these opportunities. The ultimate goal of the ECHO project is to increase both access to and continuity of oral health care across communities in the greater Los Angeles area. Method We describe this innovative interdisciplinary training program within the context of current interprofessional education models. First, we describe the program and its development. Second, we describe how COMD students benefit from the training program. Third, we examine how students from other disciplines experience benefits related to interprofessional education and COMD. Fourth, we provide reflections and insights from COMD faculty who participated in the project. Conclusions The ECHO program has great potential for continuing to build innovative clinical training opportunities for students with the inclusion of Child and Family Studies, Public Health, Nursing, and Nutrition departments. These partnerships push beyond the norm of disciplines often used in collaborative efforts in Communication Sciences and Disorders. Additionally, the training students received with ECHO incorporates not only interprofessional education but also relevant and important aspects of diversity and inclusion, as well as strengths-based practices.

Informed consent and nurses’ roles

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 684-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Astrid P Susilo ◽  
Jan van Dalen ◽  
Michelene N Chenault ◽  
Albert Scherpbier
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
National Level ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Informed Consent Process ◽  
Consent Process ◽  
Nurses And Physicians ◽  
Three Factor

Background: In Southeast Asia, the process of obtaining informed consent is influenced by both culture and policy at the hospital and national level. Both physicians and nurses play vital roles in this process, but physicians influence the roles of nurses. Objectives: Since the physicians and nurses often have different perspectives, it is important to investigate their views about the informed consent process and nurses’ roles therein and whether there is a difference between ideal and experienced practice (reality), and whether this differs across hospitals. Methods: A questionnaire was developed and a survey was conducted among physicians and nurses. Using exploratory factor analysis a three factor structure was determined: ‘nurses’ roles’, ‘barriers in informed consent’, and ‘adequacy of information’. Non-parametric tests were applied to compare nurses and physicians, and hospital setting. Participants and research context: Responses were obtained from 129 physicians and 616 nurses from two Indonesian hospitals. Those hospitals differ in ownership, location, and size. Ethical consideration: The study was reviewed by the hospital ethical committee. Participation was voluntary and confidentiality was ensured by keeping the responses anonymous. Findings: Physicians and nurses differ significantly on all three factors. The scores reflecting disparity between ideal and reality regarding nurses’ roles varied across professions, while barriers in informed consent differed between hospitals. Discussion: The differences between ideal and reality indicated that improvement in the informed consent process and nurses’ roles therein is called for. Varying views between physicians and nurses on nurses’ roles may hinder collaboration. The differences between hospital settings showed interventions may have to be customized for different settings. Conclusion: Views on nurses’ roles vary across professions. Views on barriers in informed consent vary across hospitals. Therefore interprofessional education is needed to promote interprofessional collaboration and intervention to improve informed consent practice should be tailored to the hospital context.

Interprofessional Collaborative Practice and School Nursing: A Model for Improved Health Outcomes

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Fleming ◽  
Mayumi Willgerodt
Keyword(s):  
Case Management ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
School Setting ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
School Nurse ◽  
Collaborative Practice ◽  
Interprofessional Collaborative Practice

Effective communication, teamwork, and interprofessional collaboration, or teams of health and non-health professionals working together, are critical to improving the patient experience of care; improving population health; and reducing healthcare costs (i.e., the Triple Aim). In 2016, the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) Expert Panel updated its Core Competencies for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice. As health professionals who collaborate with an extensive network of health and non-health professionals, school nurses embody the aims of interprofessional collaboration (IPC). This article briefly reviews the background of interprofessional collaboration and describes ways that school nurse practice aligns with IPC core competencies to incorporate interprofessional collaboration. We discuss successes, such as case management and care coordination, and include challenges to IPC in the school setting. In conclusion, through case management and collaborative care, school nurse expertise in effective IPC fosters knowledge through which core competencies can be strengthened, with benefits for both patients and other healthcare providers.

scholarly journals Evaluation of an Interprofessional Problem-based Learning Module on Care of Persons Living with HIV/AIDS

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel D'Eon ◽  
Peggy Proctor ◽  
Jane Cassidy ◽  
Nora McKee ◽  
Krista Trinder
Keyword(s):  
Student Satisfaction ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Learning Experience ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Great Promise ◽  
Persons Living With Hiv ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Hiv Aids

Background: Interprofessional education (IPE) holds great promise in continuing to reform the management of complex chronic conditions such as HIV/AIDS, and Problem-based Learning (PBL) is a suitable format for IPE. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a large scale, compulsory interprofessional PBL module on HIV/AIDS education. In 2004, 30 physical therapy and 30 medical students at the University of Saskatchewan engaged in the HIV/AIDS PBL module. By 2007 over 300 students from seven healthcare programs were involved.Methods and Findings: The module was evaluated over the years using student satisfaction surveys, focus groups, self-assessments, and in 2007 with written pretest/post-tests. Students rated the learning experience about both HIV/AIDS and about interprofessional collaboration, at 4 or 5 out of 6 and effect sizes fell between d = .70 and 3.19. That only one pre-test/post-test study was conducted at a single institution is one of the limitations of this study.Conclusions: Students generally thought highly of the interprofessional PBL module on HIV/AIDS and learned a considerable amount. Although more research is needed to substantiate the self-assessment data, establish what and how much is being learned, and compare PBL to alternative methodologies, PBL is a promising approach to IPE.

scholarly journals “Mainstreaming” Interprofessional Education within Hospital Settings: Findings from a Multiple Case Study

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Hollenberg ◽  
Scott Reeves ◽  
Mary Agnes Beduz ◽  
Lianne Jeffs ◽  
Debbie Kwan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Professional Education ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Organizational Outcomes ◽  
Evaluation Framework ◽  
Management Support ◽  
Realistic Evaluation ◽  
Protected Time ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Insight Into

AbstractBackground: Interest in interprofessional education (IPE) to promote effective interprofessional collaboration (IPC) has gained momentum across healthcare, professional education, and government sectors. In general, the IPE literature tends to report single-site studies. This article presents a rare study that reports a largescale multi-site IPE initiative. It draws upon a newly developed notion of mainstreaming—introduced to the literature by Barr and Ross—that helps illuminate the implementation issues related to an IPE initiative.Methods and Findings: A realistic evaluation framework was employed to explore the overarching impact of this large initiative (involving 6 IPE programs within 13 hospitals) on the teaching hospital network in which it was implemented. Qualitative methods were used to gather a total of 142 interviews with program leaders, facilitators, and learners. Findings provide insight into the mainstreaming of IPE in relation to educational, professional, and organizational outcomes. Educational outcomes detail how inter-organizational partnerships developed among hospitals with the sharing of ideas and resources for implementing IPE and IPC. Professional outcomes describe learners’ experiences of increased awareness of the policy agenda and the meanings and value they attach to IPE and IPC. Organizational outcomes demonstrate that interprofessional champions with senior management support and protected time were core mainstreaming elements, and yet participants outlined a range of concerns and desires for the sustainability of this IPE initiative.Conclusions: This article provided empirical insight into the perceptions, ideas, and experiences of IPE from a wide range of program developers, facilitators, and attendees. Barr and Ross’ concept of mainstreaming and the use of a realistic evaluation framework provide a useful way to illuminate the processes and outcomes of implementing a large multi-institutional IPE initiative.

scholarly journals KOMUNIKASI DALAM PRAKTEK KOLABORASI INTERPROFESI SEBAGAI UPAYA PENINGKATAN PELAYANAN

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haira kaniara
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Effective Communication ◽  
Hospital Service

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui komunikasi efektif dalam praktik kolaborasi interprofesi akan meningkatkan kualitas pelayanan. Metode penelitian Literature review ini dilakukan dengan melakukan penelusuran artikel publikasi pada EBSCO,dengan kata kunci yang dipilih yaitu interprofessional Collaboration practice, effective communication, hospital,service quality.Dari hasil penelusuran bahwa kualitas layanan yang baik tergantung pada profesional yang bekerja sama dalam tim interprofessional. Komunikasi interprofesional yang digunakan adalah SBAR (Situation-Background Assessment-Recommendation).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document