scholarly journals Forms of Operative and Service Activities of the Ukraine’s State Border Guard Agencies (Units): Concepts and Legal Regulation

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 18-23
Author(s):  
V. V. Polovnikov
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
State Official ◽  
Individual Concepts ◽  
Service Activities ◽  
The Law ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Enforcement Activity

As the objective of this article, the characteristics of the concept and legal regulation of the Ukrainian state border guard agencies’ (units) operative and service activities forms are chosen. Such activity is a type of law enforcement activity. The level of the rule of law compliance of such agencies (units) officials and official persons’ service activities depends on the state of its legal regulation. Based on the analysis of the current Ukrainian legislation and scientific views, the author characterized such forms of operative and service activities as border guard and border control. The author's definition of individual concepts is formulated. In particular, according to the author, Ukraine’s state border guard unit is SBGSU state border guard agency’s structural unit, which is responsible for the state border’s certain section protection. The operative and service activities of such units is one of the forms of its state (official) external activity, which is implemented in the border guard service process and carrying out other measures, in accordance with the law enforcement and other SBGSU credentials, concerning persons and legal entities not subordinate to this unit, which implies the origin of all kinds of social relations. The form of operative and service activities of the respective unit is a system of interrelated measures reflecting the content of law enforcement and other credentials of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine in a certain direction of its state (official) external activities. The forms of operative and service activities are categorized. It is offered to regulate these concepts at the level of the Law of Ukraine “On the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine” and by-laws.

scholarly journals Administrative and Legal Principles of Prosecutor’s Office Interaction with Public Administration Entities on the Issues of Performing Assigned Functions

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-61
Author(s):  
О. Ю. Прокопенко ◽  
В. І. Кравцов
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Law ◽  
Executive Agencies ◽  
Enforcement Activity

The problem of legal regulation of interaction between the prosecutor’s office and public administration entities on the issues of performing the assigned functions has been studied. The research is based on studying such legislative acts as the Constitution of Ukraine, Laws of Ukraine “On Central Executive Agencies”, “On the Prosecutor’s Office”, “On the Status of MPs of Ukraine”, “On Temporary Investigative and Special Commissions of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine” and other legislative acts and bylaws regulating the interaction of the prosecutor’s office with state authorities. The interaction of the prosecutor’s office with public administration entities has been defined as the procedure of appeal of the prosecutor’s office to the executive authorities, which is regulated by law norms, as well as the procedure of consideration of the appeals of MPs and representatives of the executive authorities in the prosecutor’s office. The authors have established the following main directions of the interaction between the prosecutor’s office and the state authorities: consideration of Mps inquiries by the prosecutor’s office, participation of prosecutors in the work of investigative commissions and temporary special commissions of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, interaction of the prosecutor’s office with the Accounting Chamber of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, prosecutors’ representation of state interests in the court by presenting lawsuits within administrative, commercial or civil proceedings, interaction of the prosecutor’s office with the judicial branch of power in the process of judicial system, coordination of law enforcement activity, informing the representative authorities about the results of the activity of the prosecutor’s office and the rule of law in the state and individual territorial community. Improvement of legal principles of cooperation between prosecutor’s office and public administration entities can take place in such areas as bringing the provisions of the Law of Ukraine “On the Prosecutor’s Office” in line with the Constitution of Ukraine, development of a common form of request to all prosecutor’s office in regard to represent the interests in court, establishment of uniform terms for all authorities to consider their requests by the prosecutor’s office, establishment of a separate norm in the Law of Ukraine “On the Prosecutor’s Office” that would regulate the procedure and conditions of coordination of law enforcement activities of other authorities by the prosecutor’s office.

Zur Frage der doktrinellen Auslegung des Artikels 61 Pkt. 3 der Verfassung der Republik Kasachstan

2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-144
Author(s):  
Ermek B. Abdrasulov
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legislative Process ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
National Business

This article examines the issues of differentiation of legislative and subordinate regulation of public relations. It is noted that in the process of law-making activities, including the legislative process, practical questions often arise about the competence of various state bodies to establish various legal norms and rules. These issues are related to the need to establish a clear legal meaning of the constitutional norms devoted to the definition of the subject of regulation of laws. In particular, there is a need to clarify the provisions of paragraph 3 of Article 61 of the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan in terms of the concepts "the most important public relations", "all other relations", "subsidiary legislation", as well as to establish the relationship between these concepts. Interpretation is also required by the provisions of p. 4 of Article 61 of the Constitution in terms of clarifying the question of whether the conclusion follows from mentioned provisions that all possible social relations in the Republic of Kazakhstan are subject to legal regulation, including those that are subject to other social and technical regulators (morality, national, business and professional traditions and customs, religion, standards, technical regulations, etc.). Answering the questions raised, the author emphasizes that the law and bylaws, as a rule, constitute a single system of legislation, performing the functions of primary and secondary acts. However, the secondary nature of subsidiary legislation does not mean that they regulate "unimportant" public relations. The law is essentially aimed at regulating all important social relations.

scholarly journals Application of the concept of collective dominance in the Russian competition law: challenges and solutions

2020 ◽  
Vol 210 ◽  
pp. 13030
Author(s):  
Igor Bashlakov-Nikolaev ◽  
Sergey Maximov
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Competition Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Formal Approach ◽  
The Law ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Statutory Regulation ◽  
Collective Dominance

The Russian competition law does not include the definition of the concept of collective dominance, and the notion of this institution itself contains many gaps. The indicated disadvantages of statutory regulation and simplified approaches of the Federal Antimonopoly Service, which became possible due to the formal approach, have led to the formation of controversial law enforcement practice by the antimonopoly authority and courts. The article presents the analysis of legal regulation, as well as the law enforcement practice, and proposition on solutions to the stated problems.

scholarly journals LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE SYSTEM OF THE MECHANISM OF INFLUENCE ON MIGRATION RELATIONS

2021 ◽  
Vol 6(72) (3) ◽  
pp. 357-365
Author(s):  
K. V. Trifonova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
State Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Regulation Mechanism ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Definition Of

In the article, from the standpoint of legal science and practice of state regulation of migration relations, the author examines the application of legal liability to violators of the norms of migration legislation. The author conducts a theoretical and legal analysis of the institution of legal responsibility. The definition of legal responsibility as a legal reaction of society and the state to the unlawfulness of actions (inaction) allows us to conclude that the introduction by the state of special legal regulation is a form of disposition of state power. The implementation of legal responsibility in the dynamics of legal regulation is characterized by the intertwining of regulatory, substantive and procedural and legal aspects, which allow ensuring the passage of responsibility through all stages and procedures of legal regulation, which creates an ordering effect. In conclusion, the author points out that legal responsibility, being an element of the legal regulation mechanism, clearly demonstrates its specificity and features, as well as general efficiency in the law enforcement process of imposing punishment.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS ON THE DEFINITION OF THE SUBJECT OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL LAW

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Оlena Shtefan ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Judicial Reform ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Relationship

The subject of this article was one of the fundamental and debatable provisions of the doctrine of civil procedural law - its subject. The author on the basis of the analysis of scientific sources, the legislation carried out the retrospective analysis of formation and development of scientific thought concerning definition of a subject of civil procedural law. The paper identifies two main approaches to understanding the subject of the industry and elements of its structure. Analyzing the "narrow" approach to defining the subject of civil procedural law and certain areas of its coverage in the works of scholars, the author substantiates the position on the relationship between procedural activities and social relations that arise between the court and the parties. Particular attention is paid to the history of inclusion in the subject of civil procedural law enforcement proceedings. The author's position on the subject and system of civil procedural law is substantiated. The essence of the "broad" approach to the definition of the subject of the industry by including in its structure of non-jurisdictional forms of legal protection is revealed. The essence of two opposite tendencies in scientific researches concerning structure of a subject of civil procedural law is revealed: the first tendency is reduced to expansion of a subject at the expense of inclusion in it of economic procedural law, at ignoring independent character of this branch of law; the second - the narrowing of the subject of civil procedural law by removing from its structure of enforcement proceedings, the relations arising in the consideration of labor cases. The connection between the definition of the subject of civil procedural law and the jurisdiction of the court defined in the legislation is substantiated. It is proved that the tendency to narrow the subject of civil procedural law was embodied in the legislation of the country as a result of judicial reform in 2016, which led to conflicts in legislation and problems in law enforcement. Based on the theoretical model of determining the subject of legal regulation and using the analogy of determining its structure, the elements of the structure of the subject of civil procedural law are distinguished and its definition is formulated.

GAP IN THE LEGISLATION AND WAYS TO OVERCOME

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olena Dashkovska ◽  
◽  
Vasily Demchenko ◽  
Vitalii Yavorskyi ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Norm ◽  
Private Law ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
The Law ◽  
Law And Legislation

The article analyzes the concepts of "gaps in law" and "gaps in legislation", outlines the general features of these concepts, identifies the main causes of the emergence and existence of gaps in legislation and law. Emphasis is placed on the fact that gaps in the law take place in the legal regulation of only those social relations that have the character of legal. The main ways to eliminate and overcome gaps are considered, their differences are considered, it is concluded that gaps in law and legislation can be overcome by analogy of law and analogy of legislation. The main characteristics of the application of these means of overcoming gaps are determined. Attention is paid to the analogy of law as an exclusive means of legal influence. It is noted that by means of analogy the rights are not eliminated, but only gaps in the law are promptly overcome. It is concluded that it is used only when it is not possible to find such a legal norm. The analogy of the legislation is considered as a specific means of making a legally significant decision in case of gaps in the legislation relating to the specific case. The conclusion about the universality of such a method is made. The basic principles of application of analogy of legislation are stated. It is determined that the analogy of the law applies to relations that are not regulated by law, but should be in the field of legal regulation. It is emphasized that the analogy of legislation is used mainly by judicial bodies in their law enforcement acts, usually to clarify and supplement legislative provisions in the areas of legal regulation, which have gaps. It is noted that the analogy must comply with the fundamental principles of law. It is noted that the analogy of law, as well as the analogy of legislation, are inherent exclusively in private law areas of legal regulation. The article concludes that gaps in law and legislation can be overcome by analogy of law and analogy of legislation, respectively. Certain postulates of application of these means are defined.

scholarly journals State Service in the Law Enforcement Sphere and Its Major Features

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 576-580
Author(s):  
Roman V. Nagornykh
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Regulation Mechanism ◽  
State Service ◽  
Legal Enforcement ◽  
Functional Features ◽  
The Law ◽  
Characteristic Features ◽  
Enforcement Activity

The article investigates the main features of state service in the law enforcement sphere and the place of state service in administrative and legal regulation mechanism. The goals of the work are as follows: to consider state service in the law enforcement sphere as a single legal category, to reveal its essence and characteristic features as a social system, to provide a scientific classification of its constituent elements and disclose their administrative and legal content. We highlight the following main functional features of those state bodies the service in which can be called law enforcement activity: state and power-based nature of activity, exercising executive and administrative powers, special functional and target purpose, application of special measures of legal influence based on the use of persuasion and coercion methods, and a special legal status. We conclude that practical solution to the question of classifying state service in a particular state body as law enforcement activity may be found through legislative definition of the concept of law enforcement activity of the state, law enforcement functions of state authorities, and the system of state authorities exercising law enforcement functions. Key words: state service, administrative and legal regulation, law enforcement activity, law enforcement functions, legal enforcement.

scholarly journals THE STATE OF LEGAL REGULATION OF OFFICIAL INVESTIGATIONS IN THE PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4(106)) ◽  
pp. 67-73
Author(s):  
В. О. Галушко
Keyword(s):  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Current State ◽  
The Status ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Main Regulator ◽  
High Level

The relevance of the topic of the article is that the implementation of legal procedures within a particular branch of law requires a clear establishment and definition of key stages, procedures, patterns and subjective composition of the latter. That is, we are talking about the legal regulation of legal processes, the high level of quality of which directly affects the effectiveness and efficiency of the relevant sequences of legally significant actions. Official investigations in the prosecutor's office in this aspect are no exception, so it is appropriate to analyze the current state of their legal regulation. Determining the state of legal regulation of official investigations in the prosecutor's office requires a full understanding of the features and internal nature of this category. Note that legal regulation has a deep theoretical basis. It can be pointed out that legal regulation in a separate part is an expression of the content of the principle of the rule of law, that is, it is an indicator of the action of law as the main regulator of social relations. However, there are other features of this category that are important to outline within this article. The article, based on the analysis of scientific views of scientists, offers the author's vision on the interpretation of the concept of legal regulation of official investigations in the prosecutor's office of Ukraine. Emphasis is placed on the specifics of the mechanism of legal regulation of official investigations in the prosecutor's office and identified features of its structure. The general assessment of the state of legal regulation of official investigations in the prosecutor's office is given. It is concluded that at the present stage the legal regulation of official investigations in the prosecutor's office is disordered in its internal structure. Yes, there is a corresponding dissonance between the status and the practice of applying official investigations. The procedure for this procedure, the subject composition, the local legal framework, as well as other mechanical features of official investigations are developed and have the appropriate forms of operation. At the same time, the status and purpose of official investigations in the prosecutor's office, their connection with disciplinary proceedings, principles, as well as the general place in the field of official discipline of prosecutors in modern realities are not properly regulated.

scholarly journals Problematics of the Content of "Labor" Сonstitution Сategory

2021 ◽  
pp. 20-24
Author(s):  
Anna Kanakova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
High Quality ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Right

The article discusses the constitutional category of «labour», the definition of which is not enshrined in legislative acts because it is considered to be a well-known category, which is not a special legal one and does not require any clarification. However, this approach creates difficulties for legal regulation, as it blurs the boundaries for the legislator and the executor. Lack of awareness of the concept of a regulated category can lead to a situation when the legislator, creating a new law or making amendments to an existing one, will subject to regulation the area that does not pertain to the relevant legal phenomenon, or vice versa - will ignore part of the content of the regulated category, which is certain to negatively affect the quality of legal regulation. Law enforcement practices similarly face difficulties in having only doctrinal understandings of statutory concepts, which creates inconsistency in decisions made by lawyers in course of their professional work. The 1993 Constitution of the Russian Federation enshrined the category of «labour» in a number of articles, but did not clarify the interpretation of its concept. The analysis of economic and legal views on labor allows us to conclude that, despite the status of a well-known category, which, it would seem, does not need an explanation, only the presence of clear criteria for recognizing an activity as labor, provides high-quality legal regulation, in particular, it allows not only to separate the types of activities that are not subject to legal regulation, but also to choose the right branch of law that regulates social relations in each particular case.

On Legal Nature and Classificatory Identity Standards of Law Enforcement Ethics

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Рафаиль Валиев ◽  
Rafail Valiev
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Problem Situation ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Forms ◽  
Enforcement Activity

Based on the problem situation conditioned by indeterminacy of institutional position of the standards of law enforcement ethics within the mechanism of contemporary law enforcement regulation, the author attempts to analyze the legal nature of the above standards. The study reveals that the legal nature of standards of law enforcement ethics is conditioned by the necessity to protect the identity of citizens and the law enforcement system itself from the negative impact produced by various forms of irregular conduct by subjects of law enforcement. As a result of comparing the standards of law enforcement ethics and the rules of law the author establishes that according to the technical-legal forms of their external expression and other attributes, as well as their regulatory potential, the standards of law enforcement ethics are comparable to the status of the rules of law. The study permits us to conclude that the standards of law enforcement ethics possess the classificatory identity typical of the protective rules of law represented by relations in the field of law enforcement activity. This identity is conditioned by the specificity of the subject of their regulation. The standards of law enforcement ethics are of subsidiary significance as they supplement and develop standards of status laws in matters of legal regulation of the moral aspect of the law enforcement activity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document