ИЗМЕНЕНИЕ ПАРАДИГМЫ МЕТОДОЛОГИИ ЮРИСПРУДЕНЦИИ

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 32-40
Author(s):  
Ю. М. Оборотов
Keyword(s):  
Legal Theory ◽  
Research Strategy ◽  
The State ◽  
New Paradigm ◽  
Methodological Question ◽  
Modern Development ◽  
Decisive Importance ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Methodological Approaches ◽  
The Law

В современной методологии юриспруденции происходит переход от изучения состо­яний ее объекта, которыми выступают право и государство, к постижению этого объек­та в его изменениях и превращениях. Две подсистемы методологии юриспруденции, подсистема обращенная к состоянию права и государства; и подсистема обращенная к изменениям права и государства, — получают свое отображение в концептуальной форме, методологических подходах, методах, специфических понятиях. Показательны перемены в содержании методологии юриспруденции, где определяю­щее значение имеют методологические подходы, определяющие стратегию исследова­тельских поисков во взаимосвязи юриспруденции с правом и государством. Среди наи­более характерных подходов антропологический, аксиологический, цивилизационный, синергетический и герменевтический — определяют плюралистичность современной методологии и свидетельствуют о становлении новой парадигмы методологии юриспру­денции.   In modern methodology of jurisprudence there is a transition from the study the states of its object to its comprehension in changes and transformations. Hence the two subsystems of methodology of jurisprudence: subsystem facing the states of the law and the state as well as their components and aspects; and subsystem facing the changes of the law and the state in general and their constituents. These subsystems of methodology of jurisprudence receive its reflection in conceptual form, methodological approaches, methods, specific concepts. Methodology of jurisprudence should not be restricted to the methodology of legal theory. In this regard, it is an important methodological question about subject of jurisprudence. It is proposed to consider the subject of jurisprudence as complex, covering both the law and the state in their specificity, interaction and integrity. Indicative changes in the content methodology of jurisprudence are the usage of decisive importance methodological approaches that govern research strategy searches in conjunction with the law and the state. Among the most characteristic of modern development approaches: anthropological, axiological, civilization, synergistic and hermeneutic. Modern methodology of jurisprudence is pluralistic in nature alleging various approaches to the law and the state. Marked approaches allow the formation of a new paradigm methodology of jurisprudence.

Human Rights Activities as a Function of the Prosecutor’s Office

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 88-93
Author(s):  
K.N. Golikov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
Main Function ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law

The subject of this article is the problems of the nature, essence and purpose of prosecutorial activity. The purpose of the article is to study and justify the role of the human rights function in prosecutorial activities in the concept of a modern legal state. At the heart of prosecutorial activity is the implementation of the main function of the Prosecutor’s office – its rights and freedoms, their protection. This means that any type (branch) of Prosecutor's supervision is permeated with human rights content in relation to a citizen, society, or the state. This is confirmed by the fact that the Federal law “On the Prosecutor's office of the Russian Federation” establishes an independent type of Prosecutor's supervision-supervision over the observance of human and civil rights and freedoms. It is argued that the legislation enshrines the human rights activities of the Prosecutor's office as its most important function. It is proposed to add this to the Law “On the Prosecutor's office of the Russian Federation”.

The social uses of the law at a Soweto garbage dump: Reclaiming the law and the state in the informal economy

2016 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 222-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Samson
Keyword(s):  
Informal Economy ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Legal Theory ◽  
Social World ◽  
The State ◽  
Informal Workers ◽  
The Social ◽  
Critical Legal Theory ◽  
The Law ◽  
Social Uses

The informal economy is typically understood as being outside the law. However, this article develops the concept ‘social uses of the law’ to interrogate how informal workers understand, engage and deploy the law, facilitating the development of more nuanced theorizations of both the informal economy and the law. The article explores how a legal victory over the Johannesburg Council by reclaimers of reusable and recyclable materials at the Marie Louise landfill in Soweto, South Africa shaped their subjectivities and became bound up in struggles between reclaimers at the dump. Engaging with critical legal theory, the author argues that in a social world where most people do not read, understand, or cite court rulings, the ‘social uses of the law’ can be of greater import than the actual judgement. This does not, however, render the state absent, as the assertion that the court sanctioned particular claims and rights is central to the reclaimers’ social uses of the law. Through the social uses of the law, these reclaimers force us to consider how and why the law, one of the cornerstones of state formation, cannot be separated from the informal ways it is understood and deployed. The article concludes by sketching a research agenda that can assist in developing a more relational understanding of the law and the informal economy.

The Carrigan Committee of 1930-31 and the ‘moral condition of the Saorstát’

2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (128) ◽  
pp. 519-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Finnane
Keyword(s):  
Civil War ◽  
The State ◽  
Moral Code ◽  
War Of Independence ◽  
National Archives ◽  
Moral Condition ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law

The character of modern Ireland after partition has long been the subject of debate, by columnists, poets, novelists and historians. John Whyte’s outstanding study of the process by which what he called the ‘Catholic moral code’ became enshrined in the ‘law of the state’ summarised the ‘remarkable consensus’ achieved in the years 1923-37, a time when there was ‘overwhelming agreement that traditional Catholic values should be maintained, if necessary by legislation’. Based on personal reminiscences and published documents, Whyte’s contribution is of enduring value to those seeking to understand the culture of modern Ireland. His account is even more impressive when read against the background of materials which have more recently become available in the National Archives. These enable some of the detail to be filled in, but they also provoke some new questions about the state of the country and the means by which a peaceable Ireland was to be constructed in the aftermath of a war of independence and a civil war.

Constitution of the Far Eastern Republic

1922 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 665-671
Author(s):  
Harold S. Quigley
Keyword(s):  
Democratic Republic ◽  
The State ◽  
Habeas Corpus ◽  
Freedom Of Conscience ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
Far Eastern ◽  
Boundary Lines

The constitution of the Far Eastern Republic, promulgated April 17, 1921, contains ten articles, divided into 184 clauses. There is no preamble. Article I, among other general provisions, sets forth that “The Far Eastern Republic is established as a democratic republic.” Article II names the component parts and the boundary lines of the state and undertakes to maintain the rights and obligations formerly Russian within that territory. The subject of Article III is “Citizens and their Rights.” Included in the latter are equality before the law; freedom of conscience and speech; habeas corpus; inviolability of person, house, and correspondence; and non-liability to arrest without warrant unless taken in the act.

Manifestations and Arguments

2020 ◽  
pp. 229-262
Author(s):  
Peer Zumbansen
Keyword(s):  
Social Order ◽  
Legal Theory ◽  
Competent Authority ◽  
Legal Pluralism ◽  
The State ◽  
Social Ordering ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Critical Legal Theory ◽  
Distinguishing Features ◽  
Legal Sociology

While the term “legal pluralism’ literally denotes a plurality of legal orders, it is their plurality of and the distinguishing features between them, which continues to make the subject matter a very charged and hotly debated one. Seen through the lens of legal sociology and anthropology, the plurality of coexisting, normative orders appears, above all, as a matter of description, as a fact of social ordering. Meanwhile, as some of these normative systems are being claimed as being “law,” while others are associated with nonlegal forms of social order, such as customary, traditional, or indigenous norms as well as, perhaps, sector-specific rules of professional or industry conduct, the categories used to draw the lines between legal and nonlegal norms become in themselves highly contentious. The chapter argues that to neglect the fundamental distinction between legal pluralism as “manifestation” and as “argument” perpetuates a troubling inability on the part of positivist and analytical legal theory to engage with law’s inherent instability. Especially at a time, where the actors, norms, and processes that together constitute and shape emerging transnational regulatory regimes are located and operating both within and beyond the state as the purportedly singularly competent authority of law creation and enforcement, the deconstruction of “legal pluralism” as “nonlaw” and threat to the state can serve as the foundation for a new, critical legal theory.

scholarly journals Was Duplessis Right?

2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-436
Author(s):  
Roderick A. Macdonald
Keyword(s):  
Political Theory ◽  
Social Theory ◽  
Legal Theory ◽  
The State ◽  
Fiftieth Anniversary ◽  
The Other ◽  
Judicial Decision ◽  
The Law ◽  
Good And Evil

Given the inclination of legal scholars to progressively displace the meaning of a judicial decision from its context toward abstract propositions, it is no surprise that at its fiftieth anniversary, Roncarelli v. Duplessis has come to be interpreted in Manichean terms. The complex currents of postwar society and politics in Quebec are reduced to a simple story of good and evil in which evil is incarnated in Duplessis’s “persecution” of Roncarelli. In this paper the author argues for a more nuanced interpretation of the case. He suggests that the thirteen opinions delivered at trial and on appeal reflect several debates about society, the state and law that are as important now as half a century ago. The personal socio-demography of the judges authoring these opinions may have predisposed them to decide one way or the other; however, the majority and dissenting opinions also diverged (even if unconsciously) in their philosophical leanings in relation to social theory (internormative pluralism), political theory (communitarianism), and legal theory (pragmatic instrumentalism). Today, these dimensions can be seen to provide support for each of the positions argued by Duplessis’s counsel in Roncarelli given the state of the law in 1946.

scholarly journals El catálogo general y el inventario de bienes reconocidos como instrumentos de protección del patrimonio histórico andaluz. Cuestiones procedimentales y competencias municipales

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel González Ríos
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
The State ◽  
General Catalogue ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
Historical Heritage ◽  
Object Of Study

<p align="justify">Este trabajo de investigación analiza las competencias que corresponden a la Administración estatal, autonómica y local en materia de protección y fomento del patrimonio histórico y cultural, prestando especial atención a las competencias municipales; para posteriormente centrarnos en el estudio de los instrumentos de protección del patrimonio histórico andaluz, el Catálogo General y el Inventario de Bienes Reconocidos, en los que aquellas competencias se proyectan. Así, nuestro objeto de estudio son los bienes que los integran, el procedimiento de inscripción y el régimen jurídico aplicable a los titulares o poseedores de los bienes inscritos. Y todo ello, analizando no solo la Ley de Patrimonio Histórico Andaluz de 2007, sino también, la normativa estatal relacionada y la jurisprudencia referente al tema.</p> <p align="justify"><b>This work of investigation analyses the competitions that correspond to the state Administration, regional and local in matter of protection and promotion of the historical and cultural heritage, loaning special attention to the municipal competitions; for later centre us in the study of the instruments of protection of the historical heritage of Andalusia, the General Catalogue and the Inventory of Recognized Goods, in which those competitions are projected . Like this, our object of study is the goods that integrate them, the procedure of registration and the applicable juridical diet to the headlines or possessors of the goods inscribed. And all this, analyzing, not only the Law of Andalusia Historical Heritage of 2007, but also the state rule related and the jurisprudence concerning the subject.</b></p>

scholarly journals BOOK REVIEW: PANCASILA MORALS, LAW AND POWER (MORAL PANCASILA, HUKUM, DAN KEKUASAAN)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayu Aulia Rahmah ◽  
Moses Glorino Rumambo Pandin
Keyword(s):  
Human Resources ◽  
Legal Theory ◽  
The State ◽  
Correct Result ◽  
The People ◽  
Legal Situation ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

The book called Moral Pancasila, Hukum, dan Kekuasaan was written by Romli Atmasasmita with the aim of being a form of participation in bringing legal civilization in Indonesia so that it can be better and more advanced. In this book, the author elaborates on legal theory related to Pancasila, which is the state ideology as well as the source of all legal sources. The writing of the book Moral Pancasila, Hukum, dan Kekuasaan is addressed to all readers as well as the nation's generation who are interested in law and especially experts and legal apparatus. The writer hopes that this book can provide insight and invites to manage law in the field of natural and human resources efficiently, productively, and constructively because the legal situation depends on the people who run it. If the law is implemented correctly by the right person, the law will give a fair and correct result.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document