scholarly journals Formation of Financial Statements at Islamic Financial Institutions

Conceptually, the key approaches to the formation of financial reporting for an Islamic financial institution (IFI) have much in common with approaches developed for economic entities in the traditional economy. At the same time, the AAOIFI Concept and the Financial Accounting Standard No. (1) provide for Islamic financial institution-specific provisions and reporting forms that reflect the requirements of the Sharia. Disclosure of methods in published accounts is intended to help its users distinguish between changes in the financial position of an Islamic financial institution, the results of its operations, cash flow, limited investment managed by it, the sources and use of Zakat (poor-due) and Kard funds and charitable foundations. Further development of the regulation of the issues on the formation of financial statements seems to us in the making common approaches to its formation closer for companies operating in the traditional economy and Islamic financial institutions.

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Nur Diana Adhikara

The low understanding of accounting and financial accounting standards is a fundamental problem for Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in Indonesia. This makes it difficult to prepare and manage financial statements. The presence of the Financial Accounting Standards for Non-Publicly-Accountable Entities (SAK-ETAP) on January 1, 2011, is expected to accommodate small and medium enterprises in making easy, transparent and accountable financial statements. But In fact, many MSMEs that have not been able to apply SAK ETAP properly because it is considered to be too complex and not by the financial reporting needs of MSMEs. On January 1, 2018, SAK EMKM was enacted as a standard that could help about 57.9 million MSME entrepreneurs in Indonesia in properly preparing their financial statements without having to get caught up in the complexity of it. SAK EMKM is a much simpler financial accounting standard than SAK ETAP. This study aims to provide empirical evidence on the perception of MSME business actors regarding the importance of financial bookkeeping and reporting for their business and the factors that affect the level of understanding of MSME’s related to SAK EMKM. The sample of research was MSMEs business actors in Malang Raya with purposive sampling method with the total of 225 respondents. The results showed that company size, educational background, and level of education affect the MSME business entrepreneurs' perception of the importance of financial bookkeeping and reporting. While the level of understanding of MSME business entrepreneurs of SAK EMKM is affected by the level of information on SAK EMKM, educational background and education level of the MSME business actors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dian Andari

ABSTRACTIndonesia as a country with dual-banking system applies local accounting standards for conventional and Islamic financial institutions named SAK (Standar Akuntansi Keuangan or Generally Accepted Accounting Standard) which may raise the question of accounting harmonization with Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) issued by Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI). This study aims to analyze the harmony level of Islamic accounting in Indonesia to FAS issued by the AAOIFI. The analysis covers de jure (formal or regulatory) harmonization and de facto (practical) harmonization. It involves content analysis utilizing FAS no. 27 of investment accounts to Indonesian PSAK at de jure analysis, and to thirteen of Indonesian Islamic banks annual report in 2016 for de facto analysis. Wilcoxon signed rank test is conducted to measure the significance of harmony to AAOIFI standards. The result shows that there is no harmony in de jure and de facto level. ABSTRAKIndonesia sebagai negara dengan dual-banking system memiliki standar akuntansi keuangan (SAK) yang digunakan oleh lembaga keuangan konvensional dan syariah. Hal ini dapat menimbulkan pertanyaan tentang harmonisasi SAK dengan Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) yang dikeluarkan oleh Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tingkat keharmonisan akuntansi syariah di Indonesia terhadap FAS yang dikeluarkan oleh  AAOIFI. Analisis ini mencakup harmonisasi de jure (formal atau secara regulasi) dan harmonisasi de facto (praktis). Penelitian ini melibatkan analisis konten menggunakan FAS no. 27 akun investasi ke PSAK Indonesia pada analisis de jure, dan tiga belas laporan tahunan bank syariah Indonesia pada tahun 2016 untuk analisis de facto. Tes peringkat uji Wilcoxon dilakukan untuk mengukur signifikansi keselarasan dengan standar AAOIFI. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada harmonisasi antara FAS dan SAK dalam tingkat de jure dan de facto.


IQTISHADUNA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-148
Author(s):  
Fitriani .

The main objective of this study is to explore the nature of accounting for Ijarahfinancing and its differences with conventional lease financing from the Islamic law and accounting perspectives.The study makes a comparison between the International Accounting Standard on leasing (IAS 17); the accounting standard for Ijarah (FAS 8) as developed by the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI); and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan/PSAK 107). The study found that there are major differences as to the nature of leasing and Ijarah, and as a result accounting principles that have driven all the three standards as well as accounting techniques developed for leasing and Ijarah are significantly different.


Author(s):  
Mezbah Uddin Ahmed

This chapter elucidates the arguments for and against differential approach pertaining to financial reporting amongst Islamic Financial Institutions (IFIs). The chapter has identified additional objectives which the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI) aims to achieve in comparison to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The chapter has also identified the global adoption status for both AAOIFI Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) and IFRS Standards, as well as the difficulties faced in adopting AAOIFI's FAS. This chapter offers illustrative examples of AAOIFI's FAS and IFRS applications to help in providing a much better understanding in terms of similarities and differences in the application of these two sets of standards.


Author(s):  
Md Robiul Islam ◽  
Mohammad Shamsus Sadekin

Compliance with financial reporting guidelines/standards promulgated by Regulatory Bodies has become a crucial issue of the day after a series of corporate debacles over a few years. Regulators, professional bodies and researchers throughout the world have expressed their concern about the need for improved accounting pronouncements and compliance for providing better information than previously required for the preparation and presentation of corporate financial reporting. The present study primarily focuses on the reporting disclosure levels and compliance with Bangladesh Bank (BB) Guidelines, Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI) Accounting Standard, Bangladesh/International Financial Reporting Standard (B/IFRS) and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rules of Islamic Financial Institutions in Bangladesh. Annual reports of (08) eight Islamic banks in Bangladesh have been examined for the year ending 2015. The results showed that the Islamic banks significantly followed the selected accounting guidelines/standards under review and did bring remarkable changes in the financial reporting practices made by the Islamic banks in Bangladesh. The study attempted to examine empirically the levels of disclosure in corporate annual reports of Islamic banks in Bangladesh. The study recommended increasing the level of compliance to make their financial reports more informative. The study also tries to ascertain the regulatory necessary requirements in preparing the financial statements of banks under Islamic shariah and tries to display the compliance status of these banks with legislations. The average compliance rate is 93.28% for BB guidelines, 46.54% for AAOIFI Accounting Standard, 48.50% for B/IFRS and 51.99% for SEC rules considering all required aspects of financial reports. Compiling all of the requirements regarding financial reports of regulatory bodies will be helpful for banks to make financial reports convenient.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-110
Author(s):  
Muzakkir S.

All results of operations managed in a Sharia Financial Institution should use a system that does not harm either party in accordance with applicable accounting standards. The accounting basis is the accounting principle that determines when the effects of transactions or events must be recognized for financial reporting purposes. Which accounting base is used by a particular organization, depending on the policies and conditions that exist. Regardless of which accounting basis is used, this paper will explain both of these accounting bases that exist in practice, both in the private sector and the public sector including government, to review the National Sharia Board Fatwa Number 14 / DSN-DSN / IX / 2000 Concerning Distribution Systems Business Results in Islamic Financial Institutions.The approach used in this paper is the hadith study approach to the legal basis contained in the DSN Fatwa concerning Business Results Distribution System in Islamic Financial Institutions. This approach is expected to be able to describe the conceptual framework related to the legal basis for establishing a fatwa.


2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 866-896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Habib Ahmed ◽  
Faruq Arif Tajul Ariffin ◽  
Yusuf Karbhari ◽  
Zurina Shafii

Purpose Since International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are not primarily meant for the accounting needs of Islamic banks, the Accounting and Auditing Organisation for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI) was established to develop specific accounting standards for Shari’ah compliance. The purpose of this paper is to assess the de jure harmonisation between the disclosure requirements of the IFRS-based Malaysian Accounting Standards (MAS) and those of the AAOIFI. Design/methodology/approach Using Malaysia as a case study, the paper examines the extent of the de jure congruence between the IFRS-based MAS and AAOIFI’s Financial Accounting Standard No 1 (FAS1), which is considered to be one of the key disclosure standards for Islamic banks. We employ leximetrics and content analysis to analyse these accounting standards and the additional guidelines introduced by the Malaysian Accounting Standards Board (MASB) and the Central Bank of Malaysia (Bank Negara Malaysia, BNM) to identify the gaps between different tiers of MAS and FAS1. Findings The study finds that de jure congruence between the IFRS-based MAS and AAOIFI standards has improved through the introduction of additional accounting guidelines by both the MASB and the banking regulator, BNM. However, some gaps remain between the two standards. These gaps may be difficult to completely eliminate due to differences in the fundamental principles underlying the development of both standards. Originality/value While some studies have explored the de facto congruence between AAOIFI accounting standards and others, this paper is the first, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, to examine the de jure congruence between those standards with the IFRS-based MAS.


ETIKONOMI ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaser Taufik Syamlan ◽  
Murniati Mukhlisin

This study aims to propose a model of Zero Waste Accounting in Islamic Financial Institutions in Indonesia and how it is relevant to the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).  Due to the nature of the research that is exploration thus the research adopts interpretative approach that is essential to validate the research with “convincingness” approach rather than positivist measures of the reliability, validity of data and the generalization of results. The finding documents that Zero Waste Accounting is in vein with the spirit of Maqashid ul-Shariah that has been embedded as a part of the purpose of Islamic financial institution establishment. Statement of Sources and Uses of Zero Waste Accounting should become one of the additional disclosures. The paper sheds a light the need on Zero Waste Accounting for the accounting standard setters.JEL Classification: G20, G52, Q56How to Cite:Syamlan, Y. T., & Mukhlisin, M. (2020). Zero Waste Accounting in Islamic Financial Institutions in Indonesia and Its Role in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals. Etikonomi: Jurnal Ekonomi, 19(2), xx – xx. https://doi.org/10.15408/etk.v19i2.15538.


Author(s):  
Faleel Jamaldeen

The aim of this cross-country research is to examine how the profit and loss sharing mudarabah investment deposits are classified and disclosed in the financial statement of Islamic banks. The cross-country study examined the financial statements of fifty-one fully-fledged Islamic banks. The results of the data analysis show that Islamic banks disclose the mudarabah investment account in different ways. The absence of standardized disclosure for mudarabah investment deposit confuses the stakeholders. This research suggests to the regulators to fully or partially adopt the AAOIFI standards specifically for Islamic financial institutions.


2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas K. Schneider ◽  
Gordon S. May ◽  
David R. Shaffer

<span>The purpose of this study was to apply social-psychological research methods to address an issue in the development of general accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Of concern to the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) in the development of GAAP is the attitudes of its constituent groups with respect to the credibility of GAAP. Our main objective was to assess any differences in the credibility perception of GAAP, as indicated by the three main groups of FASB constituents: corporate preparers of financial statements (preparers), CPAs who audit financial reports to ensure their adherence to GAAP (auditors), and accountants who us financial reports to make lending and investment decisions (users). The results indicated that auditors perception of the credibility of GAAP along eight credibility dimensions was significantly different than that of preparers and users of financial reporting. These results are important to the standard setting process because they indicate a lack of consensus among the three main FASB constituent groups, and may indicate an elevation of auditor views over those of users and preparers. Some implications of these results and suggestions for future research are discussed.</span>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document