scholarly journals UPAYA PENINGKATAN PENERIMAAN PAJAK PASCA TAX AMNESTY PADA KANWIL DJP BALI

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-49
Author(s):  
Ida I Dewa A Manik Sastri ◽  
Luh Kade Datrini
Keyword(s):  
Public Awareness ◽  
National Income ◽  
Institutional Transformation ◽  
Tax Revenue ◽  
State Spending ◽  
Tax Revenues ◽  
Tax Amnesty ◽  
The World ◽  
The Government ◽  
State Revenues

On July 1, 2016, the Government established Law No. 11 of 2016 concerning Tax Amnesty. This law has been postponed several times, after tough discussions in the House of Representative (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat – DPR) since 2015. The failure to achieve tax revenues over the past few years has triggered the enactment of this law. The government sees that tax revenues are still low due to a lack of public awareness in reporting taxes, even though the government in the last few years has relied heavily on state revenues from the results of tax revenues. The World Bank notes that Indonesia's tax ratio in 2014 was only 10.84% ​​of Gross Domestic Income, while the average tax ratio of countries in the world was 14.81%. So the level of tax collectibility in Indonesia is still very small, so it is quite heavy in supporting state spending. The purpose of this study was to find out the benefits of tax amnesty as an effort to stimulate national income, to find out the magnitude of the tax amnesty contribution in increasing state revenues, and analyze the influence of several factors in increasing tax revenue after tax amnesty. The implementation of tax amnesty that ended at the end of March 2017 was quite good. The results showed that the number of taxpayers participating in the tax amnesty were 974,058, the amount was still small compared to the potential tax in the country. The amount of state revenue from the Tax amnesty is 107 trillion from 1,104.9 total realized tax revenues in 2016. An important point that must be done immediately after the tax amnesty is the administration update related to data and information management with an integrated IT system with all stakeholders, coordination of tax law enforcement through examination, and institutional transformation.

scholarly journals INCREASING THE REVENUE OF POST TAX AMNESTY IN BALI REGIONAL OFFICE OF DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TAXATION (DGT)

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 96-102
Author(s):  
Ida I Dewa Manik Sastri ◽  
Luh Kade Datrini
Keyword(s):  
National Income ◽  
Institutional Transformation ◽  
Tax Revenue ◽  
Regional Office ◽  
State Revenue ◽  
Tax Amnesty ◽  
It Systems ◽  
The World ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
Two Stages

The application of tax amnesty in the world has different results in every country there are successful there are also failed. For that research to know the advantages of tax amnesty as an effort to stimulate national income, to know the magnitude of the tax amnesty contribution in increasing state revenues; to analyze the effect of several influencing factors as an effort to increase the tax post revenue of Tax Amnesty. This research was conducted in two stages, firstly doing a quantitate if and secondly doing a qualitative study. The result showed that: the number of taxpayers who took tax amnesty with an amount of 974,058 based on Declaration of Treasure report, it is still a little amount compared to the potential tax in the country. The amount of state revenue of Tax amnesty was 107 Trillion among the total of 1,104.9 tax revenue realization of Post Tax Amnesty in 2016. So, the important points that should be immediately done are: Administration upgrading related to data and information management with IT systems integrated with all stakeholders, coordination of constitution enforcement through taxation examination, and institutional transformation.

Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Amnesti Pajak Tahun 2016 Di Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-50
Author(s):  
Setiadi Alim Limseti ◽  
Lilik Indrawati
Keyword(s):  
Tax Evasion ◽  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Tax Revenue ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Tax Base ◽  
Tax Revenues ◽  
Tax Amnesty ◽  
The Government

Income from the tax sector is generally the main income for all countries in the world in order to finance its activities. Increased revenue from the tax sector is often hampered, due to the large tax evasion and tax avoidance activities. Tax evasion and tax avoidance practices are triggered by the practice of low tax rates and other facilities provided by the tax heaven countries. In order to combat tax evasion and tax avoidance, the approach taken by each country is different. But basically approach done can be distinguished on soft apporach and hard approach. One approach that is classified as a soft approach is a tax amnesty program. In 2016 the Government of Indonesia is implementing a tax amnesty program based on Law Number 11 of 2016 concerning Tax Amnesty applied from 1 July 2016 to 31 March 2017. This paper will evaluate the successful implementation of the tax amnesty program that has been implemented in Indonesia. Evaluation is based on the achievement of 3 objectives, namely the repatriation of assets from abroad, expansion of the tax base and increase in tax revenue for the short and long term. From the point of asset repatriation, the tax amnesty program is considered quite successful, because although the target of asset repatriation is not achieved, but the asset repatriation has reached 30.54% of the estimated financial assets abroad. From the point of view of the expansion of the tax base, the number of declarations and repatriation reaches Rp. 4,737.56 trillion has exceeded the target. Meanwhile, from the point of view of increasing short-term tax revenues, the objective of the amnesty program can be considered quite successful, because it contributes 10.15% to the average amount of tax revenue in 2016 and 2017, although it has not been able to raise the growth rate of overall tax revenue for the year 2016 and 2017. Increased tax revenues for the long term can not be evaluated, because the tax amnesty program was completed 1 year ago.

scholarly journals Mengulik Euforia Amnesti Pajak: Hukum-APBN-Utang-Pajak (Studi Kasus Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Kabupaten X)

InFestasi ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Whedy Prasetyo
Keyword(s):  
Public Awareness ◽  
Tax Compliance ◽  
Tax Revenue ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Mental Attitude ◽  
Tax Amnesty ◽  
The People ◽  
Job Opportunities ◽  
The Government

<p>This study aims to investigate Law. 11 of 2016 on Tax Amnesty dated July 1, 2016 which aims to increase tax revenues and encourage the transfer of assets abroad to the country (asset repatriation). A case study on Tax Office Primary Regency Xwith a qualitative approach is used in this study by showing the response of the presence of PSAK 70 on the Implementation of Asset Accounting (Treasures) and Liabilities (Debt) Tax Amnesty in a proportional perspective. The result is the growth of tax compliance in the motivation and mental attitude of the taxpayer through integrity, responsibility, discipline, accuracy, cooperation, honesty, visi onary, motivation and attitude to achieve tax functions as Budgeter, Regulern, Democracy, and Redistribution in tax amnesty. These four functions are a manifestation of the Law-APBN-Debt-Taxon tax realization targets, therefore tax is expected to be a form of public awareness (voluntary compliance) in contributingto the State through self assessment. Finally, the function of tax amnesty can be an economic tool for the welfare of the people, one of the sources of development financing, to encourage economic growth through the current development policy and it means to create job opportunities and other economic and business opportunities. So that the two parties between the government and WP have a synergistic relationship in recording and reporting the amount of taxes that become obligations, toward a fair tax revenue structure.</p>

scholarly journals COMPARISON OF TAX AMNESTY IMPLEMENTATION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (01) ◽  
pp. 77-85
Author(s):  
Norbertus Purnomolastu
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Tax Revenues ◽  
Tax Amnesty ◽  
Implementation Period ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Way ◽  
State Revenues

Taxes are a major source of revenue in a large states so the governer strives invarious ways to increase state revenues from taxes. This happened because noteveryone who pays taxes, referred as taxpayers is willing to pay their taxes welland correctly. One of the ways used by the government is issuing a policy thatcan increase tax revenues. That policy is known as Tax Amnesty.There are manycountries, both developed and developing countries that have implemented TaxAmnesty policy. In this paper, the author analyzes the implementation of TaxAmnesty by comparing two developing countries in Asia, Indonesia and India,This kind of study is known as comparative study. One of the considerations aboutthe pointing of the countries as subjects is both of Indonesia and India started toimplementing Tax Amnesty at the same time in 2016. The analysis is done bycomparing the background, the purpose of the implementation, and the resultsobtained from Tax Amnesty policy. The result of Tax Amnesty showed that differentimplementation purpose, implementation period, and the way to implementcaused different results of tax revenues.

scholarly journals Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Amnesti Pajak Tahun 2016 Di Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-50
Author(s):  
Setiadi Alim Lim ◽  
Lilik Indrawati
Keyword(s):  
Tax Evasion ◽  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Tax Revenue ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Tax Base ◽  
Tax Revenues ◽  
Tax Amnesty ◽  
The Government

Income from the tax sector is generally the main income for all countries in the world in order to finance its activities. Increased revenue from the tax sector is often hampered, due to the large tax evasion and tax avoidance activities. Tax evasion and tax avoidance practices are triggered by the practice of low tax rates and other facilities provided by the tax heaven countries. In order to combat tax evasion and tax avoidance, the approach taken by each country is different. But basically approach done can be distinguished on soft apporach and hard approach. One approach that is classified as a soft approach is a tax amnesty program. In 2016 the Government of Indonesia is implementing a tax amnesty program based on Law Number 11 of 2016 concerning Tax Amnesty applied from 1 July 2016 to 31 March 2017. This paper will evaluate the successful implementation of the tax amnesty program that has been implemented in Indonesia. Evaluation is based on the achievement of 3 objectives, namely the repatriation of assets from abroad, expansion of the tax base and increase in tax revenue for the short and long term. From the point of asset repatriation, the tax amnesty program is considered quite successful, because although the target of asset repatriation is not achieved, but the asset repatriation has reached 30.54% of the estimated financial assets abroad. From the point of view of the expansion of the tax base, the number of declarations and repatriation reaches Rp. 4,737.56 trillion has exceeded the target. Meanwhile, from the point of view of increasing short-term tax revenues, the objective of the amnesty program can be considered quite successful, because it contributes 10.15% to the average amount of tax revenue in 2016 and 2017, although it has not been able to raise the growth rate of overall tax revenue for the year 2016 and 2017. Increased tax revenues for the long term can not be evaluated, because the tax amnesty program was completed 1 year ago.

CORRELATION BETWEEN TAX POLICY AND CORRUPTION IN THE LEGAL PERSPECTIVE FOR COUNTRY'S ECONOMIC GROWTH

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 205
Author(s):  
Gideon J. ◽  
Edgar H. ◽  
Ivan I. ◽  
Nabil N. ◽  
Aptina A. ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Developing Countries ◽  
Tax Evasion ◽  
Tax Policy ◽  
Public Awareness ◽  
Transparency International ◽  
Tax Amnesty ◽  
Legal Perspective ◽  
State Income ◽  
The Government

<p>People Tax is the main source of state income. The better the tax policy of a country, the better the development of a country. One of the factors that influence the level of public awareness in paying taxes is corruption. Study shows that tax collection is one of them influenced by corruption. In the data of Corruption Perceptions Index 2016 reported by Transparency International, Indonesia is ranked 90 out of 176 countries. Tax evasion is a serious problem for many countries. Every year, the government loses revenue potential as many residents evade taxes in various ways. For this reason, the government implements tax amnesty. Tax amnesty is designed to permanently reduce the amount of underground economy activity, thereby increasing tax revenues in the future and developing countries can grow well.</p>

scholarly journals Implikasi Penerapan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2016 Tentang Pengampunan Pajak (Tax Amnesty) Dalam Meningkatkan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Agus Saiful Abib ◽  
Efi Yulistyowati ◽  
Amri Panahatan Sihotang
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Fiscal Year ◽  
Tax Revenue ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Tax Amnesty ◽  
The Government ◽  
To Come ◽  
National Tax

<p>Tahun 2016, pemerintah mengeluarkan kembali kebijakan <em>Tax</em> <em>Amnesty </em>yang dituangkan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2016 tentang Pengampunan Pajak. Pengampunan Pajak (<em>Tax</em> <em>Amnesty)</em> ini diharapkan dapat meningkatkan penerimaan pajak dalam jangka pendek melalui pembayaran uang tebusan, meningkatkan penerimaan pajak dalam jangka panjang melalui perluasan basis data pemajakan, meningkatkan kepatuhan Wajib Pajak, transisi ke sistem perpajakan baru yang lebih kuat dan adil, dan mendorong rekonsiliasi perpajakan nasional. Sehubungan dengan hal tersebut, untuk mengetahui apakah program <em>Tax</em> <em>Amnesty</em> Indonesia Tahun 2016 berhasil atau tidak, khususnya dalam meningkatkan kepatuhan wajib pajak, maka perlu dilakukan penelitian tentang : “Implikasi Penerapan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2016 tentang Pengampunan Pajak (<em>Tax</em> <em>Amnesty</em>) dalam Meningkatkan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak”. Adapun permasalahan yang akan dibahas adalah bagaimana implikasi penerapan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2016 tentang Pengampunan Pajak<em> (Tax</em> <em>Amnesty)</em> dalam meningkatkan kepatuhan Wajib Pajak ? Berdasarkan implikasi tersebut, maka bagaimana sebaiknya pengaturan perpajakan yang akan datang ? Berdasarkan permasalahan tersebut jenis penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif yang akan dikaji dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, spesifikasi penelitiannya diskriptif analitis, data yang dipergunakan data sekunder, yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa implikasi penerapan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2016 tentang Pengampunan Pajak<em> (Tax</em> <em>Amnesty)</em> dapat meningkatkan kepatuhan Wajib Pajak, dan berdasarkan implikasi tersebut SE Dirjen Pajak No. SE - 06/PJ/2017 seharusnya tidak hanya untuk tahun pajak 2017 saja, tetapi juga untuk tahun-tahun yang akan datang. Di samping itu perlu ada peraturan yang mengatur tentang pengawasan terhadap pelaksanaan hak Wajib Pajak.</p><pre>In 2016, the government re-issue the Tax Amnesty policy as outlined in Law Number 11 Year 2016 on Tax Amnesty. The Tax Amnesty is expected to increase tax revenue in the short term through ransom payments, increase tax revenues over the long term through the expansion of taxation databases, increase taxpayer compliance, transition to a stronger and more just tax system, and encourage national tax reconciliation. In relation to this matter, to find out whether the program of Tax Amnesty Indonesia Year 2016 succeed or not, especially in increasing taxpayer compliance, it is necessary to do research on: "Implications Implementation of Law Number 11 Year 2016 on Tax Amnesty in Improving Taxpayer Compliance ". The problem to be discussed is how the implications of the implementation of Law Number 11 Year 2016 on Tax Amendment (Tax Amnesty) in improving taxpayer compliance? Based on these implications, then how should the taxation arrangements to come? Based on the problem, this type of research is normative juridical which will be studied with the approach of legislation, the analytical descriptive research specification, the data used secondary data, which analyzed qualitatively. The result of the research shows that the implication of the implementation of Law Number 11 Year 2016 on Tax Amnesty can improve Taxpayer compliance, and based on the implication of SE Dirjen Pajak No. SE - 06 / PJ / 2017 should not only be for the fiscal year 2017 alone, but also for the years to come. In addition, there should be a regulation that regulates the supervision of the implementation of taxpayers' rights.</pre>

scholarly journals Analisis Potensi Penerimaan Pajak Daerah Dan Retribusi Daerah Kota Pematangsiantar

Owner ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 339-349
Author(s):  
Asmawati Asmawati ◽  
Amran Saragih ◽  
Nora Januarti Panjaitan ◽  
Christina Kumala
Keyword(s):  
Public Services ◽  
Tax Revenue ◽  
Tax Collection ◽  
Tax Revenues ◽  
The Government ◽  
Developing Area ◽  
The City

Local tax revenues and levies, especially in the city of Pematangsiantar, have not been fully implemented effectively and optimally because one of them is the regulations on tax collection and sanctions for violations that have not been fully enforced. As a developing area, the city of Pematangsiantar should manage sources of income that can be used in development to improve public services in a real and sustainable manner. The potential that exists in Pematangsiantar City must be managed optimally, seen from the number of restaurants and hotels in Pematangsiantar City, an indication that if the government is serious in handling taxes, the revenue that will become Pematangsiantar City's income will increase. However, it is estimated that the main problems in the study of tax potential are not insignificant, mainly related to administrative performance as well as taxpayer compliance. For this reason, a solution is needed how to make efforts to increase tax revenue

scholarly journals CAN REMITTANCES BOOST TAX REVENUES IN ZIMBABWE? A SECONDARY QUARTERLY TIME-SERIES ANALYSIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-144
Author(s):  
Michael Takudzwa Pasara ◽  
◽  
Michael Zuze ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Time Series Data ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Ordinary Least Squares ◽  
Series Data ◽  
Tax Revenue ◽  
Tax Revenues ◽  
Main Challenge ◽  
The Government

The study applied the ordinary least squares (OLS) technique on quarterly time-series data to analyze if remittances can boost tax revenue in Zimbabwe. The main challenge faced in Zimbabwe is the insufficient tax revenues to finance growing public spending needs. Results indicate that the share of remittances both in the current and lagged period significantly influenced income tax revenue and the volume of manufacturing. Trade openness was found to be insignificant. Similar results were also observed for the variables when value-added tax to total revenue was the dependent variable. When lagged variables were taken into account, results showedthat only remittances were significant. Thus, increased remittance inflows have significant potential to generate more taxes for the government through income and consumption taxes. The study recommends the creation of platforms, which stimulate and attract more remittances, such as reducing costs of sending remittances through formal channels. Secondly, good governance and quality institutions provide appropriate economic environment and growth policies. Economic growth fosters increased and sustainable tax due to an increased tax base.

scholarly journals Tax amnesty and secondary tax evasion

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-139
Author(s):  
Yu-Kun Wang ◽  
Li Zhang ◽  
We-Me Ho
Keyword(s):  
Tax Evasion ◽  
Initial Assessment ◽  
Tax Revenue ◽  
Pareto Improvement ◽  
Tax Amnesty ◽  
Policy Tool ◽  
Assessment Period ◽  
The Government ◽  
Behavioural Aspects

AbstractThough tax amnesties (TAs) are considered as a policy tool to increase revenue for governments, they have generated some puzzles. To solve the puzzles of TA we should not ignore the behavioural aspects of delinquent taxpayers. In this paper, we focus on a relatively neglected but important area of the TA literature. Considering that people who participate in tax amnesty policy (TAP) may not honestly report the whole amounts of evaded tax, thus they commit a secondary tax evasion. We indicate that even considering the risk of abstaining from TA and incurring possible uncertainty of tax evasion penalties, participating in a TA provides a higher level of utility for the delinquent taxpayers. Also, due to a secondary tax evasion usually accompanying with TA, we show that during the initial assessment period of a TAP the tax revenue drastically increases and when the assessment period is approaching the tax revenue stably declines and ultimately converges to a fixed value. Furthermore, we show that if delinquent taxpayers participate in the TAP and the penalties are larger than the expected tax revenue of the government, it increases the tax revenue without reducing the welfare of other taxpayers, so as to achieving Pareto improvement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document