scholarly journals Analisis Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-65
Author(s):  
Hesti Febriyanti ◽  
Heni Pujiastuti
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Research Populations ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pemecahan masalah dari masing-masing gaya belajar yang berbeda. Penelitian ini termasuk dalam penelitian deskriptif-kualitatif. Popuasi yang diambil dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa SMPN 1 Kibin tahun ajaran 2019/2020. Teknik pengambilan sampel penelitian menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini berupa kuesioner, tes, wawancara, dan peneliti. Data mengenai menganalisis pemecahan masalah diambil dari kuesioner dan tes. Hasilnya didapat gaya belajar visual mendominasi. Kemudian 1 siswa dari gaya belajar yang berbeda dijadikan sampel untuk di wawancara. Hasil analisis menunjukkan pemecahan masalah setiap siswa berbeda karena dipengaruhi oleh gaya belajar. Gaya belajar visual dalam pemecahan masalah cenderung menekankan pada soal tes dan mencari informasi yang mendetail untuk memecahkan masalah. Gaya belajar auditorial dalam memecahkan masalah cenderung mengandalkan ingatan ketika pembelajaran. Gaya belajar kinestetik dalam pemecahan masalah cenderung memahaminya terlebih dahulu, kemudian dikonstruksikan dalam kehidupan sehari-hari. Dari hasil tersebut dapat disimpulkan bahwa gaya belajar memegang peranan penting dalam pemecahan masalah. Kata kunci : Pemecahan masalah; Gaya belajar visual; Gaya belajar auditorial; Gaya belajar kinestetik   Abstract This study aims to determine the problem solving of each different learning style. This research is included in descriptive-qualitative research. Populations taken in this study were students of SMPN 1 Kibin 2019/2020 school year. The research sampling technique used cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used in this study were in the form of questionnaires, tests, interviews, and researchers. Data regarding analyzing problem solving is taken from questionnaires and tests. The result is that the visual learning style is dominated. Then 1 student from a different learning style is sampled to be interviewed. The analysis shows that each student's problem solving is different because it is influenced by learning styles. Visual learning styles in problem solving tend to emphasize test questions and look for detailed information to solve problems. Auditory learning styles in solving problems tend to rely on memories when learning. Kinesthetic learning styles in problem solving tend to understand them first, then constructed in daily life. From these results it can be concluded that the learning style plays an important role in problem solving. Keywords: Problem solving; Visual learning style; Auditory learning style; Kinesthetic learning style

STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR GEOGRAFI

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liyusri . ◽  
Julaga Situmorang
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Instructional Strategy ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Student Acheivement ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan: (1) hasil belajar Geografi siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan strategi pembelajaran berbasis masalah (SPBM) lebih tinggi dibandingkan yang dibelajarkan dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori (SPE), (2) perbedaan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Visual, Auditorial, dan Kinestetik, (3) interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar siswa terhadap hasil belajar Geografi siswa. Populasi penelitian adalah siswa kelas XI Ilmu Sosial SMA Negeri 1 Pinangsori. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan Cluster Random Sampling. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kuasi eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2x3. Teknik analisa data yang digunakan teknik ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikan α = 0,05. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan (1) hasil belajar Geografi siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan strategi pembelajaran berbasis masalah (SPBM) lebih tinggi dibandingkan yang dibelajarkan dengan strategi ekspositori (SPE); (2) Terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar Geografi siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Visual, Auditorial, dan Kinestetik; (3) terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar mempengaruhi hasil belajar  Geografi siswa.   Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran berbasis masalah dan ekspositori, gaya belajar visual, auditorial, dan kinestetik, hasil belajar geografi   Abstract: This research was aimed to: (1) the student acheivement of Geography who were tought by problem based instructional strategy is higher than that taugh by exspository instruction strategy, (2) the differences of the students acheivements of Geography who have Visual, Auditory and Kinesthetic learning style, (3) the interaction between instructional strategy and learnig style of student acheivement. The population  in this research is all of student grade XI social sciences at Senior High School 1 Pinangsori of Tapanuli Tengah. The sampling technique use in this research is cluster random sampling technique. The research method used was quasi exsperiment with 2x3 factorial designs. Tecnique analyses data was two way ANOVA testing at significance 0,05. The result showed that: (1) student acheivement of Geography who were taught by problem based instructional strategy is higher than that student acheivement who were taught by exspository instruction strategy; (2) there are differences of students acheivements which is as has Visual, Auditory, dan Kinesthetic learning style; (3) there are interaction between instructional strategy and learnig style of student acheivement. Keywords: problem-based learning strategies and expository, visual learning styles, auditory, and kinesthetic learning outcomes geography

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR SISWA TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Winner Macson Pandiangan ◽  
Sahat Siagian ◽  
Harun Sitompul
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Homogeneous Population ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) perbedaan hasil belajar Matematika antara siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi TGT dan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki Gaya Belajar Kinestetik dan Gaya Berpikir Visual (3) interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika siswa. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI SMK Pharmaca Medan sebanyak 3 kelas dengan jumlah 122 orang. Teknik penarikan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan disain penelitian faktorial 2x2, sedangkan teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi a = 0.05. Syarat ANAVA adalah data berdistribusi normal dengan Lilifors dan data harus memiliki varians populasi homogen dengan uji Bartlett dan uji Fisher. Hasil penelitian diperoleh: (1) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Pembelajaran TGT lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang memiliki Gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan Gaya belajar Visual dan (3) terdapat interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dengan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika.  Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, hasil belajar matematika Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students who are taught using the TGT Strategy and Expository Strategy, (2) knowing the differences in learning outcomes of students who have Kinesthetic Learning Styles and Visual Thinking Styles (3) interactions between uses Learning strategies and learning styles in influencing students' mathematics learning outcomes. The population of this study were 3 class students of Pharmaca Medan Vocational High School as many as 3 classes with a total of 122 people. The sampling technique was carried out by cluster random sampling. The research method uses a quasi-experimental method with 2x2 factorial research design, while the data analysis technique uses two-way ANOVA at a significance level a = 0.05. ANOVA requirements are normally distributed data with Lilifors and data must have homogeneous population variance with the Bartlett test and Fisher's test. The results of the study were obtained: (1) the students 'mathematics learning outcomes that were learned using the TGT Learning Strategy were higher than using the Expository Strategy, (2) the students' mathematics learning outcomes who had a Kinesthetic Learning Style were higher than the Visual learning styles and (3) there were interaction between the use of learning strategies and learning styles in influencing mathematics learning outcomes. Keywords: learning strategies, learning styles, mathematics learning outcomes

scholarly journals Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran STAD Berbantuan Geogebra pada Materi Similaritas Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar

2017 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Wawan Wawan
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Method ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Achievement In Mathematics

The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of Learning model of STAD geogebra viewed from learning style. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 2 × 3. The population was entirely the students 4thof Mathematics Education Program Ma’arif Institute of Metro Lampung in Academic Year 2015/2016. The samples of the research were taken by using the cluster random sampling technique. The size of the sample was 50 students consisted of 26 students in the first experimental class and 24 students in the control class. The instruments to gather the data of the research were test of learning achievement in mathematics and student learning styles questionnaire. The data was analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusionsof thisresearchwere as follows. (1) The cooperative learning model of STAD Geogebra type resulted in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the Powerpoint-assisted direct learning model. (2) Students with visual learning style have the same achievement with students with auditory learning styles. Students with auditory learning style have the same achievement with students with kinesthetic learning styles. Students with visual learning styles have a better academic achievement than students with kinesthetic learning styles. (3) Difference in achievement of each learning method was not consistent with their respective learning styles and differences between individual learning style also was not consistent in each learning method Keywords: geogebra, power point, STAD

The Effect of Students’ Learning Models and Style on Students’ Achievement in Reading

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa P.N. Nainggolan ◽  
Busmin Gurning ◽  
Sumarsih Sumarsih
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Visual Style ◽  
Level Of Significance ◽  
Test Result ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

The objectives of the research were to find out whether a) students’ achievement in reading comprehension taught by using Jigsaw model was higher than taught by using Task-Based Learning (TBL) b) students’ achievement in reading comprehension with visual style was higher than that students with auditory style. The population was the students of SMA Budi Murni 2 Medan with 104 students. The samples were 3 parallel classes and two classes by applying cluster random sampling. The questionnaire was administered for classifying the students upon the visual and auditory learning style. The data were analyzed by applying two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at the level of significance α= 0.05. The result proved that students’ achievement in reading comprehension taught by using Jigsaw was higher than that taught by using TBL,  students’ achievement in reading comprehension with visual learning style was higher than those with auditory learning style and there was interaction between models of learning and learning styles on students’ achievement in reading comprehension. Moreover, Tuckey-test result also showed that visual style students got higher achievement if they were taught by using Jigsaw model while auditory style students got higher achievement if they were taught by using TBL model. Keywords: Effect; Models of Learning; Reading Comprehension; Students’ Learning Style; Students’ Achievement

scholarly journals Learning Styles and English Proficiency of Undergraduate EFL Students at One State Islamic University in Sumatera, Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 214-228
Author(s):  
Lenny Marzulina ◽  
Nova Lingga Pitaloka ◽  
Aren Dwi Yolanda
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
English Proficiency ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Coefficient Corrélation ◽  
Prediction Test ◽  
Efl Students

This study investigated (1) the correlation between each learning style and English proficiency, and investigated (2) the influence of each learning style to English proficiency of undergraduate EFL students of one state Islamic University in Sumatera, Indonesia. The study was in the form of correlational research method. The population of the study was 537 active EFL students. By using purposive sampling technique, there were 82 students involved as participants. The data were gained by using two instruments: Barsch Learning Styles Questionnaire and TOEFL prediction test. The result showed that 1) 34.0% of students preferred in visual learning style, 43% of students preferred in Auditory learning style, and 23% of students preferred in Kinesthetic learning style. 2) the coefficient correlation between visual learning style preference and English proficiency with r-obtained was (0.430). It was higher than r-table (.2565), then Ha1 was accepted and Ho1 was rejected. It indicated that there was a significant correlation between visual learning styles and their English proficiency. 3) The coefficient correlation between Auditory learning style and English proficiency was (0.2565). It was lower than r-table (.2565), then Ho2 was accepted and Ha2 was rejected. 4) The coefficient correlation between Kinesthetic learning styles and English Proficiency was (-0.166). It was lower than r-table (.2565), then Ho3 was accepted, and Ha3 was rejected. It showed that there was no significant correlation between kinesthetic learning style and English proficiency of EFL students. Besides, there was also a significant influence of visual learning style on English proficiency with 18.5% contributions.

scholarly journals Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Pola Bilangan Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-80
Author(s):  
I Gusti Ayu Sinta Inastuti ◽  
Sri Subarinah ◽  
Eka Kurniawan ◽  
Amrullah Amrullah
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Solution Strategy ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Number Pattern ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Academic Year

The purpose of this study was to determine eighth grade student problem-solving ability on number pattern material. This study was held academic year focused on assessing students learning styles. The methods used in this study were questionnaires, tests, and interviews. The results showed that class VIII students consisted of 26 students had visual learning styles, 24 students had auditory styles and 16 students had kinesthetic styles. Subjects taken in this study were 2 students from each learning style, then the subject was given a test to describe the number pattern material and conducted an interview. As a result, based on the analysis of the problem-solving ability stages, students with visual and auditory learning styles were able to reach the stage of understanding the question / problem, designing and choosing a solution strategy, and solving problems with a mathematical model, but have not yet reached the stage of re-checking the solutions obtained. On the contrary, Students with a kinesthetic learning style have been able to reach the stage of understanding the question / problem, but have not been able to reach the stage of designing and choosing a solution strategy, or solving problems with mathematical models, and even re-checking the solutions obtained. This shows that the problem solving ability of students with visual and auditory learning styles is better than students with kinesthetic learning styles.

scholarly journals ANALISIS AKTIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA BERDASARKAN GAYA BELAJAR VISUAL AUDITORIAL KINESTETIK SISWA PADA PEMBELAJARAN BIOLOGI KELAS XI IPA MAN 1 MEDAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siti Riska Amina ◽  
Zulkifli Simatupang
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Activities ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Motor Activities ◽  
Survey Results

This research aims to determine students's learning activities based on visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles of students XI IPA class at MAN 1 Medan Academic Year 2015/2016. The Population of this research is 60 students in two of XI IPA classes and samples were determined by using purposive sampling technique in which the sample was 18 students. The type of this research is a descriptive research. As the research instrument with 36 item of learning style’s questionnaire and the observations are done two times by using learning activities observation sheets. The survey results revealed that students with  visual learning style have the highest writing activities with a percentage of 51.1%, visual activities by 50% and motor activities with a percentage of 39.1%. Students with auditory learning style have a high listening activities with a percentage of 37.9% and oral activities with a percentage of 32.7%. Students with kinesthetic learning style have the highest oral activities with a percentage of 41.4%, and listening activities with a percentage of 39.9%.Keywords: biology learning activities, learning styles

scholarly journals KEMAMPUAN VISUAL SPASIAL SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL PISA KONTEN SHAPE AND SPACE BERDASARKAN GAYA BELAJAR

KadikmA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Nur Eni Isnaini
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Pattern Search ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Visual Ability ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Collection Methods

This study aims to describe students' spatial-visual ability in solving PISA questions in shape and space content based on visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles. This type of research used in this research is descriptive qualitative research. Subjects in the study were six students from Class X MIPA 3 SMA Negeri 2 Tanggul consisting of two students from each of the visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles. The data collection methods used were questionnaires, tests, and interviews. The instruments used in this study were learning style questionnaires, shape and space content PISA test questions, and interview guidelines. The results showed that the achievement of the characteristics of the sixth spatial-visual abilities of the subjects differed. Students with a visual learning style can meet the characteristics of pattern search, conceptualization, problem-solving, and imagination in full. Students with an auditory learning style can meet the characteristics of conceptualization, problem-solving, and imagination completely but are unable to meet the characteristics of pattern search. Students with kinesthetic learning styles meet the characteristics of problem solving and imagination but are unable to meet indicators on the characteristics of pattern search and conceptualization. This can be seen from the results of solving the questions given and interviews conducted on the research subjects. Keyword: Spatial-Visual Ability, PISA Questions on Shape and Space Content, Learning Style

The Effect of Instructional Approaches and Learning Styles on Students’ Achievement of Grammar

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rista Damesari Saragih ◽  
Lince Sihombing ◽  
Eddi Setia
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Significant Interaction ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Cluster Sampling ◽  
Instructional Approaches ◽  
Vocational High School ◽  
Instructional Approach ◽  
Auditory Learning

The objectives of this research are to investigate whether: (1) students’ achievement of grammar taught by applying inductive approach higher than taught by applying deductive approach, (2) achievement of grammar of visual learning style students higher than achievement of grammar of auditory learning style students, and (3) there is an interaction between instructional approaches and learning styles on the students’ achievement of grammar. The population was students of Grade X of Vocational High School 1 Beringin Deli Serdang. Based on Cluster Sampling technique, two classes were chosen, namely Grades X1 and X3. The data were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA with 2 × 2 factorial design. The result reveals that (1) Students` grammar achievement taught by using inductive instructional approach is higher than that taught by using deductive instructional Approach (81,20 > 72,10), (2) Students with visual learning style have higher achievement in grammar than students with auditory learning style (81,90 > 72) and (3) there is significant interaction between instructional approaches and learning styles on students` achievement of grammar (4.906 > 3.96). Thus, it can be concluded that the application of instructional approaches and learning styles can affect students` achievement in grammar.   Keywords: Grammar; Instructional Approach; Learning Styles

scholarly journals IDENTIFIKASI GAYA BELAJAR MAHASISWA

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 56
Author(s):  
Jeanete Ophilia Papilaya ◽  
Neleke Huliselan
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Survey Method ◽  
Guidance And Counseling ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Survey Results

The objective of this study was to identify learning styles of students. The approach used in this study is a quantitative approach with survey method. The variable in this study is a single variable , namely the identification of student learning styles. The study population is students of Guidance and Counseling FKIP Pattimura University totaling 388 people. Samples were used as samples in the amount of 10% of the population of 39 people. The sampling technique using Simple Random Sampling. Learning styles questionnaire prepared based on the opinion of De Poter & Hernacki is used as a data collection tool. Learning styles identified as visual learning style, auditorial learning style, and kinesthetic learning style. Data analysis techniques in this study is the descriptive statistical analysis methods. Based on the survey results revealed that students of guidance and counseling FKIP Pattimura University has a tendency to one learning style. Of the 39 students found that 6 students had a tendency visual learning style, 20 students have a tendency to auditory learning style, 1 student has a tendency kinestheticlearning style, and 12 students have a tendency to mix between learning styles and learning styles visual auditorylearning styles.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document