The Effect of Students’ Learning Models and Style on Students’ Achievement in Reading

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa P.N. Nainggolan ◽  
Busmin Gurning ◽  
Sumarsih Sumarsih
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Visual Style ◽  
Level Of Significance ◽  
Test Result ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

The objectives of the research were to find out whether a) students’ achievement in reading comprehension taught by using Jigsaw model was higher than taught by using Task-Based Learning (TBL) b) students’ achievement in reading comprehension with visual style was higher than that students with auditory style. The population was the students of SMA Budi Murni 2 Medan with 104 students. The samples were 3 parallel classes and two classes by applying cluster random sampling. The questionnaire was administered for classifying the students upon the visual and auditory learning style. The data were analyzed by applying two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at the level of significance α= 0.05. The result proved that students’ achievement in reading comprehension taught by using Jigsaw was higher than that taught by using TBL,  students’ achievement in reading comprehension with visual learning style was higher than those with auditory learning style and there was interaction between models of learning and learning styles on students’ achievement in reading comprehension. Moreover, Tuckey-test result also showed that visual style students got higher achievement if they were taught by using Jigsaw model while auditory style students got higher achievement if they were taught by using TBL model. Keywords: Effect; Models of Learning; Reading Comprehension; Students’ Learning Style; Students’ Achievement

scholarly journals Analisis Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-65
Author(s):  
Hesti Febriyanti ◽  
Heni Pujiastuti
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Research Populations ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pemecahan masalah dari masing-masing gaya belajar yang berbeda. Penelitian ini termasuk dalam penelitian deskriptif-kualitatif. Popuasi yang diambil dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa SMPN 1 Kibin tahun ajaran 2019/2020. Teknik pengambilan sampel penelitian menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini berupa kuesioner, tes, wawancara, dan peneliti. Data mengenai menganalisis pemecahan masalah diambil dari kuesioner dan tes. Hasilnya didapat gaya belajar visual mendominasi. Kemudian 1 siswa dari gaya belajar yang berbeda dijadikan sampel untuk di wawancara. Hasil analisis menunjukkan pemecahan masalah setiap siswa berbeda karena dipengaruhi oleh gaya belajar. Gaya belajar visual dalam pemecahan masalah cenderung menekankan pada soal tes dan mencari informasi yang mendetail untuk memecahkan masalah. Gaya belajar auditorial dalam memecahkan masalah cenderung mengandalkan ingatan ketika pembelajaran. Gaya belajar kinestetik dalam pemecahan masalah cenderung memahaminya terlebih dahulu, kemudian dikonstruksikan dalam kehidupan sehari-hari. Dari hasil tersebut dapat disimpulkan bahwa gaya belajar memegang peranan penting dalam pemecahan masalah. Kata kunci : Pemecahan masalah; Gaya belajar visual; Gaya belajar auditorial; Gaya belajar kinestetik   Abstract This study aims to determine the problem solving of each different learning style. This research is included in descriptive-qualitative research. Populations taken in this study were students of SMPN 1 Kibin 2019/2020 school year. The research sampling technique used cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used in this study were in the form of questionnaires, tests, interviews, and researchers. Data regarding analyzing problem solving is taken from questionnaires and tests. The result is that the visual learning style is dominated. Then 1 student from a different learning style is sampled to be interviewed. The analysis shows that each student's problem solving is different because it is influenced by learning styles. Visual learning styles in problem solving tend to emphasize test questions and look for detailed information to solve problems. Auditory learning styles in solving problems tend to rely on memories when learning. Kinesthetic learning styles in problem solving tend to understand them first, then constructed in daily life. From these results it can be concluded that the learning style plays an important role in problem solving. Keywords: Problem solving; Visual learning style; Auditory learning style; Kinesthetic learning style

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR SISWA TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Winner Macson Pandiangan ◽  
Sahat Siagian ◽  
Harun Sitompul
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Homogeneous Population ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) perbedaan hasil belajar Matematika antara siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi TGT dan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki Gaya Belajar Kinestetik dan Gaya Berpikir Visual (3) interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika siswa. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI SMK Pharmaca Medan sebanyak 3 kelas dengan jumlah 122 orang. Teknik penarikan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan disain penelitian faktorial 2x2, sedangkan teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi a = 0.05. Syarat ANAVA adalah data berdistribusi normal dengan Lilifors dan data harus memiliki varians populasi homogen dengan uji Bartlett dan uji Fisher. Hasil penelitian diperoleh: (1) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Pembelajaran TGT lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang memiliki Gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan Gaya belajar Visual dan (3) terdapat interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dengan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika.  Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, hasil belajar matematika Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students who are taught using the TGT Strategy and Expository Strategy, (2) knowing the differences in learning outcomes of students who have Kinesthetic Learning Styles and Visual Thinking Styles (3) interactions between uses Learning strategies and learning styles in influencing students' mathematics learning outcomes. The population of this study were 3 class students of Pharmaca Medan Vocational High School as many as 3 classes with a total of 122 people. The sampling technique was carried out by cluster random sampling. The research method uses a quasi-experimental method with 2x2 factorial research design, while the data analysis technique uses two-way ANOVA at a significance level a = 0.05. ANOVA requirements are normally distributed data with Lilifors and data must have homogeneous population variance with the Bartlett test and Fisher's test. The results of the study were obtained: (1) the students 'mathematics learning outcomes that were learned using the TGT Learning Strategy were higher than using the Expository Strategy, (2) the students' mathematics learning outcomes who had a Kinesthetic Learning Style were higher than the Visual learning styles and (3) there were interaction between the use of learning strategies and learning styles in influencing mathematics learning outcomes. Keywords: learning strategies, learning styles, mathematics learning outcomes

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF TEACHING STRATEGIES AND LEARNING STYLE ON STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN READING COMPREHENSION

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-77
Author(s):  
Fitri, Ayu
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Teaching Strategies ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Advance Organizer ◽  
Visual Style ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Group 1

The objectives of this experimental research were to investigate whether: 1) students’ achievement in reading comprehension taught by using advance organizer strategy was higher than taught by using reciprocal strategy. 2) students’ achievement in reading comprehension with visual style was higher than that students with verbal style, and 3) there was interaction between teaching strategies and learning styles on students’ achievement in reading comprehension. The population of this research was the students in grade X of private senior high school named SMA Kartika I-1 Medan in 2012/2013 school year. The total number of population was five classes containing 200 students. There were two classes containing 83 students chosen as sample of this research by applying cluster random sampling technique. In further, there was cluster random assignment done in both two classes in order to know the position of the class whether as experimental group 1 or experimental group 2.The experimental group 1 was treated by using advance organizer strategy and the experimental group 2 was treated by using reciprocal strategy. Then,the research design was experimentby using factorial design 2x2 because there is two independent variables (teaching strategies) and two attributives (learning styles). The questionnaire was conducted for classifying the students’ learning style upon the visual and verbal. Next, students’ achievement in reading comprehension text was measured by using reading comprehension test. The data were analyzed by applying two- way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at the level of significance ?= 0,05. The result reveals that (1) students’ achievement in reading comprehension taught by using advance organizer was higher than that taught by using reciprocal strategy, with Fobs= 9,1Ftab= 3,96, (2) students’ achievement in reading comprehension with visual learning style was higher that that with verbal learning style, with Fobs=11,7 Ftab= 3,96,(3) there is  interaction between teaching strategies and learning styles on students’ achievement in reading comprehension with Fobs= 47,4Ftab= 3,96. Moreover, Tuckey-Test result also showed that visual style students got higher achievement if they were taught by using advance organizer strategy while verbal style students got higher achievement if they were taught by using reciprocal strategy.

STUDENT’S LEARNING STYLES IN LEARNING READING COMPREHENSION

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinta sasmita And Siti Aisah Ginting
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Tenth Grade ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Auditory Learners

This study is about student’s learning styles in learning reading comprehension. The design of this research was descriptive research. The data were collected by using questionnaires and observation sheet. The subject of the study are the XI AP 2 of SMK Swasta Harapan Stabat and the object of the study are the students learning styles in learning reading comprehension. The data were analyzed by using Fleming theory. The purpose of conducting this research was find out whether the most dominant learning style in reading comprehension and to find out what are the types of student’s learning styles which has higher achievement in reading comprehension of XI grade in SMK Swasta Harapan Stabat in academic 2016/2017. There were 32 students as the subject of this research. In this case, the researcher collected the data by using learning style questionnaire and observation. The result showed that auditory learning style is the most dominant learning style at the tenth grade students at SMK Swasta Harapan Stabat, the percentage was 71,87%, it means 23 from 32 students prefer to hear than read and move. The second was kinesthetic learning style, the score, 21,88%, means that only 7 students prefer to move. Then, visual learning style, score 6,25%, means that 2 from 32 students prefer to read. For the fastest student’s in reading comprehension came from auditory students or auditory learners. They get score 69,56% followed kinesthetic 21,74%, and visual 8,70%.

The effect of Teaching Methods and Learning Styles on Students’ Achievement in Reading Comprehension

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Parwati Parwati ◽  
Busmin Gurning ◽  
Berlin Sibarani
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Experimental Research ◽  
Teaching Methods ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Visual Style ◽  
Jigsaw Method ◽  
Experimental Group

The objectives of this experimental research were to investigate whether: 1) students’ achievement in reading comprehension taught by using CIRC method was higher than taught by using Jigsaw method. 2) students’ achievement in reading comprehension with visual style was higher than those with kinesthetic style, 3) there was interaction between teaching methods and learning styles on students’ achievement in reading comprehension. One hundred of 2011/2012 grade X students of SMAN 1 Delitua were selected as sample by applying cluster random sample technique. The research design was experimental research by using factorial design 2x2. Experimental group 1 was treated by using CIRC method and experimental group 2 was treated by using Jigsaw method. The questionnaire was conducted for classifying the students upon the visual and kinesthetic learning style. Students’ achievement in reading comprehension text was measured by using reading comprehension test. The data were analyzed by applying two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at the level of significance α= 0.05. The result reveals that (1) students’ achievement in reading comprehension taught by using CIRC was higher than that taught by using Jigsaw method, with Fobs= 3.36>Ftab=2.70, (2) students’ achievement in reading comprehension with visual learning style was higher than that with kinesthetic learning style with Fobs= 8.64>Ftable=2.70, (3) there is interaction between teaching method and learning styles on students’ achievement in reading comprehension with Fobs=7.74>Ftable=2.70. The result of Scheffe-Test showed that visual style students got higher achievement if they were taught by using CIRC method while kinesthetic style students got higher achievement if they were taught by using Jigsaw method.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INQUIRI DENGAN MASYARAKAT BELAJAR DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Marianto Pardosi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Communities ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) Perbedaan hasil belajar matematika antara siswa yang diajar dengan model  pembelajaran inkuiri dan yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran masyarakat belajar, (2) Perbedaan hasil belajar matematika  antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dan gaya belajar auditorial, (3) interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VI Sekolah Dasar Negeri 118299 Aek Raso, Teknik penarikan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikan α = 0,05. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) hasil belajar matematika siswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajarn inkuiri lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar siswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran masyarakat belajar, (2) hasil belajar matematika siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar auditorial, (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Perhitungan uji lanjut dengan uji Scheffe menunjukkan perbedaan yang signifikan pada hasil belajar matematika antara model pembelajaran inkuiri dan masyarakat belajar, begitu pula anatara gaya belajar visual dan gaya belajar auditorial. Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran, inquiri, masyarakat belajar, gaya belajar visual, gaya belajar auditorial, matematika Abstract: This study aims to find out: (1) Differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students taught with inquiry learning models and those taught with learning communities learning models, (2) Differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students who have visual learning styles and auditory learning styles , (3) the interaction between learning models and learning styles on learning outcomes in mathematics. The population of this research is all students of grade VI of State Elementary School 118299 Aek Raso, withdrawal technique with cluster random sampling. The research method uses a quasi-experimental method with a 2 x 2 factorial research design. Data analysis technique uses two-way ANOVA at a significant level α = 0.05. The research findings show that: (1) the learning outcomes of students who are taught with inquiry learning models are higher than the learning outcomes of students taught with learning models of learning communities, (2) the results of learning mathematics students who have higher visual learning styles than student learning outcomes which has an auditory learning style, (3) there is an interaction between the learning model and learning style on learning outcomes in mathematics. Further test calculations with the Scheffe test show significant differences in mathematics learning outcomes between inquiry learning models and learning communities, as well as between visual learning styles and auditory learning styles. Keywords: learning model, inquiry, learning society, visual learning style, auditory learning style, mathematics

STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR GEOGRAFI

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liyusri . ◽  
Julaga Situmorang
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Instructional Strategy ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Student Acheivement ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan: (1) hasil belajar Geografi siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan strategi pembelajaran berbasis masalah (SPBM) lebih tinggi dibandingkan yang dibelajarkan dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori (SPE), (2) perbedaan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Visual, Auditorial, dan Kinestetik, (3) interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar siswa terhadap hasil belajar Geografi siswa. Populasi penelitian adalah siswa kelas XI Ilmu Sosial SMA Negeri 1 Pinangsori. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan Cluster Random Sampling. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kuasi eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2x3. Teknik analisa data yang digunakan teknik ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikan α = 0,05. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan (1) hasil belajar Geografi siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan strategi pembelajaran berbasis masalah (SPBM) lebih tinggi dibandingkan yang dibelajarkan dengan strategi ekspositori (SPE); (2) Terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar Geografi siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Visual, Auditorial, dan Kinestetik; (3) terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar mempengaruhi hasil belajar  Geografi siswa.   Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran berbasis masalah dan ekspositori, gaya belajar visual, auditorial, dan kinestetik, hasil belajar geografi   Abstract: This research was aimed to: (1) the student acheivement of Geography who were tought by problem based instructional strategy is higher than that taugh by exspository instruction strategy, (2) the differences of the students acheivements of Geography who have Visual, Auditory and Kinesthetic learning style, (3) the interaction between instructional strategy and learnig style of student acheivement. The population  in this research is all of student grade XI social sciences at Senior High School 1 Pinangsori of Tapanuli Tengah. The sampling technique use in this research is cluster random sampling technique. The research method used was quasi exsperiment with 2x3 factorial designs. Tecnique analyses data was two way ANOVA testing at significance 0,05. The result showed that: (1) student acheivement of Geography who were taught by problem based instructional strategy is higher than that student acheivement who were taught by exspository instruction strategy; (2) there are differences of students acheivements which is as has Visual, Auditory, dan Kinesthetic learning style; (3) there are interaction between instructional strategy and learnig style of student acheivement. Keywords: problem-based learning strategies and expository, visual learning styles, auditory, and kinesthetic learning outcomes geography

HUBUNGAN GAYA BELAJAR SISWA TERHADAP ASPEK PENGETAHUAN SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN SISTEM KOMPUTER DI SMK IT RAHMATAN KARIMAH BENGKULU TENGAH

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (01) ◽  
pp. 13-20
Author(s):  
Dian Saputra
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Computer System ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Post Test ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Relationship

This study aims to find out the relationship between learning style and students’ knowledge aspect on Computer System Subject at SMK IT Rahmatan Karimah of  Central Bengkulu, the type of research is quantitative and the subject of research is grade X in SMK IT Rahmatan Karimah of  Central Bengkulu. Data collection techniques using observation, Questionnaire and documentation. Data analysis techniques used were Descriptive Analysis, and inferential Statistical Analysis. The results of visual learning style post-test were 11 people with a mean of 76.36, an auditory learning style of 8 people at a mean of 62.14, a kinesthetic learning style of 3 people at a mean of 50.33, apart from that (r x y = 2.35) and the magnitude of r is reflected in the table (r table = 0.4132). Then rxy > r table ie = 2.35> 0.4132. In other words, Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. It has a significant relationship between the learning styles of students and students’ knowledge aspect on Computer System Subject of grade X TKJ in SMK IT Rahmatan Karimah of  Central Bengkulu

The Effect of Teaching Strategies and Learning Styles on the Students’ Achievement

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Teguh Satria Amin ◽  
Eddi Setia ◽  
Lince Sihombing
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Teaching Strategies ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Reflective Learning ◽  
Direct Reading ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

This research investigates 1) students’ achievement in reading comprehension taught by using Direct Reading Thinking Activity (DR-TA) strategy is higher than taught by using Know, What to Learn, and Learned (KWL) strategy, 2) students’ achievement in reading comprehension with impulsive learning style is higher than students’ achievement in reading comprehension with reflective learning style, and (3) there is  interaction between teaching strategies and learning styles on the students’ achievement. Two classes containing of 70 students were chosen as sample by apllying cluster random sampling technique. The experimental group 1 was treated by using DR-TA and the experimental group 2 was treated by using KWL. The students’ achievement was measured by using test. The questionnaire was conducted to find out the students’ learning style. The data were analyzed by applying two-ways analysis of variance. The findings show that (1) the students’ achievement in reading comprehension taught by using DR-TA higher than using KWL; (2) students’ achievement in reading comprehension with impulsive learning style is lower than that with reflective learning style; (3) there is interaction between teaching strategies and learning styles on the students’ achievement in reading comprehension. The analysis revealed that the teaching strategies significantly affected the students’ reading achievement.   Keywords: DR-TA, KWL, Impulsive Learning Style, Reflective Learning Style, Reading Comprehension

The Effect of Instructional Approaches and Learning Styles on Students’ Achievement of Grammar

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rista Damesari Saragih ◽  
Lince Sihombing ◽  
Eddi Setia
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Significant Interaction ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Cluster Sampling ◽  
Instructional Approaches ◽  
Vocational High School ◽  
Instructional Approach ◽  
Auditory Learning

The objectives of this research are to investigate whether: (1) students’ achievement of grammar taught by applying inductive approach higher than taught by applying deductive approach, (2) achievement of grammar of visual learning style students higher than achievement of grammar of auditory learning style students, and (3) there is an interaction between instructional approaches and learning styles on the students’ achievement of grammar. The population was students of Grade X of Vocational High School 1 Beringin Deli Serdang. Based on Cluster Sampling technique, two classes were chosen, namely Grades X1 and X3. The data were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA with 2 × 2 factorial design. The result reveals that (1) Students` grammar achievement taught by using inductive instructional approach is higher than that taught by using deductive instructional Approach (81,20 > 72,10), (2) Students with visual learning style have higher achievement in grammar than students with auditory learning style (81,90 > 72) and (3) there is significant interaction between instructional approaches and learning styles on students` achievement of grammar (4.906 > 3.96). Thus, it can be concluded that the application of instructional approaches and learning styles can affect students` achievement in grammar.   Keywords: Grammar; Instructional Approach; Learning Styles

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document