STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR GEOGRAFI

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liyusri . ◽  
Julaga Situmorang
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Instructional Strategy ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Student Acheivement ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan: (1) hasil belajar Geografi siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan strategi pembelajaran berbasis masalah (SPBM) lebih tinggi dibandingkan yang dibelajarkan dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori (SPE), (2) perbedaan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Visual, Auditorial, dan Kinestetik, (3) interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar siswa terhadap hasil belajar Geografi siswa. Populasi penelitian adalah siswa kelas XI Ilmu Sosial SMA Negeri 1 Pinangsori. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan Cluster Random Sampling. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kuasi eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2x3. Teknik analisa data yang digunakan teknik ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikan α = 0,05. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan (1) hasil belajar Geografi siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan strategi pembelajaran berbasis masalah (SPBM) lebih tinggi dibandingkan yang dibelajarkan dengan strategi ekspositori (SPE); (2) Terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar Geografi siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Visual, Auditorial, dan Kinestetik; (3) terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar mempengaruhi hasil belajar  Geografi siswa.   Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran berbasis masalah dan ekspositori, gaya belajar visual, auditorial, dan kinestetik, hasil belajar geografi   Abstract: This research was aimed to: (1) the student acheivement of Geography who were tought by problem based instructional strategy is higher than that taugh by exspository instruction strategy, (2) the differences of the students acheivements of Geography who have Visual, Auditory and Kinesthetic learning style, (3) the interaction between instructional strategy and learnig style of student acheivement. The population  in this research is all of student grade XI social sciences at Senior High School 1 Pinangsori of Tapanuli Tengah. The sampling technique use in this research is cluster random sampling technique. The research method used was quasi exsperiment with 2x3 factorial designs. Tecnique analyses data was two way ANOVA testing at significance 0,05. The result showed that: (1) student acheivement of Geography who were taught by problem based instructional strategy is higher than that student acheivement who were taught by exspository instruction strategy; (2) there are differences of students acheivements which is as has Visual, Auditory, dan Kinesthetic learning style; (3) there are interaction between instructional strategy and learnig style of student acheivement. Keywords: problem-based learning strategies and expository, visual learning styles, auditory, and kinesthetic learning outcomes geography

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR SISWA TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Winner Macson Pandiangan ◽  
Sahat Siagian ◽  
Harun Sitompul
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Homogeneous Population ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) perbedaan hasil belajar Matematika antara siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi TGT dan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki Gaya Belajar Kinestetik dan Gaya Berpikir Visual (3) interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika siswa. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI SMK Pharmaca Medan sebanyak 3 kelas dengan jumlah 122 orang. Teknik penarikan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan disain penelitian faktorial 2x2, sedangkan teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi a = 0.05. Syarat ANAVA adalah data berdistribusi normal dengan Lilifors dan data harus memiliki varians populasi homogen dengan uji Bartlett dan uji Fisher. Hasil penelitian diperoleh: (1) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Pembelajaran TGT lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang memiliki Gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan Gaya belajar Visual dan (3) terdapat interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dengan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika.  Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, hasil belajar matematika Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students who are taught using the TGT Strategy and Expository Strategy, (2) knowing the differences in learning outcomes of students who have Kinesthetic Learning Styles and Visual Thinking Styles (3) interactions between uses Learning strategies and learning styles in influencing students' mathematics learning outcomes. The population of this study were 3 class students of Pharmaca Medan Vocational High School as many as 3 classes with a total of 122 people. The sampling technique was carried out by cluster random sampling. The research method uses a quasi-experimental method with 2x2 factorial research design, while the data analysis technique uses two-way ANOVA at a significance level a = 0.05. ANOVA requirements are normally distributed data with Lilifors and data must have homogeneous population variance with the Bartlett test and Fisher's test. The results of the study were obtained: (1) the students 'mathematics learning outcomes that were learned using the TGT Learning Strategy were higher than using the Expository Strategy, (2) the students' mathematics learning outcomes who had a Kinesthetic Learning Style were higher than the Visual learning styles and (3) there were interaction between the use of learning strategies and learning styles in influencing mathematics learning outcomes. Keywords: learning strategies, learning styles, mathematics learning outcomes

scholarly journals Analisis Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-65
Author(s):  
Hesti Febriyanti ◽  
Heni Pujiastuti
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Research Populations ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pemecahan masalah dari masing-masing gaya belajar yang berbeda. Penelitian ini termasuk dalam penelitian deskriptif-kualitatif. Popuasi yang diambil dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa SMPN 1 Kibin tahun ajaran 2019/2020. Teknik pengambilan sampel penelitian menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini berupa kuesioner, tes, wawancara, dan peneliti. Data mengenai menganalisis pemecahan masalah diambil dari kuesioner dan tes. Hasilnya didapat gaya belajar visual mendominasi. Kemudian 1 siswa dari gaya belajar yang berbeda dijadikan sampel untuk di wawancara. Hasil analisis menunjukkan pemecahan masalah setiap siswa berbeda karena dipengaruhi oleh gaya belajar. Gaya belajar visual dalam pemecahan masalah cenderung menekankan pada soal tes dan mencari informasi yang mendetail untuk memecahkan masalah. Gaya belajar auditorial dalam memecahkan masalah cenderung mengandalkan ingatan ketika pembelajaran. Gaya belajar kinestetik dalam pemecahan masalah cenderung memahaminya terlebih dahulu, kemudian dikonstruksikan dalam kehidupan sehari-hari. Dari hasil tersebut dapat disimpulkan bahwa gaya belajar memegang peranan penting dalam pemecahan masalah. Kata kunci : Pemecahan masalah; Gaya belajar visual; Gaya belajar auditorial; Gaya belajar kinestetik   Abstract This study aims to determine the problem solving of each different learning style. This research is included in descriptive-qualitative research. Populations taken in this study were students of SMPN 1 Kibin 2019/2020 school year. The research sampling technique used cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used in this study were in the form of questionnaires, tests, interviews, and researchers. Data regarding analyzing problem solving is taken from questionnaires and tests. The result is that the visual learning style is dominated. Then 1 student from a different learning style is sampled to be interviewed. The analysis shows that each student's problem solving is different because it is influenced by learning styles. Visual learning styles in problem solving tend to emphasize test questions and look for detailed information to solve problems. Auditory learning styles in solving problems tend to rely on memories when learning. Kinesthetic learning styles in problem solving tend to understand them first, then constructed in daily life. From these results it can be concluded that the learning style plays an important role in problem solving. Keywords: Problem solving; Visual learning style; Auditory learning style; Kinesthetic learning style

scholarly journals Gaya Belajar Mahasiswa Thailand di Universitas Islam Riau

GERAM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
Muhammad Mukhlis
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Foreign Students ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Lecture Material ◽  
Lecture Method ◽  
Good Learning

Learning styles are the ways, attitudes, and habits undertaken by students to gain comfort in learning. In this case, the researcher analyzed the foreign students’ learning style from Thailand who are studying at the Islamic University of Riau. The result of study showed that foreign students’ learning style from Thailand tended to use Kinesthetic learning style. This was based on research findings, learning style that has the highest value of kinestetik with an average of 84.6%, followed by an auditory learning style with an average of 76.9% and then visual learning style with an average of 61.5 %. As the findings in research are: First, for visual learning style students prefered to use the media in the lecture process. They were more able to concentrate when the lecturer explains the lecture material when looking at the face. Students could not memorize the material while listening to music. Students understood the material written on the board rather than read more quickly. Second, for auditory learning style, students prefered their lecturers by using lecture method. Students more easily remembered well the lecture material during the discussion. Students will lose concentration, when they heard a noise. Students prefered to discuss with friends if they find problems learning. Third, for students' kinesthetic learning styles along with. Students were more interested in lectures that are in practice. Students memorized the material while walking more dominant. when studying students could not read quickly. The findings could certainly be an input for educators in order to absorb, organize, and suit the learning strategies with learning styles, so as to show good learning outcomes and will be in accordance with lecture objectives

scholarly journals Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa SMK Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-59
Author(s):  
Elsa Komala ◽  
Asri Maulani Afrida
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Mathematical Representation ◽  
School Students ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Student Questionnaire

This research aims to describe the mathematical representation abilities of vocational school students in terms of visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles, as well as learning styles that have the best representational abilities in mathematics learning. The research was conducted at SMK Negeri 2 Cilaku Cianjur. The research method used is descriptive research with a quantitative approach. The subjects in this study were all 29 students of class X TKJ 2 with purposive sampling technique. The data used are written tests to reveal mathematical representation abilities, observation and questionnaires to classify students based on learning styles, interviews with students. Data processing used descriptive analysis of the percentage of posttest scores, learning styles by looking at the percentage of observation statements and answers to student questionnaire statements. The results of the data analysis showed that the percentage of achievement of the mathematical representation ability of students with a visual learning style was 71.43% in the sufficient category, students with the auditory learning style 71.25% in the sufficient category, and students with the kinesthetic learning style 73.89% with the sufficient category. The kinesthetic learning style has the best representation ability in mathematics learning with a percentage of 73.89% with a sufficient category.

scholarly journals Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran STAD Berbantuan Geogebra pada Materi Similaritas Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar

2017 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Wawan Wawan
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Method ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Achievement In Mathematics

The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of Learning model of STAD geogebra viewed from learning style. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 2 × 3. The population was entirely the students 4thof Mathematics Education Program Ma’arif Institute of Metro Lampung in Academic Year 2015/2016. The samples of the research were taken by using the cluster random sampling technique. The size of the sample was 50 students consisted of 26 students in the first experimental class and 24 students in the control class. The instruments to gather the data of the research were test of learning achievement in mathematics and student learning styles questionnaire. The data was analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusionsof thisresearchwere as follows. (1) The cooperative learning model of STAD Geogebra type resulted in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the Powerpoint-assisted direct learning model. (2) Students with visual learning style have the same achievement with students with auditory learning styles. Students with auditory learning style have the same achievement with students with kinesthetic learning styles. Students with visual learning styles have a better academic achievement than students with kinesthetic learning styles. (3) Difference in achievement of each learning method was not consistent with their respective learning styles and differences between individual learning style also was not consistent in each learning method Keywords: geogebra, power point, STAD

The Effect of Students’ Learning Models and Style on Students’ Achievement in Reading

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa P.N. Nainggolan ◽  
Busmin Gurning ◽  
Sumarsih Sumarsih
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Visual Style ◽  
Level Of Significance ◽  
Test Result ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

The objectives of the research were to find out whether a) students’ achievement in reading comprehension taught by using Jigsaw model was higher than taught by using Task-Based Learning (TBL) b) students’ achievement in reading comprehension with visual style was higher than that students with auditory style. The population was the students of SMA Budi Murni 2 Medan with 104 students. The samples were 3 parallel classes and two classes by applying cluster random sampling. The questionnaire was administered for classifying the students upon the visual and auditory learning style. The data were analyzed by applying two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at the level of significance α= 0.05. The result proved that students’ achievement in reading comprehension taught by using Jigsaw was higher than that taught by using TBL,  students’ achievement in reading comprehension with visual learning style was higher than those with auditory learning style and there was interaction between models of learning and learning styles on students’ achievement in reading comprehension. Moreover, Tuckey-test result also showed that visual style students got higher achievement if they were taught by using Jigsaw model while auditory style students got higher achievement if they were taught by using TBL model. Keywords: Effect; Models of Learning; Reading Comprehension; Students’ Learning Style; Students’ Achievement

PENGARUH PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAMDI MADRASAH TSANAWIYAH MESRAKOTA PEMATANGSIANTAR

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Mul Iadi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Scientific Approach

<p>The purpose of this study was to find out: (1) differences in Akidah<br />Akhlak learning outcomes of students taught with scientific approaches<br />with students taught with contextual approaches, (2) differences in<br />learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak students who have visual, auditory and<br />kinesthetic learning styles, and (3) the influence of the scientific approach<br />and student learning styles on the learning outcomes of Akidah Akhlak.<br />This research method is quasi-experimental with the population of this<br />study are students of class VII (Seven). The sample was chosen into two<br />classes with cluster random sampling technique, in this case selected for<br />the experimental class with a scientific approach is class VIIa with the<br />number of students 31, while for the control class that is the contextual<br />approach is class VIId with the number of students 34. Instruments of data<br />collection is a questionnaire and test of learning outcomes. The technique<br />by analysis of variance (Anava) at "α" = 0.05. The results of this study are:<br />(1) student learning outcomes taught with scientific approach (= 33.5)<br />higher than student learning outcomes taught with contextual approaches<br />(= 28,7), with Fcount = 68,10&gt; Ftable = 3.988 , (2) student learning<br />outcomes with visual learning style (= 34.21) higher than student learning <br />outcomes with kinesthetic learning styles (= 28.38) and auditory learning <br />styles (= 27.69), with Fcount = 79,32 &gt; Ftable = 3.988. And (3) there is an<br />interaction between learning strategies and learning styles towards<br />learning outcomes with statistical calculations known F count = 30,16&gt;<br />Ftable = 3.988. Further test calculations using the Scheffe test also showed<br />a significant difference between student learning outcomes taught by the<br />scientific approach and the contextual approach (CTL) as well as student<br />learning outcomes with visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles.</p>

scholarly journals Learning Styles and English Proficiency of Undergraduate EFL Students at One State Islamic University in Sumatera, Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 214-228
Author(s):  
Lenny Marzulina ◽  
Nova Lingga Pitaloka ◽  
Aren Dwi Yolanda
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
English Proficiency ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Coefficient Corrélation ◽  
Prediction Test ◽  
Efl Students

This study investigated (1) the correlation between each learning style and English proficiency, and investigated (2) the influence of each learning style to English proficiency of undergraduate EFL students of one state Islamic University in Sumatera, Indonesia. The study was in the form of correlational research method. The population of the study was 537 active EFL students. By using purposive sampling technique, there were 82 students involved as participants. The data were gained by using two instruments: Barsch Learning Styles Questionnaire and TOEFL prediction test. The result showed that 1) 34.0% of students preferred in visual learning style, 43% of students preferred in Auditory learning style, and 23% of students preferred in Kinesthetic learning style. 2) the coefficient correlation between visual learning style preference and English proficiency with r-obtained was (0.430). It was higher than r-table (.2565), then Ha1 was accepted and Ho1 was rejected. It indicated that there was a significant correlation between visual learning styles and their English proficiency. 3) The coefficient correlation between Auditory learning style and English proficiency was (0.2565). It was lower than r-table (.2565), then Ho2 was accepted and Ha2 was rejected. 4) The coefficient correlation between Kinesthetic learning styles and English Proficiency was (-0.166). It was lower than r-table (.2565), then Ho3 was accepted, and Ha3 was rejected. It showed that there was no significant correlation between kinesthetic learning style and English proficiency of EFL students. Besides, there was also a significant influence of visual learning style on English proficiency with 18.5% contributions.

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN MIND MAP DAN EKSPOSITORI DENGAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR TEKNOLOGI PERKANTORAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Darmauli .
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Map Learning ◽  
Technology Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Technology Students

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian adalah Perbedaan hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran antara siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map dan hasil belajar siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori, Perbedaan hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dengan yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik, dan interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X, berjumlah 145 orang yang berasal dari 4 kelas. Teknik penarikan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian yang menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi α = 0,05. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori, hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Visual, terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran . Perhitungan uji lanjut dengan uji Scheffe menunjukkan hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik lebih tinggi bila diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, sedangkan hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih tinggi bila diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori. Kata Kunci:strategi pembelajaran, mind map, ekspositori, teknologi perkantoran Abstract: The research objectives are: differences in office technology learning outcomes between students taught with mind map learning strategies and student learning outcomes taught with expository learning strategies, differences in office technology learning outcomes between students who have visual learning styles with which has a kinesthetic learning style, and the interaction between learning strategies and learning styles on the learning outcomes of office technology. The population of this study was all students of class X, totaling 145 people from 4 classes. The sampling technique is done by cluster random sampling. The research method that uses a quasi-experimental method with a 2 x 2 factorial research design. Data analysis techniques using two-way ANOVA at a significance level α = 0.05. The research findings show that: the learning outcomes of office technology students taught with mind map learning strategies are higher than the learning outcomes of students taught with expository learning strategies, learning outcomes of office technology students who have higher kinesthetic learning styles rather than student learning outcomes that have a visual learning style, there is an interaction between learning strategies and learning styles on learning outcomes of office technology. The calculation of further tests with the scheffe test shows the learning outcomes of office technology students who have higher kinesthetic learning styles when taught with mind map learning strategies, whereas office technology learning outcomes of students who have higher visual learning styles when taught with expository learning strategies. Keywords: learning strategies, mind maps, expository, office technology

scholarly journals An Analysis of Students’ Learning Styles on Microbiology Lectures in the New Normal Era

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (7) ◽  
pp. 1249-1255
Author(s):  
Roberi Sepda Fian Sinaga ◽  
Hasruddin Hasruddin ◽  
Fauziyah Harahap
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Quantitative Data ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
New Normal ◽  
The Third ◽  
Analysis Technique

The aim of this study was to analyze the learning styles on microbiology lectures for students in the new normal era. This study was a non-experimental with quantitative data. The population were all the third semester students majoring in Biology, Universitas Negeri Medan who studied microbiology consisting of 6 classes totaling 180 people. The sample consisted of 3 classes of 60 people who were taken randomly using random sampling technique. The data analysis technique was carried out using inferential statistics. The results showed that students’ visual learning style obtained 71%, audio learning style obtained 64% in the good category and kinesthetic learning style obtained 63% were all in the good category. Of the three learning styles, the highest percentage was found in the visual learning style.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document