scholarly journals SAUDI TEACHERS’ PRACTICES OF FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT: A QUALITATIVE STUDY

2016 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-15
Author(s):  
Saeed Almuntasheri
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Formative Assessment ◽  
Classroom Interaction ◽  
Science Inquiry ◽  
Teaching Science ◽  
Assessment Practices ◽  
Inquiry Teaching ◽  
Science Classes ◽  
Assessment Strategies ◽  
Assessment Conversations

Shifting from teacher-centred to student-centred practices requires teachers to understand strategies to interact with students in science classes. Formative assessment strategies are very critical component of classroom interaction where teachers obtain information about student learning wherever possible. Traditionally, however, teachers ask questions and evaluate student responses but without investigating student contributions to the classroom interaction. This qualitative study aimed at developing teachers’ knowledge of formative assessment strategies when teaching science-based inquiry in Saudi Arabia. 12 teachers were observed when teaching science and details of one teachers’ practices of formative assessment is presented in this study. Formative assessment framework that describes assessment conversations is used and modified to observe teachers’ assessment practices. Assessment conversation consists of four-step cycles, where the teacher elicits information from students through questioning, the student responds, the teacher recognizes the student’s response, and then uses the information to develop further inquiry. Findings indicate that teachers ask questions and receive responses but rarely allow students to share their own ideas or discuss their own thinking. The study underlines the importance of integrating formative assessment strategies during scientific inquiry teaching for professional development as a way to increase student participation and allow opportunities for students’ inquiry in science classes. Key words: assessment conversations, formative assessment, science inquiry.

scholarly journals Network Analysis of Survey Data to Identify Non-Homogeneous Teacher Self-Efficacy Development in Using Formative Assessment Strategies

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 54
Author(s):  
Jesper Bruun ◽  
Robert Harry Evans
Keyword(s):  
Formative Assessment ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Assessment Practices ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Teacher Researcher ◽  
Working Groups ◽  
Individual Self ◽  
Assessment Strategies

In a European project about formative assessment, Local Working Groups (LWGs) from six participating countries made use of a format for teacher-researcher collaboration. The activities in each LWG involved discussions and reflections about implementation of four assessment formats. A key aim was close collaboration between teachers and researchers to develop teachers’ formative assessment practices, which were partially evidenced with changes in attributes of self-efficacy. The research question was: to what extent do working with formative assessment strategies in collaboration with researchers and other teachers differentially affect individual self-efficacy beliefs of practicing teachers across different educational contexts? A 12-item teacher questionnaire, with items selected from a commonly used international instrument for science teaching self-efficacy, was distributed to the participating teachers before and after their work in the LWGs. A novel method of analysis using networks where participants from different LWGs were linked based on the similarities of their answers, revealed differences between empirically identified groups and larger super groups of participants. These analyses showed, for example, that one group of teachers perceived themselves to have knowledge about using formative assessment but did not have the skills to use it effectively. It is suggested that future research and development projects may use this new methodology to pinpoint groups, which seem to respond differently to interventions and modify guidance or instruction accordingly.

Developing Teacher Candidates' Formative Assessment Practices

2020 ◽  
pp. 254-280
Author(s):  
Amanda T. Sugimoto ◽  
Nicole R. Rigelman
Keyword(s):  
Formative Assessment ◽  
Teacher Candidates ◽  
Elementary Mathematics ◽  
Methods Course ◽  
Assessment Practices ◽  
Mathematics Methods ◽  
Elementary Mathematics Instruction ◽  
Mathematics Methods Course ◽  
Elementary Field ◽  
Assessment Strategies

This chapter describes an initiative to better prepare teacher candidates to use formative assessment practices in their elementary mathematics instruction. Specifically, the initiative involved a curriculum and pedagogical redesign of an elementary mathematics methods course sequence. During the redesign implementation, the instructors intentionally modeled formative assessment practices for teacher candidates and had teacher candidates complete scaffolded field-based assignments in their elementary field placement classrooms in order to practice formative assessment strategies. Throughout the chapter, there are illustrative examples of how the instructors implemented this initiative as well as how teacher candidates carried out the formative assessment practices in their settings. The chapter concludes with a discussion about teacher candidate growth and challenges when learning about and implementing formative assessment practices in mathematics.

Methods and Strategies: Formative Assessment Practices to Support Students who Struggle in Science

2017 ◽  
Vol 055 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Audrey Martinez-Gudapakkam ◽  
Karen Mutch-Jones ◽  
Jennifer Hicks
Keyword(s):  
Formative Assessment ◽  
Assessment Practices ◽  
Support Students

English Medium of Instruction in Multilingual Science Classes: Teaching Science or Language?

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-59
Author(s):  
Dor Prasad Bhandari
Keyword(s):  
Science Teachers ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Teaching Science ◽  
Kathmandu Valley ◽  
Medium Of Instruction ◽  
English Medium Of Instruction ◽  
Science Classes ◽  
Depth Interviews

English medium of instruction in multilingual science classes: teaching science or language? is an attempt to identify the effects, methods, and approaches of teaching science in English medium of instruction in Multilingual (ML) science classes. The article is prepared on the basis of in-depth interviews taken with science teachers who are teaching science in multilingual classes. Three science teachers are selected purposively from different three (English Medium Instructions) EMI schools of Kathmandu valley. After taking the interview it was transcribed, coded, and generated the theme. Based on the themes generated it was found that the EMI is important for teaching and learning but it is not everything. Similarly, it was found that the teaching of science is not similar to teaching the grammar structures, and always not possible to use English as a medium of making the concept clear of theoretical ideas of science.

A qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework to investigate why patients were or were not assessed for rehabilitation after stroke

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 966-977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A Lynch ◽  
Julie A Luker ◽  
Dominique A Cadilhac ◽  
Caroline E Fryer ◽  
Susan L Hillier
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Theoretical Domains Framework ◽  
Assessment Practices ◽  
Stroke Units ◽  
Changing Practice ◽  
Referral Practices ◽  
Rehabilitation Assessment

Objective: To explore the factors perceived to affect rehabilitation assessment and referral practices for patients with stroke. Design: Qualitative study using data from focus groups analysed thematically and then mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework. Setting: Eight acute stroke units in two states of Australia. Subjects: Health professionals working in acute stroke units. Interventions: Health professionals at all sites had participated in interventions to improve rehabilitation assessment and referral practices, which included provision of copies of an evidence-based decision-making rehabilitation Assessment Tool and pathway. Results: Eight focus groups were conducted (32 total participants). Reported rehabilitation assessment and referral practices varied markedly between units. Continence and mood were not routinely assessed (4 units), and people with stroke symptoms were not consistently referred to rehabilitation (4 units). Key factors influencing practice were identified and included whether health professionals perceived that use of the Assessment Tool would improve rehabilitation assessment practices (theoretical domain ‘social and professional role’); beliefs about outcomes from changing practice such as increased equity for patients or conversely that changing rehabilitation referral patterns would not affect access to rehabilitation (‘belief about consequences’); the influence of the unit’s relationships with other groups including rehabilitation teams (‘social influences’ domain) and understanding within the acute stroke unit team of the purpose of changing assessment practices (‘knowledge’ domain). Conclusion: This study has identified that health professionals’ perceived roles, beliefs about consequences from changing practice and relationships with rehabilitation service providers were perceived to influence rehabilitation assessment and referral practices on Australian acute stroke units.

scholarly journals Coaching in design-based learning: a grounded theory approach to create a theoretical model and practical propositions

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. R. van Diggelen ◽  
K. I. Doulougeri ◽  
S. M. Gomez-Puente ◽  
G. Bombaerts ◽  
K. J. H. Dirkx ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Theoretical Model ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Formative Assessment ◽  
Theoretical Perspective ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Theory Approach ◽  
Coaching Model ◽  
Teachers And Students ◽  
Grounded Theory Approach

Abstract The purpose of this study is to determine what good coaching during design-based learning (DBL) entails by integrating theoretical and practical perspectives on good coaching. For this purpose, a grounded theory approach was used. For the practical perspective, themes on good coaching were derived from a qualitative study on coaching by observing and interviewing teachers and students involved in a DBL project. For the theoretical perspective, we consulted and analyzed literature on scaffolding, feedback, and formative assessment and coaching in problem-based learning from the learning sciences and the studio model from arts and design literature. Synthesizing themes from both perspectives led to the development of a theoretical coaching model consisting of three main categories (and four subcategories), seventeen themes and thirteen propositions. The model and propositions might be of use for those involved in coaching students in DBL and provide relevant directions for research on coaching in DBL.

scholarly journals Pre-service Teachers’ Decision-Making and Classroom Assessment Practices

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cherry Zin Oo ◽  
Dennis Alonzo ◽  
Chris Davison
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Classroom Assessment ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Initial Teacher Education ◽  
Integrate Assessment ◽  
Assessment Practices ◽  
Learning And Teaching ◽  
Supervising Teachers ◽  
Assessment Strategies

Classroom assessment practices play a pivotal role in ensuring effective learning and teaching. One of the most desired attributes of teachers is the ability to gather and analyze assessment data to make trustworthy decisions leading to supporting student learning. However, this ability is often underdeveloped for a variety of reasons, including reports that teachers are overwhelmed by the complex process of data analysis and decision-making and that often there is insufficient attention to authentic assessment practices which focus on assessment for learning (AfL) in initial teacher education (ITE), so teachers are uncertain how to integrate assessment into teaching and make trustworthy assessment decisions to develop student learning. This paper reports on the results of a study of the process of pre-service teachers’ (PSTs) decision-making in assessment practices in Myanmar with real students and in real classroom conditions through the lens of teacher agency. Using a design-based research methodology, a needs-based professional development program for PSTs’ assessment literacy was developed and delivered in one university. Following the program, thirty PSTs in the intervention group were encouraged to implement selected assessment strategies during their practicum. Semi-structured individual interviews were undertaken with the intervention group before and after their practicum in schools. This data was analyzed together with data collected during their practicum, including lesson plans, observation checklists and audiotapes of lessons. The analysis showed that PSTs’ decision-making in the classroom was largely influenced by their beliefs of and values in using assessment strategies but, importantly, constrained by their supervising teachers. The PSTs who understood the principles of AfL and wanted to implement on-going assessment experienced tension with supervising teachers who wanted to retain high control of the practicum. As a result, most PSTs could not use assessment strategies effectively to inform their decisions about learning and teaching activities. Those PSTs who were allowed greater autonomy during their practicum and understood AfL assessment strategies had greater freedom to experiment, which allowed them multiple opportunities to apply the result of any assessment activity to improve both their own teaching and students’ learning. The paper concludes with a discussion of the kind of support PSTs need to develop their assessment decision-making knowledge and skills during their practicum.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document