scholarly journals Risk assessment of food packaging materials and ways to prevent these risks

2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 59-62
Author(s):  
L.V. Hortseva ◽  
T.V. Shutova ◽  
O.S. Martynova ◽  
V.V. Zaval'na ◽  
T.P. Kostiuchenko
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Human Health ◽  
Food Packaging ◽  
Packaging Material ◽  
Packaging Materials ◽  
Material Control ◽  
Health Safety ◽  
Food Packaging Materials ◽  
Different Types

The article provides different types of modern food packaging materials, their advantages and possible risks during use. Issues of safe use and necessity for packaging material control have been also reviewed. Studies of some packaging products under the parameters of human health safety were described.

scholarly journals Effect of Different Types of Packaging Materials on the Shelf Life of Pasteurized Camel Milk

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 24-37
Author(s):  
Ahmed Elghali Mohamed Khalil Ayman Diaf Alla Ismail Alshikh ◽  
Ahmed Eltigani Almansoori Mohamed Abdelsalam Abdalla
Keyword(s):  
Shelf Life ◽  
Sensory Evaluation ◽  
Food Packaging ◽  
Camel Milk ◽  
Packaging Materials ◽  
Migration Test ◽  
Test Analysis ◽  
Food Packaging Materials ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Aluminum Cans

Nine types of packaging materials were tested on this study Included (I) Polyethylenetetraphthalate (PET) Bottle, (ii) Polypropylene (PP) Cup, (iii) polystyrene (PS) Cup, (iv) Low density polyethylene (LDPE) Bottle, (v) Light Proof Polyethyleneterephthalate(LPET) Bottle,(vi) High density Polyethylene(HDPE) Bottle, (vii) Aluminum Cans, (viii) Glass(Emerald Green) and (ix) Cartoon bottles (250 ml size) were dispensed in the aseptic condition with Pasteurized camel milk (80 ˚C,16s) for two seasons Summer and Winter and stored immediately inside the chiller at 5 ˚C for 30 days, The camel milk samples were examined for microbial quality, sensory evaluation, also food packaging materials were examined for overall migration test, approximate shelf life of the pasteurized camel milk at temperature 5 ˚C in all types of packaging materials in our study period 30 days, Sensory Evaluation results shown that there is significant differences within best packaging materials, so we can say best packaging materials not same in summer and winter. We see also the best packaging materials is not same in winter of all type of Sensory Evaluation with one ranking (PS, HDPE) respectively, but not difference in summer, so the best in winter is (PP - PS – PET) respectively, lastly the overall migration test analysis for the food packaging materials shown that there are no significant differences within packaging materials. So we can say responds in group equally at all packaging materials and all samples meets the specification limits as per Article 12, EU 10/2011.

scholarly journals Application of various types of coatings in food packaging materials: Sensorial assessment and health safety

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Małgorzata Nowacka ◽  
Aleksandra Mika ◽  
Artur Wiktor ◽  
Patrycja Ciosek ◽  
Katarzyna Rybak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Food Packaging ◽  
Packaging Materials ◽  
Health Safety ◽  
Food Packaging Materials

scholarly journals The Feasibility of Irradiated Bioplastics As Future Packaging Material

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (9S3) ◽  
pp. 1422-1425
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Food Packaging ◽  
Review Paper ◽  
Packaging Material ◽  
Packaging Materials ◽  
Food Packaging Materials ◽  
The Future ◽  
Biomass Components ◽  
Toxic Fumes

For bioplastic materials, the role of radiation in shaping their performance has received growing scholarly interest. Notably, bioplastic materials refer to substances manufactured using organic biomass components. To prepare these substances, different processes are implemented. For hightechnology firms, specialty plastics are required, especially those with specific responses upon being exposed to radiation. In the recent years, the majority of food packaging materials have received approval relative to the aspect of irradiation. However, the extent to which these substances could be safe has proved challenging to unearth; with the industry charged with food and regulation guidelines on focus. of importance to note is that the bioplastic materials come with several benefits. Some of these merits include the affirmation that they do not generate toxic fumes and that they also reduce the emission of carbon dioxide, which would be the case if other unrelated materials were used. The central aim of this review paper is to examine the degree to which irradiated bioplastic materials could prove feasible relative to their use as packaging materials in the future.

scholarly journals A Review of the Applications and Biodegradation of Polyhy-droxyalkanoates and Poly(lactic acid) and Its Composites

Polymers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 1544
Author(s):  
Jet Yin Boey ◽  
Lydia Mohamad ◽  
Yong Sen Khok ◽  
Guan Seng Tay ◽  
Siti Baidurah
Keyword(s):  
Food Packaging ◽  
Synthesis Process ◽  
Poly Lactic Acid ◽  
Packaging Materials ◽  
The Past ◽  
Food Packaging Materials ◽  
Potential Alternative ◽  
Negative Impacts ◽  
Available Information ◽  
Potential Food

Overconsumption of plastic goods and improper handling of petroleum-derived plastic waste have brought a plethora of negative impacts to the environment, ecosystem and human health due to its recalcitrance to degradation. These drawbacks become the main driving force behind finding biopolymers with the degradable properties. With the advancement in biopolymer research, polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) and poly(lacyic acid) (PLA) and its composites have been alluded to as a potential alternative to replace the petrochemical counterpart. This review highlights the current synthesis process and application of PHAs and PLA and its composites for food packaging materials and coatings. These biopolymers can be further ameliorated to enhance their applicability and are discussed by including the current commercially available packaging products. Factors influencing biodegradation are outlined in the latter part of this review. The main aim of this review article is to organize the scattered available information on various aspects of PHAs and PLA, and its composites for packaging application purposes. It is evident from a literature survey of about 140 recently published papers from the past 15 years that PLA and PHA show excellent physical properties as potential food packaging materials.

Regulations for Food Packaging Materials

2021 ◽  
pp. 467-494
Author(s):  
R.A Ilyas ◽  
S.M Sapuan ◽  
L.N. Megashah ◽  
Rushdan. Ibrahim ◽  
M.S.N. Atikah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Food Packaging ◽  
Packaging Materials ◽  
Food Packaging Materials

Cutin‐Inspired Polymers and Plant Cuticle‐like Composites as Sustainable Food Packaging Materials

2021 ◽  
pp. 161-198
Author(s):  
Susana Guzmán‐Puyol ◽  
Antonio Heredia ◽  
José A. Heredia‐Guerrero ◽  
José J. Benítez
Keyword(s):  
Food Packaging ◽  
Plant Cuticle ◽  
Packaging Materials ◽  
Sustainable Food ◽  
Food Packaging Materials

Detection of 20 Phthalate Esters in Different Kinds of Food Packaging Materials by GC-MS/MS with Five Internal Standards

2019 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 255-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji-cai Fan ◽  
Quan Jin ◽  
Hua-li He ◽  
Ren Ren ◽  
Shu-ting Wang
Keyword(s):  
Food Packaging ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Phthalate Esters ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Packaging Materials ◽  
Purification Step ◽  
Internal Standards ◽  
Extraction Solvent ◽  
Food Packaging Materials ◽  
Relative Standard

Abstract Background: Phthalate esters (PAEs) are a group of chemical compounds widely used as plasticizers to increase the flexibility of plastics that are used in the manufacturing of kitchen utensils and food containers. Objective: In this study, a simple, rapid, and sensitive method for the determination of 20 PAEs in different kinds of food packaging materials has been developed. Methods: Samples injected with five internal standards were extracted with acetonitrile saturated with n-hexane and then detected by GC-MS/MS without a purification step. Results: The standard calibration curves were linear for all analytes over the concentration range of 5–500 μg/L, and the correlation coefficients ranged from 0.9913 to 0.9999. The LODs and LOQs were in the ranges of 1.7–62.5 and 5.5–208.3 μg/kg, respectively. The accuracy of this method was evaluated by measuring the recovery from spiked samples. The recoveries of all 20 phthalates from samples spiked at three different concentrations were measured, and the recovery was in the range of 82.1–110.8% and the relative standard deviation range of recovery result (n = 6) was 0.3–9.7%. Conclusions: The method presented here is simple, rapid, and sensitive and can be applied to large-scale detection of PAEs in plastic materials. Highlights: Instead of only one solvent, acetonitrile saturated with n-hexane was used as the extraction solvent. Samples were pretreated without a purification step. Five internal standards were used for quantitative determination.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document