scholarly journals Incidence and indications of LSCS among Doctors Community of Chattogram

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 37-40
Author(s):  
Adiba Malik ◽  
Kamrun Nessa ◽  
Yasmin Ara Begum ◽  
M Jalal Uddin ◽  
Aklima Sultana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Placenta Previa ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Birth Asphyxia ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Subsequent Pregnancy ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Lower Segment Caesarean Section

Background: Lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) is a surgical intervention, which is carried out to ensure the safety of mother and baby when vaginal delivery is not possible or when danger to mother and baby would be greater with vaginal delivery. This study is designed to identify indication of LSCS and detect complications if any among the respondents. Materials and methods: Cross sectional descriptive study where 95 female doctors of Chattogram were selected by convenient sampling without knowing their mode of delivery and if it is LSCS then indication of LSCS , maternal and neonatal complications were noted. Results: Age of the respondents at the time of interview were noted and most of them were between 31- 40 years 52 (55%), regarding income most of them between 100000 -200000 42(44%) most of the delivery occurred in the private clinics 92 (70%) regarding mode of delivery, LSCS was 92 (70%) vaginal delivery 40 (30%) regarding indications of LSCS most common was repeat caesarean section 27 (29%) and second common was LSCS due to maternal interest 18 (20%) and others were severe preeclampsia 10 (11%) fetal distress 08(09%) placenta previa, Diabetes with big baby, cephalopelvic disproportion, PROM with non progression of labour. PPH was the most common complication 05 (63%), next was paralytic ileus 02 (25%) and left ventricular failure 01 (12%). Common neonatal comoplications were low birth weight baby 904 (40%), prematurity 03 (30%) and birth asphyxia 03 (03%). Conclusion: LSCS is a major surgical procedure for delivery. Inspite of its low maternal morbidity and mortality due to improved surgical technique, modern aneasthetic skill and availability of blood and blood products, still it carries a slightly greater risk in subsequent pregnancy, so we should be rational in doing primary caesarean section. Chatt Maa Shi Hosp Med Coll J; Vol.20 (2); July 2021; Page 37-40

scholarly journals Indicators for mode of delivery in pregnant women with uteruses scarred by prior caesarean section: a retrospective study of 679 pregnant women

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhifen Hua ◽  
Fadwa El Oualja
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Placenta Previa ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Fetal Membrane ◽  
Delivery Mode ◽  
Maternal Preference

Abstract Background The delivery mode for pregnant women with uteruses scarred by prior caesarean section (CS) is a controversial issue, even though the CS rate has risen in the past 20 years. We performed this retrospective study to identify the factors associated with preference for CS or vaginal birth after CS (VBAC). Methods Pregnant women (n = 679) with scarred uteruses from Moulay Ali Cherif Provincial Hospital, Rashidiya, Morocco, were enrolled. Gestational age, comorbidity, fetal position, gravidity and parity, abnormal amniotic fluid, macrosomia, placenta previa or abruptio, abnormal fetal presentation, premature rupture of fetal membrane with labor failure, poor progression in delivery, and fetal outcomes were recorded. Results Out of 679 pregnant women ≥28 gestational weeks, 351 (51.69%) had a preference for CS. Pregnant women showed preference for CS if they were older (95% CI 1.010–1.097), had higher gestational age (95% CI 1.024–1.286), and a shorter period had passed since the last CS (95% CI 0.842–0.992). Prior gravidity (95% CI 0.638–1.166), parity (95% CI 0.453–1.235), vaginal delivery history (95% CI 0.717–1.818), and birth weight (95% CI 1.000–1.001) did not influence CS preference. In comparison with fetal preference, maternal preference was the prior indicator for CS. Correlation analysis showed that pregnant women with longer intervals since the last CS and history of gravidity, parity, and vaginal delivery showed good progress in the first and second stages of vaginal delivery. Conclusions We concluded that maternal and gestational age and interval since the last CS promoted CS preference among pregnant women with scarred uteruses.

scholarly journals Perinatal Outcome of Deliveries after One Previous Caesarean Section

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Narinder Kaur ◽  
Sushila Jain
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Previous Caesarean Section ◽  
Lower Segment Caesarean Section ◽  
History Of ◽  
Live Fetus ◽  
The Right ◽  
A Prospective Study

Introduction: Contrary to the WHO recommended caesarean section (CS) rate of 15%, there is an alarming trend of increasing caesarean section rates. An important reason for this is repeat caesarean section (RCS). Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) is one of the methods of reducing CS rates in women with history of previous CS. This study was done with the aim to see the maternal and fetal outcome among parturient with history of single previous caesarean section and to determine the rate of VBAC at Lumbini Medical College, Nepal. Methods: This is a prospective study done for a period of ten months. Seventy parturient fulfilling inclusion criteria of term pregnancy with single live fetus and history of one Lower Segment Caesarean Section (LSCS) were enrolled in the study. Patients meeting the criteria for VBAC were given trial of labour and others were taken for elective repeat CS. This cohort was analyzed further, with respect to age, parity, period of gestation, mode of delivery, indication for CS, maternal and fetal complications and outcomes. Results: VBAC was successful in 27.14% of patients (n=19) while the rest 51 (72.85%) underwent RCS . Indications for RCS was mainly scar tenderness 7 (13.7%), fetal distress 6 (11.7%), non progress of labour 6 (11.7%), meconium stained liquor 6 (11.7%) and post-dated pregnancy 6 (11.7%). Maternal morbidity was comparable in women undergoing RCS or VBAC. There was one still birth and one early neonatal death in each group due to complications of meconium aspiration. Conclusion: Patients with previous CS are at high risk of RCS. If trial of labor is allowed under careful patient selection and supervision, the rate of vaginal delivery after caesarean section can be increased safely. As there is no added perinatal morbidity and mortality in cases of VBAC as compared to RCS, VBAC shows the right way forward to decrease the rate of caesarean section.

scholarly journals CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 1537-1545
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ikram ◽  
Amna Javed ◽  
Shafqat Mukhtar
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Fetal Monitoring ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Labour Room

Introduction: The cardiotocography (CTG) is more commonly knows aselectronic fetal monitoring (EFM). A cardiotocography measures the fetal heart and the frequencyof uterine contractions. Using two separate disc shaped transducers. Objectives: The objectiveof this study is to co-relate the intrapartum cardiotocography monitoring with fetomaternaloutcome. Study Design: Cross sectional analytical study. Setting: Department of Obstetricsand Gynaecology, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan. Period: From September 2012 toMarch 2013 (Six Months). Patient & Method: Total 60 patients (pregnant females) fulfilling theinclusion criteria were selected for this study, who were admitted in labour room in early andactive labour. In group A normal CTG monitoring and in Group B women with abnormal CTGmonitoring. Maternal outcomes in terms of mode of delivery and fetal outcome (APGAR Score,neonatal seizures, admission to nursery and time of neonatal discharge were seen). Result: Themean age in group A was 26.13+3.90 years and in group B was 26.53+4.17 years. The meangestational age in group A was 38.40+1.50 weeks and in group B was 36.60+1.59 weeks. Ingroup A, 25 (83.3%) woman were delivered through spontaneous vaginal birth and 4(13.4%)women, who were delivered by caesarean section (for all indication except fetal distress), 1(3.3%) woman by assisted vaginal birth (for all other indications). In group B there were 7(23.8%)women who delivered through spontaneous vaginal birth. 3(10%) women by assisted vaginalbirth (for abnormal CTG monitoring) and 20(66.7%) women by caesarean section (for abnormalCTG). In group A, there were 7(23.3%) neonates who were admitted in nursery, while in groupB, there were 19(63.3%) neonates, who were admitted in nursery. Conclusion: Intrapartumexternal fetal cardiotocography is not a single indicator of fetal distress. An increased caesareansection rate in babies with a pathological cardiotocography stresses on the need for additionaltests to differentiate hypoxic fetuses from non-hypoxic.

scholarly journals CAESAREAN SECTION

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (07) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeeda Bano ◽  
Myda Muzaffar ◽  
Masooma Zafar ◽  
Fareeha Yousaf
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Placenta Previa ◽  
Breech Presentation ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Obstructed Labor ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Life Saving ◽  
The Ideal

Introduction: Caesarean Section (CS) is a surgical procedure carried out for thedelivery of the baby when circumstances render the possibility of a safe vaginal birth. Thoughcaesarean section can be life-saving in many situations, its unnecessary use has become a globalhealth concern. For almost 3 decades, the ideal rate for caesarean sections was consideredto be between 10% and 15% but its consistently increasing frequency over the past years hasbrought it to limelight. Objective: To determine the frequency and indications of Caesareansection at DHQ Teaching Hospital, Sahiwal. Study Design: A Cross-sectional descriptive study.Setting: Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, DHQ Teaching Hospital, Sahiwal affiliatedwith Sahiwal Medical College, Sahiwal. Period: It was carried out over a period of 6 monthsfrom December, 2016 to May, 2017. Methods: All the caesarean sections carried out during thestudy duration were included. Both maternal and fetal indications were recorded. The patientsnot willing to participate were not included. Results: Out of the total, Caesarean Sectionaccounted for 44.7% of the total deliveries. 72.05 % were elective and 27.49% were emergencyprocedures. Most Common Indications were found out to be previous >2 C-Sections (36.4%),previous 1 C-Section (28.3%). Rest of them were breech presentation (2.69%), obstructed labor(1.68%), fetal distress (2.6%), placenta previa (8.08%), APH (2.02%), post-dated pregnancy(4.04%), uterine rupture (7.56%) and others (6.58%). Conclusion: It was concluded that >2previous C-Sections is the most common indication. The high frequency should be controlledby proper counselling and education of the mothers and families, regarding the complicationsof caesarean section.

scholarly journals The maternal and fetal outcome of repeat previous one caesarean section

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uma Jain ◽  
Deepali Jain ◽  
Shaily Sengar ◽  
Preeti Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Placenta Previa ◽  
Birth Asphyxia ◽  
Neonatal Morbidity ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Bladder Injury ◽  
History Of ◽  
Caesarean Hysterectomy ◽  
Placenta Accrete

Background: The rates of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes have increased significantly in the last decade. Patients with repeated caesarean deliveries also have a greater risk of placenta previa, placenta accrete, uterine rupture, bowel and bladder injury, and unplanned hysterectomy.Methods: This retrospective study was performed between 01 April 2017 to 31 March 2021, at a private hospital to know about the surgical difficulties and maternal and neonatal complications encountered in cases of repeated LSCS. The outcome of 1028 women admitted with a history of previous LSCS was studied.Results: The 613 patients were given a trial of labour. 40.07% of patients delivered normally. The most common indication for repeat LSCS was CPD in 20.94% and fetal distress 20.12%. The most common complication observed was adhesion in 37.65%. Scar dehiscence in 8.92 %, scar rupture in 0.64%, uterine atony in 4.8%, placenta previa in 3.57%, placenta accrete in 0.64%, injury to the bladder was seen in 0.97%, caesarean hysterectomy was done in only 2 cases and gaped wound was found in 1.13% of cases. 19.15% of neonates were admitted to NICU. Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes in 14.77%. premature neonates were 8.44% RDS was found in 7.62%, birth asphyxia was found in 2.92% cases and neonatal sepsis was found in 1.13%.Conclusions: The dramatic increase in caesarean section rates over the past three decades has been associated with a corresponding increase in maternal morbidity but there a continuous decrease in neonatal morbidity and mortality rates because of advances in neonatal medicine.

scholarly journals Perinatal determinants of D-dimer levels in a cross-sectional study of low risk pregnant women

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-82
Author(s):  
NM Murphy ◽  
AS Khashan ◽  
DI Broadhurst ◽  
O Gilligan ◽  
K O’Donoghue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
D Dimer ◽  
In Pregnancy

Background To examine perinatal determinants of the antenatal levels of D-dimers. Methods Cross-sectional study of 760 low risk pregnant women recruited into five gestational groups. Variables examined in antenatal groups included maternal age, body mass index, parity, smoking, family history venous thromboembolism (VTE) and previous use of the oral contraceptive pill (OCP). Onset of labour and mode of delivery were also examined in the post-natal group. Results D-dimer levels in group 4 (38–40 + 6) were significantly lower in the women with a history of taking the OCP when compared to those that had not taken it in the past ( P = 0.027). In the day 2 post-natal group, the median level of D-dimer was significantly higher in primparous when compared to multiparous women ( P = 0.015). The median D-dimer levels were significantly lower in the elective Caesarean section group in comparison to spontaneous onset ( P = 0.003) and induction of labour ( P = 0.016). When the mode of delivery was examined, the median D-dimer levels were significantly lower in those that had an elective Caesarean section when compared to normal vaginal delivery ( P = 0.008) and instrumental vaginal delivery ( P = 0.007). Women post elective Caesarean section had a significantly lower D-dimer than those after emergency Caesarean section ( P = 0.008). Discussion There are some significant differences in D-dimer levels when certain perinatal determinants are examined. This work is potentially beneficial to the future diagnosis of VTE in pregnancy as it supports previously published recommended D-dimer levels for the diagnosis of VTE in pregnancy.

scholarly journals Vaginal birth after Cesarean section (VBAC)

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Javed Iqbal ◽  
Fouzia Nausheen ◽  
Fozia Ali Bhatti ◽  
Shahida Sheikh
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Placenta Previa ◽  
Multiple Pregnancy ◽  
Fetal Monitoring ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Normal Pregnancy ◽  
Fetal Mortality ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Vertex Presentation

Aims & Objective: To find out the rate of vaginal delivery after one caesarean section Study Design: Non-interventional, descriptive study Study Setting: Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Allama Iqbal Medical College and Jinnah Hospital, Lahore. Materials and Methods: A trial of vaginal delivery was carried out on 100 patients with previous one caesarean section. Selection criteria were subjects with normal pregnancy, adequate maternal pelvic dimensions vertex presentation and spontaneous onset of labour with previous one uncomplicated LSCS. Patients with classical caesarean section, medical complications, multiple pregnancy, IUGR, placenta previa and extensive myomectomy were excluded from the study. Informed consent was taken from all patients; trail of scar was given with vigilance. Maternal and fetal monitoring was carried out with facility of operation theatre, anaesthesia and paediatrician. Results: Majority of patients was between 20-24 years of age. 58% of the patients were primipara. Successful vaginal delivery was achieved in 72% and rate of repeat section was 28%. Leading indications for repeat section were failure to progress, (50%), fetal distress (28.5%) and scar tenderness (21.43%). No maternal & fetal mortality occurred. Conclusion: Trial of scar after one LSCS should be encouraged with vigilant monitoring provided no obstetric contraindication exists.

scholarly journals VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CAESAREAN SECTION

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (04) ◽  
pp. 665-669
Author(s):  
SUNBAL KASHIF ◽  
MALAHAT MANSOOR ◽  
RUBINA TARIQ ◽  
Tayyaba Tahira
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Lower Abdominal Pain ◽  
Cardiac Activity ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Bishop Score ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Caesarean

Introduction: Vaginal birth after caesarean section is currently the preferred method of delivery for pregnant women who had previous one lower segment caesarean section. This common practice warrants some reconsideration in light of recent clinical data on the risks associated with VBAC. Objectives: To evaluate conditions which can achieve successful vaginal birth after one caesarean section. Study Design: Cross-sectional analytic study. Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Unit-I, Services Hospital, Lahore. Duration of Study with Dates: Study was carried out over a period of six months from 08-06-2006 to 07-12-2006. Subjects and Methods: One hundred pregnant women meeting inclusion criteria were included. During trial of labour patients were closely monitored by vital signs, fetal cardiac activity, lower abdominal pain and tenderness, fetal distress, vaginal bleeding and loss of presenting part. Results: Mean age of the patients was 34.27 + 6.45. According to distribution of cases by parity, maximum number i.e 64 (64.0%) was P 3-6. 79 patients (79.0%) had prior vaginal delivery. Maximum 41.0% patients were due to fetal distress while in 28% indication for previous caesarean were breech presentation. In 71% patient membranes were intact while 29.0% patients presented with per vaginal leaking. 51.0% had dilatation between 3-4cm. VBAC was more successful in patients 58.0% with favourable Bishop score. Conclusions: BMI <20, prior vaginal delivery, non-recurrent indication for previous caesarean, spontaneous onset of labour, cervical dilatation or favourable Bishop score, weight of baby < 3.5kg predict an individual’s likelihood of successful VBAC.

scholarly journals Induction of Labour in Prelabour Rupture of Membranes with or without Cervical Ripening with Prostaglandin E2

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 4
Author(s):  
Shreyashi Aryal ◽  
Chanda Karki
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Prostaglandin E2 ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Birth Asphyxia ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Cervical Ripening ◽  
Cervical Priming ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
A Prospective Study

Objective: To compare the outcome of induction of labour with titrated dose of oxytocin with or without pre induction cervical ripening using prostaglandin E2. Methods: This is a prospective study. Sixty women with prelabour rupture of membranes (PROM) and Bishops score of less than six were randomly assigned to either immediate induction with intravenous oxytocin drip or induction with intravenous oxytocin drip preceded by cervical priming with prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) gel 0.5mg instilled intracervically. These two groups were compared regarding the mode of delivery, induction to delivery interval and maternal and neonatal morbidities. Results: Cervical priming with PGE2 resulted in lesser number of caesarean section (5 Vs. 12) and lower incidence of meconium stained liquor (n=6 Vs. n=2). Induction to vaginal delivery interval was shorter when cervical priming was done (5.4 hrs Vs 7.9 hrs). The maternal morbidity was negligible (<1%) in both the groups. The number of neonates with birth asphyxia (n=2) and the need for their resuscitation (n=2) was more in the oxytocin group but the need of antibiotics for the neonates was more in PGE2 group (5% Vs. 3%). Conclusion: Induction of labor with oxytocin, with or without cervical priming with vaginal PGE2 gel, are both reasonable options in cases of PROM, since they result in statistically non significant rates of maternal and neonatal morbidities and caesarean section. Cervical priming with prostaglandin results in higher rate of vaginal delivery and shorter induction to vaginal delivery interval and this is viewed as an advantage to the mother.

scholarly journals ABNORMAL CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY;

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (06) ◽  
pp. 1087-1091
Author(s):  
Saima Perveen ◽  
Farrukh Naheed ◽  
Mussarat Sultana ◽  
Azra Sultana
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Apgar Score ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Lateral Position ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Lower Segment ◽  
Lower Segment Caesarean Section ◽  
Case Series Study

Objective: To observe the effect of abnormal Cardiotocography to delivery interval on perinatal outcome in terms of Apgar score. Study design: Descriptive case series study. Place and duration of study: Baqai Medical University department of obstetrics and gynecology Fatima Hospital Karachi from Jan 2011 to July 2011. Material and method: One hundred patients were registered who had pathological Cardiotocography. Bishop’s score was noted and decision to deliver the patient was made according to the abnormality, and bishop’s score. If bishop’s score was good and vaginal delivery was imminent, then her second stage was shortened by operative vaginal delivery. Fetal distress was managed by left lateral position, O2 inhalation and hydration. If delivery was not imminent then decision of urgent LSCS was made, meanwhile fetal distress was managed. Decision – delivery interval was recorded, and fetal outcome was noted in terms of Apgar score and resuscitation needed. Results: During this period one hundred pregnant women at term had pathological CTG for which they were delivered urgently. Among them 12% of parturients were delivered within 30 min ,68% delivered within 30-60 min , 12% delivered in 60-90 min and only 8% were delivered in 90-120 min. Seventy four (74%) of parturients were delivered by emergency lower segment caesarean section and 26% of parturients were delivered by instrumental vaginal delivery. Fetal outcome in terms of 1 min Apgar score ,38% of neonates had Apgar score of <7 ,46% had >7 and 16% had Apgar score of <5. This group of neonates required resuscitation and 5 min Apgar was good. No neonate was admitted in Neonatal unit. Conclusions: In this study it is concluded that with fetal heart rate abnormality, if fetus is delivered within 60 min, it is not associated with poor fetal and neonatal outcome, provided fetal distress is managed while preparing for emergency lower segment caesarean section.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document