scholarly journals Epidemiology of Trauma Patients Presented at Emergency Department of Trauma Center

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 158-161
Author(s):  
Santosh Paudel ◽  
Siddhartha Dhungana ◽  
Nabin Pokhrel ◽  
Gaurav Raj Dhakal
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Trauma Care ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Head Injuries ◽  
Traumatic Injury ◽  
Unintentional Injury ◽  
Common Mechanism ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Head And Neck Injury

Background: Emergency Department of National Trauma Center Nepal Center is the only specialized trauma care hospital in Nepal, in operation since 2012. Traumatic injury is one of the major causes for mortality worldwide. This study aims to see the epidemiology, pattern of injuries and outcome of the patients presenting to the emergency room.Methods: After getting ethical approval, we included all patients presenting to the Emergency Department with at least one injury, between Jan 2018 to Dec 2020. Informations on age, gender, mechanism of injury and outcome was abstracted for all patients presenting to the emergency department. Data were extracted from hospital database with the permission of hospital authority.Results: Total of 49991 patients presented to emergency department with different types of injuries.  Among them 7792 (14.0%) needed hospital admission. Fall and road crashes comprised almost 80% of admitted cases. Mortality was 2.1% of admitted patients, mostly with head injuries followed by multiple injuries. Conclusions: Among the patient visiting the trauma center during the study period most common mechanism of the injury were fall and road crash with head and neck injury. Majority of the patients were only managed in the ward without surgery.Keywords: Emergency care; triage; trauma care system; unintentional injury

scholarly journals Surgical Site Infections at a Level I Trauma Center in India: Data From an Indigenously Developed, e-SSI Surveillance System

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s397-s398
Author(s):  
Ayush Lohiya ◽  
Samarth Mittal ◽  
Vivek Trikha ◽  
Surbhi Khurana ◽  
Sonal Katyal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surveillance System ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Predominant Pathogen ◽  
Level I

Background: Globally, surgical site infections (SSIs) not only complicate the surgeries but also lead to $5–10 billion excess health expenditures, along with the increased length of hospital stay. SSI rates have become a universal measure of quality in hospital-based surgical practice because they are probably the most preventable of all healthcare-associated infections. Although, many national regulatory bodies have made it mandatory to report SSI rates, the burden of SSI is still likely to be significant underestimated due to truncated SSI surveillance as well as underestimated postdischarge SSIs. A WHO survey found that in low- to middle-income countries, the incidence of SSIs ranged from 1.2 to 23.6 per 100 surgical procedures. This contrasted with rates between 1.2% and 5.2% in high-income countries. Objectives: We aimed to leverage the existing surveillance capacities at our tertiary-care hospital to estimate the incidence of SSIs in a cohort of trauma patients and to develop and validate an indigenously developed, electronic SSI surveillance system. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted at a 248-bed apex trauma center for 18 months. This project was a part of an ongoing multicenter study. The demographic details were recorded, and all the patients who underwent surgery (n = 770) were followed up until 90 days after discharge. The associations of occurrence of SSI and various clinico-microbiological variables were studied. Results: In total, 32 (4.2%) patients developed SSI. S. aureus (28.6%) were the predominant pathogen causing SSI, followed by E. coli (14.3%) and K. pneumoniae (14.3%). Among the patients who had SSI, higher SSI rates were associated in patients who were referred from other facilities (P = .03), had wound class-CC (P < .001), were on HBOT (P = .001), were not administered surgical antibiotics (P = .04), were not given antimicrobial coated sutures (P = .03) or advanced dressings (P = .02), had a resurgery (P < .001), had a higher duration of stay in hospital from admission to discharge (P = .002), as well as from procedure to discharge (P = .002). SSI was cured in only 16 patients (50%) by 90 days. SSI data collection, validation, and analyses are essential in developing countries like India. Thus, it is very crucial to implement a surveillance system and a system for reporting SSI rates to surgeons and conduct a robust postdischarge surveillance using trained and committed personnel to generate, apply, and report accurate SSI data.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Mechanisms of Injury Among the Amish Population in Central Pennsylvania

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110505
Author(s):  
Larissa Whitney ◽  
Kelly Bonneville ◽  
Madison Morgan ◽  
Lindsey L. Perea
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Traumatic Injury ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Geographic Location ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Common Mechanism ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Trauma Centers ◽  
Injury Patterns ◽  
Level Of Evidence

Background Individuals presenting with traumatic injury in rural populations have significantly different injury patterns than those in urban environments. With an increasing Amish population, totaling over 33 000 in our catchment area, their unique way of life poses additional factors for injury. This study aims to evaluate differences in mechanism of injury, location of injury, and demographic patterns within the Amish population. We hypothesize that there will be an increased incidence of agriculture-related mechanisms of injury. Methods All Amish trauma patients presenting to our level I trauma center over 20 years (1/2000-4/2020) were retrospectively analyzed. Mechanism and geographic location of injury were collected. Demographic and clinical variables were compared between the age groups. Results There were 1740 patients included in the study with 36.4% (n = 634) ≤ 14 years. Only 10% (n = 174) were ≥ 65 years. The most common mechanism across all ages was falls. However, when separating out the pediatric population ( ≤ 14 years), 27.8% (n = 60) fell from a height on average > 8-10 feet. The most common geographic location of injury was at home in all age groups, except for the 15-24 year group, which was roadways. Discussion The Amish population poses a unique set of mechanisms of injury and thus injury patterns to rural trauma centers. We have found the most common injuries to be falls, buggy accidents, animal-related injuries, and farming accidents across all age groups. Future research and collaboration with other rural trauma centers treating large Amish populations would be beneficial to maximize injury prevention in this population. Level of Evidence Level 3a, epidemiological.

Epidemiological trends of spine and spinal cord injuries in the largest Canadian adult trauma center from 1986 to 2006

2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farhad Pirouzmand
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Case Fatality Rate ◽  
Spinal Cord Injuries ◽  
Head Injuries ◽  
Case Fatality ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Relative Distribution ◽  
Fatality Rate ◽  
Over Time

Object In this study the author documents the epidemiology of spine and spinal cord injuries (SCIs) over 2 decades at the largest Level I adult trauma center in Canada. He describes the current state of spine injuries (SIs), their changing patterns over the years, and the relative distribution of different demographic factors in a defined group of trauma patients. Methods Data on all trauma patients admitted to Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre between 1986 and 2006 were collected from the Sunnybrook Trauma Registry Database. Aggregate data on SIs and SCIs, including demographic information, etiology, severity of injuries (injury severity score [ISS]), and associated injuries, were recorded. The data were analyzed in a main category of spinal fracture and/or dislocation with or without SI and in two subgroups of patients with SIs, one encompassing all forms of SCIs and the other including only complete SCIs (CSCIs). Collected data were evaluated using univariate techniques to depict the trend of variables over the years. The number of deaths per year and the length of stay (LOS) were used as crude measures of outcome. Several multivariate analysis techniques, including Poisson regression, were used to model the frequency of death and LOS as functions of various trauma variables. Results There were 12,192 trauma patients in the study period with 23.2% having SIs, 5.4% having SCIs, and 3% having CSCIs. The SCIs constituted 23.3% of all SIs. The respective characteristics of the SI, SCI, and CSCI groups were as follows: median age 36, 33, and 30 years; median LOS 18, 27, and 29 days; median ISS 29, 30, and 34; female sex ratio 34, 24, and 23%; and case fatality rate 16.7, 16.6, and 21%. Seventy-nine percent of patients had associated head injuries; conversely, 24% of patients with head injuries had SIs. The mean admission age of patients increased by ~ 10 years over the study period, from the early 30s to the early 40s. The relative incidence of SIs remained stable at ~ 23%, but the incidence of SCIs decreased ~ 40% over time to 4.5%. Motor vehicle accidents remained the principal etiology of trauma, although falling and violence became more frequent contributors of SIs. The average annual ISS remained stable over time, but the LOS was reduced by 50% in both the SI and SCI groups. Age, ISS, and SCIs were associated with a longer LOS. The case fatality rate remained relatively unchanged over time. Poisson analysis suggested that the presence of an SCI does not change the case fatality rate. Conclusions Data in this analysis will provide useful information to guide future studies on changing SI patterns, possible etiologies, and efficient resource allocation for the management of these diseases.

scholarly journals FREE PERITONEAL FLUID IN TRAUMA PATIENTS: THE PARADIGM SHIFT

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-8
Author(s):  
I. Negoi ◽  
S. Păun ◽  
S. Hostiuc ◽  
B. Stoica ◽  
I. Tănase ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Fluid ◽  
Head Injuries ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Traumatic Injury ◽  
Preoperative Imaging ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Conversion To Open Surgery ◽  
Associated Lesions ◽  
Trauma Surgeons ◽  
Free Peritoneal Fluid

Trauma surgeons are confronted nowadays with various abdominal injuries, with a more and more increased severity, secondary to urban violence and traffic related accidents. We aim to better define the prognostic value of post-traumatic hemoperitoneum (PTH) in the nowadays era of nonoperative management of abdominal lesions, and to correlate it with the current pattern of traumatic injuries. Retrospective study of patients admitted during 24 months. Selections criteria: (1) Traumatic injury; (2) Free peritoneal fluid on preoperative imaging; (3) Surgical exploration of the abdomen. Setting: A level I trauma center. Results: There were 64 patients, with two peak frequencies between 18-35 and 50-70 years old. Abdominal wall ecchymoses were found in 36 (55%) of cases. Out of 64 cases 37 (58.7%) were transportation related, 12 (19%) caused by human aggression and 10 (16.9%) by falls. According to the Trauma Score (TS) there were 50 (78.2%) cases with TS between 14-16, 9 (17.2%) between 10 –13 and 3 (4.8%) with TS <9. More frequent extraabdominal associated lesions were: head injuries – 38 (58.5%), thoracic trauma – 34 (52.3%), orthopedic injuries – 24 (36.9%). Diagnostic peritoneal lavage was performed in 5 (7.8%) cases. FAST has a sensibility of 70.21% and CT scan a sensibility of 100%. Most frequent injured abdominal organs were the spleen – 36 (56.25%), liver 17 (26.56%) and mesentery 14 (21.87%). Laparotomy was performed in 59 (92.2%) of cases, laparoscopy in 2 (3.1%) of cases and conversion to open surgery in 3 (4.7%) cases. Mortality was 23.43%. We observed several predictive factors for mortality on univariate analysis: haemoglobin < 8g/dl (p=0.02), haematocrits < 25% (p=0.01), hemoperitoneum > 1500 ml (p=0.04), colonic trauma (p=0.001), head (p=0.01) and thoracic injuries (p=0.04). Dedicated trauma surgeons should balance between trauma kinetics details, patients’ clinical examination, and diagnostic workup, in an effort to decrease morbidity and mortality secondary to missed injuries or unnecessary laparotomies.

The G60 Trauma Center: A Future Consideration?

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (6) ◽  
pp. 547-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marko Bukur ◽  
Joshua Simon ◽  
Joseph Catino ◽  
Margaret Crawford ◽  
Ivan Puente ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Head Injuries ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Trauma Centers ◽  
Failure To Rescue ◽  
Level I

With a considerably increasing elderly population, we sought to determine whether the volume of elderly trauma patients treated impacted outcomes at two different Level I trauma centers. This is a retrospective review of all elderly patients (>60 years) at two state-verified Level I trauma centers over the past five years. The elderly trauma center (ETC) saw a greater proportion (52%) of elderly patients than the reference trauma center (30%, TC). Demographic and clinical characteristics were abstracted and stratified into ETC and TC groups for comparison. Primary outcomes were overall postinjury complication and mortality rates, as well as death after major complication (failure to rescue). ETC patients were older (78.6 vs 70.5), more likely to be admitted with severe head injuries (head abbreviated injury score ≥ 3, 50.0% vs 32%), had a greater overall injury burden (injury severity score > 16 41.4% vs 21.1%), and required intensive care unit admission (81.3% vs 64%) than the TC group. Need for operative intervention, mechanism of injury, and comorbidities were similar between the two groups. Overall complications were higher in trauma patients admitted to the TC (21.9% vs 14.3%), as well as failure to rescue (4.0% vs 1.8%). Adjusting for confounding factors, ETC had significantly lower chance of developing a postinjury complication (adjusted odds ratios [AOR] = 0.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.3, 0.5]), failure to rescue (AOR = 0.3, 95% CI = [0.1, 0.5]), and overall mortality (AOR = 0.3, 95% CI = [0.2, 0.4]). Improved outcomes were demonstrated in the Level I center treating a higher proportion of elderly patients. Exact etiology of these benefits should be determined for quality improvement in care of the injured geriatric patient.

scholarly journals Profile of trauma patients in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital in South India

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 558 ◽  
Author(s):  
KundavaramPaul Prabhakar Abhilash ◽  
Nilanchal Chakraborthy ◽  
GauthamRaja Pandian ◽  
VineetSubodh Dhanawade ◽  
ThomasKurien Bhanu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
South India ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Care Hospital

scholarly journals Effect of coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on orthopedic trauma patients presenting in the emergency department of a maximum care hospital and level 1 trauma center

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Frink ◽  
V. Ketter ◽  
N. Klama ◽  
T. Knauf ◽  
S. Betz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Control Period ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Orthopedic Trauma ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Level 1

Abstract Introduction While overcrowding of emergency departments was often reported in the recent years, during the early phase of the pandemic, a reduction in patient numbers was seen. The aim of the current study was to describe the orthopedic trauma patient cohort presenting to the emergency department (ED) during the early pandemic period as compared to the cohort from the analogue time period 2019. Materials and methods A single-center case–control study was performed. All the consecutive orthopedic trauma patients > 12 years presenting to the ED were included. Patients in the same time period in 2019 served as the control group. Results Compared to 2019, in 2020, 33% less patients presented in the emergency department. Patients treated in 2020 were significantly older, significantly more often brought to ED by emergency medical services and significantly more often admitted. The number of fractures and diagnoses requiring surgical treatment decreased only slightly and the proportion of these patients among all the patients was significantly higher during the pandemic than in the control period. Furthermore, a higher percentage of polytrauma patients could be found in 2020 as well. Analysis of Manchester Triage System showed significantly less not urgent patients in 2020. Conclusion The present study shows a significant decline in the number of patients treated in the ED during the pandemic period but at the same time almost identical numbers of patients with fractures or diagnoses requiring surgical treatment. In the context of an overall decline in patient numbers, a stronger concentration on level 1 trauma centers seems to be evident during the pandemic.

scholarly journals Prehospital Trauma Care Registry Problems in South Brazil

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 97-100
Author(s):  
Adonis Nasr ◽  
Phillipe Abreu-Reis ◽  
Iwan Collaço ◽  
Flavio Saavedra Tomasich
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Care ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Gunshot Wounds ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Electronic Data Collection ◽  
Prehospital Trauma Care ◽  
Care Assessment ◽  
South Brazil

ABSTRACT Background Trauma registry remains a great problem to most countries that are implementing trauma systems. Nondigital data assessment and storage may lead to information deterioration along the process. In order to verify the missing registry in prehospital trauma rescuers’ form, we ran this study. Study design A prospective observational noncontrolled study with 288 random trauma cases brought to a Level 1 Trauma Center in Curitiba, between May 28th and June 10th 2006. We analyzed data registered in the prehospital rescue team form. The including criteria were all patients delivered to the trauma center by ambulances. The excluding criteria were patients not transported by ambulances and those without the proper form filled out. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square for discrete, and the student's t-test for continuous variables. Results Two hundred and eighty-eight trauma cases were observed. Twelve patients were excluded. Of the 276 patients who met the including criteria, 75% were men with a mean age of 27-year-old. In only 8.34% of times patients were brought by doctors, while in 91.66% by paramedics. 63.4% of patients were traffic injuries victims, followed by 12.31% falls, 6.52% falls from the high, 5.79% gunshot wounds, 5.34% assaults, 3.62% stab wounds, 2.89% others. Impressively, 16 patients (5.89%) had no records of respiratory rate from the prehospital care assessment, 20 (7.24%) had no data of systolic blood pressure and 13(4.71%)had no pulse registry. Furthermore, 31.25% of the RR not registered were abnormal in the hospital admission evaluation, as well as 15% of the SBPs, and 23% of HR. None of the cases had information regarding time from the scene to the hospital. Conclusion Electronic data collection shall make checklists consistently filled out. It is not well understood the importance of registering data for most of healthcare providers working in the field, especially when they do not follow the in-hospital care of trauma patients. How to cite this article Abreu-Reis P, Tomasich FS, Nasr A, Collaco I. Prehospital Trauma Care Registry Problems in South Brazil. Panam J Trauma Crit Care Emerg Surg 2014;3(3):97-100.

Unseen Burden of Injury: Post-Hospitalization Mortality in Geriatric Trauma Patients

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110468
Author(s):  
Ciara R. Huntington ◽  
Angela M. Kao ◽  
Ronald F. Sing ◽  
Samuel W. Ross ◽  
A. Britt Christmas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Social Security ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Geriatric Trauma ◽  
Common Mechanism ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Social Security Death Index

Background/Objectives Older adults are at risk for adverse outcomes after trauma, but little is known about post-acute survival as state and national trauma registries collect only inpatient or 30-day outcomes. This study investigates long-term, out-of-hospital mortality in geriatric trauma patients. Methods Level I Trauma Center registry data were matched to the US Social Security Death Index (SSDI) to determine long-term and out-of-hospital outcomes of older patients. Blunt trauma patients aged ≥65 were identified from 2009 to 2015 in an American College of Surgeons Level 1 Trauma Center registry, n = 6289 patients with an age range 65-105 years, mean age 78.5 ± 8.4 years. Dates of death were queried using social security numbers and unique patient identifiers. Demographics, injury, treatments, and outcomes were compared using descriptive and univariate statistics. Results Of 6289 geriatric trauma patients, 505 (8.0%) died as an inpatient following trauma. Fall was the most common mechanism of injury (n = 4757, 76%) with mortality rate of 46.5% at long-term follow-up; motor vehicle crash (MVC) (n = 1212, 19%) had long-term mortality of 27.6%. Overall, 24.1% of patients died within 1 year of trauma. Only 8 of 488 patients who died between 1 and 6 months post-trauma were inpatient. Mortality rate varied by discharge location: 25.1% home, 36.4% acute rehabilitation, and 51.5% skilled nursing facility, P < .0001. Conclusion Inpatient and 30-day mortality rates in national outcome registries fail to fully capture the burden of trauma on older patients. Though 92% of geriatric trauma patients survived to discharge, almost one-quarter had died by 1 year following their injuries.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document