scholarly journals Town-building cadastre system as a tool for the formation of the investment climate of the administrative-territorial units

Author(s):  
L. Olifirenko ◽  
O. Didyk

Town-building development is an integral part of investment and municipal development and an important prerequisite for the formation of a favorable investment climate characterizing the qualitative level of the administrative-territorial units (ATU) development. In turn the system of town-building cadastre and investment activity of regional enterprises and organizations reflect the effectiveness of the institutional aspect of state building and being the driving force for an active investment policy provide the opportunity to attract the material and intangible potential of the ATU to the sphere of town-planning development. The effectiveness of the interconnection of these both components reconstitutes in the individuality of town-building architecture phenomenon. Therefore receiving an effective mechanism in consequence of the interaction of all participants in the town-planning development process with the aim of creating town-building cadastre system as an instrument for providing investment climate is an important cause for ATU development. The problems of creating the town-building cadastre and monitoring in Ukraine have been investigated in the works of national scientists, such as V. A. Smilka, M.M.Domin, A. A. Liashchenko, O. V. Dobrokhodova and others. The question of the investment climate in town-building activity is not sufficiently investigated. Mostly the experts of state bodies carry out work on planning the development of ATU within the limits of their authority. Therefore, the scientific side of the issue needs further analysis. The analysis of the national legal framework made it possible to establish that ATU development in Ukraine is within the legal framework. However, the shortcomings of the mechanism for implementing the norms of laws and by-laws do not allow attracting significant investment funds for the ATU, and the lack of budget funds deprives town-building ideas further development. European experience shows that the practice of effectively functioning town-building cadastre and monitoring is an integral part of town-building activities. The balance between decentralization and centralization in the process of building the mechanism of participants interaction in the town-building activity enabled to make a positive forecast for improving the investment climate, saving through information and automation and increasing the activities of government and local self-government bodies. The author's position is that in the process of creating a system of town-building cadastre the national regulatory framework allows focusing not only on performing state functions in attracting investment, but also on expanding the horizons of search, involving all interested participants and improving the mechanism of their interaction during town-building activities.

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 03011
Author(s):  
Olga V. Didkovskaya ◽  
Aleksey Y. Bocharov ◽  
Marina V. Ilyina ◽  
Olga A. Mamaeva

Every year the number of free land plots for construction of buildings is steadily decreasing in cities. In this regard, the participants in the investment and construction process are increasingly seeking to maximize the use of land. A logical way for this is to use high-rise construction. However, until recently, builders encountered serious obstacles in the form of lack of special norms and rules for the design of high-rise buildings. It led to the need for individual coordination of each high-rise facility, the development and approval of special technical conditions, the passage of numerous administrative approvals. Thus, investment activity regarding the construction of high-rise buildings in the Russian Federation is reduced. In 2016, there were regulatory changes that substantially alleviated these difficulties. In this article, the authors analyze the features of the town-planning normative-legal field of high-rise construction and its development, track the interrelations between the regulatory regulation of the construction of similar facilities, with the real need, the technical feasibility and economic feasibility of their construction in the urban district of Samara. Conclusions and suggestions are also based on the analysis of the norms of urban zoning, the residential real estate market and the value of land plots.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-129
Author(s):  
Irina A. KOTENKO

The paper examines one of the characteristic fi nishing elements of the roofs of buildings - the dome. The originality of forms and varieties of their application is noted, fi rst of all in the Аrt Nouveau architecture, as well as in neoclassicism and various stylizations in the provincial city of Samara of the beginning of the 20th century. The author emphasizes the special signifi cance of the peculiar form in the composition of the building and the town-planning application. The widespread varieties of domes in the considered period of town-planning development are investigated and classifi ed. Due to its infl uence on the surrounding area, panoramas and silhouett es of the city, the domes retain their special town-planning signifi - cance. In the modern architecture of Samara, there has been an interest in this composite element, which is a kind of code of a historical city. The article considers modern examples of dome completions in Samara buildings.


Author(s):  
Alexander Papageorgiou-Venetas

The author, an architect and town planner, graduated from the Faculty of Architecture of the Athens Technical University, specialized in town planning in Paris, and obtained his Ph. D in urban design at the Technical University of West Berlin. After a ten-year period of practicing architecture in Athens where he conducted several studies for the Greek Tourism Organization (hotels), the Archaeological Service of Greece (landscaping of excavation areas) and private clients, he has been working mainly in Germany (Berlin and Munich) as well as in Greece as an urban designer in a wide scope of activities, including teaching, research and a planning consultancy. His special interest focuses on urban conservation, planning and urban history. He has worked with the Freie Planungsgruppe Berlin and the Burckhard Planconsulť Basel.He has elaborated major planning development and preservation schemes for the Greek state (Chios Tourist Development, Mykonos-Delos Development Plan, Chania Old Town Preservation Scheme) and acted as an expert for UNESCO (1970, Iran) and the UNCHS (1982, Yugoslavia). As an advisor to the Greek Minister of Culture ( 1974- 1977) he coordinated the Greek participation in the U.N. Vancouver Conference on Human Settlements (1976) and in the European Architectural Heritage Year (1975). He has also acted as the liaison officer between the National Greek Committee and the UNESCO experts for the Acropolis conservation campaign. He has taught as a visiting professor in Berlin (1969-1970), Stuttgart (1981-1982) and Munich (1996-1997) and was for 10 years (1976-1985) Professor of Urban History at the Post-Graduate Center "Raymond Lemaire" for the Conservation of the Architectural and Urban Heritage in Bruges and Louvain/Belgium. He has elaborated major research studies on European planning history and planning issues of his native town Athens, and is considered an authority on the town planning history of modern Athens. 


Author(s):  
Evgeniya Mikhailovna Popova ◽  
Irina Vitalevna Mezentseva

Currently, the Russian regions apply a vast array of tools for regulating the investment process, including tax incentives. Active use of tax preferences is dictated by the fact that in the conditions of regional budget deficit, tax incentives, unlike subsidies, do not require direct budget expenditures for stimulating investment activity. However, the world experience demonstrates that tax incentives do not fall under the group of factors that strongly affect investment decisions. For determining the degree of preference of tax incentives in relation to other measures of regional support, a survey was carried among Chinese investors, who implement investment projects on the territory of Zabaykalsky Krai. The survey was based on a method of hierarchical analysis based on the special matrices by filed in by the investors. The acquired results displayed that out of ten measures of state support, tax incentives hold the eighth place. The calculated coefficient of the significance of tax incentives testifies to the low attractiveness of fiscal stimuli for the Chinese investors. The authora attempted to find the reasons for tax incentive not being in demand. The scientific novelty of this work consists in conducting the analysis of regional legislation that regulates the order of granting investment tax incentives based on the concept of behavioral economics. In the course of application of the provisions of behavioral economics, emphasis was made on the subjective aspect of the mechanism of preferential taxation. The reasonableness of considering such peculiarities of human mind as cognitive inertia and relativity is substantiated with regards to arranging the structure of tax incentives that would allow increasing the importance of tax incentives in formation of investment climate on the territory of Zabaykalsky Krai. The authors make recommendations on increasing the attractiveness of tax incentives among Chinese investors based on the concept of reference point and the effect of loss aversion.


Author(s):  
A.V. Korchemnaya

Competitiveness of Russia economy under modern conditions demands systemacy of public administration. As a result of creation of national strategic planning system a number of govern-ment programs aimed at the economy development of the Russian Federation and perspective en-trance of the country to the world market is carried out. One of the main tasks of the economy de-velopment is creation of favorable investment climate in the country, investment activity, attraction of investments into the economy of the country’s regions.


Author(s):  
Matteo Gargantini ◽  
Carmine Di Noia ◽  
Georgios Dimitropoulos

This chapter analyzes the current regulatory framework for cross-border distribution of investment funds and submits some proposals to improve it. The chapter is organized as follows. Section 2 provides a schematic description of the legal taxonomy for collective investment schemes. Section 3 addresses the EU disclosure regimes that apply to the distribution of various types of investment funds. Sections 4 and 5 consider conduct-of-business rules and, respectively, the legal framework for the allocation of supervisory powers on product regulation when fund units are distributed in more than one country. Section 6 provides some data that help assess the performance of the current framework for cross-border distribution. It then analyzes some of the residual legal rules and supervisory practices that still make cross-border distributions of funds more burdensome than purely national distributions, whether these restrictions are set forth in the country where investors are domiciled (Section 7) or in the fund's home country (Section 8).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document