scholarly journals Peculiarities of Sports Injures of Sprint and Throwing Cohorts in Track and Field Athletics

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (88) ◽  
Author(s):  
Linas Rekus ◽  
Evelina Rekuvienė ◽  
Aušra Burkauskienė ◽  
Daiva Emilija Rekienė ◽  
Žibuoklė Senikienė ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Body Part ◽  
Track And Field ◽  
Body Parts ◽  
Lower Extremity Injuries ◽  
Extremity Trauma ◽  
Upper Extremity Trauma ◽  
Extremity Injuries

Research background and hypothesis. The severity of recurrence of injuries in track and field athletics gives possibility to adjust training programs for athletes.  Research aim was to analyse which body parts are mostly injured and the severity of recurrence of injuries in track and field athletics gives possibility to adjust training programs for athletes.Research methods. Thirty six athletes were given questionnaires developed using standardized methodology validated by the IOC and implemented by the IAAF during international track and field competitions.Research results. There were 64 cases of injuries among 33 athletes: head and trunk cases – 12 (18.8%), upper extremity – 14 (21.9%), lower extremity – 38 (59.4%). In all cases lower extremity injuries dominated. In sprinters lower extremity injuries dominated and there was no upper extremity trauma. In throwers the upper and the lower extremity were equally vulnerable, mild and very mild injuries were observed. There was no difference between both groups in recurrence of the same trauma.Discussion and conclusions.  Estimating which body parts are mostly injured in sports gives the possibility to  adjust  training  programs  for  athletes,  increasing  the  amount  of  athletic  exercises  intended  for  the  functional preparation of those parts.  Injuries in track and field are frequent and dominating injuries are of lower extremity; there exist the possibility of recurrence of the injury in the same body part. Injuries prevalent in sprinter cohort are of lower extremities, and injuries prevalent in throwing cohort are of lower and upper extremities.Keywords: physiotherapy, Parkinson’s disease, reaction time.

scholarly journals FEATURES OF SPORTS PERFORMANCE RELATED INJURIES OF ELITE TRACK AND FIELD ATHLETES IN LITHUANIA

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (103) ◽  
pp. 24-31
Author(s):  
Linas Rekus ◽  
Lina Simaškaitė ◽  
Egidijus Šakalys
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Sports Medicine ◽  
Sports Injuries ◽  
Track And Field ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Lower Extremity Injuries ◽  
Huge Impact ◽  
One Year ◽  
Extremity Injuries

Background. Sports injuries have a huge impact on performance of athletes in competitions. A lot of athletes do not obtain full recovery after injuries, which leads to trauma recurrence or higher severity injuries. Being aware of dominating anatomical regions and frequencies of occurrence of these traumas could help to prevent it and to protect athletes’ health. Methods. In 2013 Lithuanian professional athletes were asked to fill in questionnaires developed by using standardized methodology validated by the IOC and implemented by the IAAF during international track and field competitions. Data were collected, processed and analysed. Results were obtained using statistical methods, significance level of p ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant. Results. We investigated 33 athletes- sprinters and throwers (javelin and discus throwers, shot putters). They had 57 cases of traumatic injuries in one year period (2012–2013). Results of the study showed that injuries of lower extremity statistically significantly dominated comparing with upper extremity and head/trunk in both fields of sport. Injuries by anatomical region were: lower extremity – 67%, upper extremity – 12%, head and trunk – 21%. Most of all were injured: hamstrings 23%, inguinal 10.5%, lumbar 13% area. Comparing traumas between throwers and sprinters groups lower extremity injuries statistically significantly dominated in sprinters group, while upper extremity had been injured only in the throwers’ group. Analysing severity of the injuries we noticed that moderate and mild injuries were dominating. Mild and moderate severity injuries appeared leading to a higher risk of re-injury than high severity traumas. Recurrence of the same injury was noticed only in the group of sprinters – 57.9% of sprinters repeatedly suffered mostly from hamstring and inguinal traumas. Conclusions. According to the results of this study, sports medicine physicians could predict potential localization and recurrence of injuries and collaborating with coaches and athletes prepare opportune training programs to avoid harm.

scholarly journals ORTHOPEDIC INJURIES IN ADOLESCENT GYMNASTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0011
Author(s):  
Katie Kim ◽  
Michael Saper
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
The Body ◽  
Adolescent And Young Adult ◽  
Body Region ◽  
Lower Extremity Injuries ◽  
Common Location ◽  
Orthopedic Injuries ◽  
Extremity Injuries

Background: Gymnastics exposes the body to many different types of stressors ranging from repetitive motion, high impact loading, extreme weight bearing, and hyperextension. These stressors predispose the spine and upper and lower extremities to injury. In fact, among female sports, gymnastics has the highest rate of injury each year. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on location and types of orthopedic injuries in adolescent (≤20 years) gymnasts. Methods: The Pubmed, Medline, EMBASE, EBSCO (CINAHL) and Web of Science databases were systematically searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify all studies reporting orthopedic injuries in adolescent and young adult gymnasts. All aspects of injuries were extracted and analyzed including location, type and rates of orthopedic injuries. Results: Screening yielded 22 eligible studies with a total of 427,225 patients. Twenty of 22 studies reported upper extremity injuries of which four specifically focused on wrist injuries. Eight studies reported lower extremity injuries. Nine studies reported back/spinal injuries. Seven studies investigated each body location of injury; one study reported the upper extremity as the most common location for injury and six studies reported the lower extremity as the most common location for injury. Of those seven studies, five (23%) reported sprains and strains as the most common injury. One study reported fractures as the most common injury. Conclusion: There is considerable variation in reported injury location. Some studies focused specifically on the spine/back or wrist. The type of gymnastics each patient participated in was also different, contributing to which area of the body was more heavily stressed, or lacking. Current literature lacks data to fully provide evidence regarding which body region is more frequently injured and the type of injury sustained.

Prediction Rules for Selective Radiographic Assessment of Extremity Injuries in Children and Adolescents

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-57
Author(s):  
Kenneth M. McConnochie ◽  
Klaus J. Roghmann ◽  
Joel Pasternack ◽  
David J. Monroe ◽  
Liberatore P. Monaco
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Logit Analysis ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Prediction Rules ◽  
Lower Extremity Injuries ◽  
Extremity Injuries ◽  
Point Tenderness

To assess the potential for selective use of roentgenography in evaluating extremity injuries, prediction rules were developed based on prospective observations for 617 injured children and adolescents examined in our Emergency Department (phase 1) and tested on 601 examined 1 year later (phase 2). Logit analysis produced best-fitting statistical models for phase 1 data with significant (P < 0.05) direct effects of gross signs, point tenderness, activity not routine, swelling moderate or severe, time from injury <6 hours, and pain with motion for upper extremity injuries; and, for lower extremity injuries, not knee injury, activity not routine, point tenderness, and foot injury. Prediction rules developed in phase 1 performed equally well when tested on phase 2 injuries. Data from both phases were combined, therefore, in analysis that produced risk estimates. For all injury types (ie, for injuries with all possible combinations of presence or absence of these findings), risk for fracture was derived. For upper extremity injuries, with a threshold risk for fracture of 20% used to select specific injury types for roentgenography, prediction rule outcomes were 18.1% of roentgenograms avoided and 5.3% of fractures missed. For lower extremity injuries, using a threshold risk of 10% to select injury types for roentgenography, outcomes were 25.8% of roentgenograms avoided and 5.3% of fractures missed. Alternative prediction rules allowed still greater roentgenogram avoidance, although missed fractures also increased. Risk of adverse functional outcome from missed fractures appeared small. Annual national cost savings from the elimination of 18.1% of upper and 25.8% of lower extremity roentgenographic evaluations was estimated at $103 million.

Imaging Evaluation of Pediatric Extremity Trauma, Part III: Lower Extremity and Soft Tissues

1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 241-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan D. John ◽  
William A. Phillips
Keyword(s):  
Young Children ◽  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Soft Tissues ◽  
Plain Radiograph ◽  
Imaging Evaluation ◽  
Avulsion Fractures ◽  
Lower Extremity Injuries ◽  
Below The Knee ◽  
Extremity Trauma ◽  
Extremity Injuries

Lower extremity injuries are slightly less common than upper extremity injuries in children, and the structures below the knee are more often involved. Impaction injuries are often associated with twisting forces which can result in subtle buckle and hairline types of fractures, particularly in young children. Epiphyseal-metaphyseal injuries are especially common at the ankle. A variety of avulsion fractures also occur in the lower extremities, often associated with injury to nearby cartilaginous and ligamentous structures. This article reviews the important plain radiograph findings of lower extremity injuries in children as well as indications for special imaging such as ultrasound and MRI.

scholarly journals Epidemiology of orthopaedic trauma in Istanbul level 3 private hospital

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 1185
Author(s):  
Dursun Karakaş ◽  
Murat Demiroğlu
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Private Hospital ◽  
Pelvic Trauma ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
Vertebral Trauma ◽  
Upper Extremity Trauma ◽  
Extremity Injuries ◽  
Tissue Trauma

Background: The distribution of patients who were admitted to the hospital for trauma depends on the location of hospital and the distribution of the population where the hospital is located. The aim was to answer the question regarding the distribution of orthopaedic traumas which were admitted to the emergency service of level 3 a private hospital and to be able to shed light on necessary training and equipment for the aforementioned emergency departments.Methods: The distribution of the patients who were admitted to level 3 private hospital for a year was analyzed retrospectively. The patients who admitted between January 2014 and January 2015 were divided into subgroups as upper extremity, lower extremity, vertebral disk pathology, vertebral trauma, infection and soft tissue trauma, accompanying thoracic trauma and then they were taken into consideration.Results: A total of 1538 patients admitted during a 12-month period. The number of the patients with upper extremity trauma was 539 while that of lower extremity was 423. There were 365 patients with vertebral trauma which was followed by 94 patients with pelvic trauma. The remaining patient group had thoracic trauma.Conclusions: The patients aged between 30-39 years constituted the majority of the cases in present study. The upper extremity injuries were predominant. Also, the number of male patients was higher in every month. The center where the hospital is located plays an important role in determining the age group and type of trauma.

scholarly journals Retrospective analysis of injury trends in recreational skiers and snowboarders in Erciyes Ski Centre

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 313-319
Author(s):  
G. Özen ◽  
E. Yilmaz ◽  
H. Koç ◽  
C. Akalan
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Injury Surveillance System ◽  
Lower Extremity Injuries ◽  
System A ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Body Location ◽  
Spss Software ◽  
Alpine Skiers ◽  
Extremity Injuries

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the important differences in overall rates and frequency of injury cases and injury characteristics between the recreational alpine skiers and snowboarders in Erciyes Ski Centre. Methods: The data for this research was obtained from the Erciyes Ski Centre Injury Surveillance System. A total of 834 injury cases that ski patrols registered injury cases caused by recreational alpine skiing and snowboarding during the 2002 to 2017 winter seasons were respectively examined. The injury cases were grouped according to the skiing disciplines. All data were analysed using SPSS software. Results: Injury cases were 690 skiers (82.7%) and 144 snowboarders (17.3%). 397 (57.5%) male and 293 (42.5%) female were skiers and 91 (63.2%) male and 53 (36.8%) female were snowboarders. There was no statistically significant difference between the gender ratios in skiers and snowboarders (p > .05). Data analysis indicated that there were statistically significant differences in the ratios of lower and upper extremity injuries between skiers and snowboarders ( p < .05 ). Skiers suffered more lower extremity injuries while snowboarders suffered more upper extremity injuries ( p < .05 ). Contusion was the most common injuries type in both skiers and snowboarders ( p < .05) . Conclusions: The lower extremity injuries in skiers and the upper extremity injuries in snowboarders were more common with respect to body location of injuries. For both the recreational activities, contusion was the most common injury type.

scholarly journals Concussion in National Football League Athletes Is Not Associated With Increased Risk of Acute, Noncontact Lower Extremity Musculoskeletal Injury

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 232596712110034
Author(s):  
Toufic R. Jildeh ◽  
Fabien Meta ◽  
Jacob Young ◽  
Brendan Page ◽  
Kelechi R. Okoroha
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
National Football League ◽  
Field Performance ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Lower Extremity Injury ◽  
Extremity Injury ◽  
Lower Extremity Injuries ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Extremity Injuries ◽  
And Control

Background: Impaired neuromuscular function after concussion has recently been linked to increased risk of lower extremity injuries in athletes. Purpose: To determine if National Football League (NFL) athletes have an increased risk of sustaining an acute, noncontact lower extremity injury in the 90-day period after return to play (RTP) and whether on-field performance differs pre- and postconcussion. Study Design: Cohort study, Level of evidence, 3. Methods: NFL concussions in offensive players from the 2012-2013 to the 2016-2017 seasons were studied. Age, position, injury location/type, RTP, and athlete factors were noted. A 90-day RTP postconcussive period was analyzed for lower extremity injuries. Concussion and injury data were obtained from publicly available sources. Nonconcussed, offensive skill position NFL athletes from the same period were used as a control cohort, with the 2014 season as the reference season. Power rating performance metrics were calculated for ±1, ±2, and ±3 seasons pre- and postconcussion. Conditional logistic regression was used to determine associations between concussion and lower extremity injury as well as the relationship of concussions to on-field performance. Results: In total, 116 concussions were recorded in 108 NFL athletes during the study period. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of an acute, noncontact lower extremity injury between concussed and control athletes (8.5% vs 12.8%; P = .143), which correlates with an odds ratio of 0.573 (95% CI, 0.270-1.217). Days (66.4 ± 81.9 days vs 45.1 ± 69.2 days; P = .423) and games missed (3.67 ± 3.0 vs 2.9 ± 2.7 games; P = .470) were similar in concussed athletes and control athletes after a lower extremity injury. No significant changes in power ratings were noted in concussed athletes in the acute period (±1 season to injury) when comparing pre- and postconcussion. Conclusion: Concussed, NFL offensive athletes did not demonstrate increased odds of acute, noncontact, lower extremity injury in a 90-day RTP period when compared with nonconcussed controls. Immediate on-field performance of skill position players did not appear to be affected by concussion.

scholarly journals EFFECTIVENESS OF PRE-SEASON PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE TESTS IN IDENTIFYING IN-SEASON LOWER EXTREMITY INJURIES IN ADOLESCENT GYMNASTS

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0014
Author(s):  
Danielle A Farzanegan ◽  
Emily Francione ◽  
Nicole Melfi
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Physical Performance ◽  
Performance Tests ◽  
Kinetic Chain ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Balance Test ◽  
Lower Extremity Injuries ◽  
Common Location ◽  
Acute Injuries ◽  
Extremity Injuries

Background: Artistic competitive gymnastics results in a wide, unique spectrum of injuries. Due to the high number of injuries and the current lack of research related to pre-competitive testing in adolescent gymnasts, it is crucial to find a method to predict the likelihood of an athlete sustaining an in-season injury. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to 1) describe the frequency and type of pre-season and in-season injuries, 2) determine if there were differences in physical performance tests between those who had a lower extremity (LE) injury in-season and those who did not, and 3) determine if there were differences in age, level, sex, BMI, sport modifications, previous injury, and current injury between those who had a LE injury and those who didn’t. Methods: Thirty-seven adolescent gymnasts (average age: 12.81 years) were included with levels ranging from 5 (novice) to 10 (elite). Participants (15 males and 22 females) were surveyed for previous and current injury. The athletes completed a performance battery before the competition season including: Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test (LQYBT), Closed Kinetic Chain dorsiflexion (CKCDF), single hop (SH), triple hop (TH), and the Functional Movement Screen (FMS). Follow-up data was collected at the end of the competitive season for comparison. The data was analyzed using descriptive methods and comparative analyses including chi-square and independent t-tests with an alpha level set at .05. Results: Sixty-five percent reported an injury in the last year and seventy-eight percent reported pre-season injuries at testing day. The most common location for pre-season injury was the ankle/foot (24% and 31% respectively). There were no differences between injured and non-injured athletes when comparing asymmetries in CKCDF, LQYBT posteromedial or posterolateral reach, hop testing, or FMS. The LQYBT-anterior scores were significantly different at p=.049 between the injured versus uninjured groups, with 91% of the in-season injury group having a difference <4cm. Similarly, the LQYBT-composite score using a cut-off of 95% was significant at p=.043 with those >95% category being more likely to get injured. There were no significant differences in demographic information comparing injury occurrence. Conclusion: The tested physical performance battery may be useful in tracking gymnasts over time, but may not be beneficial in forecasting injuries in a sport with high percentages of acute injuries. The collected injury volume may not be reflective of a standard season as COVID-19 decreased the number of competitions. Additional research to identify athletes at risk for injury requires further investigation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document