scholarly journals A New Method for Chromosomes Preparation by ATP-Competitive Inhibitor SP600125 via Enhancement of Endomitosis in Fish

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenting Xu ◽  
Yanxiu Mo ◽  
Yu He ◽  
Yunpeng Fan ◽  
Guomin He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Competitive Inhibitor ◽  
P53 Signaling ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cultured Fish ◽  
Block Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Fish Cells

Previous studies have suggested that 1,9-Pyrazoloanthrone, known as SP600125, can induce cell polyploidization. However, what is the phase of cell cycle arrest caused by SP600125 and the underlying regulation is still an interesting issue to be further addressed. Research in this article shows that SP600125 can block cell cycle progression at the prometaphase of mitosis and cause endomitosis. It is suggested that enhancement of the p53 signaling pathway and weakening of the spindle assembly checkpoint are associated with the SP600125-induced cell cycle arrest. Using preliminary SP600125 treatment, the samples of the cultured fish cells and the fish tissues display a great number of chromosome splitting phases. Summarily, SP600125 can provide a new protocol of chromosomes preparation for karyotype analysis owing to its interference with prometaphase of mitosis.

scholarly journals Hyperbaric oxygen promotes not only glioblastoma proliferation but also chemosensitization by inhibiting HIF1α/HIF2α-Sox2

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pan Wang ◽  
Sheng Gong ◽  
Jinyu Pan ◽  
Junwei Wang ◽  
Dewei Zou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Hyperbaric Oxygen ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Malignant Progression ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Chemotherapy Sensitivity ◽  
Hypoxic Conditions ◽  
Cycle Arrest

AbstractThere exists a consensus that combining hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) and chemotherapy promotes chemotherapy sensitivity in GBM cells. However, few studies have explored the mechanism involved. HIF1α and HIF2α are the two main molecules that contribute to GBM malignant progression by inhibiting apoptosis or maintaining stemness under hypoxic conditions. Moreover, Sox2, a marker of stemness, also contributes to GBM malignant progression through stemness maintenance or cell cycle arrest. Briefly, HIF1α, HIF2α and Sox2 are highly expressed under hypoxia and contribute to GBM growth and chemoresistance. However, after exposure to HBO for GBM, whether the expression of the above factors is decreased, resulting in chemosensitization, remains unknown. Therefore, we performed a series of studies and determined that the expression of HIF1α, HIF2α and Sox2 was decreased after HBO and that HBO promoted GBM cell proliferation through cell cycle progression, albeit with a decrease in stemness, thus contributing to chemosensitization via the inhibition of HIF1α/HIF2α-Sox2.

scholarly journals Influenza A Virus Replication Induces Cell Cycle Arrest in G0/G1 Phase

2010 ◽  
Vol 84 (24) ◽  
pp. 12832-12840 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan He ◽  
Ke Xu ◽  
Bjoern Keiner ◽  
Jianfang Zhou ◽  
Volker Czudai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Influenza A Virus ◽  
Influenza A ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Virus Production ◽  
Phase Cell ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Infected Cells

ABSTRACT Many viruses interact with the host cell division cycle to favor their own growth. In this study, we examined the ability of influenza A virus to manipulate cell cycle progression. Our results show that influenza A virus A/WSN/33 (H1N1) replication results in G0/G1-phase accumulation of infected cells and that this accumulation is caused by the prevention of cell cycle entry from G0/G1 phase into S phase. Consistent with the G0/G1-phase accumulation, the amount of hyperphosphorylated retinoblastoma protein, a necessary active form for cell cycle progression through late G1 into S phase, decreased after infection with A/WSN/33 (H1N1) virus. In addition, other key molecules in the regulation of the cell cycle, such as p21, cyclin E, and cyclin D1, were also changed and showed a pattern of G0/G1-phase cell cycle arrest. It is interesting that increased viral protein expression and progeny virus production in cells synchronized in the G0/G1 phase were observed compared to those in either unsynchronized cells or cells synchronized in the G2/M phase. G0/G1-phase cell cycle arrest is likely a common strategy, since the effect was also observed in other strains, such as H3N2, H9N2, PR8 H1N1, and pandemic swine H1N1 viruses. These findings, in all, suggest that influenza A virus may provide favorable conditions for viral protein accumulation and virus production by inducing a G0/G1-phase cell cycle arrest in infected cells.

scholarly journals Roquin1 Suppresses Breast Cancer Growth by Inducing Cell Cycle Arrest via Selectively Destabilizing Cell Cycle–Promoting Gene mRNAs

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenbao Lu ◽  
Meicen Zhou ◽  
Bing Wang ◽  
Xueting Liu ◽  
Bingwei Li
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Breast Cancer Cell ◽  
Breast Tumor ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest

Abstract Background: Dysregulation of cell cycle progression is one of the common features of human cancer cells, however, its mechanism remains unclear. This study aims to clarify the role and the underlying mechanisms of Roquin1 in cell cycle arrest induction in breast cancer.Methods: Public cancer databases were analyzed to identify the expression pattern of Roquin1 in human breast cancers and the significant association with patient survival. Quantitative real-time PCR and western blots were performed to detect the expression of Roquin1 in breast cancer samples and cell lines. Cell counting, MTT assay, flow cytometry, and in vivo study were conducted to investigate the effects of Roquin1 on cell proliferation, cell cycle progression and tumor progression. RNA-sequencing was applied to identify the differential genes and pathways regulated by Roquin1. RNA immunoprecipitation assay, luciferase reporter assay, mRNA half-life detection, RNA affinity binding assay, and RIP-ChIP were used to explore the molecular mechanisms of Roquin1.Results: We showed that Roquin1 expression in breast cancer tissues and cell lines was inhibited, and the reduction in Roquin1 expression was associated with poor overall survival and relapse free survival of patients with breast cancer. Roquin1 overexpression inhibited breast cancer cell proliferation and induced G1/S cell cycle arrest without causing significant apoptosis. In contrast, knockdown of Roquin1 promoted breast cancer cell growth and cycle progression. Moreover, in vivo induction of Roquin1 by adenovirus significantly suppressed breast tumor growth and metastasis. Mechanistically, Roquin1 selectively destabilizing cell cycle–promoting genes, including Cyclin D1, Cyclin E1, cyclin dependent kinase 6 (CDK6) and minichromosome maintenance 2 (MCM2) through targeting the stem–loop structure in the 3’untranslated region (3’UTR) of mRNAs via its ROQ domain, leading to the downregulation of cell cycle–promoting mRNAs.Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated that Roquin1 was a novel breast tumor suppressor and could induce G1/S cell cycle arrest by selectively downregulating the expression of cell cycle–promoting genes, which might as a potential molecular target for breast cancer treatment.

scholarly journals BRCA2 abrogation triggers innate immune responses potentiated by treatment with PARP inhibitors

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timo Reisländer ◽  
Emilia Puig Lombardi ◽  
Florian J. Groelly ◽  
Ana Miar ◽  
Manuela Porru ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Innate Immune ◽  
Interferon Response ◽  
Acute Response ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Dna Replication And Repair ◽  
Sting Pathway

Heterozygous germline mutations in BRCA2 predispose to breast and ovarian cancer. Contrary to non-cancerous cells, where BRCA2 deletion causes cell cycle arrest or cell death, BRCA2 inactivation in tumors is associated with uncontrolled cell proliferation. We set out to investigate this conundrum by exploring modalities of cell adaptation to loss of BRCA2 and focused on genome-wide transcriptome alterations. Human cells in which BRCA2 expression was inhibited using a doxycycline (DOX)-inducible shRNA for 4 or 28 days were subjected to RNA-seq analyses. Gene sets differentially expressed in BRCA2-deficient versus -proficient cells revealed a biphasic response to BRCA2 abrogation. The early, acute response consisted of downregulation of genes involved in cell cycle progression, DNA replication and repair and was associated with cell cycle arrest in G1. Surprisingly, the late, chronic response consisted predominantly of upregulation of innate immune response genes controlled by interferon. Activation of the cGAS-STING pathway detected in these cells further substantiated the concept that long-term BRCA2 abrogation triggers cell-intrinsic immune signaling. Importantly, we found that treatment with PARP inhibitors stimulated the interferon response in cells and tumors lacking BRCA2. We propose that PARP inhibitors may suppress growth of BRCA2-deficient cells and tumors, in part, by activating interferon signaling.

scholarly journals Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E7 Maintains Elevated Levels of the cdc25A Tyrosine Phosphatase during Deregulation of Cell Cycle Arrest

2002 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 619-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don X. Nguyen ◽  
Thomas F. Westbrook ◽  
Dennis J. McCance
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Tyrosine Phosphatase ◽  
Early Gene ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Hpv 16 ◽  
Human Papillomavirus Type 16 ◽  
Cycle Arrest

ABSTRACT Essential to the oncogenic properties of human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) are the activities encoded by the early gene product E7. HPV-16 E7 (E7.16) binds to cellular factors involved in cell cycle regulation and differentiation. These include the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (Rb) and histone deacetylase (HDAC) complexes. While the biological significance of these interactions remains unclear, E7 is believed to help maintain cells in a proliferative state, thus establishing an environment that is conducive to viral replication. Most pathways that govern cell growth converge on downstream effectors. Among these is the cdc25A tyrosine phosphatase. cdc25A is required for G1/S transition, and its deregulation is associated with carcinogenesis. Considering the importance of cdc25A in cell cycle progression, it represents a relevant target for viral oncoproteins. Accordingly, the present study focuses on the putative deregulation of cdc25A by E7.16. Our results indicate that E7.16 can impede growth arrest induced during serum starvation and keratinocyte differentiation. Importantly, these E7-specific phenotypes correlate with elevated cdc25A steady-state levels. Reporter assays performed with NIH 3T3 cell lines and human keratinocytes indicate that E7 can transactivate the cdc25A promoter. In addition, transcriptional activation by E7.16 requires the distal E2F site within the cdc25A promoter. We further demonstrate that the ability of E7 to abrogate cell cycle arrest, activate cdc25A transcription, and increase cdc25A protein levels requires intact Rb and HDAC-1 binding domains. Finally, by using the cdk inhibitor roscovitine, we reveal that E7 activates the cdc25A promoter independently of cell cycle progression and cdk activity. Consequently, we propose that E7.16 can directly target cdc25A transcription and maintains cdc25A gene expression by disrupting Rb/E2F/HDAC-1 repressor complexes.

scholarly journals TGEV nucleocapsid protein induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis through activation of p53 signaling

2014 ◽  
Vol 445 (2) ◽  
pp. 497-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Ding ◽  
Yong Huang ◽  
Qian Du ◽  
Feng Dong ◽  
Xiaomin Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Nucleocapsid Protein ◽  
P53 Signaling ◽  
Cycle Arrest

scholarly journals Fluctuations in p53 Signaling Allow Escape from Cell-Cycle Arrest

2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 581-591.e5 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Reyes ◽  
Jia-Yun Chen ◽  
Jacob Stewart-Ornstein ◽  
Kyle W. Karhohs ◽  
Caroline S. Mock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
P53 Signaling ◽  
Cycle Arrest

scholarly journals The RASSF6 Tumor Suppressor Protein Regulates Apoptosis and Cell Cycle Progression via Retinoblastoma Protein

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (17) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shakhawoat Hossain ◽  
Hiroaki Iwasa ◽  
Aradhan Sarkar ◽  
Junichi Maruyama ◽  
Kyoko Arimoto-Matsuzaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Tumor Suppressor ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
P53 Expression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Hct116 Cells

ABSTRACT RASSF6 is a member of the tumor suppressor Ras association domain family (RASSF) proteins. RASSF6 is frequently suppressed in human cancers, and its low expression level is associated with poor prognosis. RASSF6 regulates cell cycle arrest and apoptosis and plays a tumor suppressor role. Mechanistically, RASSF6 blocks MDM2-mediated p53 degradation and enhances p53 expression. However, RASSF6 also induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in a p53-negative background, which implies that the tumor suppressor function of RASSF6 does not depend solely on p53. In this study, we revealed that RASSF6 mediates cell cycle arrest and apoptosis via pRb. RASSF6 enhances the interaction between pRb and protein phosphatase. RASSF6 also enhances P16INK4A and P14ARF expression by suppressing BMI1. In this way, RASSF6 increases unphosphorylated pRb and augments the interaction between pRb and E2F1. Moreover, RASSF6 induces TP73 target genes via pRb and E2F1 in a p53-negative background. Finally, we confirmed that RASSF6 depletion induces polyploid cells in p53-negative HCT116 cells. In conclusion, RASSF6 behaves as a tumor suppressor in cancers with loss of function of p53, and pRb is implicated in this function of RASSF6.

Silencing of miR-1246 Induces Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis in Cisplatin-Resistant Ovarian Cancer Cells by Promoting ZNF23 Transcription

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Lu Cai ◽  
Qian Zhang ◽  
Lili Du ◽  
Feiyun Zheng
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Luciferase Reporter ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
Ovarian Cancer Cells ◽  
Tunel Staining ◽  
Cycle Arrest

Ovarian cancer (OC) is the most frequent cause of death among patients with gynecologic malignancies. In recent years, the development of cisplatin (DDP) resistance has become an important reason for the poor prognosis of OC patients. Therefore, it is vital to explore the mechanism of DDP resistance in OC. In this study, microRNA-1246 (miR-1246) expression in OC and DDP-resistant OC cells was determined by RT-qPCR, and chemosensitivity to DDP was assessed by the CCK-8 assay. A dual-luciferase reporter assay was performed to confirm the interaction between miR-1246 and zinc finger 23 (<i>ZNF23</i>), while changes in <i>ZNF23</i> expression were monitored by RT-qPCR, immunofluorescence, and western blot assays. Moreover, cell proliferation, cycle phase, and apoptosis were determined by EdU staining, flow cytometry, TUNEL staining, and Hoechst staining. Our data showed that miR-1246 was highly expressed in DDP-resistant OVCAR-3 and TOV-112D cells. Functionally, overexpression of miR-1246 markedly enhanced DDP resistance and cell proliferation, and suppressed cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of OC cells. Inhibition of miR-1246 expression significantly attenuated DDP resistance and cell proliferation, and increased cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in DDP-resistant OC cells. Furthermore, <i>ZNF23</i> was identified as a target gene of miR-1246, and ZNF23 protein expression was notably downregulated in DDP-resistant OC cells. Moreover, overexpression of miR-1246 significantly downregulated the <i>ZNF23</i> levels in OVCAR-3 and TOV-112D cells, and inhibition of miR-1246 upregulated the <i>ZNF23</i> levels in the DDP-resistant OVCAR-3 and TOV-112D cells. In conclusion, miR-1246 might be a novel regulator of DDP-resistant OC that functions by regulating <i>ZNF23</i> expression in DDP-resistant cells, as well as cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, and apoptosis.

scholarly journals Effect of Piceatannol on Cell Cycle Progression in Prostate Cancer Cells (P05-005-19)

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Larissa Kido ◽  
Eun-Ryeong Hahm ◽  
Valeria Cagnon ◽  
Mário Maróstica ◽  
Shivendra Singh
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cell Cycle Distribution ◽  
Mutant P53 ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest

Abstract Objectives Piceatannol (PIC) is a polyphenolic and resveratrol analog that is found in many vegetables consumed by humans. Like resveratrol, PIC has beneficial effects on health due to its anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative and anti-proliferative features. However, the molecular targets of PIC in prostate cancer (PCa), which is the second most common cancer in men worldwide, are still poorly understood. Preventing cancer through dietary sources is a promising strategy to control diseases. Therefore, the aim of present study was to investigate the molecular mechanistic of actions of PIC in PCa cell lines with different genetic background common to human prostate cancer. Methods Human PCa cell lines (PC-3, 22Rv1, LNCaP, and VCaP) were treated with different doses of PIC (5–40 µM) and used for cell viability assay, measurement of total free fatty acids (FFA) and lactate, and cell cycle distribution. Results PIC treatment dose- and time-dependently reduced viability in PC-3 (androgen-independent, PTEN null, p53 null) and VCaP cells (androgen-responsive, wild-type PTEN, mutant p53). Because metabolic alterations, such as increased glucose and lipid metabolism are implicated in pathogenesis of in PCa, we tested if PIC could affect these pathways. Results from lactate and total free fatty acid assays in VCaP, 22Rv1 (castration-resistant, wild-type PTEN, mutant p53), and LNCaP (androgen-responsive, PTEN null, wild-type p53) revealed no effect of PIC on these metabolisms. However, PIC treatment delayed cell cycle progression in G0/G1 phase concomitant with the induction of apoptosis in both LNCaP and 22Rv1 cells, suggesting that growth inhibitory effect of PIC in PCa is associated with cell cycle arrest and apoptotic cell death at least LNCaP and 22Rv1 cells. Conclusions While PIC treatment does not alter lipid or glucose metabolism, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induction are likely important in anti-cancer effects of PIC. Funding Sources São Paulo Research Foundation (2018/09793-7).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document