scholarly journals Usefulness of Diastolic Function Score as a Predictor of Long-Term Prognosis in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
SungA Bae ◽  
Hyun Ju Yoon ◽  
Kye Hun Kim ◽  
Hyung Yoon Kim ◽  
Hyukjin Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Diastolic Function ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Left Ventricular Diastolic Function ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Background: Left ventricular diastolic function (LVDF) evaluation using a combination of several echocardiographic parameters is an important predictor of adverse events in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). To date, the clinical impact of each individual LVDF marker is well-known, but the clinical significance of the sum of the abnormal diastolic function markers and the long-term clinical outcome are not well-known. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of LVDF score in predicting clinical outcomes of patients with AMI.Methods: LVDF scores were measured in a 2,030 patients with AMI who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention from 2012 to 2015. Four LVDF parameters (septal e′ ≥ 7 cm/s, septal E/e′ ≤ 15, TR velocity ≤ 2.8 m/s, and LAVI ≤ 34 ml/m2) were used for LVDF scoring. The presence of each abnormal LVDF parameter was scored as 1, and the total LVDF score ranged from 0 to 4. Mortality and hospitalization due to heart failure (HHF) in relation to LVDF score were evaluated. To compare the predictive ability of LVDF scores and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) for mortality and HHF, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and landmark analyses were performed.Results: Over the 3-year clinical follow-up, all-cause mortality occurred in 278 patients (13.7%), while 91 patients (4.5%) developed HHF. All-cause mortality and HHF significantly increased as LVDF scores increased (all-cause mortality–LVDF score 0: 2.3%, score 1: 8.8%, score 2: 16.7%, score 3: 31.8%, and score 4: 44.5%, p < 0.001; HHF–LVDF score 0: 0.6%, score 1: 1.8%, score 2: 6.3%, score 3: 10.3%, and score 4: 18.2%, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, a higher LVDF score was associated with significantly higher adjusted hazard ratios for all-cause mortality and HHF. In landmark analysis, LVDF score was a better predictor of long-term mortality than LVEF (area under the ROC curve: 0.739 vs. 0.640, p < 0.001).Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that LVDF score was a significant predictor of mortality and HHF in patients with AMI. LVDF scores are useful for risk stratification of patients with AMI; therefore, careful monitoring and management should be performed for patients with AMI with higher LVDF scores.

scholarly journals Electrical storm reveals worse prognosis compared to myocardial infarction complicated by ventricular tachyarrhythmias in ICD recipients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian Müller ◽  
Michael Behnes ◽  
Tobias Schupp ◽  
Dominik Ellguth ◽  
Gabriel Taton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Electrical Storm ◽  
Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
St Segment ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Worse Prognosis

AbstractBoth acute myocardial infarction complicated by ventricular tachyarrhythmias (AMI–VTA) and electrical storm (ES) represent life-threatening clinical conditions. However, a direct comparison of both sub-groups regarding prognostic endpoints has never been investigated. All consecutive implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients were included retrospectively from 2002 to 2016. Patients with ES apart from AMI (ES) were compared to patients with AMI accompanied by ventricular tachyarrhythmias (AMI–VTA). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 3 years, secondary endpoints were in-hospital mortality, rehospitalization rates and major adverse cardiac event (MACE) at 3 years. A total of 198 consecutive ICD recipients were included (AMI–VTA: 56%; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI): 22%; non-ST-segment myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) 78%; ES: 44%). ES patients were older and had higher rates of severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 35%. ES was associated with increased all-cause mortality at 3 years (37% vs. 19%; p = 0.001; hazard ratio [HR] = 2.242; 95% CI 2.291–3.894; p = 0.004) and with increased risk of first cardiac rehospitalization (44% vs. 12%; p = 0.001; HR = 4.694; 95% CI 2.498–8.823; p = 0.001). This worse prognosis of ES compared to AMI–VTA was still evident after multivariable adjustment (long-term all-cause mortality: HR = 2.504; 95% CI 1.093–5.739; p = 0.030; first cardiac rehospitalization: HR = 2.887; 95% CI 1.240–6.720; p = 0.014). In contrast, the rates of MACE (40% vs. 32%; p = 0.326) were comparable in both groups. At long-term follow-up of 3 years, ES was associated with higher rates of all-cause mortality and rehospitalization compared to patients with AMI–VTA.

Abstract 12691: Long-term Optimal Medical Therapy for Patients With Mid-range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
YeeKyoung KO ◽  
Seungjae JOO ◽  
Jong Wook Beom ◽  
Jae-Geun Lee ◽  
Joon-Hyouk CHOI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Medical Therapy ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ras Inhibitors

Introduction: In the era of the initial optimal interventional and medical therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), a number of patients with mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction (40% <EF<50%) becomes increasing. However, the long-term optimal medical therapy for these patients has been rarely studied. Aims: This observational study aimed to investigate the association between the medical therapy with beta-blockers or inhibitors of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and clinical outcomes in patients with mid-range EF after AMI. Methods: Among 13,624 patients enrolled in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health (KAMIR-NIH), propensity-score matched patients who survived the initial attack and had mid-range EF were selected according to beta-blocker or RAS inhibitor therapy at discharge. Results: Patients with beta-blockers showed significantly lower 1-year cardiac death (2.4 vs. 5.2/100 patient-year; hazard ratio [HR] 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.98; P =0.045) and MI (1.7 vs. 4.0/100 patient-year; HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.18-0.95; P =0.037). On the other hand, RAS inhibitors were associated with lower 1-year re-hospitalization due to heart failure (2.8 vs. 5.5/100 patient-year; HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.31-0.92; P =0.024), and no significant interaction with classes of RAS inhibitors (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers) was observed ( P for interaction=0.332). Conclusions: Beta-blockers or RAS inhibitors at discharge were associated with better 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with mid-range EF after AMI.

scholarly journals Impella versus IABP in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock

Open Heart ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brunilda Alushi ◽  
Andel Douedari ◽  
Georg Froehlig ◽  
Wulf Knie ◽  
Thomas H Wurster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality

ObjectiveWe investigated the benefit of Impella, a modern percutaneous mechanical support (pMCS) device, versus former standard intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS).MethodsThis single-centre, retrospective study included patients with AMICS receiving pMCS with either Impella or IABP. Disease severity at baseline was assessed with the IABP-SHOCK II score. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30 days. Secondary outcomes were parameters of shock severity at the early postimplantation phase. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards models identified independent predictors of the primary outcome.ResultsOf 116 included patients, 62 (53%) received Impella and 54 (47%) IABP. Despite similar baseline mortality risk (IABP-SHOCK II high-risk score of 18 % vs 20 %; p = 0.76), Impella significantly reduced the inotropic score (p < 0.001), lactate levels (p < 0.001) and SAPS II (p =0.02) and improved left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.01). All-cause mortality at 30 days was similar with Impella and IABP (52 % and 67 %, respectively; p = 0.13), but bleeding complications were more frequent in the Impella group (3 vs 4 units of transfused erythrocytes concentrates due to bleeding complications, p = 0.03). Previous cardiopulmonary resuscitation (HR 3.22, 95% CI 1.76 to 5.89; p < 0.01) and an estimated intermediate (HR 2.77, 95% CI 1.42 to 5.40; p < 0.01) and high (HR 4.32 95% CI 2.03 to 9.24; p = 0.01) IABP-SHOCK II score were independent predictors of all-cause mortality.ConclusionsIn patients with AMICS, haemodynamic support with the Impella device had no significant effect on 30-day mortality as compared with IABP. In these patients, large randomised trials are warranted to ascertain the effect of Impella on the outcome.

scholarly journals Prognostic impacts of prehospital age shock index in patients with acute myocardial infarction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Hirota ◽  
K Moriwaki ◽  
A Takasaki ◽  
T Takamura ◽  
T Kurita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Shock Index ◽  
Significant Independent Predictor ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Chi Squared

Abstract Introduction Early identification of high-risk patients is the cornerstone of managing patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Age Shock index (ASI; age multiplied by the ratio of heart rate/systolic blood pressure) has been reported to be similar to Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score for predicting mortality in patients with AMI. However, prognostic impacts of prehospital ASI (pre-ASI) in patients with AMI remain unknown. Methods We analyzed of 2578 AMI patients who underwent emergency primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from January 2013 to March 2018, using data from Mie ACS Registry, a prospective and multicenter registry in Japan. Pre-ASI was recorded by emergency medical services at the first contact with the patient before admission, and in-hospital ASI (in-ASI) was recorded prior to PCI at admission. The primary end point was defined as all-cause death. Results Median follow-up duration was 753 days (497–838 days). All-cause death was observed in 230 (8.9%) patients. The ROC-AUC (Receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve) of pre-ASI for all- cause death was 0.76 (p&lt;0.001), which was similar to that of in-ASI (0.78, p&lt;0.001) (p=0.25 for pre-ASI versus in-ASI). The cut-off value for pre-ASI and in-ASI was for the prediction of all-cause death was both 45 with a sensitivity of 0.66 and a specificity of 0.78, with a sensitivity of 0.68 and a specificity of 0.76 respectively. According to the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis by combination of pre-ASI≥45 and in-ASI≥45, the patients with pre-ASI≥45 and in-ASI≥45 showed significantly higher all-cause mortality compared to the patients with pre-ASI≥45 and in-ASI&lt;45, the patients with pre-ASI&lt;45 and in-ASI≥45, and the patients with pre-ASI&lt;45 and in-ASI&lt;45 (p&lt;0.001) (Figure). The addition of pre-ASI≥45 to in-ASI≥45 (global chi-squared score: 205) resulted in a significantly increased global chi-squared score, suggesting the incremental prognostic value of pre-ASI (267; p&lt;0.001). Multivariate cox proportional hazard regression analysis for all-cause mortality demonstrated pre-ASI≥45 was a significant independent predictor (HR: 4.86; 95% CI: 3.36 to 7.02, p&lt;0.001). It was strongest predictor compared to left ventricular ejection fraction&lt;40% (HR: 2.45; 95% CI 1.67 to 3.58, p&lt;0.001), hemodialysis (HR: 3.45; 95% CI 1.66 to 7.17, p=0.001), door to balloon time&gt;90 minutes (HR: 1.66; 95% CI 1.18 to 2.34, p=0.004). Conclusions High pre-ASI predict increase mortality and assessment of both high pre-ASI and high in-ASI enhance risk stratification in patients with AMI. Early recognizing high pre-ASI may help us make better strategies and improve prognosis for high-risk AMI patients. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

P3632Prognostic impact of aortic valve stenosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Mizutani ◽  
T Kurita ◽  
S Kasuya ◽  
T Mori ◽  
H Ito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Stenosis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is associated with the presence and severity of coronary artery disease independently of clinical risk factors, which leads to increased cardiovascular mortality. However, the prevalence of AS and its prognostic value among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remain unknown. Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence and prognostic impact of AS in AMI patients. Methods We studied 2,803 AMI patients using data from Mie ACS registry, a prospective and multicenter registry. Patients were divided into subgroups according to the presence and severity of AS based on maximal aortic flow rate by Doppler echocardiography before hospital discharge: non-AS <2.0 m/s, 2.0 m/s≤mild AS <3.0 m/s, 3.0 m/s≤moderate AS <4.0m/s and severe AS≥4.0 m/s. The primary outcome was defined as 2-year all-cause mortality. Results AS was detected in 79 patients (2.8%) including 49 mild AS, 23 moderate AS and 6 severe AS. AS patients were significantly older (79.9±9.8 versus 68.3±12.6 years), and higher killip classification than non-AS patients (P<0.01, respectively). However, left ventricular ejection fraction, and prevalence of primary PCI was similar between the 2 groups. During the follow-up periods (median 725 days), 333 (11.9%) patients experienced all-cause death. AS patients demonstrated the higher all-cause mortality rate compared to that of non-AS patients during follow up (47.3% versus 11.3%, P<0.0001, chi square). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the probability of all-cause mortality was significantly higher among AS patients than non-AS patients, and was highest among moderate and severe AS (See figure A and B). Cox regression analyses for all-cause mortality demonstrated that the severity of AS was the strongest and independent poor prognostic factor (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.30–2.24, P<0.001, See table). Cox hazard regression analysis Hazard ratio 95% Confidential interval P-value Severity of aortic valve stenosis 1.71 1.30–2.24 <0.001 Killip classification 1.63 1.46–1.82 <0.001 Age 1.07 1.06–1.09 <0.001 Serum creatinine level 1.05 1.03–1.08 <0.001 Max CPK level 1.00 1.00–1.01 <0.001 Left ventricular ejection fraction 0.96 0.95–0.97 <0.001 Primary percutaneous coronary intervention 0.67 0.47–0.96 0.03 CPK suggests creatinine phosphokinase. All cause mortality Conclusions The presence of AS of any severity contributes to worsening of patients' prognosis following AMI independently of other known risk factors. Acknowledgement/Funding None

scholarly journals Antialdosterone in Acute Myocardial Infarction patients: a Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiao Chen ◽  
Zhuqing Li ◽  
Die Zhao ◽  
Jie Sun ◽  
Yiling Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Ventricular Remodeling ◽  
Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Purpose: A comprehensive evaluation of the benefits of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients is lacking. We aimed to summarize the evidence on the efficacy and safety of MRA in post-AMI patients.Methods: Articles were identified through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Ovid (Medline1946-2021) and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from their inception to Dec 31, 2020. Results: MRA reduced the risk of all-cause mortality by 16% (relative ratio(RR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval(CI) (0.76,0.94), P=.002), new or worsening heart failure (HF) 14% (RR 0.86, 95%CI (0.78,0.96), P=.007), death from HF by 22% (RR 0.78, 95%CI (0.62,0.99), P=.04), and cardiovascular death by 16% (RR 0.84, 95%CI (0.74,0.94), P=.003) in post-AMI patients. Meanwhile, all-cause mortality was reduced by 38% (RR 0.62, 95%CI (0.42,0.90), P=.01), 30% (RR 0.70, 95%CI (0.49,1.00), P=.05), and 29% (RR 0.71, 95%CI (0.59,0.86), P=.0004) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients and those who initiated MRA treatment within 3 days and (3,7) days, respectively. Post-AMI patients without left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) treated with MRA improved left ventricular ejection fraction (mean difference[MD] 2.74, 95%CI (2.49,2.99), P<.00001) and reduced left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic volume indices (MD -6.23, 95%CI (-10.93,-1.52), P=.009; MD -3.13, 95%CI (-5.79,-0.47), P=.02). The corresponding RR were 1.73 (95%CI (1.44,2.08), P<.00001) for considered common side effects (hyperkalemia and gynecomastia).Conclusion: Our findings suggest that all-cause mortality is lower in STEMI patients and in patients initiating MRA within 7 days, and that post-AMI patients without LVSD have improved left ventricular remodeling and cardiac function.

scholarly journals Antialdosterone in Acute Myocardial Infarction patients: a Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiao Chen ◽  
Die Zhao ◽  
Jie Sun ◽  
Chengzhi Lu
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Ventricular Remodeling ◽  
Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract We aimed to summarize the evidence on the efficacy and safety of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) in post acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. Articles were identified through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Ovid (Medline1946-2021) and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from their inception to December 31, 2020. MRA reduced the risk of all-cause mortality by 16% (relative ratio (RR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.76, 0.94), P = 0.002). Meanwhile, all-cause mortality was reduced by 38% (RR 0.62, 95% CI (0.42, 0.90), P = 0.01), 30% (RR 0.70, 95% CI (0.49, 1.00), P = 0.05), and 29% (RR 0.71, 95% CI (0.59, 0.86), P = 0.0004) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients and those who initiated MRA treatment within 3 days and (3,7) days, respectively. Post-AMI patients without left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) treated with MRA improved left ventricular ejection fraction (mean difference [MD] 2.74, 95% CI (2.49, 2.99), P < 0.00001) and reduced left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic volume indices (MD -6.23, 95% CI (-10.93, -1.52), P = 0.009; MD -3.13, 95% CI (-5.79, -0.47), P = 0.02). The corresponding RR were 1.73 (95% CI (1.44, 2.08), P < 0.00001) for considered common side effects (hyperkalemia and gynecomastia). Our findings suggest that all-cause mortality is lower in STEMI patients and in patients initiating MRA within 7 days, and that post-AMI patients without LVSD have improved left ventricular remodeling and cardiac function.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document