P3632Prognostic impact of aortic valve stenosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Mizutani ◽  
T Kurita ◽  
S Kasuya ◽  
T Mori ◽  
H Ito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Stenosis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is associated with the presence and severity of coronary artery disease independently of clinical risk factors, which leads to increased cardiovascular mortality. However, the prevalence of AS and its prognostic value among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remain unknown. Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence and prognostic impact of AS in AMI patients. Methods We studied 2,803 AMI patients using data from Mie ACS registry, a prospective and multicenter registry. Patients were divided into subgroups according to the presence and severity of AS based on maximal aortic flow rate by Doppler echocardiography before hospital discharge: non-AS <2.0 m/s, 2.0 m/s≤mild AS <3.0 m/s, 3.0 m/s≤moderate AS <4.0m/s and severe AS≥4.0 m/s. The primary outcome was defined as 2-year all-cause mortality. Results AS was detected in 79 patients (2.8%) including 49 mild AS, 23 moderate AS and 6 severe AS. AS patients were significantly older (79.9±9.8 versus 68.3±12.6 years), and higher killip classification than non-AS patients (P<0.01, respectively). However, left ventricular ejection fraction, and prevalence of primary PCI was similar between the 2 groups. During the follow-up periods (median 725 days), 333 (11.9%) patients experienced all-cause death. AS patients demonstrated the higher all-cause mortality rate compared to that of non-AS patients during follow up (47.3% versus 11.3%, P<0.0001, chi square). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the probability of all-cause mortality was significantly higher among AS patients than non-AS patients, and was highest among moderate and severe AS (See figure A and B). Cox regression analyses for all-cause mortality demonstrated that the severity of AS was the strongest and independent poor prognostic factor (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.30–2.24, P<0.001, See table). Cox hazard regression analysis Hazard ratio 95% Confidential interval P-value Severity of aortic valve stenosis 1.71 1.30–2.24 <0.001 Killip classification 1.63 1.46–1.82 <0.001 Age 1.07 1.06–1.09 <0.001 Serum creatinine level 1.05 1.03–1.08 <0.001 Max CPK level 1.00 1.00–1.01 <0.001 Left ventricular ejection fraction 0.96 0.95–0.97 <0.001 Primary percutaneous coronary intervention 0.67 0.47–0.96 0.03 CPK suggests creatinine phosphokinase. All cause mortality Conclusions The presence of AS of any severity contributes to worsening of patients' prognosis following AMI independently of other known risk factors. Acknowledgement/Funding None

scholarly journals Impella versus IABP in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock

Open Heart ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brunilda Alushi ◽  
Andel Douedari ◽  
Georg Froehlig ◽  
Wulf Knie ◽  
Thomas H Wurster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality

ObjectiveWe investigated the benefit of Impella, a modern percutaneous mechanical support (pMCS) device, versus former standard intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS).MethodsThis single-centre, retrospective study included patients with AMICS receiving pMCS with either Impella or IABP. Disease severity at baseline was assessed with the IABP-SHOCK II score. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30 days. Secondary outcomes were parameters of shock severity at the early postimplantation phase. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards models identified independent predictors of the primary outcome.ResultsOf 116 included patients, 62 (53%) received Impella and 54 (47%) IABP. Despite similar baseline mortality risk (IABP-SHOCK II high-risk score of 18 % vs 20 %; p = 0.76), Impella significantly reduced the inotropic score (p < 0.001), lactate levels (p < 0.001) and SAPS II (p =0.02) and improved left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.01). All-cause mortality at 30 days was similar with Impella and IABP (52 % and 67 %, respectively; p = 0.13), but bleeding complications were more frequent in the Impella group (3 vs 4 units of transfused erythrocytes concentrates due to bleeding complications, p = 0.03). Previous cardiopulmonary resuscitation (HR 3.22, 95% CI 1.76 to 5.89; p < 0.01) and an estimated intermediate (HR 2.77, 95% CI 1.42 to 5.40; p < 0.01) and high (HR 4.32 95% CI 2.03 to 9.24; p = 0.01) IABP-SHOCK II score were independent predictors of all-cause mortality.ConclusionsIn patients with AMICS, haemodynamic support with the Impella device had no significant effect on 30-day mortality as compared with IABP. In these patients, large randomised trials are warranted to ascertain the effect of Impella on the outcome.

scholarly journals Clinical profile and management of patients with incident and recurrent acute myocardial infarction in Albania - a call for more focus on prevention strategies

2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 236-243
Author(s):  
Sokol Myftiu ◽  
Enxhela Sulo ◽  
Genc Burazeri ◽  
Bledar Daka ◽  
Ilir Sharka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Clinical Profile ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Hospital Treatment ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Incident Cases

AbstractBackgroundThe clinical profile of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients reflects the burden of risk factors in the general population. Differences between incident (first) and recurrent (repeated) events and their impact on treatment are poorly described. We studied potential differences in the clinical profile and in-hospital treatment between patients hospitalised with an incident and recurrent AMI.MethodsA total of 324 patients admitted in the Coronary Care Unit of ‘Mother Teresa’ hospital, Tirana, Albania (2013-2014), were included in the study. Information on AMI type, complications and risk factors was obtained from patient’s medical file.Logistic regression analyses were used to explore differences between the incident and recurrent AMIs regarding clinical profile and in-hospital treatment.ResultsOf all patients, 50 (15.4%) had a prior AMI. Compared to incident cases, recurrent cases were older (P=0.01), more often women (P=0.01), less educated (P=0.01), and smoked less (P=0.03). Recurrent cases experienced more often heart failure (HF) (OR=2.48; 95% CI: 1.31–4.70), impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (OR=1.97; 95% CI:1.05–3.71), and multivessel disease (OR=6.32; 95% CI: 1.43–28.03) than incident cases. In-hospital use of beta-blockers was less frequent among recurrent compared to incident cases (OR=0.45; 95% CI: 0.24–0.85), while no statistically significant differences between groups were observed regarding angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, statin, aspirin or invasive procedures.ConclusionA more severe clinical expression of the disease and underutilisation of treatment among recurrent AMIs are likely to explain their poorer prognosis compared to incident AMIs.

scholarly journals Prognostic impacts of prehospital age shock index in patients with acute myocardial infarction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Hirota ◽  
K Moriwaki ◽  
A Takasaki ◽  
T Takamura ◽  
T Kurita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Shock Index ◽  
Significant Independent Predictor ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Chi Squared

Abstract Introduction Early identification of high-risk patients is the cornerstone of managing patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Age Shock index (ASI; age multiplied by the ratio of heart rate/systolic blood pressure) has been reported to be similar to Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score for predicting mortality in patients with AMI. However, prognostic impacts of prehospital ASI (pre-ASI) in patients with AMI remain unknown. Methods We analyzed of 2578 AMI patients who underwent emergency primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from January 2013 to March 2018, using data from Mie ACS Registry, a prospective and multicenter registry in Japan. Pre-ASI was recorded by emergency medical services at the first contact with the patient before admission, and in-hospital ASI (in-ASI) was recorded prior to PCI at admission. The primary end point was defined as all-cause death. Results Median follow-up duration was 753 days (497–838 days). All-cause death was observed in 230 (8.9%) patients. The ROC-AUC (Receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve) of pre-ASI for all- cause death was 0.76 (p&lt;0.001), which was similar to that of in-ASI (0.78, p&lt;0.001) (p=0.25 for pre-ASI versus in-ASI). The cut-off value for pre-ASI and in-ASI was for the prediction of all-cause death was both 45 with a sensitivity of 0.66 and a specificity of 0.78, with a sensitivity of 0.68 and a specificity of 0.76 respectively. According to the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis by combination of pre-ASI≥45 and in-ASI≥45, the patients with pre-ASI≥45 and in-ASI≥45 showed significantly higher all-cause mortality compared to the patients with pre-ASI≥45 and in-ASI&lt;45, the patients with pre-ASI&lt;45 and in-ASI≥45, and the patients with pre-ASI&lt;45 and in-ASI&lt;45 (p&lt;0.001) (Figure). The addition of pre-ASI≥45 to in-ASI≥45 (global chi-squared score: 205) resulted in a significantly increased global chi-squared score, suggesting the incremental prognostic value of pre-ASI (267; p&lt;0.001). Multivariate cox proportional hazard regression analysis for all-cause mortality demonstrated pre-ASI≥45 was a significant independent predictor (HR: 4.86; 95% CI: 3.36 to 7.02, p&lt;0.001). It was strongest predictor compared to left ventricular ejection fraction&lt;40% (HR: 2.45; 95% CI 1.67 to 3.58, p&lt;0.001), hemodialysis (HR: 3.45; 95% CI 1.66 to 7.17, p=0.001), door to balloon time&gt;90 minutes (HR: 1.66; 95% CI 1.18 to 2.34, p=0.004). Conclusions High pre-ASI predict increase mortality and assessment of both high pre-ASI and high in-ASI enhance risk stratification in patients with AMI. Early recognizing high pre-ASI may help us make better strategies and improve prognosis for high-risk AMI patients. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Association between admission blood glucose and prognosis in non-diabetic patients with first-ever acute myocardial infarction

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramin Eskandari ◽  
Parisa Matini ◽  
Sepideh Emami ◽  
Yousef Rezaei
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Coronary Syndrome

Abstract Background: Admission hyperglycemia has been associated with major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Methods: In this study we sought to determine the association between admission blood sugar (ABS) and the outcomes of non-diabetic patients with first-ever acute myocardial infarction (MI). Non-diabetic patients with MI were evaluated from March 2016 to March 2019. Baseline characteristics, laboratories, electrocardiogram, and baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were recorded. All patients were followed up and outcomes were obtained. Follow-up data comprised of repeating electrocardiogram and echocardiography at 1 year, and MACCE, including re-MI, stroke, and mortality. Results: A total of 312 patients with a mean age of 54.2 ± 11.9 years were evaluated. All patients were followed up for a median of 38 months. The frequencies of in-hospital mortality and MACCE at late follow-up were higher in third tertile of ABS compared with those in first and second tertiles (both p <0.05). Based on the Cox regression analysis, the independent predictors of MACCE included age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.068, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.033 – 1.105, p <0.001), third tertile of ABS >172 mg/dL (HR 21.257, 95% CI 2.832 – 159.577, p=0.003), and baseline LVEF (HR 0.947, 95% CI 0.901 – 0.995, p=0.031). Conclusion: Admission stress hyperglycemia is associated with increased rates of in-hospital mortality and MACCE at late follow-up in non-diabetic patients with MI. Moreover, elevated ABS, older ages, and a decreased value of baseline LVEF predicted MACCE during follow-up.

scholarly journals Predictors of left ventricular ejection fraction recovery after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Peiro Aventin ◽  
E Gambo Ruberte ◽  
T Simon Paracuellos ◽  
D Gomez Martin ◽  
A Perez Guerrero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Introduction Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has proven benefits in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). A significant proportion of them shows recovery of systolic function Objective To analyse the main baseline, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic characteristics that may predict LVEF recovery after TAVR. Methods A cohort study was conducted. Consecutive patients undergoing TAVR in our center from January 2012 to December 2020 were included. Baseline clinical profile, electrocardiographic (EKG), echocardiographic (ECH) parameters were recorded, as well as MACE during follow-up (major adverse cardiovascular events including: all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident and heart failure hospitalization). Reduced systolic function was defined as LVEF &lt;50%. We considered recovery of systolic function as LVEF ≥50% at follow-up. Results A total of 292 patients were included. 48% were women and the median age was 81.07 years (77.63–86.22). 22.6% (66 patients) had reduced LVEF at baseline. Half of them showed recovered systolic function during follow-up. Patients who did not recovered LVEF had a higher prevalence of dyslipidemia and peripheral artery disease. History of cardiac surgery was more frequently found in this group, and they showed a higher surgical risk estimated by EuroScore II. They had lower LVEF and aortic valve mean gradient, and more frequently presented non-synus rhythm (NSR), left bundle branch block and right ventricular dysfunction (RVD). These characteristics are shown in figure 1. In univariate analysis lower Euroscore II, presence of synus rhythm, absence of LBBB and RVD, as well as higher aortic valve mean gradient were predictors of LVEF recovery. In multivariate analysis RVD and mean aortic gradient were independent predictors. Among all patients included in our study, those presenting with RV dysfunction were significantly associated with lower LVEF mean values (46,0% vs 57,2%; p&lt;0,01) After a median follow-up of 21.3 (8.52–38.94) months, MACE were lower in recovered LVEF group (HR 0.25 95% CI: 0.05–1.21). There were no statistically significant differences in all-cause mortality, nevertheless there was a trend towards a higher non-cardiovascular mortality in this group, essentially at the expense of deaths from malignant neoplasms and SARS-COV-2 infections. Survival curves for MACE are represented in figure 2. Conclusion In our study, half of the patients with impaired ventricular function undergoing TAVR showed recovery of ejection fraction. Right ventricular function and aortic valve mean gradient at baseline were independent predictors of recovery. Identifying predictors of LVEF recovery is fundamental in the evaluation of potential candidates for TAVR, and can help clinicians assess risks and benefits, as well as long-term prognosis of these patients. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Characteristics and analysis Survival curves for MACE

scholarly journals The outcomes of acute myocardial infarction patients comorbidity with hypertension and hyperhomocysteinemia

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jumei Yan ◽  
Jiamin Zhou ◽  
Jun Huang ◽  
Hongyu Zhang ◽  
Zilin Deng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Vital Signs ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Artery Disease

AbstractThis study investigated the outcomes and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) incurred by acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients comorbiding with hypertension and hyperhomocysteinemia (HHcy) during hospitalization and 1-year follow-up. 648 consecutive AMI patients were divided into four categories: (1) hypertension with Hcy ≥ 15 µmol/L; (2) hypertension with Hcy < 15 µmol/L; (3) no-hypertension with Hcy ≥ 15 µmol/L; (4) no-hypertension with Hcy < 15 µmol/L. Information taken from these case files included gender, past medical history, vital signs, laboratory examination, electrocardiogram, coronary angiography, cardiac ultrasound, and medicine treatment. The primary endpoints were duration of coronary care units (CCU) stay, duration of in-hospital stay, and MACEs during follow-up. Our data show that hypertension and HHcy have a synergistic effect in AMI patients, AMI comorbiding with hypertension and HHcy patients had more severe multi-coronary artery disease and more frequent non-culprit coronary lesions complete clogging, had a higher prevalence of pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and significant decreases in the left ventricular ejection fraction. These patients had significant increases in the duration of CCU stay and in-hospital stay, had significant increase in the rate of MACEs, had significant decreases in the survival rate during follow-up.

scholarly journals Antialdosterone in Acute Myocardial Infarction patients: a Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiao Chen ◽  
Zhuqing Li ◽  
Die Zhao ◽  
Jie Sun ◽  
Yiling Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Ventricular Remodeling ◽  
Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Purpose: A comprehensive evaluation of the benefits of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients is lacking. We aimed to summarize the evidence on the efficacy and safety of MRA in post-AMI patients.Methods: Articles were identified through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Ovid (Medline1946-2021) and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from their inception to Dec 31, 2020. Results: MRA reduced the risk of all-cause mortality by 16% (relative ratio(RR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval(CI) (0.76,0.94), P=.002), new or worsening heart failure (HF) 14% (RR 0.86, 95%CI (0.78,0.96), P=.007), death from HF by 22% (RR 0.78, 95%CI (0.62,0.99), P=.04), and cardiovascular death by 16% (RR 0.84, 95%CI (0.74,0.94), P=.003) in post-AMI patients. Meanwhile, all-cause mortality was reduced by 38% (RR 0.62, 95%CI (0.42,0.90), P=.01), 30% (RR 0.70, 95%CI (0.49,1.00), P=.05), and 29% (RR 0.71, 95%CI (0.59,0.86), P=.0004) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients and those who initiated MRA treatment within 3 days and (3,7) days, respectively. Post-AMI patients without left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) treated with MRA improved left ventricular ejection fraction (mean difference[MD] 2.74, 95%CI (2.49,2.99), P<.00001) and reduced left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic volume indices (MD -6.23, 95%CI (-10.93,-1.52), P=.009; MD -3.13, 95%CI (-5.79,-0.47), P=.02). The corresponding RR were 1.73 (95%CI (1.44,2.08), P<.00001) for considered common side effects (hyperkalemia and gynecomastia).Conclusion: Our findings suggest that all-cause mortality is lower in STEMI patients and in patients initiating MRA within 7 days, and that post-AMI patients without LVSD have improved left ventricular remodeling and cardiac function.

scholarly journals ONE-YEAR CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOME IN PATIENTS ON CLOPIDOGREL ANTI-PLATELET THERAPY AFTER ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

2018 ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Dragana Stokanovic ◽  
Valentina N. Nikolic ◽  
Jelena Lilic ◽  
Svetlana R. Apostolovic ◽  
Milan Pavlovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Emergency Care ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Anti Platelet Therapy

The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors in patients on clopidogrel anti-platelet therapy after acute myocardial infarction, for cardiovascular mortality, re-hospitalization and admission to emergency care unit. We followed 175 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy, with clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid, for 1 year after acute myocardial infarction, both STEMI and NSTEMI. Beside demographic and clinical characteristics, genetic ABCB1, CYP2C19 and CYP2C9 profile was analyzed using Cox-regression analysis. End-points used were: mortality, re-hospitalization and emergency care visits, all related to cardiovascular system. During the accrual and follow-up period, 8 patients (4.6%) died, mostly as a direct consequence of an acute myocardial infarction. Re-hospitalization was needed in 27 patients (15.4%), in nine patients (33.3%) with the diagnosis of re-infarction. Thirty-two patients (18.3%) were admitted to emergency care unit due to cardiovascular causes, up to 15 times during the follow-up. NSTEMI was an independent predictor of all three events registered (mortality OR=7.4, p<0.05; re-hospitalization OR=2.8, p<0.05); emergency care visit OR=2.4, p<0.05). Other significant predictors were related to kidney function (urea and creatinine level, creatinine clearance), co-morbidities such as arterial hypertension and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, as well as clopidogrel dosing regimen. As a conclusion, it may be suggested that one of the most significant predictors of cardiovascular events (mortality, re-hospitalization and emergency care visits) is NSTEMI. Besides, clopidogrel administration according to up-to-date guidelines, with high loading doses and initial doubled maintenance doses, improves 1-year prognosis in patients with AMI.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document