scholarly journals A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Inpatient Mortality Associated With Nosocomial and Community COVID-19 Exposes the Vulnerability of Immunosuppressed Adults

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J. Ponsford ◽  
Tom J. C. Ward ◽  
Simon M. Stoneham ◽  
Clare M. Dallimore ◽  
Davina Sham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Relative Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Definition ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Critical Care Admission ◽  
Community Acquired Infection

BackgroundLittle is known about the mortality of hospital-acquired (nosocomial) COVID-19 infection globally. We investigated the risk of mortality and critical care admission in hospitalised adults with nosocomial COVID-19, relative to adults requiring hospitalisation due to community-acquired infection.MethodsWe systematically reviewed the peer-reviewed and pre-print literature from 1/1/2020 to 9/2/2021 without language restriction for studies reporting outcomes of nosocomial and community-acquired COVID-19. We performed a random effects meta-analysis (MA) to estimate the 1) relative risk of death and 2) critical care admission, stratifying studies by patient cohort characteristics and nosocomial case definition.Results21 studies were included in the primary MA, describing 8,251 admissions across 8 countries during the first wave, comprising 1513 probable or definite nosocomial COVID-19, and 6738 community-acquired cases. Across all studies, the risk of mortality was 1.3 times greater in patients with nosocomial infection, compared to community-acquired (95% CI: 1.005 to 1.683). Rates of critical care admission were similar between groups (Relative Risk, RR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.50 to 1.08). Immunosuppressed patients diagnosed with nosocomial COVID-19 were twice as likely to die in hospital as those admitted with community-acquired infection (RR=2.14, 95% CI: 1.76 to 2.61).ConclusionsAdults who acquire SARS-CoV-2 whilst already hospitalised are at greater risk of mortality compared to patients admitted following community-acquired infection; this finding is largely driven by a substantially increased risk of death in individuals with malignancy or who had undergone transplantation. These findings inform public health and infection control policy and argue for individualised clinical interventions to combat the threat of nosocomial COVID-19, particularly for immunosuppressed groups.Systematic Review RegistrationPROSPERO CRD42021249023

scholarly journals A systematic review and meta-analysis of inpatient mortality associated with nosocomial and community COVID-19 exposes the vulnerability of immunosuppressed adults

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J Ponsfonrd ◽  
Tom JC Ward ◽  
Simon Stoneham ◽  
Clare M Dallimore ◽  
Davina Sham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Relative Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Definition ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Critical Care Admission ◽  
Community Acquired Infection

Background: Little is known about the mortality of hospital-acquired (nosocomial) COVID-19 infection globally. We investigated the risk of mortality and critical care admission in hospitalised adults with nosocomial COVID-19, relative to adults requiring hospitalisation due to community-acquired infection. Methods: We systematically reviewed the peer-reviewed and pre-print literature from 1/1/2020 to 9/2/2021 without language restriction for studies reporting outcomes of nosocomial and community-acquired COVID-19. We performed a random effects meta-analysis (MA) to estimate the 1) relative risk of death and 2) critical care admission, stratifying studies by patient cohort characteristics and nosocomial case definition. Results: 21 studies were included in the primary MA, describing 8,246 admissions across 8 countries during the first wave, comprising 1517 probable or definite nosocomial COVID-19, and 6729 community-acquired cases. Across all studies, the risk of mortality was 1.31 times greater in patients with nosocomial infection, compared to community-acquired (95% CI: 1.01 to 1.70). Rates of critical care admission were similar between groups (Relative Risk, RR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.50 to 1.08). Immunosuppressed patients diagnosed with nosocomial COVID-19 were twice as likely to die in hospital as those admitted with community-acquired infection (RR=2.14, 95% CI: 1.76 to 2.61). Conclusions: Adults who acquire SARS-CoV-2 whilst already hospitalised are at greater risk of mortality compared to patients admitted following community-acquired infection; this finding is largely driven by a substantially increased risk of death in individuals with malignancy or who had undergone transplantation. These findings inform public health and infection control policy, and argue for individualised clinical interventions to combat the threat of nosocomial COVID-19, particularly for immunosuppressed groups. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42021249023

scholarly journals Obesity and Mortality Among Patients Diagnosed With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tahmina Nasrin Poly ◽  
Md. Mohaimenul Islam ◽  
Hsuan Chia Yang ◽  
Ming Chin Lin ◽  
Wen-Shan Jian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Risk Ratio ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Epidemiological Studies ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Class Iii Obesity

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has already raised serious concern globally as the number of confirmed or suspected cases have increased rapidly. Epidemiological studies reported that obesity is associated with a higher rate of mortality in patients with COVID-19. Yet, to our knowledge, there is no comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effects of obesity and mortality among patients with COVID-19. We, therefore, aimed to evaluate the effect of obesity, associated comorbidities, and other factors on the risk of death due to COVID-19. We did a systematic search on PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus between January 1, 2020, and August 30, 2020. We followed Cochrane Guidelines to find relevant articles, and two reviewers extracted data from retrieved articles. Disagreement during those stages was resolved by discussion with the main investigator. The random-effects model was used to calculate effect sizes. We included 17 articles with a total of 543,399 patients. Obesity was significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality among patients with COVID-19 (RRadjust: 1.42 (95%CI: 1.24–1.63, p < 0.001). The pooled risk ratio for class I, class II, and class III obesity were 1.27 (95%CI: 1.05–1.54, p = 0.01), 1.56 (95%CI: 1.11–2.19, p < 0.01), and 1.92 (95%CI: 1.50–2.47, p < 0.001), respectively). In subgroup analysis, the pooled risk ratio for the patients with stroke, CPOD, CKD, and diabetes were 1.80 (95%CI: 0.89–3.64, p = 0.10), 1.57 (95%CI: 1.57–1.91, p < 0.001), 1.34 (95%CI: 1.18–1.52, p < 0.001), and 1.19 (1.07–1.32, p = 0.001), respectively. However, patients with obesity who were more than 65 years had a higher risk of mortality (RR: 2.54; 95%CI: 1.62–3.67, p < 0.001). Our study showed that obesity was associated with an increased risk of death from COVID-19, particularly in patients aged more than 65 years. Physicians should aware of these risk factors when dealing with patients with COVID-19 and take early treatment intervention to reduce the mortality of COVID-19 patients.

scholarly journals Renin-angiotensin system blocker and outcomes of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Thorax ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. thoraxjnl-2020-215322
Author(s):  
Hyun Woo Lee ◽  
Chang-Hwan Yoon ◽  
Eun Jin Jang ◽  
Chang-Hoon Lee
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Renin Angiotensin System ◽  
Angiotensin Ii Receptor ◽  
Angiotensin System ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Receptor Blockers

BackgroundThe association of ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) with disease severity of patients with COVID-19 is still unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate if ACEI/ARB use is associated with the risk of mortality and severe disease in patients with COVID-19.MethodsWe searched all available clinical studies that included patients with confirmed COVID-19 who could be classified into an ACEI/ARB group and a non-ACEI/ARB group up until 4 May 2020. A meta-analysis was performed, and primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and severe disease.ResultsACEI/ARB use did not increase the risk of all-cause mortality both in meta-analysis for 11 studies with 12 601 patients reporting ORs (OR=0.52 (95% CI=0.37 to 0.72), moderate certainty of evidence) and in 2 studies with 8577 patients presenting HRs. For 12 848 patients in 13 studies, ACEI/ARB use was not related to an increased risk of severe disease in COVID-19 (OR=0.68 (95% CI=0.44 to 1.07); I2=95%, low certainty of evidence).ConclusionsACEI/ARB therapy was not associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality or severe manifestations in patients with COVID-19. ACEI/ARB therapy can be continued without concern of drug-related worsening in patients with COVID-19.

scholarly journals Sudden death in patients with sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily S. Heilbrunn ◽  
Paddy Ssentongo ◽  
Vernon M. Chinchilli ◽  
Anna E. Ssentongo
Keyword(s):  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sudden Death ◽  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cardiac Mortality ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality

AbstractBackgroundOver 1 billion individuals across the globe experience some form of sleep apnea, and this number is steadily rising. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) can negatively influence one’s quality of life and potentially increase the risk of mortality. However, this association between OSA and mortality has not been comprehensively and thoroughly explored. This meta-analysis was conducted to conclusively estimate the risk of death for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in OSA patients.Study Design4,613 articles from databases including PUBMED, OVID & Joana Briggs, and SCOPUS were comprehensively assessed by two reviewers (AES & ESH) for inclusion criteria. 28 total articles were included, with 22 of them being used for quantitative analysis. Pooled effects of all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and sudden death were calculated by utilizing the metaprop function in R Statistical Software and the random-effects model with appropriate 95% confidence intervals.ResultsAnalysis on 42,032 individuals revealed that those with OSA were twice as likely to die from cardiac mortality compared to those without sleep apnea (HR= 1.94, 95%CI 1.39-2.70). Likewise, individuals with OSA were 1.7 times as likely to die from all-cause sudden death compared to individuals without sleep apnea (HR= 1.74, 95%CI 1.40-2.10). There was a significant dose response relationship between severity of sleep apnea and incidence risk of death, where those with severe sleep apnea wereConclusionsIndividuals with obstructive sleep apnea are at an increased risk for all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality. Further research related to appropriate interventions and treatments are necessary in order to reduce this risk and optimize survival in this population.Key MessagesWhat is the key question?Are individuals with sleep apnea at an increased risk for cardiovascular mortality and sudden death?What is the bottom Line?Sleep apnea is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality and sudden death, with a dose response relationship, where those with severe sleep apnea are at the highest risk of mortality.Why read on?This is the first systematic review and meta-analyses to synthesize and quantify the risk of mortality in those with sleep apnea, highlighting important directions for future research.Prospero Registration IDCRD42020164941

scholarly journals Cleaning products and respiratory health outcomes in occupational cleaners: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. oemed-2020-106776
Author(s):  
Olia Archangelidi ◽  
Sean Sathiyajit ◽  
Dario Consonni ◽  
Debbie Jarvis ◽  
Sara De Matteis
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Relative Risk ◽  
Health Effects ◽  
Respiratory Health ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Atopic Asthma ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Lung Function Decline ◽  
Cleaning Products ◽  
Increased Risk

There is consistent evidence of increased respiratory symptoms in occupational cleaners; however, uncertainty remains on type of respiratory health effects, underlying causal agents, mechanisms and respiratory phenotypes. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and if possible, a meta-analysis of the available literature to characterise and quantify the cleaning-related respiratory health effects. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and included studies that evaluated the association of any respiratory health outcome with exposure to cleaning occupation or products in occupational cleaners. A modified GRADE was used to appraise the quality of included studies. We retrieved 1124 articles, and after applying our inclusion criteria, 39 were selected for the systematic review. We performed a meta-analysis of the 21 studies evaluating asthma which showed a 50% increased pooled relative risk in cleaners (meta-relative risk (RR)=1.50; 95% CI 1.44 to 1.56). Population-based cross-sectional studies showed more stable associations with asthma risk. No evidence of atopic asthma as dominant phenotype emerged. Also, we estimated a 43% increased risk (meta-RR=1.43; 95% CI 1.31 to 1.56) of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Evidence for associations with bronchial-hyper-responsiveness, lung function decline, rhinitis, upper and lower respiratory tract symptoms was weaker. In our systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that working as a cleaner is associated with an increased risk of reversible and even irreversible obstructive airway diseases. All studies lacked quantitative exposure assessment to cleaning products; this would help elucidate underlying causal agents and mechanisms. Exposure control and respiratory surveillance among cleaners is warranted to prevent the associated respiratory health burden. Trial registration number: CRD4201705915.

scholarly journals Pre-existing COPD is associated with an increased risk of mortality and severity in COVID-19: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Golam Rabbani ◽  
Sheikh Mohammad Shariful Islam ◽  
Muhammad Aziz Rahman ◽  
Nuhu Amin ◽  
Bushra Marzan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Increased Risk

Epistaxis Risk Associated with Intranasal Corticosteroid Sprays: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 161 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric L. Wu ◽  
William C. Harris ◽  
Casey M. Babcock ◽  
Bailin H. Alexander ◽  
Charles A. Riley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Relative Risk ◽  
English Language ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Included Study ◽  
Pubmed Central ◽  
Intranasal Corticosteroids ◽  
Language Studies ◽  
Increased Risk

Objective Intranasal corticosteroids (INCSs) are widely utilized for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Epistaxis is a known adverse effect of INCSs, but it is not known if the risk of epistaxis differs among INCSs. Data Sources Systematic review of primary studies identified through Medline, Embase, Web of Science, PubMed Central, and Cochrane databases. Review Methods Systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA standard. English-language studies were queried through February 1, 2018. The search identified randomized controlled trials of INCSs for treatment of allergic rhinitis that reported incidence of epistaxis. An itemized assessment of the risk of bias was conducted for each included study, and meta-analysis was performed of the relative risk of epistaxis for each INCS. Results Of 949 identified studies, 72 met the criteria for analysis. Meta-analysis demonstrated an overall relative risk of epistaxis of 1.48 (95% CI, 1.32-1.67) for all INCSs. The INCSs associated with the highest risk of epistaxis were beclomethasone hydrofluoroalkane, fluticasone furoate, mometasone furoate, and fluticasone propionate. Beclomethasone aqueous, ciclesonide hydrofluoroalkane, and ciclesonide aqueous were associated with the lowest risk of epistaxis. Conclusions about epistaxis with use of budesonide, triamcinolone, and flunisolide are limited due to the low number of studies and high heterogeneity. Conclusions While a differential effect on epistaxis among INCS agents is not clearly demonstrated, this meta-analysis does confirm an increased risk of epistaxis for patients using INCSs as compared with placebo for treatment of allergic rhinitis.

Abstract 17216: Upright T Wave in Lead AVR and Risk of Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
laith A derbas ◽  
Raed Qarajeh ◽  
Anas Noman ◽  
Mohammed Al Amoodi ◽  
Ala Mohsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
T Wave ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Lead Avr

Background: Multiple observational studies have shown that positive T wave in lead AVR (PTAVR) on 12-lead electrocardiogram is associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes including death. We sought to review the literature and conduct a meta-analysis to estimate the risk of mortality in patients with PTAVR. Methods: We searched multiple databases to investigate the association between PTAVR and risk of death. Studies that reported adjusted odds ratio (OR) or hazards ratio (HR) of the association between PTAVR and risk of death (all cause or cardiovascular mortality) were included. We used inverse variance approach to pool adjusted OR /HR and it’s 95 % confidence interval using a random effects model meta-analysis. Results: Out of 140 relevant studies, 17 studies were eligible. Twelve studies reported all-cause mortality and enrolled 4,122 patients, 1976 (47.9%) were males. PTAVR was associated with a significant increase in all-cause mortality, with a pooled adjusted OR 2.44, 95% CI [1.76-3.39], heterogeneity I 2 = 86%. Five studies reported cardiovascular mortality and enrolled 31,713 patients, 27,628 (87.1%) were males. PTAVR was associated with a significant increase in cardiovascular mortality, with a pooled adjusted OR 2.34, 95% CI [1.82-3.0], heterogeneity I 2 = 68%. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that PTAVR is significantly associated with a higher risk of death from any cause as well cardiovascular mortality. Lead AVR, an often neglected lead, should be carefully interpreted as it may provide important prognostic information. Further studies are warranted to examined the prognostic value of PTAVR in risk stratification when added to existing cardiovascular risk scores.

scholarly journals Association of Sex, Age, and Comorbidities with Mortality in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Intervirology ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Mohitosh Biswas ◽  
Shawonur Rahaman ◽  
Tapash Kumar Biswas ◽  
Zahirul Haque ◽  
Baharudin Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Considerable Proportion ◽  
Relative Risks ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
Reduce Risk

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Although severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection is causing mortality in considerable proportion of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) patients, however, evidence for the association of sex, age, and comorbidities on the risk of mortality is not well-aggregated yet. It was aimed to assess the association of sex, age, and comorbidities with mortality in COVID-2019 patients. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Literatures were searched using different keywords in various databases. Relative risks (RRs) were calculated by RevMan software where statistical significance was set as <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05. <b><i>Results:</i></b> COVID-19 male patients were associated with significantly increased risk of mortality compared to females (RR 1.86: 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.67–2.07; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.00001). Patients with age ≥50 years were associated with 15.4-folds significantly increased risk of mortality compared to patients with age &#x3c;50 years (RR 15.44: 95% CI 13.02–18.31; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.00001). Comorbidities were also associated with significantly increased risk of mortality; kidney disease (RR 4.90: 95% CI 3.04–7.88; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.00001), cereborovascular disease (RR 4.78; 95% CI 3.39–6.76; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.00001), cardiovascular disease (RR 3.05: 95% CI 2.20–4.25; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.00001), respiratory disease (RR 2.74: 95% CI 2.04–3.67; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.00001), diabetes (RR 1.97: 95% CI 1.48–2.64; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.00001), hypertension (RR 1.95: 95% CI 1.58–2.40; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.00001), and cancer (RR 1.89; 95% CI 1.25–2.84; <i>p</i> = 0.002) but not liver disease (RR 1.64: 95% CI 0.82–3.28; <i>p</i>= 0.16). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Implementation of adequate protection and interventions for COVID-19 patients in general and in particular male patients with age ≥50 years having comorbidities may significantly reduce risk of mortality associated with COVID-19.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document