scholarly journals Developing Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Pulmonary Complications After Emergency Gastrointestinal Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiong Xue ◽  
Duan Wen ◽  
Mu-Huo Ji ◽  
Jianhua Tong ◽  
Jian-Jun Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
Gastrointestinal Surgery ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Pulmonary Complications ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Diffuse Peritonitis ◽  
Preoperative Albumin

Objective: Investigate whether machine learning can predict pulmonary complications (PPCs) after emergency gastrointestinal surgery in patients with acute diffuse peritonitis.Methods: This is a secondary data analysis study. We use five machine learning algorithms (Logistic regression, DecisionTree, GradientBoosting, Xgbc, and gbm) to predict postoperative pulmonary complications.Results: Nine hundred and twenty-six cases were included in this study; 187 cases (20.19%) had PPCs. The five most important variables for the postoperative weight were preoperative albumin, cholesterol on the 3rd day after surgery, albumin on the day of surgery, platelet count on the 1st day after surgery and cholesterol count on the 1st day after surgery for pulmonary complications. In the test group: the logistic regression model shows AUC = 0.808, accuracy = 0.824 and precision = 0.621; Decision tree shows AUC = 0.702, accuracy = 0.795 and precision = 0.486; The GradientBoosting model shows AUC = 0.788, accuracy = 0.827 and precision = 1.000; The Xgbc model shows AUC = 0.784, accuracy = 0.806 and precision = 0.583. The Gbm model shows AUC = 0.814, accuracy = 0.806 and precision = 0.750.Conclusion: Machine learning algorithms can predict patients' PPCs with acute diffuse peritonitis. Moreover, the results of the importance matrix for the Gbdt algorithm model show that albumin, cholesterol, age, and platelets are the main variables that account for the highest pulmonary complication weights.

scholarly journals Using Nomograms to Predict the PPCs of Patients With Diffuse Peritonitis Undergoing Emergency Gastrointestinal Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiong Xue ◽  
Yu Zhu ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
Jian-Jun Yang ◽  
Cheng-Mao Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Gastrointestinal Surgery ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Pulmonary Complications ◽  
Diffuse Peritonitis ◽  
Lasso Regression ◽  
Physical Status Classification ◽  
Independent Risk Factors ◽  
Auc Value ◽  
Preoperative Albumin

Objective: To develop and validate a nomogram model for predicting postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients with diffuse peritonitis undergoing emergency gastrointestinal surgery.Methods: We used the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model to analyze the independent risk factors for PPCs in patients with diffuse peritonitis who underwent emergency gastrointestinal surgery. Using R, we developed and validated a nomogram model for predicting PPCs in patients with diffuse peritonitis undergoing emergency gastrointestinal surgery.Results: The LASSO regression analysis showed that AGE, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification (ASA), DIAGNOSIS, platelets (on the 3rd day after surgery), cholesterol (on the 3rd day after surgery), ALBUMIN (on the first day after surgery), and preoperative ALBUMIN were independent risk factors for PPCs in patients with diffuse peritonitis undergoing emergency gastrointestinal surgery. The area under the curve (AUC) value of the nomogram model in the training group was 0.8240; its accuracy was 0.7000, and its sensitivity was 0.8658. This demonstrates that the nomogram has a high prediction value. Also in the test group, the AUC value of the model established by the variables AGE, ASA, and platelets (on the 3rd day after surgery), cholesterol (on the 3rd day after surgery), ALBUMIN (on the first day after surgery), and preoperative ALBUMIN was 0.8240; its accuracy was 0.8000; and its specificity was 0.8986. In the validation group, the same results were obtained. The results of the clinical decision curve show that the benefit rate was also high.Conclusion: Based on the risk factors AGE, ASA, DIAGNOSIS, platelets (on the 3rd day after surgery), cholesterol (on the 3rd day after surgery), ALBUMIN (on the first day after surgery), and preoperative ALBUMIN, the nomogram model established in this study for predicting PPCs in patients with diffuse peritonitis undergoing emergency gastrointestinal surgery has high accuracy and discrimination.

scholarly journals A machine learning-based predictor for the identification of the recurrence of patients with gastric cancer after operation

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengmao Zhou ◽  
Junhong Hu ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
Mu-Huo Ji ◽  
Jianhua Tong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Predictive Performance ◽  
Original Data ◽  
Postoperative Recurrence ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

AbstractTo explore the predictive performance of machine learning on the recurrence of patients with gastric cancer after the operation. The available data is divided into two parts. In particular, the first part is used as a training set (such as 80% of the original data), and the second part is used as a test set (the remaining 20% of the data). And we use fivefold cross-validation. The weight of recurrence factors shows the top four factors are BMI, Operation time, WGT and age in order. In training group:among the 5 machine learning models, the accuracy of gbm was 0.891, followed by gbm algorithm was 0.876; The AUC values of the five machine learning algorithms are from high to low as forest (0.962), gbm (0.922), GradientBoosting (0.898), DecisionTree (0.790) and Logistic (0.748). And the precision of the forest is the highest 0.957, followed by the GradientBoosting algorithm (0.878). At the same time, in the test group is as follows: the highest accuracy of Logistic was 0.801, followed by forest algorithm and gbm; the AUC values of the five algorithms are forest (0.795), GradientBoosting (0.774), DecisionTree (0.773), Logistic (0.771) and gbm (0.771), from high to low. Among the five machine learning algorithms, the highest precision rate of Logistic is 1.000, followed by the gbm (0.487). Machine learning can predict the recurrence of gastric cancer patients after an operation. Besides, the first four factors affecting postoperative recurrence of gastric cancer were BMI, Operation time, WGT and age.

scholarly journals Predicting hospitalization following psychiatric crisis care using machine learning

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthijs Blankers ◽  
Louk F. M. van der Post ◽  
Jack J. M. Dekker
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
Nearest Neighbors ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Gradient Boosting ◽  
Ensemble Model ◽  
K Nearest Neighbors ◽  
Crisis Care

Abstract Background Accurate prediction models for whether patients on the verge of a psychiatric criseis need hospitalization are lacking and machine learning methods may help improve the accuracy of psychiatric hospitalization prediction models. In this paper we evaluate the accuracy of ten machine learning algorithms, including the generalized linear model (GLM/logistic regression) to predict psychiatric hospitalization in the first 12 months after a psychiatric crisis care contact. We also evaluate an ensemble model to optimize the accuracy and we explore individual predictors of hospitalization. Methods Data from 2084 patients included in the longitudinal Amsterdam Study of Acute Psychiatry with at least one reported psychiatric crisis care contact were included. Target variable for the prediction models was whether the patient was hospitalized in the 12 months following inclusion. The predictive power of 39 variables related to patients’ socio-demographics, clinical characteristics and previous mental health care contacts was evaluated. The accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the machine learning algorithms were compared and we also estimated the relative importance of each predictor variable. The best and least performing algorithms were compared with GLM/logistic regression using net reclassification improvement analysis and the five best performing algorithms were combined in an ensemble model using stacking. Results All models performed above chance level. We found Gradient Boosting to be the best performing algorithm (AUC = 0.774) and K-Nearest Neighbors to be the least performing (AUC = 0.702). The performance of GLM/logistic regression (AUC = 0.76) was slightly above average among the tested algorithms. In a Net Reclassification Improvement analysis Gradient Boosting outperformed GLM/logistic regression by 2.9% and K-Nearest Neighbors by 11.3%. GLM/logistic regression outperformed K-Nearest Neighbors by 8.7%. Nine of the top-10 most important predictor variables were related to previous mental health care use. Conclusions Gradient Boosting led to the highest predictive accuracy and AUC while GLM/logistic regression performed average among the tested algorithms. Although statistically significant, the magnitude of the differences between the machine learning algorithms was in most cases modest. The results show that a predictive accuracy similar to the best performing model can be achieved when combining multiple algorithms in an ensemble model.

scholarly journals Predicting Hospitalization following Psychiatric Crisis Care using Machine Learning

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthijs Blankers ◽  
Louk F. M. van der Post ◽  
Jack J. M. Dekker
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
Nearest Neighbors ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Predictor Variables ◽  
Gradient Boosting ◽  
K Nearest Neighbors ◽  
Psychiatric Crisis ◽  
Crisis Care

Abstract Background: It is difficult to accurately predict whether a patient on the verge of a potential psychiatric crisis will need to be hospitalized. Machine learning may be helpful to improve the accuracy of psychiatric hospitalization prediction models. In this paper we evaluate and compare the accuracy of ten machine learning algorithms including the commonly used generalized linear model (GLM/logistic regression) to predict psychiatric hospitalization in the first 12 months after a psychiatric crisis care contact, and explore the most important predictor variables of hospitalization. Methods: Data from 2,084 patients with at least one reported psychiatric crisis care contact included in the longitudinal Amsterdam Study of Acute Psychiatry were used. The accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the machine learning algorithms were compared. We also estimated the relative importance of each predictor variable. The best and least performing algorithms were compared with GLM/logistic regression using net reclassification improvement analysis. Target variable for the prediction models was whether or not the patient was hospitalized in the 12 months following inclusion in the study. The 39 predictor variables were related to patients’ socio-demographics, clinical characteristics and previous mental health care contacts. Results: We found Gradient Boosting to perform the best (AUC=0.774) and K-Nearest Neighbors performing the least (AUC=0.702). The performance of GLM/logistic regression (AUC=0.76) was above average among the tested algorithms. Gradient Boosting outperformed GLM/logistic regression and K-Nearest Neighbors, and GLM outperformed K-Nearest Neighbors in a Net Reclassification Improvement analysis, although the differences between Gradient Boosting and GLM/logistic regression were small. Nine of the top-10 most important predictor variables were related to previous mental health care use. Conclusions: Gradient Boosting led to the highest predictive accuracy and AUC while GLM/logistic regression performed average among the tested algorithms. Although statistically significant, the magnitude of the differences between the machine learning algorithms was modest. Future studies may consider to combine multiple algorithms in an ensemble model for optimal performance and to mitigate the risk of choosing suboptimal performing algorithms.

scholarly journals Predicting the Risk of Hypertension Based on Several Easy-to-Collect Risk Factors: A Machine Learning Method

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huanhuan Zhao ◽  
Xiaoyu Zhang ◽  
Yang Xu ◽  
Lisheng Gao ◽  
Zuchang Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Risk Prediction ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Hypertension Risk ◽  
Model Training

Hypertension is a widespread chronic disease. Risk prediction of hypertension is an intervention that contributes to the early prevention and management of hypertension. The implementation of such intervention requires an effective and easy-to-implement hypertension risk prediction model. This study evaluated and compared the performance of four machine learning algorithms on predicting the risk of hypertension based on easy-to-collect risk factors. A dataset of 29,700 samples collected through a physical examination was used for model training and testing. Firstly, we identified easy-to-collect risk factors of hypertension, through univariate logistic regression analysis. Then, based on the selected features, 10-fold cross-validation was utilized to optimize four models, random forest (RF), CatBoost, MLP neural network and logistic regression (LR), to find the best hyper-parameters on the training set. Finally, the performance of models was evaluated by AUC, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity on the test set. The experimental results showed that the RF model outperformed the other three models, and achieved an AUC of 0.92, an accuracy of 0.82, a sensitivity of 0.83 and a specificity of 0.81. In addition, Body Mass Index (BMI), age, family history and waist circumference (WC) are the four primary risk factors of hypertension. These findings reveal that it is feasible to use machine learning algorithms, especially RF, to predict hypertension risk without clinical or genetic data. The technique can provide a non-invasive and economical way for the prevention and management of hypertension in a large population.

scholarly journals Deep Learning Technique to Predict Heart Disease using IoT Based ECG Data

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 2559-2562
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Rule Based ◽  
Learning Techniques ◽  
Learning Technique ◽  
Logistic Regression Algorithm ◽  
Target Output

Scientific Knowledge and Electronic devices are growing day by day. In this aspect, many expert systems are involved in the healthcare industry using machine learning algorithms. Deep neural networks beat the machine learning techniques and often take raw data i.e., unrefined data to calculate the target output. Deep learning or feature learning is used to focus on features which is very important and gives a complete understanding of the model generated. Existing methodology used data mining technique like rule based classification algorithm and machine learning algorithm like hybrid logistic regression algorithm to preprocess data and extract meaningful insights of data. This is, however a supervised data. The proposed work is based on unsupervised data that is there is no labelled data and deep neural techniques is deployed to get the target output. Machine learning algorithms are compared with proposed deep learning techniques using TensorFlow and Keras in the aspect of accuracy. Deep learning methodology outfits the existing rule based classification and hybrid logistic regression algorithm in terms of accuracy. The designed methodology is tested on the public MIT-BIH arrhythmia database, classifying four kinds of abnormal beats. The proposed approach based on deep learning technique offered a better performance, improving the results when compared to machine learning approaches of the state-of-the-art

scholarly journals Machine Learning Algorithms Using Logistic Regression for Predicting Neurosurgical Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nida Fatima
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Predictive Model ◽  
Web Application ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Brier Score ◽  
Patient Counselling ◽  
Selection Of Variables

Abstract Background: Preoperative prognostication of clinical and surgical outcome in patients with neurosurgical diseases can improve the risk stratification, thus can guide in implementing targeted treatment to minimize these events. Therefore, the author aims to highlight the development and validation of predictive models determining neurosurgical outcomes through machine learning algorithms using logistic regression.Methods: Logistic regression (enter, backward and forward) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method for selection of variables from selected database can eventually lead to multiple candidate models. The final model with a set of predictive variables must be selected based upon the clinical knowledge and numerical results.Results: The predictive model which performed best on the discrimination, calibration, Brier score and decision curve analysis must be selected to develop machine learning algorithms. Logistic regression should be compared with the LASSO model. Usually for the big databases, the predictive model selected through logistic regression gives higher Area Under the Curve (AUC) than those with LASSO model. The predictive probability derived from the best model could be uploaded to an open access web application which is easily deployed by the patients and surgeons to make a risk assessment world-wide.Conclusions: Machine learning algorithms provide promising results for the prediction of outcomes following cranial and spinal surgery. These algorithms can provide useful factors for patient-counselling, assessing peri-operative risk factors, and predicting post-operative outcomes after neurosurgery.

scholarly journals Comparative analysis of multiple classification models to improve PM10 prediction performance

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 2500
Author(s):  
Yong-Jin Jung ◽  
Kyoung-Woo Cho ◽  
Jong-Sung Lee ◽  
Chang-Heon Oh
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Particulate Matter ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Occurrence Rate ◽  
Classification Models ◽  
Comparison Results ◽  
Multiple Classification

With the increasing requirement of high accuracy for particulate matter prediction, various attempts have been made to improve prediction accuracy by applying machine learning algorithms. However, the characteristics of particulate matter and the problem of the occurrence rate by concentration make it difficult to train prediction models, resulting in poor prediction. In order to solve this problem, in this paper, we proposed multiple classification models for predicting particulate matter concentrations required for prediction by dividing them into AQI-based classes. We designed multiple classification models using logistic regression, decision tree, SVM and ensemble among the various machine learning algorithms. The comparison results of the performance of the four classification models through error matrices confirmed the f-score of 0.82 or higher for all the models other than the logistic regression model.

scholarly journals Machine learning in the diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M J Espinosa Pascual ◽  
P Vaquero Martinez ◽  
V Vaquero Martinez ◽  
J Lopez Pais ◽  
B Izquierdo Coronel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Random Forest ◽  
Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Classification Model ◽  
Support Vector

Abstract Introduction Out of all patients admitted with Myocardial Infarction, 10 to 15% have Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronaries Arteries (MINOCA). Classification algorithms based on deep learning substantially exceed traditional diagnostic algorithms. Therefore, numerous machine learning models have been proposed as useful tools for the detection of various pathologies, but to date no study has proposed a diagnostic algorithm for MINOCA. Purpose The aim of this study was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of several automated learning algorithms (Support-Vector Machine [SVM], Random Forest [RF] and Logistic Regression [LR]) to discriminate between people suffering from MINOCA from those with Myocardial Infarction with Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (MICAD) at the time of admission and before performing a coronary angiography, whether invasive or not. Methods A Diagnostic Test Evaluation study was carried out applying the proposed algorithms to a database constituted by 553 consecutive patients admitted to our Hospital with Myocardial Infarction. According to the definitions of 2016 ESC Position Paper on MINOCA, patients were classified into two groups: MICAD and MINOCA. Out of the total 553 patients, 214 were discarded due to the lack of complete data. The set of machine learning algorithms was trained on 244 patients (training sample: 75%) and tested on 80 patients (test sample: 25%). A total of 64 variables were available for each patient, including demographic, clinical and laboratorial features before the angiographic procedure. Finally, the diagnostic precision of each architecture was taken. Results The most accurate classification model was the Random Forest algorithm (Specificity [Sp] 0.88, Sensitivity [Se] 0.57, Negative Predictive Value [NPV] 0.93, Area Under the Curve [AUC] 0.85 [CI 0.83–0.88]) followed by the standard Logistic Regression (Sp 0.76, Se 0.57, NPV 0.92 AUC 0.74 and Support-Vector Machine (Sp 0.84, Se 0.38, NPV 0.90, AUC 0.78) (see graph). The variables that contributed the most in order to discriminate a MINOCA from a MICAD were the traditional cardiovascular risk factors, biomarkers of myocardial injury, hemoglobin and gender. Results were similar when the 19 patients with Takotsubo syndrome were excluded from the analysis. Conclusion A prediction system for diagnosing MINOCA before performing coronary angiographies was developed using machine learning algorithms. Results show higher accuracy of diagnosing MINOCA than conventional statistical methods. This study supports the potential of machine learning algorithms in clinical cardiology. However, further studies are required in order to validate our results. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. ROC curves of different algorithms

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document