Prognostic Value of Pre-Treatment Prognostic Nutritional Index in Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract Background In recent years, the role of pre-treatment C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) in prognosis of esophageal cancer (EC) has been investigated by several studies. This meta-analysis aimed to provide a more accurate and objective assessment of the prognostic value of pre-treatment CAR in EC. Methods Studies assessing the role of pre-treatment CAR in prognosis of EC were searched from PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library (last update by April 16, 2019). The hazard ratios (HRs) of CAR and the corresponding 95% CIs for overall survival (OS) or cancer-specific survival (CSS) in EC were extracted for pooled analysis. Results A total of eight observational studies including 2255 patients were collected. The pooled analysis showed that high CAR was related to worse OS in EC (pooled HR = 1.81; 95% CI = 1.40–2.35; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that the negative correlation between the CAR and OS was consistently demonstrated in subgroups stratified by country, pathological type, and cut-off value (P < 0.05). However, there was no relation between CAR and OS in subgroup of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy at a proportion of 100% (HR = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.56–2.69; P = 0.715). In addition, high CAR was also related to worse CSS in EC (pooled HR = 2.61; 95% CI = 1.67–4.06; P < 0.001). Conclusions High pre-treatment CAR was an adverse prognostic factor for EC patients. More large-sample clinical trials are still needed to verify the prognostic value of pre-treatment CAR in EC.

Download Full-text

Prognostic nutritional index and the prognosis of diffuse large b-cell lymphoma: a meta-analysis

Cancer Cell International ◽

10.1186/s12935-020-01535-x ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 20 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Chunyan Luan ◽

Fei Wang ◽

Ning Wei ◽

Baoan Chen

Keyword(s):

B Cell ◽

Prognostic Value ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Prognostic Nutritional Index ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Nutritional Index ◽

Large B Cell

Abstract Background Some studies have investigated the prognostic value exhibited by the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in patients suffering diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but varying results were obtained. In order to determine the specific prognostic value more accurately, a meta-analysis was conducted in this study. Methods Literatures were searched from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to assess the association between PNI and the overall survival (OS) and the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with DLBCL. Results Based on seven studies with a total number of 1311 patients, our meta-analysis revealed that low PNI may meant poor OS (HR = 2.14, 95% CI 1.66–2.75, p < 0.001) and poor PFS (HR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.36–2.25, p = 0.438). Subgroup analysis showed that, in Asians, low PNI was correlated to poor OS (pooled HR = 2.06 95% CI 1.59–2.66) and poor PFS (pooled HR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.28–2.15). Similar results were obtained from one European study, which is the only study performed outside of Asia from our literature search. Conclusion For patients with DLBCL, low PNI may be interpreted as adverse prognosis. More data from European patients are required in this study to avoid analysis bias.

Download Full-text

Prognostic Significance of the Preoperative Prognostic Nutritional Index in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies

10.21203/rs.2.20066/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Ting-Ting Gong ◽

Jia-Yu Zhang ◽

Hui Sun ◽

Qi-Jun Wu ◽

Song Gao

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Ovarian Cancer ◽

Cohort Studies ◽

Publication Bias ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Prognostic Significance ◽

Prognostic Nutritional Index ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Poor Overall Survival ◽

Nutritional Index

Abstract BackgroundThe main aim of this study was to validate the potential association between the preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and survival of patients with ovarian cancer (OC).MethodsWe systematically searched multiple databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science) for publications up to June 30, 2019, to identify observational studies evaluating the PNI in relation to survival. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the quality of each study using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Summary hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated with the aid of a random-effects model. The potential for publication bias was explored using Funnel plots as well as Begg’s and Egger’s tests.ResultsAmong the 15,000 studies selected for selection, 5 retrospective cohort studies (4 from China and one from Japan) comprising 1964 OC patients met the inclusion criteria. All studies were graded as ‘low risk of bias’ according to NOS. A low preoperative PNI was associated with poor overall survival (HR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.16–2.46; I2 = 83.8%) and progression-free survival (HR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.39–2.51; I2 = 29.7%) of OC patients. No significant publication bias was detected.ConclusionsCollective data from the present systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that a low preoperative PNI is associated with poor survival in OC. Further prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.

Download Full-text