scholarly journals Management of Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Breast: A Single-Institution Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenxiang Zhang ◽  
Yi Fang ◽  
Zhihui Zhang ◽  
Jing Wang
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Clinical Presentation ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Adenoid Cystic

ObjectiveThe purpose of our study was to analyze the clinicopathologic features and surgical and oncological outcomes of adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the breast and to provide the basis for a clinical therapeutic schedule.MethodsA total of 14 patients with primary breast adenoid cystic carcinoma treated at Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 2000 to December 2017 were included. Data on clinical presentation, treatment strategy, and outcome, as well as the pathological features of ACC, were reviewed and analyzed.ResultsFourteen patients were diagnosed with ACC of the breast, out of 23205 total patients treated for breast cancer (0.06%). All but three patients were postmenopausal, with a median age at diagnosis of 60.5 years (range, 39–73 years). The most common clinical presentation was a palpable mass (85.7%), and the imaging characteristics of all patients on color Doppler ultrasound and mammography were nonspecific. Six patients (42.9%) were suspected of having ACC by fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and were confirmed by postoperative histology and immunohistochemistry. All 14 patients underwent surgery, and no patient had a positive lymph node status. Median tumor size was 1.75 cm (range, 1–3 cm). Eight/14 (57.1%) patients were hormone receptor negative (HR−) and HER-2/neu (−) (HER2−). The remaining patients were hormone receptor positive (HR+). There was no significant difference in clinicopathological characteristics between the HR+ group and the HR- group (P>0.05). The mean follow-up period was 57 months. Local recurrence occurred in 14.3% of patients, 1.7% of patients had distant metastasis, all patients with local recurrence or distant metastasis were in the HR (-) group, and all patients were alive at the last follow-up.ConclusionACC of the breast cannot be simply summarized as triple-negative breast cancer because it also includes a small number of hormone receptor-positive breast cancers. Establishing a preoperative diagnosis is difficult on the basis of clinical imaging examination, FNAC may be useful tool in the diagnosis. the final diagnosis can only be assessed based on the results of the histopathological and immunohistochemical examination. Breast-conserving surgery may be an alternative treatment strategy, and axillary lymph node dissection or sentinel node biopsy may not be necessary in some cases.

Final analysis of the PROMISE-GIM6 phase III trial assessing GnRH agonist use during chemotherapy as a strategy to preserve ovarian function in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 516-516
Author(s):  
Matteo Lambertini ◽  
Luca Boni ◽  
Andrea Michelotti ◽  
Emanuela Magnolfi ◽  
Alessio Aligi Cogoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Ovarian Function ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Premenopausal Patients

516 Background: Current guidelines recommend GnRH agonist (GnRHa) use during chemotherapy (CT) as a strategy to reduce the risk of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer (EBC). However, no long-term safety data are available raising some concerns on concurrent use of GnRHa during CT in patients with hormone receptor-positive disease. In addition, there is no evidence on the protective role of this strategy in patients with germline BRCA mutations ( mBRCA). Here, we report the final analysis of the PROMISE-GIM6 phase III randomized study, the largest trial addressing the role of GnRHa use during CT in premenopausal EBC patients (Del Mastro et al, JAMA 2011 & Lambertini et al, JAMA 2015). Methods: From October 2003 to January 2008, 281 premenopausal patients aged 18 to 45 years with stage I-III EBC candidates for (neo)adjuvant CT were randomized to receive CT alone or combined with the GnRHa triptorelin. Primary endpoint was incidence of CT-induced POI (defined as amenorrhea and post-menopausal FSH/estradiol levels 1 year following CT). This final analysis reports on post-treatment pregnancies, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). An exploratory descriptive analysis in mBRCA patients is also reported. (ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT00311636) Results: Of the 281 randomized patients (CT+GnRHa arm = 148; CT alone arm = 133), 80% had hormone receptor-positive disease. At the time of this final analysis, 38 (13.5%) patients were lost to follow-up. Median follow-up was 12.4 years (IQR: 11.3-13.2 years). In the CT+GnRHa and CT alone arms, respectively, 9 (10-year cumulative incidence of pregnancy 6.5%, 95% CI 3.5%-12.3%) and 4 (10-year cumulative incidence of pregnancy 3.2%, 95% CI 1.2%-8.3%) patients had a post-treatment pregnancy (HR 2.14, 95% CI 0.66-6.92). No differences in 10-year DFS (72.4% in CT+GnRHa arm vs. 71.2% in CT alone arm: HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.76-1.77) nor in 10-year OS (82.0% in CT+GnRHa arm vs. 85.9% in CT alone arm: HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.67-2.03) were observed. There was no interaction between treatment effect and hormone receptor status. In patients with hormone receptor-positive disease, HR was 1.02 (95% CI 0.63-1.63) for DFS and 1.12 (95% CI 0.59-2.11) for OS. Out of 43 patients tested for BRCA, overall incidence of POI, irrespective of treatment arm, was 20% in mBRCA patients (n = 10) and 12% in patients without mBRCA (n = 33). In mBRCA patients, incidence of POI was 0% and 33% in the CT+GnRHa and CT alone arms, respectively. One post-treatment pregnancy was described in a patient with mBRCA1 in the CT alone arm. Conclusions: The final analysis of the PROMISE-GIM6 trial at a median follow-up of 12.4 years provides reassuring evidence on the safety of GnRHa use during CT as a strategy to preserve ovarian function in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive EBC. Clinical trial information: NCT00311636.

Similar Efficacy for Ovarian Ablation Compared With Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil: From a Randomized Comparison of Premenopausal Patients With Node-Positive, Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (31) ◽  
pp. 4956-4962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bent Ejlertsen ◽  
Henning T. Mouridsen ◽  
Maj-Britt Jensen ◽  
Nils-Olof Bengtsson ◽  
Jonas Bergh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Ovarian Ablation ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

Purpose To compare the efficacy of ovarian ablation versus chemotherapy in early breast cancer patients with hormone receptor–positive disease. Patients and Methods We conducted an open, randomized, multicenter trial including premenopausal breast cancer patients with hormone receptor–positive tumors and either axillary lymph node metastases or tumors with a size of 5 cm or more. Patients were randomly assigned to ovarian ablation by irradiation or to nine courses of chemotherapy with intravenous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) administered every 3 weeks. Results Between 1990 and May 1998, 762 patients were randomly assigned, and the present analysis is based on 358 first events. After a median follow-up time of 8.5 years, the unadjusted hazard ratio for disease-free survival in the ovarian ablation group compared with the CMF group was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.81 to 1.22). After a median follow-up time of 10.5 years, overall survival (OS) was similar in the two groups, with a hazard ratio of 1.11 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.42) for the ovarian ablation group compared with the CMF group. Conclusion In this study, ablation of ovarian function in premenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer had a similar effect to CMF on disease-free and OS. No significant interactions were demonstrated between treatment modality and hormone receptor content, age, or any of the well-known prognostic factors.

scholarly journals Surgical management of urachal tumors: Can the umbilicus be sparred in localized disease?

Rare Tumors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 203636131984728
Author(s):  
Cristian Pavelescu ◽  
Alexandra Pavelescu ◽  
Cristian Surcel ◽  
Cristian Mirvald ◽  
Mario Alvarez-Maestro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Node ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Lymph Node Involvement ◽  
Partial Cystectomy ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Node Involvement ◽  
Urachal Adenocarcinoma

Urachal adenocarcinoma represents the third most common histological type of non-urotelial bladder cancer. A very low incidence of this disease and the lack of prospective studies have led to a rich and heterogeneous treatment history. Currently, the standard of care for these patients is represented by partial cystectomy en bloc with resection of the urachal ligament and total omphalectomy. The aim of this article is to present our experience and results in the management of patients with urachal adenocarcinoma. Between 2005 and 2015, 16 patients have undergone surgical treatment for urachal adenocarcinoma in “Fundeni” Clinical Institute and Madrid University Hospital “Infanta Sofia.” Partial cystectomy was performed in 11 (68.76%) patients, while radical cystectomy en bloc with omphalectomy was performed in 5 (31.25%) patients, which were not amendable to a limited resection. The Sheldon classification was used, as it provides appropriate disease staging and is the most commonly utilized. Postoperative pathological results showed that 7 (43.75%) patients had localized tumors, and more than one-third (37.5%) of the patients had locally advanced Sheldon III disease, while 3 patients had distant metastasis at the time of surgery. Lymph node involvement was present in 3 patients (18.75%). Mean follow-up time was 2.5 years, ranging from 4 months to 7.6 years. Three patients (18.75%) were lost to follow-up, without any documented signs of local or systemic recurrence and were cancer free at the time of the last evaluation. In cases with lymph node involvement, local recurrence or distant metastasis, patients underwent cisplatin- or 5-fluorouracil-based salvage chemotherapy. Surgical treatment represents the gold standard, while adjuvant chemotherapy has a limited impact on overall survival. The utility of navel resection is questionable due to the rarity of direct invasion or local recurrence.

Impact of obesity in postmenopausal early breast cancer patients receiving frontline adjuvant aromatase inhibitors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11020-e11020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ugur Sahin ◽  
Ibrahim Petekkaya ◽  
Cagatay Arslan ◽  
Saim Furkan Sarici ◽  
Mustafa Solak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Aromatase Inhibitors ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Postmenopausal Breast Cancer ◽  
Type I ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Significant Difference

e11020 Background: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs), anastrozole (ANA) and letrozole (LET), have been shown to be more effective than tamoxifen in the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal hormone receptor positive breast cancer. However, data from preclinical studies and subgroup analyses of some major clinical trials suggest differring efficacy among AIs. Yet the best clinical choice is still not very clear. This retrospective study aims at comparing the results of treatment with either AI among different subgroups of patients, especially among the obese patients. Methods: Between 2006-2011, 335 women with stage I to IIIC hormone receptor positive postmenopausal breast cancer treated with either ANA or LET as adjuvant treatment were included. Body mass index (BMI), estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER and PR) and HER-2 status at the time of diagnosis were recorded. Patients were grouped as BMI ≤ 30 and BMI > 30. The Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated. Subgroups were compared with the log rank test. A 5 % type-I error was used to infer statistical significance. Results: The percentage of patients receiving ANA or LET were 47.2% and 57.8%, respectively. Median age at diagnosis was 58 (42-84) and lower in the ANA group (p=0.04). Stage II to IIIC disease was present in 76.8 % and the distribution was similar between ANA and LET (p=0.84). Median time of follow-up was 29 months (6-124) and median duration of hormonotherapy was 29 months (3-68) and similar between two groups (p=0.52 and p=0.55, respectively). Of the patients 41.2 % had a BMI of > 30. There was no significant difference in overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survivals between ANA and LET (p=0.08 and p=0.94, respectively). However, among patients with a BMI of > 30 a statistically insignificant benefit in PFS was observed with LET (p=0.1). ER, PR and HER2 status had no significant impact on OS and PFS. Conclusions: In a median follow-up of 29 months letrozole and anastrozole yielded similar OS and PFS. However, among patients with a BMI of > 30, LET might bring about a PFS advantage. In selected obese patients LET might be a reasonable choice in this setting. Larger studies with long term follow-up are needed to reach an exact conclusion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document