Retrospective Study on the Application of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Measures to Promote Postoperative Rehabilitation in 50 Patients With Brain Tumor Undergoing Craniotomy

ObjectiveTo investigate whether enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) can promote rehabilitation of patients after neurosurgical craniotomy.MethodsThe clinical data of 100 patients with brain tumor undergoing craniotomy in the Department of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, from January 2018 to August 2020 were collected, including 50 patients in the ERAS group and 50 patients in the control group. t-Test, Wilcoxon’s rank sum test, and chi-square analysis were used to compare the clinical characteristics, prognosis, and hospitalization time between the two groups.ResultsThere was no significant difference in gender, age, and other general clinical data between the two groups (p > 0.05). The days of antiemetic drugs applied in the ERAS group were less than those in the control group (1.00 vs. 2.00 days, p = 0.003), and the proportion of patients requiring analgesics was lower than that of the control group (30% vs. 52%, OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.18–0.93, p = 0.031). The time of urinary catheter removal and that of patients starting ambulation in the ERAS group were shorter than those in the control group (16.00 vs. 24.00 h, and 1.00 vs. 2.00 days, p < 0.001, respectively); and the hospital length of stay (LOS) in the ERAS group was shorter than that in the control group (Total LOS, 13.00 vs. 15.50 days; Postoperative LOS, 7.00 vs. 10.00 days, p < 0.001). By analyzing the prognosis of patients in the ERAS group and control group, we found that there was no significant difference in postoperative complications and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score 1 month after operation between the two groups.ConclusionThe application of ERAS in craniotomy can accelerate the postoperative recovery of patients without increasing the perioperative risk, which is worthy of wide application. However, whether the ERAS measures can reduce the postoperative complications and improve the prognosis of patients still needs more large-scale case validation and multicenter collaborative study.

Download Full-text

Impact of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery with Preoperative Whey Protein-Infused Carbohydrate Loading and Postoperative Early Oral Feeding among Surgical Gynecologic Cancer Patients: An Open-Labelled Randomized Controlled Trial

Nutrients ◽

10.3390/nu12010264 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 12 (1) ◽

pp. 264 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Ho Chiou Yi ◽

Zuriati Ibrahim ◽

Zalina Abu Zaid ◽

Zulfitri ‘Azuan Mat Daud ◽

Nor Baizura Md. Yusop ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Whey Protein ◽

Enhanced Recovery ◽

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽

Gynecologic Cancer ◽

Intervention Group ◽

Oral Feeding ◽

Control Group ◽

Early Oral Feeding ◽

Significant Difference ◽

The Impact

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) with sole carbohydrate (CHO) loading and postoperative early oral feeding (POEOF) shortened the length of postoperative (PO) hospital stays (LPOHS) without increasing complications. This study aimed to examine the impact of ERAS with preoperative whey protein-infused CHO loading and POEOF among surgical gynecologic cancer (GC) patients. There were 62 subjects in the intervention group (CHO-P), which received preoperative whey protein-infused CHO loading and POEOF; and 56 subjects formed the control group (CO), which was given usual care. The mean age was 49.5 ± 12.2 years (CHO-P) and 51.2 ± 11.9 years (CO). The trial found significant positive results which included shorter LPOHS (78.13 ± 33.05 vs. 99.49 ± 22.54 h); a lower readmission rate within one month PO (6% vs. 16%); lower weight loss (−0.3 ± 2.3 kg vs. −2.1 ± 2.3 kg); a lower C-reactive protein–albumin ratio (0.3 ± 1.2 vs. 1.1 ± 2.6); preserved muscle mass (0.4 ± 1.7 kg vs. −0.7 ± 2.6 kg); and better handgrip strength (0.6 ± 4.3 kg vs. −1.9 ± 4.7 kg) among CHO-P as compared with CO. However, there was no significant difference in mid-upper arm circumference and serum albumin level upon discharge. ERAS with preoperative whey protein-infused CHO loading and POEOF assured better PO outcomes.

Download Full-text

Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy Based on the Concept of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery

10.21203/rs.3.rs-273736/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Ling Shu ◽

Ping Ao ◽

Zhenxing Zhang ◽

Dong Zhuo ◽

Changbin Dong ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Postoperative Complications ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Operative Time ◽

Enhanced Recovery ◽

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽

Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽

Control Group ◽

Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy ◽

Total Cost ◽

Stone Removal

Abstract Background: To evaluate the efficacy of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURSL) based on the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS).Methods: 435 patients with upper urinary calculi between 2017-2020 were retrospectively analysed and assigned to ERAS group (ERAS management) and control group (traditional management). Operative time, postoperative ambulation time, postoperative hospital stay, total cost of hospitalization, postoperative complications and stone removal were compared. Results: 427 cases were successfully performed FURSL procedure with 4 cases of ERAS group (n = 216) and 4 cases of control group (n = 219) failed respectively. No postoperative complications occurred in either group except for fever and hematuria. There were no significant difference in postoperative fever and stone removal between the two groups (all p > 0.05). The patients in ERAS group had shorter operative time, shorter postoperative ambulation time, less postoperative severe hematuria, shorter postoperative hospital stay and lower total cost of hospitalization than those in control group (all p < 0.05).Conclusions: FURSL based on the concept of ERAS for the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi is safe and reliable, with rapid postoperative recovery, low cost of hospitalization and worthy of clinical promotion.

Download Full-text

Safety and efficacy of a novel neurosurgical enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for elective craniotomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Journal of Neurosurgery ◽

10.3171/2018.1.jns171552 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 130 (5) ◽

pp. 1680-1691 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Yuan Wang ◽

Bolin Liu ◽

Tianzhi Zhao ◽

Binfang Zhao ◽

Daihua Yu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Perioperative Management ◽

Enhanced Recovery ◽

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽

Tertiary Care ◽

Hospital Length Of Stay ◽

Control Group ◽

Complication Rates ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Eras Protocol

OBJECTIVEAlthough enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have gained acceptance in various surgical specialties, no established neurosurgical ERAS protocol for patients undergoing elective craniotomy has been reported in the literature. Here, the authors describe the design, implementation, safety, and efficacy of a novel neurosurgical ERAS protocol for elective craniotomy in a tertiary care medical center located in China.METHODSA multidisciplinary neurosurgical ERAS protocol for elective craniotomy was developed based on the best available evidence. A total of 140 patients undergoing elective craniotomy between October 2016 and May 2017 were enrolled in a randomized clinical trial comparing this novel protocol to conventional neurosurgical perioperative management. The primary endpoint of this study was the postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS). Postoperative morbidity, perioperative complications, postoperative pain scores, postoperative nausea and vomiting, duration of urinary catheterization, time to first solid meal, and patient satisfaction were secondary endpoints.RESULTSThe median postoperative hospital LOS (4 days) was significantly shorter with the incorporation of the ERAS protocol than that with conventional perioperative management (7 days, p < 0.0001). No 30-day readmission or reoperation occurred in either group. More patients in the ERAS group reported mild pain (visual analog scale score 1–3) on postoperative day 1 than those in the control group (79% vs. 33%, OR 7.49, 95% CI 3.51–15.99, p < 0.0001). Similarly, more patients in the ERAS group had a shortened duration of pain (1–2 days; 53% vs. 17%, OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.29–1.37, p = 0.0001). The urinary catheter was removed within 6 hours after surgery in 74% patients in the ERAS group (OR 400.1, 95% CI 23.56–6796, p < 0.0001). The time to first oral liquid intake was a median of 8 hours in the ERAS group compared to 11 hours in the control group (p < 0.0001), and solid food intake occurred at a median of 24 hours in the ERAS group compared to 72 hours in the control group (p < 0.0001).CONCLUSIONSThis multidisciplinary, evidence-based, neurosurgical ERAS protocol for elective craniotomy appears to have significant benefits over conventional perioperative management. Implementation of ERAS is associated with a significant reduction in the postoperative hospital stay and an acceleration in recovery, without increasing complication rates related to elective craniotomy. Further evaluation of this protocol in large multicenter studies is warranted.Clinical trial registration no.: ChiCTR-INR-16009662 (chictr.org.cn)

Download Full-text

Benefits of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for fusion in degenerative spine surgery: impact on outcome, length of stay, and patient satisfaction

Neurosurgical FOCUS ◽

10.3171/2019.1.focus18669 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 46 (4) ◽

pp. E6 ◽

Cited By ~ 18

Author(s):

Bertrand Debono ◽

Marco V. Corniola ◽

Raphael Pietton ◽

Pascal Sabatier ◽

Olivier Hamel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Patient Satisfaction ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Spinal Fusion ◽

Spinal Surgery ◽

Enhanced Recovery ◽

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽

Posterior Fusion ◽

Hospital Length Of Stay ◽

Study Results ◽

Significant Difference

OBJECTIVEEnhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) proposes a multimodal, evidence-based approach to perioperative care. Thanks to the improvement in care protocols and the fluidity of the patient pathway, the first goal of ERAS is the improvement of surgical outcomes and patient experience, with a final impact on a reduction in the hospital length of stay (LOS). The implementation of ERAS in spinal surgery is in the early stages. The authors report on their initial experience in applying an ERAS program to several degenerative spinal fusion procedures.METHODSThe authors selected two 2-year periods: the first from before any implementation of ERAS principles (pre-ERAS years 2012–2013) and the second corresponding to a period when the paradigm was applied widely (post-ERAS years 2016–2017). Patient groups in these periods were retrospectively compared according to three degenerative conditions requiring fusion: anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), and posterior lumbar fusion. Data were collected on patient demographics, operative and perioperative data, LOSs, 90-day readmissions, and morbidity. ERAS-trained nurses were involved to support patients at each pre-, intra-, and postoperative step with the help of a mobile application (app). A satisfaction survey was included in the app.RESULTSThe pre-ERAS group included 1563 patients (159 ALIF, 749 ACDF, and 655 posterior fusion), and the post-ERAS group included 1920 patients (202 ALIF, 612 ACDF, and 1106 posterior fusion). The mean LOS was significantly shorter in the post-ERAS group than in the pre-ERAS group for all three conditions. It was reduced from 6.06 ± 1.1 to 3.33 ± 0.8 days for the ALIF group (p < 0.001), from 3.08 ± 0.9 to 1.3 ± 0.7 days for the ACDF group (p < 0.001), and from 6.7 ± 4.8 to 4.8 ± 2.3 days for posterior fusion cases (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in overall complications between the two periods for the ALIF (11.9% pre-ERAS vs 11.4% post-ERAS, p = 0.86) and ACDF (6.0% vs 8.2%, p = 0.12) cases, but they decreased significantly for lumbar fusions (14.8% vs 10.9%, p = 0.02). Regarding satisfaction with overall care among 808 available responses, 699 patients (86.5%) were satisfied or very satisfied, and regarding appreciation of the mobile e-health app in the perceived optimization of care management, 665 patients (82.3%) were satisfied or very satisfied.CONCLUSIONSThe introduction of the ERAS approach at the authors’ institution for spinal fusion for three studied conditions resulted in a significant decrease in LOS without causing increased postoperative complications. Patient satisfaction with overall management, upstream organization of hospitalization, and the use of e-health was high. According to the study results, which are consistent with those in other studies, the whole concept of ERAS (primarily reducing complications and pain, and then reducing LOS) seems applicable to spinal surgery.

Download Full-text

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Radical Cystectomy Decreases Postoperative Complications at Different Times

Urologia Internationalis ◽

10.1159/000518163 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

François Lannes ◽

Jochen Walz ◽

Thomas Maubon ◽

Stanislas Rybikowski ◽

Sami Fakhfakh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Postoperative Complications ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Radical Cystectomy ◽

Positive Impact ◽

Enhanced Recovery ◽

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽

Fast Recovery ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Eras Protocol ◽

Over Time

Introduction: This study aimed to assess whether enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) improves, at different time points, postoperative complications in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Methods: We performed a retrospective monocentric study using prospectively maintained databases including all patients treated by radical cystectomy between January 2015 and July 2019. An ERAS protocol was applied in all patients from February 2018. We analyzed and compared between non-ERAS and ERAS groups early and 90-day postoperative complications and 90-day readmission. ERAS was analyzed to know its implication in fast recovery improvement over time. Results: A total of 150 patients underwent radical cystectomy, 74 without ERAS and 76 with ERAS protocol. ERAS decreased significantly early (p = 0.039) and 90-day (0.012) postoperative complications. In multivariate analysis, ERAS was an independent factor associated with less early (OR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25–0.96; p = 0.37) and 90-day (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.14–0.68; p = 0.004) postoperative complications. There was no significant difference between groups for 90-day readmission (p = 0.349). Mean length of stay did not differ significantly between ERAS and non-ERAS groups (12.7 ± 6.2 and 13.1 ± 5.7 days, respectively; p = 0.743). Discussion/Conclusion: Our study shows that ERAS has an early positive impact that lasts over time on postoperative complications. ERAS implementation has decreased early and 90-day postoperative complications without increasing 90-day readmission. In our cohort, length of stay was not improved with ERAS protocol.

Download Full-text

Application of and Clinical Research on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Perioperative Care of Patients With Supratentorial Tumors

Frontiers in Oncology ◽

10.3389/fonc.2021.697699 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 ◽

Author(s):

Jingmi Wu ◽

Weina Zhang ◽

Jie Chen ◽

Hui Fei ◽

Hong Zhu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Perioperative Care ◽

Enhanced Recovery ◽

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽

Postoperative Recovery ◽

Control Group ◽

Eating Time ◽

Removal Time ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Hospital Stays ◽

Supratentorial Tumors

PurposeThis study intends to explore the safety and effectiveness of the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the perioperative care of patients with supratentorial tumors.MethodsA total of 151 supratentorial tumor patients were enrolled in this study, and they were divided into control group (n = 75) and observation group (n = 76) according to the random number table method. Patients in the control group received routine neurosurgery care, and patients in the observation group received enhanced recovery after surgery care. The incidence of perioperative complications, postoperative hospital stays, early postoperative eating time, catheter removal time, and time to get out of bed were observed for the two groups of patients, and the quality of postoperative recovery was evaluated.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in the basic data of the two groups of patients, such as age, gender, lesion location, and condition (P>0.05), and they were comparable. The observation group’s postoperative eating time, catheter removal time, and time to get out of bed were significantly earlier than those of the control group. Postoperative hospital stays and hospitalization expenses were less than those of the control group. There was a statistically significant difference in postoperative hospital stay between the two groups (P<0.05).ConclusionApplying the ERAS concept to implement perioperative care for patients with supratentorial tumors is safe and effective. It can not only reduce after-surgical stress and accelerate postoperative recovery, but also shorten hospital stays and reduce hospital costs. It is worthy of clinical application.

Download Full-text

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in Oblique lumbar interbody fusion(OLIF): a case-controlled study

10.21203/rs.3.rs-35270/v2 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Renjie Li ◽

Xiaofeng Shao ◽

Weimin Jiang

Keyword(s):

Postoperative Complications ◽

Interbody Fusion ◽

Enhanced Recovery ◽

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽

Controlled Study ◽

Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Financial Costs ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Eras Protocol

Abstract Background Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) attempts to decrease the surgical stress response to minimize postoperative complications and improve functional rehabilitation after major surgery, but it have not been widely utilized in spinal surgery. This study is to evaluate the implementation of an ERAS pathway for patients undergoing oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) surgery.Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patient who underwent OLIF in 2018 prior to ERAS (“pre-ERAS” ,n=23) and in 2019 after ERAS was instituted (“ERAS”, n=24). Major outcomes were collected included demographics, length of hospital stay, financial cost, postoperative complications, off-bed time and perioperative factors. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the pain. The ERAS pathway and compliance with pathway elements were also recorded.Results After ERAS implementation, we found no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. In our study, the mean stay in the hospital was significantly lower (p= 0.033) in the ERAS group (15.3±3.9 days) compared to the standard pathway group (13.0±3.1 days). In comparison to the standard group, we also found a variation between the financial costs of surgery and hospitalization [(16446.5±4353.3)vs(14237.7±2784.9) USD, P < 0.05]. The ERAS group manifested a lower blood loss compared with the pre-ERAS group with statistical significance [(68.3±57.1)vs(119.3±104.8) ml, P < 0.05]. There was no significant difference in operative time, complications, and 30-d readmission rates ( P > 0.05 ). Pain scores between the two groups showed a significant difference during the 3th hour and 6th hour (P < 0.05).Conclusion Institution of an ERAS protocol appears to accelerate functional recovery and reduce length of stay, financial costs and decreased pain.

Download Full-text

An Attempt of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol in Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion(OLIF)

10.21203/rs.3.rs-35270/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Renjie Li ◽

Xiaofeng Shao ◽

Weimin Jiang

Keyword(s):

Postoperative Complications ◽

Interbody Fusion ◽

Enhanced Recovery ◽

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽

Standard Group ◽

Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Financial Costs ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽

Eras Protocol

Abstract Background Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) attempts to decrease the surgical stress response to minimize postoperative complications and improve functional rehabilitation after major surgery, but it have not been widely utilized in spinal surgery. This study is to evaluate the implementation of an ERAS pathway for patients undergoing oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) surgery.Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patient who underwent OLIF in 2018 prior to ERAS (“pre-ERAS” ,n=23) and in 2019 after ERAS was instituted (“ERAS”, n=24). Major outcomes were collected included demographics, length of hospital stay, financial cost, postoperative complications, off-bed time and perioperative factors. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the pain. The ERAS pathway and compliance with pathway elements were also recorded.Results After ERAS implementation, we found no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. In our study, the mean stay in the hospital was significantly lower (p= 0.033) in the ERAS group (15.3±3.9 days) compared to the standard pathway group (13.0±3.1 days). In comparison to the standard group, we also found a variation between the financial costs of surgery and hospitalization [(116312.1±30787.4)vs(100691.2±19695.1) yuan, P < 0.05]. The ERAS group manifested a lower blood loss compared with the pre-ERAS group with statistical significance [(68.3±57.1)vs(119.3±104.8) ml, P < 0.05]. There was no significant difference in operative time, complications, and 30-d readmission rates ( P > 0.05 ). Pain scores between the two groups showed a significant difference during the 3th hour and 6th hour (P < 0.05).Conclusion Institution of an ERAS protocol appears to accelerate functional recovery and reduce length of stay, financial costs and decreased pain.

Download Full-text

Application of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Perioperative Period of Tympanoplasty and Mastoidectomy

Ear Nose & Throat Journal ◽

10.1177/0145561320928222 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 014556132092822

Author(s):

Jing-Qian Tan ◽

Yu-Bin Chen ◽

Wei-Hao Wang ◽

Shao-Li Zhou ◽

Qi-Lin Zhou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Postoperative Complications ◽

Otitis Media ◽

Enhanced Recovery ◽

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽

Perioperative Period ◽

Comfort Level ◽

Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media ◽

Control Group ◽

Suppurative Otitis Media ◽

Hospitalization Cost

Introduction: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are a series of perioperative care to optimize preoperative preparation, prevent postoperative complications, minimize stress, and speedup recovery. Tympanoplasty and mastoidectomy are common surgical procedures for chronic suppurative otitis media. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety between ERAS and conventional recovery after surgery in the perioperative period of chronic suppurative otitis media. Methods: From April 2018 to February 2019, a total of 84 patients scheduled for tympanoplasty and/or mastoidectomy due to chronic suppurative otitis media were involved and randomly divided into the ERAS group and the control group. The patients’ preoperative anxiety, postoperative pain, and comfort level were determined by comparing the results of Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and General Comfort Questionnaire (GCQ). The postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, and hospitalization cost were calculated. Results: The ERAS group showed a lower SAS score (30 [28-31.5] vs 35 [30-43], P < .05], a higher GCQ score (88 [84-100] vs 83 [78.25-92.25], P < .05), and a lower VAS score (0 [0-0] vs 1 [0-2], P < .05] after surgery. No significant difference ( P > .05) was observed between the ERAS group and the control group in postoperative complications, postoperative hospitalization time, and hospitalization cost, respectively. Conclusion: Enhanced recovery after surgery can reduce pain and improve comfort in the perioperative period of chronic suppurative otitis media.

Download Full-text

Enhanced Recovery after Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Cancer: Is it Better for Patients to Have a Quick Discharge?

Urologia Internationalis ◽

10.1159/000505757 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-8

Author(s):

Inès Dominique ◽

Corinne Palamara ◽

Emilien Seizilles De Mazancourt ◽

Rene Ecochard ◽

Helene Hacquard ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Postoperative Complications ◽

Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Enhanced Recovery ◽

Retention Rate ◽

Bowel Function ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Hospital Length ◽

Control Group ◽

Robot Assisted ◽

Significant Difference

Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of an enhanced recovery program (ERP) after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for cancer. Methods: It was a monocentric, retrospective, comparative study. An ERP after RAPN was introduced at our institution in 2015 and proposed to all consecutive patients admitted for RAPN. The control group for this study was composed of patients managed immediately before the introduction of the ERP. We collected information on patient characteristics, tumor sizes, ischemia times, biology, hospital length of stays, postoperative (≤30 days) complications, and readmission rates. Group comparisons were made using the Pearson χ2 test for qualitative data and the Student t test for quantitative data. Results: Between 2015 and 2017, 112 patients were included in the ERP group. Fifty patients were included in the control group. Ninety patients in the ERP group (80.4%) were discharged at or before postoperative day (POD) 2 versus 10 patients (20%) in the control group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the ERP and control groups for the urinary retention rate (respectively 3.6 vs. 2%; p = 0.593). Resumption of normal bowel function was significantly shorter in the ERP group (94.6% at POD1 vs. 69.6% in the control group, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences for postoperative complications (15.2% in the ERP group vs. 20% in the control group, p = 0.447) or readmissions within 30 days (8.04 vs. 0.2%, p = 0.140). Conclusions: ERP after RAPN seems to reduce postoperative length of stay without increasing postoperative complications or readmissions.

Download Full-text