scholarly journals Attitudes and Practices of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Chinese Patients With Cancer: A National Cross-Sectional Survey

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luping Zhang ◽  
Jun Wang ◽  
Bicheng Zhang ◽  
Qian Chu ◽  
Chunxia Su ◽  
...  

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are revolutionizing the field of immuno-oncology. Side effects and tumor microenvironment currently represent the most significant obstacles to using ICIs. In this study, we conducted an extensive cross-sectional survey to investigate the concept and practices regarding the use of ICIs in cancer patients in China. The results provide real-world data on the adverse events (AEs) of ICIs and the factors influencing the use of ICIs. This survey was developed by the Expert Committee on Immuno-Oncology of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO-IO) and the Expert Committee on Patient Education of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO-PE). The surveys were distributed using a web-based platform between November 29, 2019 and December 21, 2019. A total of 1,575 patients were included. High costs (43.9%), uncertainty about drug efficacy (41.2%), and no reimbursement from medical insurance (32.4%) were the factors that prevented the patients from using ICIs. The patients were most concerned about the onset time or effective duration of ICIs (40.3%), followed by the indications of ICIs and pre-use evaluation (33.4%). Moreover, 9.0, 57.1, 21.0, and 12.9% of the patients reported tumor disappearance, tumor volume reduction, no change in tumor volume, and increased tumor volume. Among the patients who received ICIs, 65.7% reported immune-related AEs (irAEs); 96.1% reported mild-to-moderate irAEs. Cancer patients in China had a preliminary understanding of ICIs. Yet, the number of patients treated with ICIs was small.

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A841-A841
Author(s):  
Bruce Tiu ◽  
Leyre Zubiri ◽  
James Iheke ◽  
Vartan Pahalyants ◽  
Nicholas Theodosakis ◽  
...  

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) generate T-cell mediated anti-tumor responses that are effective across numerous malignancies, but their use is frequently complicated by immune-related adverse events (irAEs). irAEs may lead to treatment delays, need for immunosuppression, morbidity, and even mortality.1–3Checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) is the most common cause of fatality related to anti-programmed cell death receptor/ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) agents, and can be difficult to diagnose.3 We aimed to characterize the real-world incidence and management of CIP, as well as its impact on clinical course and healthcare utilization, in a large cohort of ICI patients using a multi-institutional database.MethodsPropensity score-matched cohorts of 14,461 lung cancer patients who did or did not receive PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors between 2014 to 2021 were identified from TriNetX Dataworks, a database of health records and claims data from over 40 institutions. Incidence of pneumonia/pneumonitis was estimated using billing codes. A subgroup of 158 patients was selected by the most specific code group and confirmed to have features consistent with suspected CIP, permitting analysis of management practices and outcomes. To describe differences in healthcare utilization and survival, a second propensity score-matched cohort was generated for the subgroup.ResultsThe attributable risk of pneumonitis to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in lung cancer at 1 year after ICI initiation was 6.88% (95% CI 6.01–7.75%). Median time to onset of drug-induced pneumonitis in the subgroup was 4.4 months (IQR 2.1–7.8 months). Of 158 patients, 21 (13.3%) underwent bronchoscopy within 30 days after diagnosis. Prednisone (130/158, 82.3%), methylprednisolone (80/158, 50.6%), and antibiotics (135/158, 85.4%) were frequently prescribed. ICI was discontinued in 69.5% of patients within 90 days of drug-induced pneumonitis. Within the first year of PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, patients with pneumonitis had more hospitalizations (83.5% vs 49.4%, RR 1.69, p<0.0001) and ICU requirements than controls (28.5% vs 8.9%, RR 3.21, p<0.0001). Landmark analysis at 6 months demonstrated that CIP associated with reduced overall survival, with a mortality HR of 1.43 (95% CI 1.03–1.97, p=0.03).ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the largest study of CIP to date. Importantly, the study found that the incidence of PD-1/PD-L1-induced pneumonitis, 6.88%, is higher than clinical trial estimates (2–5%), but lower than reported in uncontrolled real-world studies (17–19%).4–8 CIP had significant negative impacts on therapy continuation, healthcare utilization, and overall survival in lung cancer. This work demonstrates proof of concept that studies of irAE incidences and patient outcomes are feasible using large claims and electronic health record databases.ReferencesBrahmer JR, Lacchetti C, Schneider BJ, et al. Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2018;36(17):1714–1768. doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6385.Puzanov I, Diab A, Abdallah K, et al. Managing toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: consensus recommendations from the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) Toxicity Management Working Group. Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer 2017;5(1):95. doi:10.1186/s40425-017-0300-z.Wang DY, Salem JE, Cohen JV, et al. Fatal toxic effects associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncology 2018;4(12):1721–1728. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.3923.Nishino M, Giobbie-Hurder A, Hatabu H, Ramaiya NH, Hodi FS. Incidence of programmed cell death 1 inhibitor-related pneumonitis in patients with advanced cancer a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncology 2016;2(12):1607–1616. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.2453.Naidoo J, Wang X, Woo KM, et al. Pneumonitis in patients treated with anti-programmed death-1/programmed death ligand 1 therapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2017;35(7):709–717. doi:10.1200/JCO.2016.68.2005.Delaunay M, Cadranel J, Lusque A, et al. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors associated with interstitial lung disease in cancer patients. European Respiratory Journal 2017;50(2). doi:10.1183/13993003.00050-2017.Suresh K, Voong KR, Shankar B, et al. Pneumonitis in non–small cell lung cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint immunotherapy: incidence and risk factors. Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2018;13(12):1930–1939. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2018.08.2035.Cathcart-Rake EJ, Sangaralingham LR, Henk HJ, Shah ND, Riaz I bin, Mansfield AS. A population-based study of immunotherapy-related toxicities in lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer 2020;21(5):421–427.e2. doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2020.04.003Ethics ApprovalAs described on TriNetX's website (https://trinetx.com/trinetx-publication-guidelines/), all data available on the network is de-identified and in-line with HIPAA Privacy Rule standards.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Po-Hsin Lee ◽  
Tsung-Ying Yang ◽  
Kun-Chieh Chen ◽  
Yen-Hsiang Huang ◽  
Jeng-Sen Tseng ◽  
...  

AbstractPleural effusion is a rare immune-related adverse event for lung cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We enrolled 281 lung cancer patients treated with ICIs and 17 were analyzed. We categorized the formation of pleural effusion into 3 patterns: type 1, rapid and massive; type 2, slow and indolent; and type 3, with disease progression. CD4/CD8 ratio of 1.93 was selected as the cutoff threshold to predict survival. Most patients of types 1 and 2 effusions possessed pleural effusion with CD4/CD8 ratios ≥ 1.93. The median OS time in type 1, 2, and 3 patients were not reached, 24.8, and 2.6 months, respectively. The median PFS time in type 1, 2, and 3 patients were 35.5, 30.2, and 1.4 months, respectively. The median OS for the group with pleural effusion CD4/CD8 ≥ 1.93 and < 1.93 were not reached and 2.6 months. The median PFS of those with pleural effusion CD4/CD8 ≥ 1.93 and < 1.93 were 18.4 and 1.2 months. In conclusion, patients with type 1 and 2 effusion patterns had better survival than those with type 3. Type 1 might be interpreted as pseudoprogression of malignant pleural effusion. CD4/CD8 ratio ≥ 1.93 in pleural effusion is a good predicting factor for PFS.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudhakar Tummala ◽  
Xerxes Pundole ◽  
Jeffrey Aldrich ◽  
Maria E. Suarez‐Almazor

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document