scholarly journals Distinct Embryonic Origin and Injury Response of Resident Stem Cells in Craniofacial Muscles

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu Cheng ◽  
Bing Shi ◽  
Jingtao Li
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Progenitor Cells ◽  
Cell Biology ◽  
Stem Cell Biology ◽  
Injury Response ◽  
Limb Muscles ◽  
Resident Stem Cells ◽  
Embryonic Origin

Craniofacial muscles emerge as a developmental novelty during the evolution from invertebrates to vertebrates, facilitating diversified modes of predation, feeding and communication. In contrast to the well-studied limb muscles, knowledge about craniofacial muscle stem cell biology has only recently starts to be gathered. Craniofacial muscles are distinct from their counterparts in other regions in terms of both their embryonic origin and their injury response. Compared with somite-derived limb muscles, pharyngeal arch-derived craniofacial muscles demonstrate delayed myofiber reconstitution and prolonged fibrosis during repair. The regeneration of muscle is orchestrated by a blended source of stem/progenitor cells, including myogenic muscle satellite cells (MuSCs), mesenchymal fibro-adipogenic progenitors (FAPs) and other interstitial progenitors. Limb muscles host MuSCs of the Pax3 lineage, and FAPs from the mesoderm, while craniofacial muscles have MuSCs of the Mesp1 lineage and FAPs from the ectoderm-derived neural crest. Both in vivo and in vitro data revealed distinct patterns of proliferation and differentiation in these craniofacial muscle stem/progenitor cells. Additionally, the proportion of cells of different embryonic origins changes throughout postnatal development in the craniofacial muscles, creating a more dynamic niche environment than in other muscles. In-depth comparative studies of the stem cell biology of craniofacial and limb muscles might inspire the development of novel therapeutics to improve the management of myopathic diseases. Based on the most up-to-date literature, we delineated the pivotal cell populations regulating craniofacial muscle repair and identified clues that might elucidate the distinct embryonic origin and injury response in craniofacial muscle cells.

The Role of Nucleophosmin In Hematopoietic Stem Cells and the Pathogenesis of Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 95-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keisuke Ito ◽  
Paolo Sportoletti ◽  
John G Clohessy ◽  
Grisendi Silvia ◽  
Pier Paolo Pandolfi
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndrome ◽  
Cell Biology ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Stem Cell Biology ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem

Abstract Abstract 95 Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is an incurable stem cell disorder characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis and an increased risk of leukemia transformation. Nucleophosmin (NPM) is directly implicated in primitive hematopoiesis, the pathogenesis of hematopoietic malignancies and more recently of MDS. However, little is known regarding the molecular role and function of NPM in MDS pathogenesis and in stem cell biology. Here we present data demonstrating that NPM plays a critical role in the maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and the transformation of MDS into leukemia. NPM is located on chromosome 5q and is frequently lost in therapy-related and de novo MDS. We have previously shown that Npm1 acts as a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor in the hematopoietic compartment and Npm1+/− mice develop a hematologic syndrome with features of human MDS, including increased susceptibility to leukemogenesis. As HSCs have been demonstrated to be the target of the primary neoplastic event in MDS, a functional analysis of the HSC compartment is essential to understand the molecular mechanisms in MDS pathogenesis. However, the role of NPM in adult hematopoiesis remains largely unknown as Npm1-deficiency leads to embryonic lethality. To investigate NPM function in adult hematopoiesis, we have generated conditional knockout mice of Npm1, using the Cre-loxP system. Analysis of Npm1 conditional mutants crossed with Mx1-Cre transgenic mice reveals that Npm1 plays a crucial role in adult hematopoiesis and ablation of Npm1 in adult HSCs leads to aberrant cycling and followed by apoptosis. Analysis of cell cycle status revealed that HSCs are impaired in their ability to maintain quiescence after Npm1-deletion and are rapidly depleted in vivo as well as in vitro. Competitive reconstitution assay revealed that Npm1 acts cell-autonomously to maintain HSCs. Conditional inactivation of Npm1 leads to an MDS phenotype including a profoundly impaired ability to differentiate into cells of the erythroid lineage, megakaryocyte dyspoiesis and centrosome amplification. Furthermore, Npm1 loss evokes a p53-dependent response and Npm1-deleted HSCs undergo apoptosis in vivo and in vitro. Strikingly, transfer of the Npm1 mutation into a p53-null background rescued the apoptosis of Npm1-ablated HSCs and resulted in accelerated transformation to an aggressive and lethal form of acute myeloid leukemia. Our findings highlight the crucial role of NPM in stem cell biology and identify a new mechanism by which MDS can progress to leukemia. This has important therapeutic implications for de novo MDS as well as therapy-related MDS, which is known to rapidly evolve to leukemia with frequent loss or mutation of TRP53. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Preclinical Challenges and Clinical Target of Nanomaterials in Regenerative Medicine

2018 ◽  
pp. 1402-1423
Author(s):  
Martin Reinhardt ◽  
Shibashish Giri ◽  
Augustinus Bader
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Cell Biology ◽  
Stem Cell Biology ◽  
Organ Engineering ◽  
Cell Therapies ◽  
Existing Problems ◽  
Present Generation

Currently, practical application of nanotechnological approaches and stem cell therapies remains a challenge in both preclinical and clinical settings. Many existing problems in tissue engineering to organ engineering have been solved by the combined approaches of nanotechnology and stem cell biology, but significant barriers remain. Details about the role of various types of nanomaterial in preclinical and clinical research have been reviewed elsewhere, but scant information exists about the influence of nanomaterials on stem cell biology. Herein, the authors highlight the current advances of nanotechnological approaches for expansion, differentiations, harvesting, labeling, imagining, tissue engineering, and organ engineering of different types of stem cells. The preclinical outcome of in vitro and in vivo animal experimentations along with some examples of clinical outcomes of nanomaterials on stem cell research is the main focus of this chapter. This book chapter might be an impetus for the present generation of young scientists to revolutionize the coming generation of effective human healthcare.

Advances in Dental Pulp Stem Cell Biology for Biomedical Engineering (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sejin Bae ◽  
Byeonguk Kang ◽  
Hyungbin Lee ◽  
Harrison Luu ◽  
Eric Mullins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Growth Factors ◽  
Dental Pulp ◽  
Cell Biology ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Stem Cell Biology ◽  
Extrinsic Factors ◽  
Differentiation Potential

BACKGROUND Many studies in stem cell biology have demonstrated that dental pulp stem cells (DPSC) may be highly proliferative and capable of pluripotent differentiation into many different tissue types. Recent advances in stem cell research have outlined methods for directing in vitro or in vivo differentiation of DPSC - although much remains to be discovered. OBJECTIVE Based upon this information, the primary objective of this study was to understand the biology and biotechnology needed to more effectively direct DPSC differentiation. METHODS Previously collected and isolated samples of DPSC from an existing repository were used. Due to the use of previously collected, non-identifiable samples this protocol was granted exemption from Human Subjects review. Previously established stem cell biomarkers (Sox-2, Oct-4, NANOG) from each isolate were correlated with their proliferation rates or doubling times to categorize them into rapid, intermediate, or slow-dividing multipotent DPSC. Growth factors and other dental biomaterials were subsequently tested to evaluate DPSC responses in proliferation, viability and morphology. RESULTS Differential responses were observed among DPSC isolates to growth factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and bone morphogenic protein (BMP-2), and biomaterials such as mineralized trioxide aggregates (MTA). The responsiveness of DPSC isolates did not correlate with any single factor but rather with a combination of proliferation rate and biomarker expression. CONCLUSIONS These data strongly suggest that some, but not all DPSC isolates are capable of a robust and significant in vitro response to differentiation stimuli, although this response is not universal. Although some biomarkers and phenotypes that distinguish and characterize these DPSC isolates may facilitate the ability to predict differentiation potential, more research is needed to determine the other intrinsic and extrinsic factors that may contribute to and modulate these DPSC responses for biotechnology and bioengineering applications. CLINICALTRIAL N/A (not applicable)

Preclinical Challenges and Clinical Target of Nanomaterials in Regenerative Medicine

2015 ◽  
pp. 350-371
Author(s):  
Martin Reinhardt ◽  
Shibashish Giri ◽  
Augustinus Bader
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Cell Biology ◽  
Stem Cell Biology ◽  
Organ Engineering ◽  
Cell Therapies ◽  
Existing Problems ◽  
Present Generation

Currently, practical application of nanotechnological approaches and stem cell therapies remains a challenge in both preclinical and clinical settings. Many existing problems in tissue engineering to organ engineering have been solved by the combined approaches of nanotechnology and stem cell biology, but significant barriers remain. Details about the role of various types of nanomaterial in preclinical and clinical research have been reviewed elsewhere, but scant information exists about the influence of nanomaterials on stem cell biology. Herein, the authors highlight the current advances of nanotechnological approaches for expansion, differentiations, harvesting, labeling, imagining, tissue engineering, and organ engineering of different types of stem cells. The preclinical outcome of in vitro and in vivo animal experimentations along with some examples of clinical outcomes of nanomaterials on stem cell research is the main focus of this chapter. This book chapter might be an impetus for the present generation of young scientists to revolutionize the coming generation of effective human healthcare.

Involvement of the Integrin Alpha 6 Receptor in the Homing and Engraftment of Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells to Bone Marrow.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1293-1293
Author(s):  
Hong Qian ◽  
Sten Eirik W. Jacobsen ◽  
Marja Ekblom
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Progenitor Cells ◽  
Progenitor Cell ◽  
Bone Marrow Cells ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Stem And Progenitor Cells ◽  
Functional Blocking

Abstract Within the bone marrow environment, adhesive interactions between stromal cells and extracellular matrix molecules are required for stem and progenitor cell survival, proliferation and differentiation as well as their transmigration between bone marrow (BM) and the circulation. This regulation is mediated by cell surface adhesion receptors. In experimental mouse stem cell transplantation models, several classes of cell adhesion receptors have been shown to be involved in the homing and engraftment of stem and progenitor cells in BM. We have previously found that integrin a6 mediates human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell adhesion to and migration on its specific ligands, laminin-8 and laminin-10/11 in vitro (Gu et al, Blood, 2003; 101:877). Using FACS analysis, the integrin a6 chain was now found to be ubiquitously (>95%) expressed in mouse hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (lin−Sca-1+c-Kit+, lin−Sca-1+c-Kit+CD34+) both in adult bone marrow and in fetal liver. In vitro, about 70% of mouse BM lin−Sca-1+c-Kit+ cells adhered to laminin-10/11 and 40% adhered to laminin-8. This adhesion was mediated by integrin a6b1 receptor, as shown by functional blocking monoclonal antibodies. We also used a functional blocking monoclonal antibody (GoH3) against integrin a6 to analyse the role of the integrin a6 receptor for the in vivo homing of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. We found that the integrin a6 antibody inhibited the homing of bone marrow progenitors (CFU-C) into BM of lethally irradiated recipients. The number of homed CFU-C was reduced by about 40% as compared to cells incubated with an isotype matched control antibody. To study homing of long-term repopulating stem cells (LTR), antibody treated bone marrow cells were first injected intravenously into lethally irradiated primary recipients. After three hours, bone marrow cells of the primary recipients were analysed by competitive repopulation assay in secondary recipients. Blood analysis 16 weeks after transplantation revealed an 80% reduction of stem cell activity of integrin a6 antibody treated cells as compared to cells treated with control antibody. These results suggest that integrin a6 plays an important role for hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell homing in vivo.

Donor Origin of Multipotent Adult Progenitor Cells in Radiation Chimeras.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1395-1395
Author(s):  
Morayma Reyes ◽  
Jeffrey S. Chamberlain
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Progenitor Cells ◽  
Y Chromosome ◽  
Stromal Cells ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Multipotent Adult Progenitor Cells

Abstract Multipotent Adult Progenitor Cells (MAPC) are bone marrow derived stem cells that can be extensively expanded in vitro and can differentiate in vivo and in vitro into cells of all three germinal layers: ectoderm, mesoderm, endoderm. The origin of MAPC within bone marrow (BM) is unknown. MAPC are believed to be derived from the BM stroma compartment as they are isolated within the adherent cell component. Numerous studies of bone marrow chimeras in human and mouse point to a host origin of bone marrow stromal cells, including mesenchymal stem cells. We report here that following syngeneic bone marrow transplants into lethally irradiated C57Bl/6 mice, MAPC are of donor origin. When MAPC were isolated from BM chimeras (n=12, 4–12 weeks post-syngeneic BM transplant from a transgenic mouse ubiquitously expressing GFP), a mixture of large and small GFP-positive and GFP-negative cells were seen early in culture. While the large cells stained positive for stroma cell markers (smooth muscle actin), mesenchymal stem cell makers (CD73, CD105, CD44) or macrophages (CD45, CD14), the small cells were negative for all these markers and after 30 cell doublings, these cells displayed the classical phenotype of MAPC (CD45−,CD105−, CD44−, CD73−, FLK-1+(vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, VEGFR2), Sca-1+,CD13+). In a second experiment, BM obtained one month post BM transplant (n=3) was harvested and mononuclear cells were sorted as GFP-positive and GFP-negative cells and were cultured in MAPC expansion medium. MAPC grew from the GFP-positive fraction. These GFP positive cells displayed the typical MAPC-like immunophenotypes, displayed a normal diploid karyotype and were expanded for more than 50 cell doublings and differentiated into endothelial cells, hepatocytes and neurons. To rule out the possibility that MAPC are the product of cell fusion between a host and a donor cell either in vivo or in our in vitro culture conditions, we performed sex mismatched transplants of female GFP donor BM cells into a male host. BM from 5 chimeras were harvested 4 weeks after transplant and MAPC cultures were established. MAPC colonies were then sorted as GFP-positive and GFP- negative and analyzed for the presence of Y-chromosome by FISH analysis. As expected all GFP-negative (host cells) contained the Y-chromosome whereas all GFP-positive cells (donor cells) were negative for the Y-chromosome by FISH. This proves that MAPC are not derived from an in vitro or in vivo fusion event. In a third study, BM mononuclear cells from mice that had been previously BM-transplanted with syngeneic GFP-positive donors (n=3) were transplanted into a second set of syngeneic recipients (n=9). Two months after the second transplant, BM was harvested and mononuclear cells were cultured in MAPC medium. The secondary recipients also contained GFP-positive MAPC. This is the first demonstration that BM transplantation leads to the transfer of cells that upon isolation in vitro generate MAPCs and, whatever the identity of this cell may be, is eliminated by irradiation. We believe this is an important observation as MAPC hold great clinical potential for stem cell and/or gene therapy and, thus, BM transplant may serve as a way to deliver and reconstitute the MAPC population. In addition, this study provides insight into the nature of MAPC. The capacity to be transplantable within unfractionated BM transplant renders a functional and physiological distinction between MAPC and BM stromal cells. This study validates the use of unfractionated BM transplants to study the nature and possible in vivo role of MAPC in the BM.

Integrin alpha 6 Is Essential for Fetal Hematopoietic Progenitor, but Not Fetal Stem Cell Homing to Bone Marrow.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1387-1387
Author(s):  
Hong Qian ◽  
Sten Eirik W. Jacobsen ◽  
Marja Ekblom
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Progenitor Cells ◽  
Progenitor Cell ◽  
Fetal Liver ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Stem And Progenitor Cells ◽  
Integrin Alpha 6

Abstract Homing of transplanted hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) in the bone marrow (BM) is a prerequisite for establishment of hematopoiesis following transplantation. However, although multiple adhesive interactions of HSCs with BM microenviroment are thought to critically influence their homing and subsequently their engraftment, the molecular pathways that control the homing of transplanted HSCs, in particular, of fetal HSCs are still not well understood. In experimental mouse stem cell transplantation models, several integrins have been shown to be involved in the homing and engraftment of both adult and fetal stem and progenitor cells in BM. We have previously found that integrin a6 mediates human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell adhesion to and migration on its specific ligands, laminin-8 and laminin-10/11 in vitro (Gu et al, Blood, 2003; 101:877). Furthermore, integrin a6 is required for adult mouse HSC homing to BM in vivo (Qian et al., Abstract American Society of Hematology, Blood 2004 ). We have now found that the integrin a6 chain like in adult HSC is ubiquitously (>99%) expressed also in fetal liver hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (lin−Sca-1+c-Kit+, LSK ). In vitro, fetal liver LSK cells adhere to laminin-10/11 and laminin-8 in an integrin a6b1 receptor-dependent manner, as shown by function blocking monoclonal antibodies. We have now used a function blocking monoclonal antibody (GoH3) against integrin a6 to analyse the role of the integrin a6 receptor for the in vivo homing of fetal liver hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells to BM. The integrin a6 antibody inhibited homing of fetal liver progenitors (CFU-C) into BM of lethally irradiated recipients. The number of homed CFU-C in BM was reduced by about 40% as compared to the cells incubated with an isotype matched control antibody. To study homing of long-term repopulating stem cells, BM cells were first incubated with anti-integrin alpha 6 or anti-integrin alpha 4 or control antibody, and then injected intravenously into lethally irradiated primary recipients. After three hours, BM cells of the primary recipients were analysed by competitive repopulation assay in secondary recipients. Blood analysis up to 16 weeks after transplantation showed that no reduction of stem cell reconstitution from integrin a6 antibody treated cells as compared to cells treated with control antibody. In accordance with this, fetal liver HSC from integrin a6 gene deleted embryos did not show any impairment of homing and engraftment in BM as compared to normal littermates. These results suggest that integrin a6 plays an important developmentally regulated role for homing of distinct hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell populations in vivo.

Novel In Vivo Evidence That Not Only Androgens But Also Pituitary Gonadotropins and Prolactin Directly Stimulate Murine Bone Marrow Stem Cells – Implications For Potential Treatment Strategies In Aplastic Anemias

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2476-2476
Author(s):  
Kasia Mierzejewska ◽  
Ewa Suszynska ◽  
Sylwia Borkowska ◽  
Malwina Suszynska ◽  
Maja Maj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Progenitor Cells ◽  
Sex Hormones ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Clonogenic Potential

Abstract Background Hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) are exposed in vivo to several growth factors, cytokines, chemokines, and bioactive lipids in bone marrow (BM) in addition to various sex hormones circulating in peripheral blood (PB). It is known that androgen hormones (e.g., danazol) is employed in the clinic to treat aplastic anemia patients. However, the exact mechanism of action of sex hormones secreted by the pituitary gland or gonads is not well understood. Therefore, we performed a complex series of experiments to address the influence of pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG), luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), androgen (danazol) and prolactin (PRL) on murine hematopoiesis. In particular, from a mechanistic view we were interested in whether this effect depends on stimulation of BM-residing stem cells or is mediated through the BM microenvironment. Materials and Methods To address this issue, normal 2-month-old C57Bl6 mice were exposed or not to daily injections of PMSG (10 IU/mice/10 days), LH (5 IU/mice/10 days), FSH (5 IU/mice/10 days), danazol (4 mg/kg/10 days) and PRL (1 mg/day/5days). Subsequently, we evaluated changes in the BM number of Sca-1+Lin–CD45– that are precursors of long term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells (LT-HSCs) (Leukemia 2011;25:1278–1285) and bone forming mesenchymal stem cells (Stem Cell & Dev. 2013;22:622-30) and Sca-1+Lin–CD45+ hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPC) cells by FACS, the number of clonogenic progenitors from all hematopoietic lineages, and changes in peripheral blood (PB) counts. In some of the experiments, mice were exposed to bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) to evaluate whether sex hormones affect stem cell cycling. By employing RT-PCR, we also evaluated the expression of cell-surface and intracellular receptors for hormones in purified populations of murine BM stem cells. In parallel, we studied whether stimulation by sex hormones activates major signaling pathways (MAPKp42/44 and AKT) in HSPCs and evaluated the effect of sex hormones on the clonogenic potential of murine CFU-Mix, BFU-E, CFU-GM, and CFU-Meg in vitro. We also sublethally irradiated mice and studied whether administration of sex hormones accelerates recovery of peripheral blood parameters. Finally, we determined the influence of sex hormones on the motility of stem cells in direct chemotaxis assays as well as in direct in vivo stem cell mobilization studies. Results We found that 10-day administration of each of the sex hormones evaluated in this study directly stimulated expansion of HSPCs in BM, as measured by an increase in the number of these cells in BM (∼2–3x), and enhanced BrdU incorporation (the percentage of quiescent BrdU+Sca-1+Lin–CD45– cells increased from ∼2% to ∼15–35% and the percentage of BrdU+Sca-1+Lin–CD45+ cells increased from 24% to 43–58%, Figure 1). These increases paralleled an increase in the number of clonogenic progenitors in BM (∼2–3x). We also observed that murine Sca-1+Lin–CD45– and Sca-1+Lin–CD45+ cells express sex hormone receptors and respond by phosphorylation of MAPKp42/44 and AKT in response to exposure to PSMG, LH, FSH, danazol and PRL. We also observed that administration of sex hormones accelerated the recovery of PB cell counts in sublethally irradiated mice and slightly mobilized HSPCs into PB. Finally, in direct in vitro clonogenic experiments on purified murine SKL cells, we observed a stimulatory effect of sex hormones on clonogenic potential in the order: CFU-Mix > BFU-E > CFU-Meg > CFU-GM. Conclusions Our data indicate for the first time that not only danazol but also several pituitary-secreted sex hormones directly stimulate the expansion of stem cells in BM. This effect seems to be direct, as precursors of LT-HSCs and HSPCs express all the receptors for these hormones and respond to stimulation by phosphorylation of intracellular pathways involved in cell proliferation. These hormones also directly stimulated in vitro proliferation of purified HSPCs. In conclusion, our studies support the possibility that not only danazol but also several other upstream pituitary sex hormones could be employed to treat aplastic disorders and irradiation syndromes. Further dose- and time-optimizing mouse studies and studies with human cells are in progress in our laboratories. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document