scholarly journals Experiences and Perceived Self-Efficacy in Distance Learning Among Teachers of Students With Special Educational Needs

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Maurer ◽  
Angelika Becker ◽  
Johanna Hilkenmeier ◽  
Monika Daseking
Keyword(s):  
Distance Learning ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Educational Needs ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Stressful Situation ◽  
Special Educational Needs ◽  
Online Questionnaire ◽  
Special Schools ◽  
School Closures ◽  
Inclusive Schools

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a great impact on school learning so far, creating a new and potentially stressful situation during school closures for teachers and students. The sudden switch to distance learning might have been especially hard to cope with for students with special educational needs (SEN). Teachers of student with SEN might thus face greater obstacles when establishing and dealing with distance learning. Teachers' self-efficacy (TSE) is a well-known factor for students' academic achievement and motivation. Little is yet known about TSE in distance learning, especially not with students with SEN. The present study aimed to investigate the experiences and the perceived TSE in distance learning of teachers teaching students with SEN at special schools and inclusive schools during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany during June 2020 and January 2021. N = 96 teachers from both special schools and inclusive schools were involved in the study and were asked to complete a self-report online questionnaire. The study follows an exploratory design to give a first overview of the experiences of teachers of students with SEN and their TSE during the school closures and distance learning. Results showed that no major difference in overall teaching experiences could be found between teachers teaching at special schools or inclusive schools. The identification of difficulties in reading at distance and the support of students with difficulties in reading at distance was perceived by the teachers as most difficult. Difficulties in writing was being rated significantly less easy to identify at distance than difficulties in mathematics. Further, the support of students with difficulties in mathematics was perceived as being significant more challenging than the identification of difficulties in mathematics. TSE in distance learning was rather low, regardless if the teachers taught at a special school or inclusive school in this time period. TSE correlated positively with the perceived goodness of identification of difficulties and support of students with difficulties in reading, writing, and mathematics. Possible reasons and implications are discussed as well as implications of the overall results for distance learning of students with SEN.

scholarly journals Barriers to implementing inclusive education for children with special educational needs: Parents’ perceptions

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 50-66
Author(s):  
Andrey Valeryevich Mironov ◽  
◽  
Evgeniya Sergeevna Shelest ◽  
Olga Vladimirovna Bulatova ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Learning Environment ◽  
Inclusive Education ◽  
Educational Needs ◽  
International Studies ◽  
Special Educational Needs ◽  
Special Schools ◽  
Barriers To Education ◽  
Inclusive Learning ◽  
Inclusive Schools ◽  
Technological Barriers

Introduction. The authors investigate the problem of creating an inclusive educational environment for children with special educational needs (SEN) through interaction with their parents. The aim of this article is to identify obstacles faced by parents of children with SEN within an inclusive learning environment. Materials and Methods. The article reviews and analyses Russian and international studies into implementing inclusive education. The empirical data were collected via questionnaires and processed using the methods of mathematical statistics. Results. The authors identified the following barriers to implementing inclusive education for children with SEN, perceived by parents: information, socio-psychological, organizational, methodological, financial and technological. The comparative analysis showed that the barriers to education of children with SEN are faced both by parents whose children attend inclusive schools, and by parents whose children attend special schools, which create special learning environment, taking into account mental and physical development of children with SEN. Parents identified barriers to education for children with SEN regardless of types of schools and mode of study. Parents of children attending inclusive schools raised concerns about organizational, methodological, financial and technological barriers. Parents whose children attend special schools emphasized social and psychological barriers. Conclusions. In conclusion, the authors summarize parents’ perceptions of the main barriers to implementing inclusive education for children with SEN.

scholarly journals Distance learning in Higher Education during the first pandemic lockdown: The point of view of students with special educational needs

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabiola Silletti ◽  
Giuseppe Ritella ◽  
Barbara Iacobellis ◽  
Cristina Semeraro ◽  
Erica Episcopo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distance Learning ◽  
Universal Design For Learning ◽  
Educational Needs ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Special Educational Needs ◽  
Online Questionnaire ◽  
Learning Framework ◽  
Design For Learning ◽  
The Impact

The study investigates the perspective on distance learning (DL) of a sample of students with disability. Participants (N= 198; 62% females) completed an online questionnaire. The results highlight that students perceive both advantages and barriers, which vary as a function of the type of disability. This seems to suggest that DL potentials should be evaluated in relation to the specific vulnerabilities and educational needs associated with each type of disability, which might be accomplished by adopting the Universal Design for Learning framework. Also, it may be that the impact of DL depends on the discipline as well as on the teachers’ digital competences, which can make a great difference in the quality of the online lesson and in the overall didactic experience of students with SEN.

scholarly journals Perspectives of Parents of Children with Special Educational Needs: Self-Efficacy and School Supports During COVID-19

2022 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Whitley ◽  
Ian Matheson ◽  
Jacqueline Specht ◽  
Jeffrey MacCormack
Keyword(s):  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Educational Needs ◽  
Special Educational Needs ◽  
Social Emotional ◽  
Academic Supports ◽  
Role Of Parents ◽  
Emotional Supports ◽  
Remote Learning

The role of parents in supporting at-home learning increased dramatically in the spring of 2020. Schools in most Canadian provinces closed physically due to COVID-19, and remote-learning options were quickly developed to ensure continued education for students. Many students with special educational needs, who typically benefit from a range of supports from school, became reliant on parents to provide means of access to and participation in remote learning. Using an online survey, we explored the perceptions of 263 Canadian parents of children with special education needs with regard to their self‑efficacy and supports from schools. We conducted multiple linear regression analyses for each of three dependent variables (academic supports, parent self‑efficacy, and social-emotional supports); independent variables included student grade level, education placement, and total school-provided supports prior to the pandemic. Findings indicated that most parents engaged in remote learning and lacked confidence in their ability to support the learning of their child. Parent self-efficacy was related to social-emotional supports from schools and not to academic supports. Parents of children in elementary grades, and of those who had received more supports from school prior to COVID‑19, reported feeling better supported in social-emotional areas by the school. Schools should explore ways of building strong collaborative relationships between educators and parents, as well as continuing to find ways of supporting families and students in both in- and out-of-school places. The pandemic, and school-building closures, have reminded us how partnerships between parents and schools are crucial for the well-being of all involved.  

scholarly journals Implementation of an individual educational route in inclusive practice

2021 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 01019
Author(s):  
Oksana Titova ◽  
Margarita Bratkova ◽  
Olga Karanevskaya ◽  
Elena Gravitskaya ◽  
Irma Barbakadze
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Special Needs ◽  
Inclusive Education ◽  
Educational Needs ◽  
Children With Special Needs ◽  
Special Educational Needs ◽  
Educational Organization ◽  
Number Of Children ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Inclusive Schools

There is currently a trend towards an increase in the number of children with special educational needs enrolled in inclusive schools. Thus, the number of children with special educational needs enrolled in inclusive schools is growing. This is caused both by significant changes in the legal regulatory framework, including the 2012 Federal Law on Education, the adoption of the Federal State Educational Standard of Primary General Education for Children with Special Needs, etc. and by the fact that in some regions the number of specialized schools is decreasing, inclusive education becomes a more affordable option for children with special education needs. School specialists, parents, and the public engage in an active dialogue about choosing the most efficient path for an educational route for special needs children, comparing the advantages and disadvantages of inclusive and special education. The design and implementation of an individual educational route, an individual curriculum is essential for children with special needs in terms of improving the quality of education and efficiently entering social life. The relevance of the study is determined by identifying the components that facilitate and complicate, hinder the development and implementation of an individual educational route for these children in an educational organization; the determination of the content of an individual educational route based on the current situation in a practical institution considering the requirements of inclusive education. The purpose of the study is to explore the problems of developing and implementing individual educational routes for children with special needs in the context of inclusion and to determine ways to solve these problems. The key methods of the study are a questionnaire and a structured interview. The empirical data confirms the assumption that the development and implementation of an individual educational route for children with special needs in an educational organization are problematic and inefficient for several reasons. The data obtained is new since similar research results have not been found in the open sources over the past five years.

SOME EXAMPLES OF TARGETS IN THE CURRICULUM Input Targets The school meets statutory requirements in the delivery and assessment of the curriculum: (Quotes from Ofsted, 1995, are from the Guidance on Inspection — page numbers are quoted from the version for secondary schools but are also in the versions for primary and special schools) • The curriculum meets statutory requirements to teach the subjects of the National Curriculum, religious education and sex education, where these apply (p. 78). • The governing body is monitoring pupil progress. • The curriculum displays breadth — all pupils come into contact with all areas of learning. • The curriculum displays balance — each area of learning is given appropriate attention. • The curriculum is relevant to the needs of all pupils. • The curriculum displays different kinds of provision for each pupil. • The curriculum displays progression for all pupils. • The curriculum displays continuity for all pupils. • The curriculum promotes pupils’ intellectual, physical and personal development and prepares pupils for the next stage of education, training or employment (ibid). • The curriculum provides equality of access and opportunity for pupils to learn and to make progress (ibid). • The curriculum meets the requirements of all pupils on the school’s Code of Practice special educational needs register (ibid). • The curriculum is planned effectively (ibid). • The curriculum is enriched by extra-curricular provision, including sport (ibid). • The curriculum includes, for pupils of secondary age, careers education and impartial guidance, drawing on the careers service (ibid). • There are effective systems for assessing pupils’ attainment (ibid). • Assessment information is used to inform curriculum planning (ibid).

2002 ◽  
pp. 62-62
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Schools ◽  
Religious Education ◽  
Sex Education ◽  
Personal Development ◽  
National Curriculum ◽  
Educational Needs ◽  
Curriculum Planning ◽  
Special Educational Needs ◽  
Special Schools ◽  
Code Of Practice

Performance of Students With Special Educational Needs in Germany: Findings From Programme for International Student Assessment 2012

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 343-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Gebhardt ◽  
Christine Sälzer ◽  
Julia Mang ◽  
Katharina Müller ◽  
Manfred Prenzel
Keyword(s):  
International Student ◽  
Student Assessment ◽  
Educational Needs ◽  
Special Educational Needs ◽  
Special Schools ◽  
International Student Assessment ◽  
9Th Grade ◽  
Proficiency Level ◽  
Inclusive Settings ◽  
Regular Students

The reporting of findings from Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) is an important part of educational monitoring in Germany. However, until now, the subsample of students with special educational needs (SEN) had been too small to single out this group and report findings. In PISA 2012, the sample of 9th-grade students in Germany was thus expanded by students with SEN in inclusive settings and students with SEN in an oversample of 49 special schools. This article describes and compares the proficiency of students with SEN in inclusive settings and in special schools. In all 3 PISA domains assessing literacy, reading, mathematics, and science, students with SEN in inclusive settings achieve proficiency Level 2, whereas students with SEN in special schools achieve proficiency Level 1. It turns out that students with SEN have a lower average socioeconomic status than regular students, especially those in special schools. Possible explanations for the higher achievement of students with SEN in inclusive settings are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document