Robotic-Assisted vs. Open Simple Prostatectomy for Large Prostates: A Meta-Analysis

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy and open simple prostatectomy for large benign prostatic hyperplasia.Methods: We systematically searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Science databases for studies published through December 2020. Controlled trials on RASP and OSP for large prostates were included. The meta-analysis was conducted with the Review Manager 5.4 software.Results: A total of seven studies with 3,777 patients were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in IPSS (WMD, 0.72; 95%CI: −0.31, 1.76; P = 0.17), QoL (WMD, 0.00; 95%CI: −0.39, 0.39; P > 0.99), Qmax (WMD, 1.88; 95% CI: −1.15, 4.91; P = 0.22), or PVR (WMD, −10.48; 95%CI: −25.13, 4.17; P = 0.16) among patients undergoing RASP and OSP. However, compared with patients who underwent OSP, patients who underwent RASP had a shorter LOS (WMD, −2.83; 95%CI: −3.68, −1.98; P < 0.001), less EBL (WMD, −304.68; 95% CI: −432.91, −176.44; P < 0.001), a shorter CT (WMD, −2.61; 95%CI: −3.94, −1.29; P < 0.001), and fewer overall complications (OR, 0.30; 95% CI: 0.16, 0.57; P < 0.001). Nevertheless, RASP was associated with a longer OT (WMD, 59.69, 95% CI: 49.40, 69.98; P < 0.001).Conclusion: The results of the current study demonstrated that RASP provided similar efficacy to those of OSP in the treatment of large prostate, while maintaining better security. Our findings indicate that RASP is a feasible and effective alternative to OSP.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted vs Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy for Pheochromocytoma: A Meta-Analysis

Frontiers in Oncology ◽

10.3389/fonc.2021.724287 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 ◽

Author(s):

Zhongyou Xia ◽

Jinze Li ◽

Lei Peng ◽

Xiaoying Yang ◽

Yulai Xu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Perioperative Outcomes ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Transfusion Rate ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Robotic Assisted ◽

The Cochrane Library ◽

Review Manager

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted adrenalectomy (RA) and standard laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) for pheochromocytoma (PHEO).MethodsWe systematically searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Science databases for studies published through January 2021. Controlled trials on RA and LA for PHEOs were included. The meta-analysis was conducted with the Review Manager 5.4 software.ResultsFour studies with 386 patients were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in OT (WMD: 0.16; 95% CI: -28.50 to 28.82; I2 = 89%; P = 0.99), transfusion rate (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.07 to 7.07; I2 = 64%; P = 0.77), conversion rate (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.07 to 2.88; I2 = 0%; P = 0.39), complication rate (OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.82; I2 = 0%; P = 0.84) among patients undergoing RA and LA. However, compared with patients who underwent LA, patients who underwent RA had a shorter LOS (OR: -0.50; 95% CI: -0.55 to 0.45; I2 = 31%; P<0.01), less EBL (WMD: -0.85; 95% CI: -13.56 to -2.54; I2 = 44%; P<0.01), and fewer IHD (OR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.70; I2 = 0%; P<0.01).ConclusionThe RA for pheochromocytoma achieve better outcomes over LA in terms of safety and efficacy.

Download Full-text

Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety between dexmedetomidine and propofol among patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis

Journal of International Medical Research ◽

10.1177/03000605211032786 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 49 (7) ◽

pp. 030006052110327

Author(s):

Weihua Liu ◽

Wenli Yu ◽

Hongli Yu ◽

Mingwei Sheng

Keyword(s):

Clinical Efficacy ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy ◽

Weighted Mean Difference ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Similar Efficacy ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Inclusion Criteria ◽

Weighted Mean

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and propofol in patients who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods Relevant studies comparing dexmedetomidine and propofol among patients who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy were retrieved from databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Results Seven relevant studies (dexmedetomidine group, n = 238; propofol group, n = 239) met the inclusion criteria. There were no significant differences in the induction time (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 3.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −0.95–7.88, I2 = 99%) and recovery time (WMD = 2.74, 95% CI = −2.72–8.19, I2 = 98%). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences in the risks of hypotension (risk ratio [RR] = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.25–1.22) and nausea and vomiting (RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.46–2.22) between the drugs, whereas dexmedetomidine carried a lower risk of hypoxia (RR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.11–0.63) and higher risk of bradycardia (RR = 3.01, 95% CI = 1.38–6.54). Conclusions Dexmedetomidine had similar efficacy and safety profiles as propofol in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Download Full-text

Intravenous dexmedetomidine during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

Journal of International Medical Research ◽

10.1177/0300060517708945 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 45 (3) ◽

pp. 924-932 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Zeqing Bao ◽

Chengmao Zhou ◽

Xianxue Wang ◽

Yu Zhu

Keyword(s):

Caesarean Section ◽

Spinal Anaesthesia ◽

Randomized Trials ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Relevant Literature ◽

Nausea And Vomiting ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Control Group ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

The Cochrane Library

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of spinal anaesthesia using dexmedetomidine for caesarean section. Methods PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and CNKI were searched for relevant literature. Results The incidence of nausea and vomiting in the dexmedetomidine group was significantly lower than that in the control group (OR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.12–0.35, P < 0.00001). No difference was found in the incidence of pruritus between the two groups (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.36–4.09, P = 0.76).The dexmedetomidine group had a higher incidence of bradycardia than did the control group (OR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.02–4.77, P = 0.05). The incidence of shivering in the dexmedetomidine group was significantly lower than that in the control group (OR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.13–0.32, P < 0.00001). The incidence of hypotension was not different between the two groups (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.49–1.56, P = 0.65). Conclusion Dexmedetomidine can decrease the incidence of nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, and shivering with spinal anaesthesia during caesarean section.

Download Full-text

Influence of NQO1 Polymorphisms on Warfarin Maintenance Dose: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (rs1800566 and rs10517)

Cardiovascular Therapeutics ◽

10.1155/2021/5534946 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2021 ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

Lihong Tian ◽

Pingping Xiao ◽

Bingrong Zhou ◽

Yishan Chen ◽

Lijuan Kang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Maintenance Dose ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Warfarin Dose ◽

Maintenance Dosage ◽

Sensitivity Analyses ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

The Cochrane Library ◽

The Relationship ◽

Review Manager ◽

Warfarin Maintenance Dose

This meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the effect of NQO1 polymorphism on the warfarin maintenance dosage. Using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, we searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for eligible studies published prior to July 7, 2021. The required data were extracted, and experts were consulted when necessary. Review Manager Version 5.4 software was used to analyze the relationship between NQO1 polymorphisms and the warfarin maintenance dosage. Four articles involving 757 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Patients who were NQO1 rs10517 G carriers (AG carriers or GG carriers) required a 48% higher warfarin maintenance dose than those who were AA carriers. Patients with NQO1 rs1800566 CT carriers required a 13% higher warfarin dose than those who were CC carriers, with no associations observed with the other comparisons of the NQO1 rs1800566 genotypes. However, the results obtained by comparing the NQO1 rs1800566 genotypes require confirmation, as significant changes in the results were found in sensitivity analyses. Our meta-analysis suggests that the NQO1 rs10517and NQO1 rs1800566 variant statuses affect the required warfarin maintenance dose.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and safety of iron supplementation in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency: a meta-analysis

British Journal Of Nutrition ◽

10.1017/s000711451900014x ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 121 (8) ◽

pp. 841-848 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Shuo Zhang ◽

Fengxiao Zhang ◽

Meng Du ◽

Kun Huang ◽

Cheng Wang

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Fixed Effects ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Fixed Effects Model ◽

Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽

Patients With Heart Failure ◽

Randomised Control Trials ◽

The Cochrane Library

AbstractFe therapy can be effective in heart failure patients both with and without anaemia. However, the role of Fe therapy in such patients is still uncertain. In this review, the aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Fe therapy in adult patients with heart failure who have reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Multiple databases (PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Clinical Trials) were searched up to December 2017 and the reference lists of relevant articles obtained from the search were reviewed. Data extracted from randomised control trials (RCT) selected for the review were pooled using a fixed effects model or a random effects model, according to heterogeneity between trials. Nine RCT were included in this meta-analysis which included a total of 789 patients who received Fe therapy and who in turn were compared with 585 controls. There was significant improvement in the 6-min walk test (19·05 m, 95 % CI 10·48, 27·62) and peak VO2/kg (0·93 ml/kg per min, 95 % CI 0·16, 1·69) in the Fe supplementation arm. With Fe therapy, fewer patients were hospitalised for heart failure (OR: 0·42, 95 % CI 0·27, 0·65), but no relationship was found for total re-hospitalisation (OR: 0·70, 95 % CI 0·32, 1·51) or mortality (OR: 0·70, 95 % CI 0·38, 1·28). Fe therapy has the potential to improve exercise tolerance, reduce re-hospitalisations for patients with HFrEF having Fe deficiency. In addition, Fe supplementation was found to be safe, with no increased rate of adverse events.

Download Full-text

The efficacy and safety of bamlanivimab treatment against COVID-19: A meta-analysis

10.1101/2021.08.24.21262580 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Huairong Xiang ◽

Bei He ◽

Yun Li ◽

Xuan Cheng ◽

Qizhi Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

Observational Studies ◽

Randomized Clinical Trials ◽

Web Of Science ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Control Group ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Positive Treatment ◽

The Cochrane Library

Background: Bamlanivimab is routinely used in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in worldwide. We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of bamlanivimab treatment in patients with COVID-19. Methods: We searched articles from Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and MedRxiv between 30 January 2020 and August 5, 2021. We selected randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies with a control group to assess the efficiency of bamlanivimab in treating patients with COVID-19. Results: Our meta-analysis retrieved 3 RCTs and 7 cohort studies including 14461 patients. Bmlanivimab may help outpatients to prevent hospitalization or emergency department visit (RR 0.41 95%CI 0.29 to 0.58), reduce ICU admission (RR 0.47 95%CI 0.23 to 0.92) and mortality (RR 0.32 95%CI 0.13 to 0.77) from the disease. The combination of bamlanivimab and etesevimab may had a greater potential for positive treatment outcome. Conclusion: Bamlanivimab has demonstrated clinical efficacy on mild or moderate ill patients with COVID-19 to prevent hospitalization, reduce severity and mortality from the disease. Combinations of two or more monoclonal antibody increase the effect. Well-designed clinical trials to identify the clinical and biochemical characteristics in COVID-19 patients'population that could benefit from bamlanivimab are warranted in the future.

Download Full-text

Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Imidafenacin for Overactive Bladder Induced by Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Men Receiving Alpha-Blocker Therapy

International Neurourology Journal ◽

10.5213/inj.2040146.073 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 24 (4) ◽

pp. 365-374

Author(s):

Tong Cai ◽

Ning Wang ◽

Liye Liang ◽

Zhongbao Zhou ◽

Yong Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽

Overactive Bladder ◽

Symptom Score ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Maximum Flow ◽

Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Systematic Research ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Alpha Blocker

Purpose: The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of imidafenacin for overactive bladder (OAB) induced by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in men receiving alpha-blocker monotherapy.Methods: We performed a systematic research of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, and searched for studies about alpha-blocker with or without imidafenacin treatment for OAB in patients with BPH. We also investigated the original references of the included texts.Results: Four randomized controlled trials including 779 participants with BPH (389 in the alpha-blocker+imidafenacin group and 390 in the alpha-blocker only group) were studied. The main efficacy endpoint was the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score, which showed a mean difference of -1.88 (95% confidence interval, -2.32 to -1.44; P<0.00001), suggesting that alpha-blocker and imidafenacin treatment was effective in treating men with OAB. As other primary efficacy end points, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) total score (P=0.47), the IPSS storage symptom score (P=0.07), the IPSS voiding symptom score (P=0.60), and the IPSS quality of life score (P=0.18) indicated that 2 methods had no significant differences in treating men with OAB. In terms of safety, which was assessed using postvoid residual volume (P=0.05) and maximum flow rate (P=0.53), the analysis suggested that combination treatment was very well tolerated.Conclusions: This study suggested that imidafenacin plus alpha-blocker was an efficacious and safe treatment for OAB symptoms in BPH patients.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of ondansetron for spinal anesthesia during cesarean section: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

Journal of International Medical Research ◽

10.1177/0300060517716502 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 46 (2) ◽

pp. 654-662 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Chengmao Zhou ◽

Yu Zhu ◽

Zeqing Bao ◽

Xianxue Wang ◽

Qili Liu

Keyword(s):

Cesarean Section ◽

Spinal Anesthesia ◽

Randomized Trials ◽

Web Of Science ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Controlled Trials ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

The Cochrane Library

Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of ondansetron during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Methods We sought randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ondansetron during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in The Cochrane Library, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science from their inception to September 2016. Results Altogether, 21 RCTs were included in this study. Meta-analysis showed that the ondansetron group had a lower incidence of nausea/vomiting and bradycardia than the placebo group during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia [relative risk (RR) = 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.36, 0.51) and RR = 0.45, 95% CI (0.26, 0.80), respectively]. There were no significant differences in the incidences of pruritus, hypotension, or shivering during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia [RR = 0.92, 95% CI (0.83, 1.02); RR = 0.72 (0.50, 1.06), 95% CI (0.50, 1.06); and RR = 0.89, 95% CI (0.71, 1.11), respectively]. Conclusion Ondansetron effectively reduces the incidences of nausea/vomiting and bradycardia under spinal anesthesia during cesarean section.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and safety of cyclosporine a for patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: a meta-analysis

BMC Nephrology ◽

10.1186/s12882-019-1575-8 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 20 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Hong-Yan Li ◽

Xialan Zhang ◽

Tianbiao Zhou ◽

Zhiqing Zhong ◽

Hongzhen Zhong

Keyword(s):

Nephrotic Syndrome ◽

Serum Creatinine ◽

Cyclosporine A ◽

Plasma Cholesterol ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Steroid Resistant ◽

Steroid Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome ◽

The Cochrane Library

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to determine efficacy and safety of cyclosporine A (CsA) for patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). Methods The Cochrane Library and PubMed were searched to extract the associated studies on Oct 10, 2018, and the meta-analysis method was used to pool and analyze the applicable investigations included in this study. The P(opulation) I(ntervention) C(omparison) O(utcome) of the study were defined as follows: P: Patients with SRNS; I: treated with CsA, cyclophosphamide (CYC), tacrolimus (TAC) or placebo/not treatment (P/NT); C: CsA vs. placebo/nontreatment (P/NT), CsA vs. CYC, CsA vs. TAC; O: complete remission (CR), total remission (TR; complete or partial remission (PR)), urine erythrocyte number, proteinuria levels, albumin, proteinuria, serum creatinine, and plasma cholesterol, etc. Data were extracted and pooled using RevMan 5.3. Results In the therapeutic regimen of CsA vs. placebo/nontreatment (P/NT), the results indicated that the CsA group had high values of CR, TR, and low values of proteinuria, serum creatinine, and plasma cholesterol when compared with those in the placebo group. In comparing CsA vs. cyclophosphamide (CYC), the results indicated that the CsA group had higher TR than the CYC group. In comparing CsA vs. tacrolimus (TAC), the results revealed insignificant differences in CR, and TR between the CsA and TAC groups. The safety of CsA was also assessed. The incidence of gum hyperplasia in CsA group was higher than that in the P/NT group, with no differences in incidence of infections or hypertension between CsA and P/NT groups. There was no difference in the incidence of hypertension between the CsA and TAC groups. Conclusions CsA is an effective and safe agent in the therapy of patients with SRNS.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and safety of pregnant women with chronic hepatitis B receiving nucleos(t)ide analogs therapy: a network meta-analysis

10.21203/rs.3.rs-28454/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Bo Zhu ◽

Xiuli Chen ◽

Fumin Feng ◽

Erhei Dai

Keyword(s):

Hepatitis B ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Pregnant Women ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

High Viral Load ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

B Virus ◽

Blocking Effects ◽

The Cochrane Library

Abstract Objective Reducing mother-to-child transmission(MTCT)of hepatitis B virus(HBV) is one of the key ways to eliminate hepatitis B. Although studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of oral nucleos(t)ide analogs(NAs),drug’s comparisons are lacking. The network meta-analysis aims to comprehensively compare and summarize the efficacy and safety of the three drugs (Lamivudine(LAM), Telbivudine(TBV) and Tenofovir(TDF)), providing a basis for drug selection. Methods A comprehensive retrieval of data was conducted from PubMed (Medline), Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CNKI and SinoMed through to December 2019. We performed pair-wise meta-analysis and Bayesian network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of NAs. Results A total of 35 studies whith involving a total of 6,109 pregnant women with HBV infenction were selected. All three drugs can effectively block MTCT and improve HBV DNA suppression (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in the occurrence of adverse events in mothers and infants.The results of the network meta analysis showed that the possibility of TBV and TDF being the best drug was 50% and 46%, the possibility of TBV and TDF being the second is the same-45%, the possibility of LAM being the worst drug is 85%. Conclusion LAM, TBV and TDF are effective in preventing MTCT of HBV in women with chronic HBV infection with high viral load. Using them does not seem to increase the probability of adverse events in pregnant women and infants. It cannot be ignored that TDF and TBV appear to show better blocking effects in clinical practice.

Download Full-text