scholarly journals High-Throughput Sequencing Analysis of the Actinobacterial Spatial Diversity in Moonmilk Deposits

Antibiotics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Maciejewska ◽  
Magdalena Całusińska ◽  
Luc Cornet ◽  
Delphine Adam ◽  
Igor Pessi ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Marta Maciejewska ◽  
Magdalena Calusinska ◽  
Luc Cornet ◽  
Delphine Adam ◽  
Igor Pessi ◽  
...  

Moonmilk are cave carbonate deposits that host a rich microbiome including antibiotic-producing Actinobacteria making these speleothems appealing for bioprospecting. Here we investigated the taxonomic profile of the actinobacterial community of three moonmilk deposits of the cave “Grotte des Collemboles” via high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons. Actinobacteria was the most common phylum after Proteobacteria, ranging from 9 to 23% of the total bacterial population. Next to actinobacterial OTUs attributed to uncultured organisms at the genus level (~44%), we identified 47 actinobacterial genera with Rhodoccocus (4 OTUs, 17%) and Pseudonocardia (9 OTUs, ~16%) as the most abundant in terms of absolute number of sequences. Streptomycetes presented the highest diversity (19 OTUs, 3%), with most of OTUs unlinked to the culturable Streptomyces strains previously isolated from the same deposits. 43% of OTUs were shared between the three studied collection points while 34% were exclusive to one deposit indicating that distinct speleothems host their own population despite their nearby localization. This important spatial diversity suggests that prospecting within different moonmilk deposits should result in the isolation of unique and novel Actinobacteria. These speleothems also host a wide range of non-streptomycetes antibiotic-producing genera, and should therefore be subjected to methodologies for isolating rare Actinobacteria.


GYNECOLOGY ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 441-444
Author(s):  
Zhanna I. Glinkina ◽  
Elena V. Kulakova ◽  
Elena G. Lebedeva ◽  
Varvara S. Kuzmicheva ◽  
Nataliya P. Makarova

The frequency of structural chromosomal transpositions can range from 1.8 to 8% among patients with reproductive disorders. There are several types of the rarest chromosomal abnormalities: insertion (insertion of a chromosomal region) and inversion (rotation of a chromosome region). This article describes a clinical case of the infertility treatment using assisted reproductive technologies in a woman with a rare chromosomal abnormality: simultaneous insertion and inversion of chromosomes 46, XX, ins (13;4)(q34;p14p15.3), inv(4)(p14q12). The structure and frequency of chromosomal aberrations were determined by high-throughput sequencing in preimplantation embryos. The result of the sequencing analysis showed that unbalanced variants for a known pathology were detected in 9 (56.3%) out of 16 observations, while in 6 (37%) only for a pathology known in the karyotype and in 3 (19%) they were presented simultaneously with the pathology of other chromosomes or with mosaicism. According to the results of the study, in preimplantation embryos, where one of the parents had chromosomal abnormalities, in addition to unbalanced variants, there is aneuploidy of other chromosomes not involved in the known pathology. They are described in 3 (21%) out of 14 observations of all identified pathology. In this regard, patients with aberrations in the karyotype are recommended, whenever possible, to carry out preimplantation genetic testing of structural rearrangements by methods allowed to analyze all chromosomes simultaneously. For example, high-throughput sequencing on the Illumina platform may become an alternative for prenatal diagnostics, which is performed in fertile couples with high risk of having a child with hereditary or congenital disorders. In the case of detection of chromosomal changes in the fetus, patients are faced with a number of ethical issues related to the necessity for medical abortion, which may contradict their religious and moral convictions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 134 ◽  
pp. 349-358
Author(s):  
W.-H. Chen ◽  
S.-J. Wu ◽  
X.-L. Sun ◽  
K.-M. Feng ◽  
K. Rahman ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianguang Hu ◽  
Xiaoshi Zhong ◽  
Jing Yan ◽  
Daoyuan Zhou ◽  
Danping Qin ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. e0230924
Author(s):  
Ao-Nan Xia ◽  
Jun Liu ◽  
Da-Cheng Kang ◽  
Hai-Guang Zhang ◽  
Ru-Hua Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document