scholarly journals Load Bearing Capacity of Cohesive-Frictional Soils Reinforced with Full-Wraparound Geotextiles: Experimental and Numerical Investigation

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 2973
Author(s):  
Gampanart Sukmak ◽  
Patimapon Sukmak ◽  
Suksun Horpibulsuk ◽  
Menglim Hoy ◽  
Arul Arulrajah
Keyword(s):  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Dry Weight ◽  
Fine Sand ◽  
Reinforced Soil ◽  
Embedment Depth ◽  
Load Bearing Capacity ◽  
Sodium Bentonite ◽  
Optimum Parameters ◽  
Planar Form ◽  
Soil Foundation

This research investigated the effects of types of cohesive-frictional soil and geotextile reinforcement configurations on the bearing capacity of reinforced soil foundation (RSF) structures, via laboratory test and numerical simulation. The four reinforcement configurations studied for the RSF included: (i) horizontal planar form of geotextile, (ii) full-wraparound ends of geotextile, (iii) full-wraparound ends of geotextile with filled-in sand, and (iv) full-wraparound ends of geotextile with filled-in sand and sand backfill. The foundation soils studied were mixtures of fine sand and sodium bentonite at replacement ratios of 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100% by dry weight of sand to have various values of plasticity index (PI). The numerical analysis of RSF structures was performed using PLAXIS 2D software. Several factors were studied, which included: embedment depth of the top reinforcement layer (U), width of horizontal planar form of the reinforcement (W), and spacing between geotextile reinforcement layers (H). Number of reinforcement layers (N) was varied to determine the optimum parameters of U/B, W/B, H/B, and N, where B is the footing width. The most effective improvement technique was found for the full wraparound ends of geotextile with filled-in sand and sand backfill. The outcome of this research will provide a preliminary guideline in a design of RSF structure with different ground soils and other RSF structures with different geosynthetic types.

Bearing Capacity Improvement of Shallow Foundations Using Cement-Stabilized Sand

2016 ◽  
Vol 723 ◽  
pp. 795-800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Habib Rasouli ◽  
Hana Takhtfirouzeh ◽  
Abbasali Taghavi Ghalesari ◽  
Roya Hemati
Keyword(s):  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Soil Stabilization ◽  
Cement Content ◽  
Experimental Tests ◽  
Dry Weight ◽  
Soil Improvement ◽  
Reinforced Soil ◽  
Shallow Foundation ◽  
Engineering Properties ◽  
Suitable Material

In order to attain a satisfactory level of safety and stability in the construction of structures on weak soil, one of the best solutions can be soil improvement. The addition of a certain percentage of some materials to the soil may compensate for its deficiency. Cement is a suitable material to be used for stabilization and modification of a wide variety of soils. By using this material, the engineering properties of soil can be improved. In this study, the effect of soil stabilization with cement on the bearing capacity of a shallow foundation was studied by employing finite element method. The material properties were obtained by conducting experimental tests on cement-stabilized sand. Cement varying from 2% to 8% by soil dry weight was added for stabilization. The effect of reinforced soil block dimensions, foundation width and cement content were investigated. From the results, it can be figured out that by stabilizing the soil below the foundation to certain dimensions with the necessary cement content, the bearing capacity of the foundation will increase to an acceptable level.

scholarly journals Numerical evaluation of the plastic hinges developed in headed stud shear connectors in composite beams with profiled steel sheeting

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentino Vigneri ◽  
Christoph Odenbreit ◽  
Matthias Braun
Keyword(s):  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Numerical Evaluation ◽  
Composite Beams ◽  
Shear Capacity ◽  
Embedment Depth ◽  
Shear Connector ◽  
Load Bearing Capacity ◽  
Plastic Hinges ◽  
Load Bearing ◽  
Headed Stud

For composite beams using novel steel sheeting, the current Eurocode 4 rules sometimes overestimate the load bearing capacity of the shear connector. This is due to the larger rib heights and the smaller rib widths in comparison with the old studies, which have been carried out to calibrate the current design equations. The RFCS Project “DISCCO” investigated this phenomena and the working group under mandate M515, CEN/TC250/SC4/SC4.T3 is enhancing this equation and working on a proposal to be taken over in the new version of Eurocode 4.The proposed new equation covers the failure behaviour of the shear connection more in detail. The test results show, that the failure consists in a combined concrete cone and stud in bending. Due to the geometry of novel steel sheeting, the load bearing capacity of the headed stud shear connector is no more limited by its shear capacity, but by its bending capacity.A 3D non-linear finite element model is developed and validated through the support of the DISCCO push-out tests. A good agreement between numerical and experimental results in terms of force-slip behaviour is achieved. Special attention of this work lies on the numerical evaluation of the number of plastic hinges ny: a stress-based procedure is presented and the results are compared to the equations presented for new Eurocode 4.The numerical simulations show that the upper plastic hinge moves up as the slip increases due to the progressive crushing of the concrete in the rib. From the parametric study, it turns out that ny is linearly proportional to the embedment depth. Compared to pre-punched hole decking, through-deck welding specimen activates less plastic hinges in the studs because of the higher stiffness provided at the base of the stud.

scholarly journals Field Evaluation of Load Bearing Capacity and Embedment Depth of Existing Ballastless Plate Girder Bridge Foundations

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 225-230
Author(s):  
Hyeonwoo Yoo ◽  
Jeongho Oh ◽  
Sinwhan Ahn
Keyword(s):  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Embedment Depth ◽  
Penetration Test ◽  
Bridge Foundations ◽  
Load Bearing Capacity ◽  
Load Bearing ◽  
Girder Bridge ◽  
Unknown Foundations ◽  
Unknown Foundation ◽  
Plate Girder

The ballastless plate girder bridge, classified as a structure type that requires an emergent replacement among domestic railway bridges, generally tends to upgrade to a ballasted track along with continuous welded rail (CWR). The axial forces of the CWR due to the temperature change need to be distributed to the bridge foundations. Because most of the existing ballastless plate girder bridges of over 50 years of age do not provide any design information, such bridge foundations are regarded as unknown foundations, and therefore, it is crucial to identify the structural adequacy and dimension. In this study, an effort was made to establish a correlation between the standard penetration test (SPT) and mid-size pneumatic cone penetration test (MPCP) to estimate the load bearing capacity of an unknown foundation. A field test was conducted to estimate the depth of the unknown foundation by employing SPT and MPCP as the source wave part. The magnitude of the shear wave was mitigated by the presence of PVC and steel pipes, such that it might be possible to identify the embedment depth of unknown foundations.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of strip footing with geogrid reinforcement for different types of soils in Mosul, Iraq

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0243293
Author(s):  
Noor Ibrahim Hasan ◽  
Aizat Mohd Taib ◽  
Nur Shazwani Muhammad ◽  
Muhamad Razuhanafi Mat Yazid ◽  
Azrul A. Mutalib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Soil Improvement ◽  
Reinforced Soil ◽  
Strip Footing ◽  
Shallow Foundation ◽  
Geogrid Reinforcement ◽  
Soil Failure ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Soil Foundation ◽  
Problematic Soil

The main cause of problematic soil failure under a certain load is due to low bearing capacity and excessive settlement. With a growing interest in employing shallow foundation to support heavy structures, it is important to study the soil improvement techniques. The technique of using geosynthetic reinforcement is commonly applied over the last few decades. This paper aims to determine the effect of using geogrid Tensar BX1500 on the bearing capacity and settlement of strip footing for different types of soils, namely Al-Hamedat, Ba’shiqah, and Al-Rashidia in Mosul, Iraq. The analysis of reinforced and unreinforced soil foundations was conducted numerically and analytically. A series of conditions were tested by varying the number (N) and the width (b) of the geogrid layers. The results showed that the geogrid could improve the footing’s bearing capacity and reduce settlement. The soil of the Al-Rashidia site was sandy and indicated better improvement than the other two sites’ soils (clayey soils). The optimum geogrid width (b) was five times the footing width (B), while no optimum geogrid number (N) was obtained. Finally, the numerical results of the ultimate bearing capacity were compared with the analytical results, and the comparison showed good agreement between both the analyses and the optimum range published in the literature. The significant findings reveal that the geogrid reinforcement may induce improvement to the soil foundation, however, not directly subject to the width and number of the geogrid alone. The varying soil properties and footing size also contribute to both BCR and SRR values supported by the improvement factor calculations. Hence, the output complemented the benefit of applying reinforced soil foundations effectively.

Increased load bearing capacity of mechanically joined FRP/metal joints using a pin structured auxiliary joining element

2020 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-60
Author(s):  
Per Heyser ◽  
Vadim Sartisson ◽  
Gerson Meschut ◽  
Marcel Droß ◽  
Klaus Dröder
Keyword(s):  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Load Bearing Capacity ◽  
Load Bearing

Load-Bearing Capacity of Direct Inlay-Retained Fibre-reinforced Composite Fixed Partial Dentures with Different Cross-Sectional Pontic Design

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-100
Author(s):  
Oana Tanculescu ◽  
Adrian Doloca ◽  
Raluca Maria Vieriu ◽  
Florentina Mocanu ◽  
Gabriela Ifteni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Fracture Pattern ◽  
Load Bearing Capacity ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Load Bearing ◽  
Reinforced Composite ◽  
Polyethylene Fibre

The load-bearing capacity and fracture pattern of direct inlay-retained FRC FDPs with two different cross-sectional designs of the ponticwere tested. The aim of the study was to evaluate a new fibre disposition. Two types of composites, Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative and Filtek Z250 (3M/ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA), and one braided polyethylene fibre, Construct (Kerr, USA) were used. The results of the study suggested that the new tested disposition of the fibres prevented in some extend the delamination of the composite on buccal and facial sides of the pontic and increased the load-bearing capacity of the bridges.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document