scholarly journals Current and Emerging Therapies for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)

Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 1247
Author(s):  
Iván Henríquez ◽  
Mack Roach ◽  
Todd M. Morgan ◽  
Alberto Bossi ◽  
Junior A. Gómez ◽  
...  

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) encompasses a heterogeneous wide range of molecular tumor behavior and a high risk of progression. Early detection and treatment are therefore crucial in these patients. Treatment has improved drastically in recent years and many novel therapeutic agents are currently under investigation. However, due to the rapidly changing therapeutic landscape in mCRPC, it is difficult for clinicians to keep up to date with the latest innovations in this area. In the present narrative review, we discuss the current and emerging therapies for mCRPC as well as the clinical and molecular factors that can help predict which patients are most likely to benefit from these novel agents.

Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 392
Author(s):  
Susana Hernando Polo ◽  
Diana Moreno Muñoz ◽  
Adriana Carolina Rosero Rodríguez ◽  
Jorge Silva Ruiz ◽  
Diana Isabel Rosero Rodríguez ◽  
...  

The therapeutic landscape of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is changing due to the emergence of new targeted therapies for the treatment of different molecular subtypes. Some biomarkers are described as potential molecular targets different from classic androgen receptors (AR). Approximately 20–25% of mCRPCs have somatic or germline alterations in DNA repair genes involved in homologous recombination. These subtypes are usually associated with more aggressive disease. Inhibitors of the enzyme poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARPi) have demonstrated an important benefit in the treatment of these subtypes of tumors. However, tumors that resistant to PARPi and wildtype BRCA tumors do not benefit from these therapies. Recent studies are exploring drug combinations with phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) or protein kinase B (AKT) inhibitors, as mechanisms to overcome resistance or to induce BRCAness and synthetic lethality. This article reviews various different novel strategies to improve outcomes in patients with prostate cancer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-11
Author(s):  
Dilyara Kaidarova ◽  
Oxana Shatkovskaya ◽  
Zaure Dushimova ◽  
Bakytzhan Ongarbayev

Relevance: Prostate cancer (PC) is one of the most common malignant neoplasms in the male population. The widespread introduction of modern diagnostic methods and the determination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels have increased the number of detected cases of localized and locally advanced PC forms. However, in some patients treated with radical methods and long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), the disease continues to progress in the form of an increase in PSA levels with castration testosterone values and with no distant metastases. Such a course of the disease is referred to as non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). Purpose: The article reports the results of a meeting of the Expert Council arranged by the Kazakh Research Institute of Oncology and Radiology on December 25, 2020, on non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer diagnostics and treatment. Results: Large clinical studies highlight the critical importance of controlling the PSA doubling time as the main prognostic factor for an unfavorable outcome to increase patient survival and prevent the development of distant metastases. Based on the results of large randomized studies, experts recommended using new-generation androgen receptor antagonists in combination with ongoing ADT to improve the clinical outcomes in nmCRPC patients at high risk of metastatic progression. The Expert Council was presented with the data of a registration clinical study on darolutamide efficacy and safety. The advantages of introducing this drug into clinical practice to expand the choice of therapeutic options were identified. Personalized adjustment of a treatment regimen will increase the treatment efficacy and ensure higher survival in this category of patients. Conclusion: Increasing survival as the main objective in treating nmCRPC patients requires improved diagnostics through regular controlling of testosterone and PSA levels, calculation of PSA doubling time, and the use of radiological diagnostic methods to rule out distant metastases. The choice of therapy in patients at high risk of metastasis shall consider the patient’s status and the treatment efficacy and safety balance.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 120-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. S. Markova ◽  
V. B. Matveev ◽  
B. M. Nazranov

Currently, doctors have at their disposal a number of drugs prolonging life of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The majority is approved for use as the 1st line therapy and, in absence of direct comparison, is considered potentially equally effective. Patients with CRPC need continuous treatment for suppression of disease progression resulting in sequential use of therapeutic agents. Modern standards and recommendations do not provide a clear algorithm for prescription, therefore an individual approach is necessary taking in account various factors of a particular case ranging from previous therapies to patients’ preferences. This article considers the most significant factors affecting CRPC therapy selection and ways of therapy optimization in compliance with the established treatment standards and taking into account the list of drugs approved for use in Russia.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS177-TPS177
Author(s):  
Louise Emmett ◽  
Shalini Subramaniam ◽  
Alison Yan Zhang ◽  
Andrew James Martin ◽  
Sonia Yip ◽  
...  

TPS177 Background: 177Lu‐PSMA‐617 (LuPSMA) is a novel radionuclide with promising activity and tolerability in metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Pre-clinical studies have shown that androgen receptor blockade with enzalutamide upregulates PSMA-receptor expression, and that PSMA-receptor blockade increases treatment response to enzalutamide. We hypothesise that concurrent administration of LuPSMA and enzalutamide will be synergistic in mCRPC. The aims of ENZA-p are to determine the activity and safety of LuPSMA and enzalutamide in men with mCRPC at high-risk of early progression on enzalutamide alone; and to identify potential prognostic and predictive biomarkers from imaging, blood, and tissue. Methods: This open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 trial will recruit 160 men with mCRPC. Key eligibility criteria include progression on androgen deprivation therapy, 2 or more high-risk features for early (LDH ≥ULN; ALP ≥ULN; albumin <35 g/L; M1 disease at diagnosis; <3 years from initial diagnosis to randomisation; >5 bone metastases; visceral metastases; PSA doubling time <84 days; pain requiring opiates >14 days; prior abiraterone), no prior treatment with a novel androgen signalling inhibitor (except abiraterone), no prior chemotherapy for mCRPC, and PSMA-avid disease on positron emission tomography (PET) with 68Ga-PSMA. Participants are randomly assigned (1:1) enzalutamide 160 mg daily or enzalutamide 160 mg daily plus LuPSMA 7.5 GBq on days 15 and 57. Two subsequent doses of Lu-PSMA will be administered if the 68Ga-PSMA PET on day 92 shows persistent PSMA expression in the tumour. Imaging assessments include CT and technetium bone scan at baseline, day 99, then every 12 weeks; 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET at baseline, days 15, 92, and first progression; and 18F FDG PET at baseline and first progression. Translational samples including circulating tumour cells (CTCs), circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) and biopsies (optional) will be collected at baseline, day 92, and first progression. The primary endpoint is PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS). Secondary endpoints include radiological-PFS, PSA-response rate, pain response and PFS, clinical-PFS, overall survival, health related quality of life, adverse events, and cost-effectiveness. Correlative studies include identification of prognostic and predictive biomarkers from 68Ga-PSMA, 18F FDG PET/CT, CTCs, and ctDNA. A sample size of 160 provides 80% power with a 2-sided type 1-error rate of 5% to detect a HR of 0.625 assuming a median PSA-PFS of 5 months with enzalutamide alone. Accrual was 5 on 13 October 2020. ENZA-p is an investigator-initiated, academic trial led by ANZUP in collaboration with the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney. Clinical trial information: NCT04419402.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 123-123
Author(s):  
Gunhild Von Amsberg ◽  
Mirjam Zilles ◽  
Philipp Gild ◽  
Winfried Alsdorf ◽  
Lukas Boeckelmann ◽  
...  

123 Background: Recent developments in the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) lead to a revival of platinum-based chemotherapy demonstrating increased activity in patients with aggressive variants of disease. Here, we report on the results of a combinational salvage therapy with cisplatin, ifosfamide and paclitaxel (TIP) in mCRPC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with mCRPC treated with TIP at the University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf between November 2013 and September 2020. Accompanying in vitro analyses were performed using human prostate carcinoma cell lines harboring different levels of drug resistance including the docetaxel-resistant sublines PC3-DR and DU45-DR. Results: In total, 17 mCRPC patients treated with TIP were eligible for efficacy analyses with a median age of 65 yrs. At baseline, liver metastases were present in 88%, metastases of other visceral sides (lung, adrenal gland, brain) in 47% and bone metastases in 76% of the patients. Median hemoglobin was 9.8mg/dl, LDH 903 U/l and AP 205 U/l. Median PSA value was 77 ng/ml covering a wide range including three patients with a PSA-value below 1ng/ml. NSE was evaluated in 83% of the patients (median 38,5 U/l). Patients were extensively pretreated with a median of three treatment lines before TIP (100% docetaxel, 82% abirateron and/or enzalutamide, 47% cabazitaxel, 41% others). A median of 3,5 cycles of TIP were applied with 29% of the patients receiving the maximum of 6 cycles. Four patients discontinued treatment due to side effects (PNP, infection, ifosfamide induced psychosis). At interim analyses, 59 % of the patients showed a radiological response or stable disease with only one patient progressing till the end of treatment. Median PFS was 2.5 months, median OS 6 months. A decrease of PSA > 30% and LDH > 50% was observed in 41% and 35% of the patients, respectively. In vitro experiments revealed additive effects of TIP in 22Rv1, LNCaP and DU45 cells and synergistic effects in neuroendocrine LASCPC-01 cells. In PC3 cells, TIP induced antagonistic effects at lower doses, whereas dose-independent additive effects were observed in docetaxel-resistant PC3-DR. Surprisingly, preliminary data of combined therapies with different drug pairs suggest an antagonistic effect of paclitaxel in the combination with both, cisplatin and ifosfamide. Conclusions: Combinational therapy with cisplatin, ifosfamide and paclitaxel showed promising activity in some patients with aggressive mCRPC. Preclinical data suggest that the drug combination of cisplatin and ifosfamide rule the efficacy of TIP in mCRPC.


Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 2034
Author(s):  
Soraia Lobo-Martins ◽  
Arlindo R. Ferreira ◽  
André Mansinho ◽  
Sandra Casimiro ◽  
Kim Leitzel ◽  
...  

The therapeutic landscape of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has substantially evolved over the last decade. Nonetheless, a better understanding of bone-targeted agents (BTAs) action in mCRPC remains an unmet need. Theuse of BTAs aims to reduce the incidence of skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with mCRPC. Less frequent BTA schedules are currently being studied to minimize adverse events. In this study, the impact of metastatic compartment (bone and extraskeletal metastases (BESM) vs. bone-only metastases (BOM)) on bone biomarker kinetics, time to first on-study SRE, and symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs) is evaluated. This is a retrospective analysis of the prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial of denosumab vs. zoledronic acid in patients with mCRPC and bone metastases. A total of 1901 patients were included, 1559 (82.0%) with BOM and 342 with BESM (18.0%). Bone metastases burden was balanced between groups. Baseline levels and normalization rates of corrected urinary N-terminal telopeptide and bone alkaline phosphatase did not differ between groups. However, BESM patients had a higher risk of SREs (adjusted HR 1.21; 95% CI 1.01–1.46; p = 0.043) and SSEs (adjusted HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.06–1.61; p = 0.014). This difference was more pronounced in the first 12 months of BTA treatment.In mCRPC, strategies of BTA schedule de-escalation may take into account presence of extraskeletal metastases.


Author(s):  
Isabel Heidegger ◽  
Petra Massoner ◽  
Iris E. Eder ◽  
Andreas Pircher ◽  
Renate Pichler ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document