scholarly journals When RAD52 Allows Mitosis to Accept Unscheduled DNA Synthesis

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camille Franchet ◽  
Jean-Sébastien Hoffmann
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Fragile Site ◽  
Repetitive Sequences ◽  
Eukaryotic Cell ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Polymerase Eta ◽  
Dna Polymerase Eta

Faithful duplication of the human genome during the S phase of cell cycle and accurate segregation of sister chromatids in mitosis are essential for the maintenance of chromosome stability from one generation of cells to the next. Cells that are copying their DNA in preparation for division can suffer from ‘replication stress’ (RS) due to various external or endogenous impediments that slow or stall replication forks. RS is a major cause of pathologies including cancer, premature ageing and other disorders associated with genomic instability. It particularly affects genomic loci where progression of replication forks is intrinsically slow or problematic, such as common fragile site (CFS), telomeres, and repetitive sequences. Although the eukaryotic cell cycle is conventionally thought of as several separate steps, each of which must be completed before the next one is initiated, it is now accepted that incompletely replicated chromosomal domains generated in S phase upon RS at these genomic loci can result in late DNA synthesis in G2/M. In 2013, during investigations into the mechanism by which the specialized DNA polymerase eta (Pol η) contributes to the replication and stability of CFS, we unveiled that indeed some DNA synthesis was still occurring in early mitosis at these loci. This surprising observation of mitotic DNA synthesis that differs fundamentally from canonical semi-conservative DNA replication in S-phase has been then confirmed, called “MiDAS”and believed to counteract potentially lethal chromosome mis-segregation and non-disjunction. While other contributions in this Special Issue of Cancers focus on the role of RAS52RAD52 during MiDAS, this review emphases on the discovery of MiDAS and its molecular effectors.

scholarly journals Endoreduplication in Maize Endosperm: An Approach for Increasing Crop Productivity

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gideon Grafi ◽  
Brian Larkins
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Storage Protein ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cyclin B ◽  
Regulatory Subunit ◽  
Maize Endosperm ◽  
M Phase

The focus of this research project is to investigate the role of endoreduplication in maize endosperm development and the extent to which this process contributes to high levels of starch and storage protein synthesis. Although endoreduplication has been widely observed in many cells and tissues, especially those with high levels of metabolic activity, the molecular mechanisms through which the cell cycle is altered to produce consecutive cycles of S-phase without an intervening M-phase are unknown. Our previous research has shown that changes in the expression of several cell cycle regulatory genes coincide with the onset of endoreduplication. During this process, there is a sharp reduction in the activity of the mitotic cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) and activation of the S-phase CDK. It appears the M-phase CDK is stable, but its activity is blocked by a proteinaceous inhibitor. Coincidentally, the S-phase checkpoint protein, retinoblastoma (ZmRb), becomes phosphorylated, presumably releasing an E2F-type transcriptional regulator which promotes the expression of genes responsible for DNA synthesis. To investigate the role of these cell cycle proteins in endoreduplication, we have created transgenic maize plants that express various genes in an endosperm-specific manner using a storage protein (g-zein) promoter. During the first year of the grant, we constructed point mutations of the maize M-phase kinase, p34cdc2. One alteration replaced aspartic acid at position 146 with asparagine (p3630-CdcD146N), while another changed threonine 161 to alanine (p3630-CdcT161A). These mutations abolish the activity of the CDK. We hypothesized that expression of the mutant forms of p34cdc2 in endoreduplicating endosperm, compared to a control p34cdc2, would lead to extra cycles of DNA synthesis. We also fused the gene encoding the regulatory subunit of the M- phase kinase, cyclin B, under the g-zein promoter. Normally, cyclin B is expected to be destroyed prior to the onset of endoreduplication. By producing high levels of this protein in developing endosperm, we hypothesized that the M-phase would be extended, potentially reducing the number of cycles of endoreduplication. Finally, we genetically engineered the wheat dwarf virus RepA protein for endosperm-specific expression. RepA binds to the maize retinoblastoma protein and presumably releases E2F-like transcription factors that activate DNA synthesis. We anticipated that inactivation of ZmRb by RepA would lead to additional cycles of DNA synthesis.

Nuclear DNA synthesis in vitro is mediated via stable replication forks assembled in a temporally specific fashion in vivo

1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 1923-1931
Author(s):  
N H Heintz ◽  
B W Stillman
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Dihydrofolate Reductase ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Chromosomal Dna ◽  
Restriction Fragments ◽  
Temporal Specificity

A cell-free nuclear replication system that is S-phase specific, that requires the activity of DNA polymerase alpha, and that is stimulated three- to eightfold by cytoplasmic factors from S-phase cells was used to examine the temporal specificity of chromosomal DNA synthesis in vitro. Temporal specificity of DNA synthesis in isolated nuclei was assessed directly by examining the replication of restriction fragments derived from the amplified 200-kilobase dihydrofolate reductase domain of methotrexate-resistant CHOC 400 cells as a function of the cell cycle. In nuclei prepared from cells collected at the G1/S boundary of the cell cycle, synthesis of amplified sequences commenced within the immediate dihydrofolate reductase origin region and elongation continued for 60 to 80 min. The order of synthesis of amplified restriction fragments in nuclei from early S-phase cells in vitro appeared to be indistinguishable from that in vivo. Nuclei prepared from CHOC 400 cells poised at later times in the S phase synthesized characteristic subsets of other amplified fragments. The specificity of fragment labeling patterns was stable to short-term storage at 4 degrees C. The occurrence of stimulatory factors in cytosol extracts was cell cycle dependent in that minimal stimulation was observed with early G1-phase extracts, whereas maximal stimulation was observed with cytosol extracts from S-phase cells. Chromosomal synthesis was not observed in nuclei from G1 cells, nor did cytosol extracts from S-phase cells induce chromosomal replication in G1 nuclei. In contrast to chromosomal DNA synthesis, mitochondrial DNA replication in vitro was not stimulated by cytoplasmic factors and occurred at equivalent rates throughout the G1 and S phases. These studies show that chromosomal DNA replication in isolated nuclei is mediated by stable replication forks that are assembled in a temporally specific fashion in vivo and indicate that the synthetic mechanisms observed in vitro accurately reflect those operative in vivo.

scholarly journals Nuclear DNA synthesis in vitro is mediated via stable replication forks assembled in a temporally specific fashion in vivo.

1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 1923-1931 ◽  
Author(s):  
N H Heintz ◽  
B W Stillman
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Dihydrofolate Reductase ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Chromosomal Dna ◽  
Restriction Fragments ◽  
Temporal Specificity

A cell-free nuclear replication system that is S-phase specific, that requires the activity of DNA polymerase alpha, and that is stimulated three- to eightfold by cytoplasmic factors from S-phase cells was used to examine the temporal specificity of chromosomal DNA synthesis in vitro. Temporal specificity of DNA synthesis in isolated nuclei was assessed directly by examining the replication of restriction fragments derived from the amplified 200-kilobase dihydrofolate reductase domain of methotrexate-resistant CHOC 400 cells as a function of the cell cycle. In nuclei prepared from cells collected at the G1/S boundary of the cell cycle, synthesis of amplified sequences commenced within the immediate dihydrofolate reductase origin region and elongation continued for 60 to 80 min. The order of synthesis of amplified restriction fragments in nuclei from early S-phase cells in vitro appeared to be indistinguishable from that in vivo. Nuclei prepared from CHOC 400 cells poised at later times in the S phase synthesized characteristic subsets of other amplified fragments. The specificity of fragment labeling patterns was stable to short-term storage at 4 degrees C. The occurrence of stimulatory factors in cytosol extracts was cell cycle dependent in that minimal stimulation was observed with early G1-phase extracts, whereas maximal stimulation was observed with cytosol extracts from S-phase cells. Chromosomal synthesis was not observed in nuclei from G1 cells, nor did cytosol extracts from S-phase cells induce chromosomal replication in G1 nuclei. In contrast to chromosomal DNA synthesis, mitochondrial DNA replication in vitro was not stimulated by cytoplasmic factors and occurred at equivalent rates throughout the G1 and S phases. These studies show that chromosomal DNA replication in isolated nuclei is mediated by stable replication forks that are assembled in a temporally specific fashion in vivo and indicate that the synthetic mechanisms observed in vitro accurately reflect those operative in vivo.

Role of androgen receptor in prostate cancer cell cycle progression from G1 into S phase and in the onset of DNA synthesis

2003 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
G Prem-Veer Reddy ◽  
Eugenia Cifuentes ◽  
Umai Bai ◽  
Richard Croxen ◽  
Mani Menon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Cancer Cell ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Prostate Cancer Cell ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression

Growth factor-deprived BALB/c 3T3 murine fibroblasts can enter the S phase after induction of c-myc gene expression

1987 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 3554-3560
Author(s):  
F Cavalieri ◽  
M Goldfarb
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
S Phase ◽  
3T3 Cells ◽  
Glucocorticoid Treatment ◽  
Plasmid Construct ◽  
Murine Fibroblasts ◽  
Myc Gene

Induction of quiescent BALB/c 3T3 murine fibroblasts by platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) or fibroblast growth factor (FGFs) is accompanied by induction of c-myc gene expression. To study the role of c-myc in cell growth, we transfected BALB/c 3T3 cells with a plasmid construct containing a glucocorticoid-inducible c-myc gene. When these transfected cells were growth arrested in PDGF-FGF-freedefined medium, glucocorticoid treatment induced S-phase DNA synthesis. This induction of DNA synthesis was inefficient, and cell proliferation was not evident, suggesting that growth factors act through stimulation of c-myc expression together with other intracellular events.

SPK1 is an essential S-phase-specific gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that encodes a nuclear serine/threonine/tyrosine kinase

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 5829-5842
Author(s):  
P Zheng ◽  
D S Fay ◽  
J Burton ◽  
H Xiao ◽  
J L Pinkham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Genomic Library ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Upstream Region ◽  
Specific Gene

SPK1 was originally discovered in an immunoscreen for tyrosine-protein kinases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We have used biochemical and genetic techniques to investigate the function of this gene and its encoded protein. Hybridization of an SPK1 probe to an ordered genomic library showed that SPK1 is adjacent to PEP4 (chromosome XVI L). Sporulation of spk1/+ heterozygotes gave rise to spk1 spores that grew into microcolonies but could not be further propagated. These colonies were greatly enriched for budded cells, especially those with large buds. Similarly, eviction of CEN plasmids bearing SPK1 from cells with a chromosomal SPK1 disruption yielded viable cells with only low frequency. Spk1 protein was identified by immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting. It was associated with protein-Ser, Thr, and Tyr kinase activity in immune complex kinase assays. Spk1 was localized to the nucleus by immunofluorescence. The nucleotide sequence of the SPK1 5' noncoding region revealed that SPK1 contains two MluI cell cycle box elements. These elements confer S-phase-specific transcription to many genes involved in DNA synthesis. Northern (RNA) blotting of synchronized cells verified that the SPK1 transcript is coregulated with other MluI box-regulated genes. The SPK1 upstream region also includes a domain highly homologous to sequences involved in induction of RAD2 and other excision repair genes by agents that induce DNA damage. spk1 strains were hypersensitive to UV irradiation. Taken together, these findings indicate that SPK1 is a dual-specificity (Ser/Thr and Tyr) protein kinase that is essential for viability. The cell cycle-dependent transcription, presence of DNA damage-related sequences, requirement for UV resistance, and nuclear localization of Spk1 all link this gene to a crucial S-phase-specific role, probably as a positive regulator of DNA synthesis.

The Schizosaccharomyces pombe hus5 gene encodes a ubiquitin conjugating enzyme required for normal mitosis

1995 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 475-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. al-Khodairy ◽  
T. Enoch ◽  
I.M. Hagan ◽  
A.M. Carr
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Schizosaccharomyces Pombe ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Ubiquitin Conjugating Enzyme ◽  
Efficient Recovery ◽  
Mediate Cell

Normal eukaryotic cells do not enter mitosis unless DNA is fully replicated and repaired. Controls called ‘checkpoints’, mediate cell cycle arrest in response to unreplicated or damaged DNA. Two independent Schizosaccharomyces pombe mutant screens, both of which aimed to isolate new elements involved in checkpoint controls, have identified alleles of the hus5+ gene that are abnormally sensitive to both inhibitors of DNA synthesis and to ionizing radiation. We have cloned and sequenced the hus5+ gene. It is a novel member of the E2 family of ubiquitin conjugating enzymes (UBCs). To understand the role of hus5+ in cell cycle control we have characterized the phenotypes of the hus5 mutants and the hus5 gene disruption. We find that, whilst the mutants are sensitive to inhibitors of DNA synthesis and to irradiation, this is not due to an inability to undergo mitotic arrest. Thus, the hus5+ gene product is not directly involved in checkpoint control. However, in common with a large class of previously characterized checkpoint genes, it is required for efficient recovery from DNA damage or S-phase arrest and manifests a rapid death phenotype in combination with a temperature sensitive S phase and late S/G2 phase cdc mutants. In addition, hus5 deletion mutants are severely impaired in growth and exhibit high levels of abortive mitoses, suggesting a role for hus5+ in chromosome segregation. We conclude that this novel UBC enzyme plays multiple roles and is virtually essential for cell proliferation.

Post-transcriptional control of the onset of DNA synthesis by an insulin-like growth factor

1984 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 1807-1814
Author(s):  
J Campisi ◽  
A B Pardee
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Growth Factors ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
S Phase ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Insulin Like Growth Factor ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Translational Inhibition

The control of eucaryotic cell proliferation is governed largely by a series of regulatory events which occur in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. When stimulated to proliferate, quiescent (G0) 3T3 fibroblasts require transcription, rapid translation, and three growth factors for the growth state transition. We examined exponentially growing 3T3 cells to relate the requirements for G1 transit to those necessary for the transition from the G0 to the S phase. Cycling cells in the G1 phase required transcription, rapid translation, and a single growth factor (insulin-like growth factor [IGF] I) to initiate DNA synthesis. IGF I acted post-transcriptionally at a late G1 step. All cells in the G1 phase entered the S phase on schedule if either insulin (hyperphysiological concentration) or IGF I (subnanomolar concentration) was provided as the sole growth factor. In medium lacking all growth factors, only cells within 2 to 3 h of the S phase were able to initiate DNA synthesis. Similarly, cells within 2 to 3 h of the S phase were less dependent on transcription and translation for entry into the S phase. Cells responded very differently to inhibited translation than to growth factor deprivation. Cells in the early and mid-G1 phases did not progress toward the S phase during transcriptional or translational inhibition, and during translational inhibition they actually regressed from the S phase. In the absence of growth factors, however, these cells continued progressing toward the S phase, but still required IGF at a terminal step before initiating DNA synthesis. We conclude that a suboptimal condition causes cells to either progress or regress in the cell cycle rather than freezing them at their initial position. By using synchronized cultures, we also show that in contrast to earlier events, this final, IGF-dependent step did not require new transcription. This result is in contrast to findings that other growth factors induce new transcription. We examined the requirements for G1 transit by using a chemically transformed 3T3 cell line (BPA31 cells) which has lost some but not all ability to regulate its growth. Early- and mid-G1-phase BPA31 cells required transcription and translation to initiate DNA synthesis, although they did not regress from the S phase during translational inhibition. However, these cells did not need IGF for entry into the S phase.

Expression of Cell Cycle Proteins P21 waf1/Cip1 , P27 kip1 , Cyclin D1 and CDK4 in Blood Vessels of Angiotensin II-Infused Rats. Role of AT 1 Receptors.

Hypertension ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 36 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 707-707
Author(s):  
Quy N Diep ◽  
Mohammed El Mabrouk ◽  
Rhian M Touyz ◽  
Ernesto L Schiffrin
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Cyclin D1 ◽  
Blood Vessels ◽  
Thymidine Incorporation ◽  
Mesenteric Arteries ◽  
Ang Ii

P79 Angiotensin II (Ang II) is an important modulator of cell growth via AT 1 receptors, as demonstrated both in vivo and in vitro . Here, we investigated the role of different proteins involved in the cell cycle, including cyclin D1, cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (cdk4) and cdk inhibitors p21 and p27 in blood vessels of Ang II-infused rats and the effect therein of the AT 1 receptor antagonist losartan. Male Sprague Dawley rats were infused for 7 days with Ang II (120 ng/kg/min s.c.) and/or treated with losartan (10 mg/kg/day orally). DNA synthesis in mesenteric arteries was evaluated by radiolabeled 3 H-thymidine incorporation. The expression of p21, p27, cyclin D1, cdk4 and E2F, which play critical roles during G1-phase of the cell cycle process, was examined by Western blot analysis. Tail cuff systolic blood pressure (mmHg) was elevated (p<0.05, n=9) in Ang II-infused rats (161.3±8.2) vs. controls (110.1±5.3) and normalized by losartan (104.4±3.2). Radiolabeled 3 H-thymidine incorporation (cpm/100 μg DNA) showed that Ang II-infusion significantly increased DNA synthesis (152±5 vs. 102±6, p<0.05). Expression of p21 and p27 was significantly decreased in the Ang II group to 23.2±10.4% and 10.3±5.3% of controls, respectively, whereas expression of cyclin D1 and cdk4 was significantly increased in the Ang II group to 213.7±8% and 263.6±37% of controls, respectively. These effects induced by Ang II infusion was normalized in the presence of losartan. Ang II had no effect on the expression of E2F. Thus, when AT 1 receptors are stimulated in vivo , DNA synthesis is enhanced in blood vessels by activation of cyclin D1 and cdk4. Reduction in cell cycle kinase inhibitors p21 and p27 may contribute to activation of growth induced by in vivo AT 1 receptor stimulation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document