scholarly journals Analyzing the Opportunities to Target DNA Double-Strand Breaks Repair and Replicative Stress Responses to Improve Therapeutic Index of Colorectal Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 3130
Author(s):  
Paula Pellenz Tomasini ◽  
Temenouga Nikolova Guecheva ◽  
Natalia Motta Leguisamo ◽  
Sarah Péricart ◽  
Anne-Cécile Brunac ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Stress Responses ◽  
Ataxia Telangiectasia ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
The Impact

Despite the ample improvements of CRC molecular landscape, the therapeutic options still rely on conventional chemotherapy-based regimens for early disease, and few targeted agents are recommended for clinical use in the metastatic setting. Moreover, the impact of cytotoxic, targeted agents, and immunotherapy combinations in the metastatic scenario is not fully satisfactory, especially the outcomes for patients who develop resistance to these treatments need to be improved. Here, we examine the opportunity to consider therapeutic agents targeting DNA repair and DNA replication stress response as strategies to exploit genetic or functional defects in the DNA damage response (DDR) pathways through synthetic lethal mechanisms, still not explored in CRC. These include the multiple actors involved in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) through homologous recombination (HR), classical non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), and microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ), inhibitors of the base excision repair (BER) protein poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), as well as inhibitors of the DNA damage kinases ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR), CHK1, WEE1, and ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM). We also review the biomarkers that guide the use of these agents, and current clinical trials with targeted DDR therapies.

scholarly journals ATM-dependent pathways of chromatin remodelling and oxidative DNA damage responses

2017 ◽  
Vol 372 (1731) ◽  
pp. 20160283 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Daniel Berger ◽  
Fintan K. T. Stanley ◽  
Shaun Moore ◽  
Aaron A. Goodarzi
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Oxidative Dna Damage ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Chromatin Remodelling ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Biochemical Network ◽  
Regulatory Function ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
The Impact

Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) is a serine/threonine protein kinase with a master regulatory function in the DNA damage response. In this role, ATM commands a complex biochemical network that signals the presence of oxidative DNA damage, including the dangerous DNA double-strand break, and facilitates subsequent repair. Here, we review the current state of knowledge regarding ATM-dependent chromatin remodelling and epigenomic alterations that are required to maintain genomic integrity in the presence of DNA double-strand breaks and/or oxidative stress. We will focus particularly on the roles of ATM in adjusting nucleosome spacing at sites of unresolved DNA double-strand breaks within complex chromatin environments, and the impact of ATM on preserving the health of cells within the mammalian central nervous system. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Chromatin modifiers and remodellers in DNA repair and signalling’.

scholarly journals ATM’s Role in the Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 1370
Author(s):  
Atsushi Shibata ◽  
Penny A. Jeggo
Keyword(s):  
Stress Responses ◽  
Ataxia Telangiectasia ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Multiple Roles ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint

Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) is a central kinase that activates an extensive network of responses to cellular stress via a signaling role. ATM is activated by DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) and by oxidative stress, subsequently phosphorylating a plethora of target proteins. In the last several decades, newly developed molecular biological techniques have uncovered multiple roles of ATM in response to DNA damage—e.g., DSB repair, cell cycle checkpoint arrest, apoptosis, and transcription arrest. Combinational dysfunction of these stress responses impairs the accuracy of repair, consequently leading to dramatic sensitivity to ionizing radiation (IR) in ataxia telangiectasia (A-T) cells. In this review, we summarize the roles of ATM that focus on DSB repair.

scholarly journals Histone chaperone Anp32e removes H2A.Z from DNA double-strand breaks and promotes nucleosome reorganization and DNA repair

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (24) ◽  
pp. 7507-7512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozge Gursoy-Yuzugullu ◽  
Marina K. Ayrapetov ◽  
Brendan D. Price
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Histone H4 ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Nucleosome Dynamics ◽  
Chromatin Template ◽  
End Resection

The repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) requires open, flexible chromatin domains. The NuA4–Tip60 complex creates these flexible chromatin structures by exchanging histone H2A.Z onto nucleosomes and promoting acetylation of histone H4. Here, we demonstrate that the accumulation of H2A.Z on nucleosomes at DSBs is transient, and that rapid eviction of H2A.Z is required for DSB repair. Anp32e, an H2A.Z chaperone that interacts with the C-terminal docking domain of H2A.Z, is rapidly recruited to DSBs. Anp32e functions to remove H2A.Z from nucleosomes, so that H2A.Z levels return to basal within 10 min of DNA damage. Further, H2A.Z removal by Anp32e disrupts inhibitory interactions between the histone H4 tail and the nucleosome surface, facilitating increased acetylation of histone H4 following DNA damage. When H2A.Z removal by Anp32e is blocked, nucleosomes at DSBs retain elevated levels of H2A.Z, and assume a more stable, hypoacetylated conformation. Further, loss of Anp32e leads to increased CtIP-dependent end resection, accumulation of single-stranded DNA, and an increase in repair by the alternative nonhomologous end joining pathway. Exchange of H2A.Z onto the chromatin and subsequent rapid removal by Anp32e are therefore critical for creating open, acetylated nucleosome structures and for controlling end resection by CtIP. Dynamic modulation of H2A.Z exchange and removal by Anp32e reveals the importance of the nucleosome surface and nucleosome dynamics in processing the damaged chromatin template during DSB repair.

scholarly journals Sustained CHK2 activity, but not ATM activity, is critical to maintain a G1 arrest after DNA damage in untransformed cells

BMC Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iraia García-Santisteban ◽  
Alba Llopis ◽  
Lenno Krenning ◽  
Jon Vallejo-Rodríguez ◽  
Bram van den Broek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
G1 Arrest ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
G1 Checkpoint ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The G1 checkpoint is a critical regulator of genomic stability in untransformed cells, preventing cell cycle progression after DNA damage. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) recruit and activate ATM, a kinase which in turn activates the CHK2 kinase to establish G1 arrest. While the onset of G1 arrest is well understood, the specific role that ATM and CHK2 play in regulating G1 checkpoint maintenance remains poorly characterized. Results Here we examine the impact of ATM and CHK2 activities on G1 checkpoint maintenance in untransformed cells after DNA damage caused by DSBs. We show that ATM becomes dispensable for G1 checkpoint maintenance as early as 1 h after DSB induction. In contrast, CHK2 kinase activity is necessary to maintain the G1 arrest, independently of ATM, ATR, and DNA-PKcs, implying that the G1 arrest is maintained in a lesion-independent manner. Sustained CHK2 activity is achieved through auto-activation and its acute inhibition enables cells to abrogate the G1-checkpoint and enter into S-phase. Accordingly, we show that CHK2 activity is lost in cells that recover from the G1 arrest, pointing to the involvement of a phosphatase with fast turnover. Conclusion Our data indicate that G1 checkpoint maintenance relies on CHK2 and that its negative regulation is crucial for G1 checkpoint recovery after DSB induction.

scholarly journals SIRT6 is a DNA Double-Strand Break Sensor

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lior Onn ◽  
Miguel Portillo ◽  
Stefan Ilic ◽  
Gal Cleitman ◽  
Daniel Stein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Binding Capacity ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
The Road ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

AbstractDNA double strand breaks are the most deleterious type of DNA damage. In this work, we show that SIRT6 directly recognizes DNA damage through a tunnel-like structure, with high affinity for double strand breaks. It relocates to sites of damage independently of signalling and known sensors and activates downstream signalling cascades for double strand break repair by triggering ATM recruitment, H2AX phosphorylation and the recruitment of proteins of the Homologous Recombination and Non-Homologous End Joining pathways. Our findings indicate that SIRT6 plays a previously uncharacterized role as DNA damage sensor, which is critical for initiating the DNA damage response (DDR). Moreover, other Sirtuins share some DSB binding capacity and DDR activation. SIRT6 activates the DDR, before the repair pathway is chosen, and prevents genomic instability. Our findings place SIRT6 at the top of the DDR and pave the road to dissect the contributions of distinct double strand break sensors in downstream signalling.

scholarly journals 53BP1 deficiency combined with telomere dysfunction activates ATR-dependent DNA damage response

2012 ◽  
Vol 197 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Martínez ◽  
Juana M. Flores ◽  
Maria A. Blasco
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Ataxia Telangiectasia ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homology Directed Repair ◽  
Damage Response

TRF1 protects mammalian telomeres from fusion and fragility. Depletion of TRF1 leads to telomere fusions as well as accumulation of γ-H2AX foci and activation of both the ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM)– and the ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR)–mediated deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage response (DDR) pathways. 53BP1, which is also present at dysfunctional telomeres, is a target of ATM that accumulates at DNA double-strand breaks and favors nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair over ATM-dependent resection and homology-directed repair (homologous recombination [HR]). To address the role of 53BP1 at dysfunctional telomeres, we generated mice lacking TRF1 and 53BP1. 53BP1 deficiency significantly rescued telomere fusions in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) lacking TRF1, but they showed evidence of a switch from the NHEJ- to HR-mediated repair of uncapped telomeres. Concomitantly, double-mutant MEFs showed evidence of hyperactivation of the ATR-dependent DDR. In intact mice, combined 53BP1/TRF1 deficiency in stratified epithelia resulted in earlier onset of DNA damage and increased CHK1 phosphorylation during embryonic development, leading to aggravation of skin phenotypes.

scholarly journals Altered DNA ligase activity in human disease

Mutagenesis ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan E Tomkinson ◽  
Tasmin Naila ◽  
Seema Khattri Bhandari
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Ligase ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Ligases ◽  
Ligase Iv ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

Abstract The joining of interruptions in the phosphodiester backbone of DNA is critical to maintain genome stability. These breaks, which are generated as part of normal DNA transactions, such as DNA replication, V(D)J recombination and meiotic recombination as well as directly by DNA damage or due to DNA damage removal, are ultimately sealed by one of three human DNA ligases. DNA ligases I, III and IV each function in the nucleus whereas DNA ligase III is the sole enzyme in mitochondria. While the identification of specific protein partners and the phenotypes caused either by genetic or chemical inactivation have provided insights into the cellular functions of the DNA ligases and evidence for significant functional overlap in nuclear DNA replication and repair, different results have been obtained with mouse and human cells, indicating species-specific differences in the relative contributions of the DNA ligases. Inherited mutations in the human LIG1 and LIG4 genes that result in the generation of polypeptides with partial activity have been identified as the causative factors in rare DNA ligase deficiency syndromes that share a common clinical symptom, immunodeficiency. In the case of DNA ligase IV, the immunodeficiency is due to a defect in V(D)J recombination whereas the cause of the immunodeficiency due to DNA ligase I deficiency is not known. Overexpression of each of the DNA ligases has been observed in cancers. For DNA ligase I, this reflects increased proliferation. Elevated levels of DNA ligase III indicate an increased dependence on an alternative non-homologous end-joining pathway for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks whereas elevated level of DNA ligase IV confer radioresistance due to increased repair of DNA double-strand breaks by the major non-homologous end-joining pathway. Efforts to determine the potential of DNA ligase inhibitors as cancer therapeutics are on-going in preclinical cancer models.

Persistent DNA damage signaling and DNA polymerase theta promote broken chromosome segregation

2021 ◽  
Vol 220 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Delisa E. Clay ◽  
Heidi S. Bretscher ◽  
Erin A. Jezuit ◽  
Korie B. Bush ◽  
Donald T. Fox
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Damage Signaling ◽  
Alternative End Joining

Cycling cells must respond to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) to avoid genome instability. Missegregation of chromosomes with DSBs during mitosis results in micronuclei, aberrant structures linked to disease. How cells respond to DSBs during mitosis is incompletely understood. We previously showed that Drosophilamelanogaster papillar cells lack DSB checkpoints (as observed in many cancer cells). Here, we show that papillar cells still recruit early acting repair machinery (Mre11 and RPA3) and the Fanconi anemia (FA) protein Fancd2 to DSBs. These proteins persist as foci on DSBs as cells enter mitosis. Repair foci are resolved in a stepwise manner during mitosis. DSB repair kinetics depends on both monoubiquitination of Fancd2 and the alternative end-joining protein DNA polymerase θ. Disruption of either or both of these factors causes micronuclei after DNA damage, which disrupts intestinal organogenesis. This study reveals a mechanism for how cells with inactive DSB checkpoints can respond to DNA damage that persists into mitosis.

scholarly journals DNA Damage and Repair Mechanisms Triggered by Exposure to Bioflavonoids and Natural Compounds

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna Goodenow ◽  
Kiran Lalwani ◽  
Christine Richardson
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Environmental Agents ◽  
Repair Mechanisms ◽  
Alternative End Joining ◽  
Differentiation Status

Eukaryotic cells use homologous recombination (HR), classical end-joining (C-NHEJ), and alternative end-joining (Alt-EJ) to repair DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Repair pathway choice is controlled by the activation and activity of pathways specific proteins in eukaryotes. Activity may be regulated by cell cycle stage, tissue type, and differentiation status. Bioflavonoids and other environmental agents such as pesticides have been shown to biochemically act as inhibitors of topoisomerase II (Top2). In cells, bioflavonoids directly lead to DNA double-strand breaks through both Top2-dependent and independent mechanisms, as well as induce DNA damage response (DDR) signaling, and promote alternative end-joining and chromosome alterations. This chapter will present differences in expression and activity of proteins in major DNA repair pathways, findings of Top2 inhibition by bioflavonoids and cellular response, discuss how these compounds trigger alternative end-joining, and conclude with implications for genome instability and human disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document