scholarly journals Study of Mesoscale Cloud System Oscillations Capable of Producing Convective Gravity Waves

Climate ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stavros Kolios
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Cloud System ◽  
Convective Gravity Waves

scholarly journals Contributions of equatorial planetary waves and small-scale convective gravity waves to the 2019/20 QBO disruption

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Jee Kang ◽  
Hye-Yeong Chun
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Rossby Wave ◽  
Rossby Waves ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Negative Wave ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Wave Forcing ◽  
Equatorial Wave ◽  
Convective Gravity Waves

Abstract. In January 2020, unexpected easterly winds developed in the downward-propagating westerly quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) phase. This event corresponds to the second QBO disruption in history, and it occurred four years after the first disruption that occurred in 2015/16. According to several previous studies, strong midlatitude Rossby waves propagating from the Southern Hemisphere (SH) during the SH winter likely initiated the disruption; nevertheless, the wave forcing that finally led to the disruption has not been investigated. In this study, we examine the role of equatorial waves and small-scale convective gravity waves (CGWs) in the 2019/20 QBO disruption using MERRA-2 global reanalysis data. In June–September 2019, unusually strong Rossby wave forcing originating from the SH decelerated the westerly QBO at 0°–5° N at ~50 hPa. In October–November 2019, vertically (horizontally) propagating Rossby waves and mixed Rossby–gravity (MRG) waves began to increase (decrease). From December 2019, contribution of the MRG wave forcing to the zonal wind deceleration was the largest, followed by the Rossby wave forcing originating from the Northern Hemisphere and the equatorial troposphere. In January 2020, CGWs provided 11 % of the total negative wave forcing at ~43 hPa. Inertia–gravity (IG) waves exhibited a moderate contribution to the negative forcing throughout. Although the zonal-mean precipitation was not significantly larger than the climatology, convectively coupled equatorial wave activities were increased during the 2019/20 disruption. As in the 2015/16 QBO disruption, the increased barotropic instability at the QBO edges generated more MRG waves at 70–90 hPa, and westerly anomalies in the upper troposphere allowed more westward IG waves and CGWs to propagate to the stratosphere. Combining the 2015/16 and 2019/20 disruption cases, Rossby waves and MRG waves can be considered the key factors inducing QBO disruption.

Contributions of Convective and Orographic Gravity Waves to the Brewer–Dobson Circulation Estimated from NCEP CFSR

2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 981-1000
Author(s):  
Min-Jee Kang ◽  
Hye-Yeong Chun ◽  
Byeong-Gwon Song
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Mass Flux ◽  
Convective Heating ◽  
Flux Divergence ◽  
Mass Fluxes ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Physically Based ◽  
Total Mass Flux ◽  
Convective Gravity Waves

Abstract Contributions of convective gravity waves (CGWs) and orographic gravity waves (OGWs) to the Brewer–Dobson circulation (BDC) are examined and compared to those from resolved waves. OGW drag (OGWD) is provided by NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR), while CGW drag (CGWD) is obtained from an offline calculation of a physically based CGW parameterization with convective heating and background data provided by CFSR. CGWD contributes to the shallow branch of the BDC regardless of the season, while OGWD contributes to both the shallow and deep branches except for the summertime, when OGWs hardly propagate into the stratosphere. At 70 hPa, the annual-mean tropical upward mass fluxes from Eliassen–Palm flux divergence (EPD), OGWD, and CGWD are 68%, 7%, and 4% of the total mass flux, respectively. The tropical upward mass flux at 70 hPa shows an increasing trend during the time period from 1979 to 1998, with 28%, 18%, and 6% of the trend driven by EPD, OGWD, and CGWD, respectively. The width of the turnaround latitudes tends to narrow for the streamfunctions induced by OGWD and CGWD but tends to widen for that induced by EPD. The contributions of GWD from MERRA (MERRA-2) to the climatology and long-term trend of the BDC are 7% (7%) and 13% (4%), respectively, somewhat smaller than the contributions of CGWD plus OGWD, which are estimated from CFSR to be 12% and 20%, respectively.

Impact of Convective Gravity Waves on the Tropical Middle Atmosphere During the Madden-Julian Oscillation

2018 ◽  
Vol 123 (17) ◽  
pp. 8975-8992
Author(s):  
S. Kalisch ◽  
M.-J. Kang ◽  
H.-Y. Chun
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Middle Atmosphere ◽  
Madden Julian Oscillation ◽  
Convective Gravity Waves

scholarly journals Stratospheric Gravity Waves Generated by Multiscale Tropical Convection

2008 ◽  
Vol 65 (8) ◽  
pp. 2598-2614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd P. Lane ◽  
Mitchell W. Moncrieff
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Cloud System ◽  
Cloud Systems ◽  
Multiscale Systems ◽  
Cloud Clusters ◽  
Horizontal Momentum ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Similar Depth ◽  
Convective Organization

Abstract The generation of gravity waves by multiscale cloud systems evolving in an initially motionless and thermodynamically uniform environment is explored using a two-dimensional cloud-system-resolving model. The simulated convection has similar depth and intensity to observed tropical oceanic systems. The convection self-organizes into preferred horizontal and temporal scales involving weakly organized propagating cloud clusters. The multiscale systems generate a broad spectrum of gravity waves with horizontal scales that range from the cloud-system scale up to the cloud-cluster scale. The gravity waves with the largest horizontal scale play an important role in modifying layered tropospheric inflow and outflow to the cloud systems, which in turn influence the multiscale convective organization. Slower-moving short-scale gravity waves make the strongest individual contribution to the vertical flux of horizontal momentum and cause a robust peak in the momentum flux spectrum that corresponds to the lifetime and spatial scale of the individual cloud systems.

scholarly journals Influence of Gravity Waves in the Tropical Upwelling: WACCM Simulations

2011 ◽  
Vol 68 (11) ◽  
pp. 2599-2612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hye-Yeong Chun ◽  
Young-Ha Kim ◽  
Hyun-Joo Choi ◽  
Jung-Yoon Kim
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Wave ◽  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Zonal Wind ◽  
Annual Cycle ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Wave Drag ◽  
Flux Divergence ◽  
Relative Contribution ◽  
The Tropics ◽  
Convective Gravity Waves

Abstract The annual cycle of tropical upwelling and contributions by planetary and gravity waves are investigated from climatological simulations using the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (WACCM) including three gravity wave drag (GWD) parameterizations (orographic, nonstationary background, and convective GWD parameterizations). The tropical upwelling is estimated by the residual mean vertical velocity at 100 hPa averaged over 15°S–15°N. This is well matched with an upwelling estimate from the balance of the zonal momentum and the mass continuity. A clear annual cycle of the tropical upwelling is found, with a Northern Hemispheric (NH) wintertime maximum and NH summertime minimum determined primarily by the Eliassen–Palm flux divergence (EPD), along with a secondary contribution from the zonal wind tendency. Gravity waves increase tropical upwelling throughout the year, and of the three sources the contribution by convective gravity wave drag (CGWD) is largest in most months. The relative contribution by all three GWDs to tropical upwelling is not larger than 5%. However, when tropical upwelling is estimated by net upward mass flux between turnaround latitudes where upwelling changes downwelling, annual mean contribution by all three GWDs is up to 19% at 70 hPa by orographic and convective gravity waves with comparable magnitudes. Effects of CGWD on upwelling are investigated by conducting an additional WACCM simulation without CGWD parameterization. It was found that including CGWD parameterization increases tropical upwelling not only directly by adding CGWD forcing, but also indirectly by modulating EPD and zonal wind tendency terms in the tropics.

scholarly journals Modeling the Interaction between Cumulus Convection and Linear Gravity Waves Using a Limited-Domain Cloud System–Resolving Model

2008 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 576-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiming Kuang
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Surface Fluxes ◽  
Cloud System ◽  
Wave Radiation ◽  
Cumulus Convection ◽  
Convective Heating ◽  
Radiative Processes ◽  
Convectively Coupled Waves ◽  
Linear Gravity

Abstract A limited-domain cloud system–resolving model (CSRM) is used to simulate the interaction between cumulus convection and two-dimensional linear gravity waves, a single horizontal wavenumber at a time. With a single horizontal wavenumber, soundings obtained from horizontal averages of the CSRM domain allow the large-scale wave equation to be evolved, and thereby its interaction with cumulus convection is modeled. It is shown that convectively coupled waves with phase speeds of 8–13 m s−1 can develop spontaneously in such simulations. The wave development is weaker at long wavelengths (>∼10 000 km). Waves at short wavelengths (∼2000 km) also appear weaker, but the evidence is less clear because of stronger influences from random perturbations. The simulated wave structures are found to change systematically with horizontal wavelength, and at horizontal wavelengths of 2000–3000 km they exhibit many of the basic features of the observed 2-day waves. The simulated convectively coupled waves develop without feedback from radiative processes, surface fluxes, or wave radiation into the stratosphere, but vanish when moisture advection by the large-scale waves is disabled. A similar degree of vertical tilt is found in the simulated convective heating at all wavelengths considered, consistent with observational results. Implications of these results to conceptual models of convectively coupled waves are discussed. In addition to being a useful tool for studying wave–convection interaction, the present approach also represents a useful framework for testing the ability of coarse-resolution CSRMs and single-column models in simulating convectively coupled waves.

scholarly journals Momentum Flux of Convective Gravity Waves Derived from an Offline Gravity Wave Parameterization. Part II: Impacts on the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation

2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 3753-3775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Jee Kang ◽  
Hye-Yeong Chun ◽  
Young-Ha Kim ◽  
Peter Preusse ◽  
Manfred Ern
Keyword(s):  
Shear Zone ◽  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Momentum Flux ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Equatorial Region ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Convective Gravity Waves ◽  
Biennial Oscillation

Abstract The characteristics of small-scale convective gravity waves (CGWs; horizontal wavelengths <100 km) and their contributions to the large-scale flow in the stratosphere, including the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO), are investigated using an offline calculation of a source-dependent, physically based CGW parameterization with global reanalysis data from 1979 to 2010. The CGW momentum flux (CGWMF) and CGW drag (CGWD) are calculated from the cloud top (source level) to the upper stratosphere using a Lindzen-type wave propagation scheme. The 32-yr-mean CGWD exhibits large magnitudes in the tropical upper stratosphere and near the stratospheric polar night jet (~60°). The maximum positive drag is 0.1 (1.5) m s−1 day−1, and the maximum negative drag is −0.9 (−0.7) m s−1 day−1 in January (July) between 3 and 1 hPa. In the tropics, the momentum forcing by CGWs at 30 hPa associated with the QBO in the westerly shear zone is 3.5–6 m s−1 month−1, which is smaller than that by Kelvin waves, while that by CGWs in the easterly shear zone (3.1–6 m s−1 month−1) is greater than that by any other equatorial planetary waves or inertio-gravity waves (inertio-GWs). Composite analyses of the easterly QBO (EQBO) and westerly QBO (WQBO) phases reveal that the zonal CGWMF is concentrated near 10°N and that the negative (positive) CGWD extends latitudinally to ±20° (±10°) at 30 hPa. The strongest (weakest) negative CGWD is in March–May (September–November) during the EQBO, and the strongest (weakest) positive CGWD is in June–August (March–May) during the WQBO. The CGWMF and CGWD are generally stronger during El Niño than during La Niña in the equatorial region.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document